IREN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Hut 8 has a net margin of -95.07% compared to IREN's net margin of 1.53%. IREN's return on equity of -10.49% beat Hut 8's return on equity of 40.35%.

IREN has a consensus price target of $20.45, signalling upside risk potential of 81.82%. On the other hand Hut 8 has an analysts' consensus of $33.63 which suggests that it could grow by 55.31%. Given that IREN has higher upside potential than Hut 8, analysts believe IREN is more attractive than Hut 8.

IREN has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hut 8 has a beta of 3.544, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 254.441%.

IREN has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Hut 8 offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. IREN pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hut 8 pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

IREN quarterly revenues are $54.4M, which are larger than Hut 8 quarterly revenues of $42.2M. IREN's net income of -$51.7M is lower than Hut 8's net income of $647K. Notably, IREN's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Hut 8's PE ratio is 11.16x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for IREN is 7.55x versus 5.64x for Hut 8. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Insignia Financial has a net margin of -95.07% compared to IREN's net margin of --. IREN's return on equity of -10.49% beat Insignia Financial's return on equity of -8.25%.

IREN has a consensus price target of $20.45, signalling upside risk potential of 81.82%. On the other hand Insignia Financial has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that IREN has higher upside potential than Insignia Financial, analysts believe IREN is more attractive than Insignia Financial.

IREN has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Insignia Financial has a beta of 0.369, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 63.061%.

IREN has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Insignia Financial offers a yield of 9.3% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. IREN pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Insignia Financial pays out -55.91% of its earnings as a dividend.

IREN quarterly revenues are $54.4M, which are larger than Insignia Financial quarterly revenues of --. IREN's net income of -$51.7M is higher than Insignia Financial's net income of --. Notably, IREN's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Insignia Financial's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for IREN is 7.55x versus 0.71x for Insignia Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MARA Holdings has a net margin of -95.07% compared to IREN's net margin of -94.79%. IREN's return on equity of -10.49% beat MARA Holdings's return on equity of 7.75%.

IREN has a consensus price target of $20.45, signalling upside risk potential of 81.82%. On the other hand MARA Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $26.83 which suggests that it could grow by 39.39%. Given that IREN has higher upside potential than MARA Holdings, analysts believe IREN is more attractive than MARA Holdings.

IREN has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MARA Holdings has a beta of 5.634, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 463.426%.

IREN has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. MARA Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. IREN pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. MARA Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

IREN quarterly revenues are $54.4M, which are smaller than MARA Holdings quarterly revenues of $131.6M. IREN's net income of -$51.7M is higher than MARA Holdings's net income of -$124.8M. Notably, IREN's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while MARA Holdings's PE ratio is 21.39x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for IREN is 7.55x versus 8.74x for MARA Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Pacific Current Group has a net margin of -95.07% compared to IREN's net margin of --. IREN's return on equity of -10.49% beat Pacific Current Group's return on equity of 20.17%.

IREN has a consensus price target of $20.45, signalling upside risk potential of 81.82%. On the other hand Pacific Current Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that IREN has higher upside potential than Pacific Current Group, analysts believe IREN is more attractive than Pacific Current Group.

IREN has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Pacific Current Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

IREN has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Pacific Current Group offers a yield of 3.45% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share. IREN pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Pacific Current Group pays out 17.8% of its earnings as a dividend. Pacific Current Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

IREN quarterly revenues are $54.4M, which are larger than Pacific Current Group quarterly revenues of --. IREN's net income of -$51.7M is higher than Pacific Current Group's net income of --. Notably, IREN's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Pacific Current Group's PE ratio is 5.23x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for IREN is 7.55x versus 2.97x for Pacific Current Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.