WULF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Coinbase Global has a net margin of -83.45% compared to TeraWulf's net margin of 3.23%. TeraWulf's return on equity of -24.17% beat Coinbase Global's return on equity of 15.99%.

TeraWulf has a consensus price target of $6.85, signalling upside risk potential of 127.58%. On the other hand Coinbase Global has an analysts' consensus of $254.93 which suggests that it could grow by 27.9%. Given that TeraWulf has higher upside potential than Coinbase Global, analysts believe TeraWulf is more attractive than Coinbase Global.

TeraWulf has a beta of 3.003, which suggesting that the stock is 200.293% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Coinbase Global has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

TeraWulf has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Coinbase Global offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. TeraWulf pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Coinbase Global pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

TeraWulf quarterly revenues are $35M, which are smaller than Coinbase Global quarterly revenues of $2B. TeraWulf's net income of -$29.2M is lower than Coinbase Global's net income of $65.6M. Notably, TeraWulf's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Coinbase Global's PE ratio is 37.33x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for TeraWulf is 7.55x versus 7.75x for Coinbase Global. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Greenidge Generation Holdings has a net margin of -83.45% compared to TeraWulf's net margin of -51.55%. TeraWulf's return on equity of -24.17% beat Greenidge Generation Holdings's return on equity of --.

TeraWulf has a consensus price target of $6.85, signalling upside risk potential of 127.58%. On the other hand Greenidge Generation Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 301.16%. Given that Greenidge Generation Holdings has higher upside potential than TeraWulf, analysts believe Greenidge Generation Holdings is more attractive than TeraWulf.

TeraWulf has a beta of 3.003, which suggesting that the stock is 200.293% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Greenidge Generation Holdings has a beta of 3.283, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 228.305%.

TeraWulf has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Greenidge Generation Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. TeraWulf pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Greenidge Generation Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

TeraWulf quarterly revenues are $35M, which are larger than Greenidge Generation Holdings quarterly revenues of $12.4M. TeraWulf's net income of -$29.2M is lower than Greenidge Generation Holdings's net income of -$6.4M. Notably, TeraWulf's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Greenidge Generation Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for TeraWulf is 7.55x versus 0.18x for Greenidge Generation Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Riot Platforms has a net margin of -83.45% compared to TeraWulf's net margin of -183.64%. TeraWulf's return on equity of -24.17% beat Riot Platforms's return on equity of -14.35%.

TeraWulf has a consensus price target of $6.85, signalling upside risk potential of 127.58%. On the other hand Riot Platforms has an analysts' consensus of $15.40 which suggests that it could grow by 81.6%. Given that TeraWulf has higher upside potential than Riot Platforms, analysts believe TeraWulf is more attractive than Riot Platforms.

TeraWulf has a beta of 3.003, which suggesting that the stock is 200.293% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Riot Platforms has a beta of 4.747, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 374.659%.

TeraWulf has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Riot Platforms offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. TeraWulf pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Riot Platforms pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

TeraWulf quarterly revenues are $35M, which are smaller than Riot Platforms quarterly revenues of $161.4M. TeraWulf's net income of -$29.2M is higher than Riot Platforms's net income of -$296.4M. Notably, TeraWulf's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Riot Platforms's PE ratio is 24.28x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for TeraWulf is 7.55x versus 5.66x for Riot Platforms. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Soluna Holdings has a net margin of -83.45% compared to TeraWulf's net margin of -95.55%. TeraWulf's return on equity of -24.17% beat Soluna Holdings's return on equity of -57.92%.

TeraWulf has a consensus price target of $6.85, signalling upside risk potential of 127.58%. On the other hand Soluna Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that TeraWulf has higher upside potential than Soluna Holdings, analysts believe TeraWulf is more attractive than Soluna Holdings.

TeraWulf has a beta of 3.003, which suggesting that the stock is 200.293% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Soluna Holdings has a beta of 3.857, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 285.657%.

TeraWulf has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Soluna Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. TeraWulf pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Soluna Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

TeraWulf quarterly revenues are $35M, which are larger than Soluna Holdings quarterly revenues of $7.5M. TeraWulf's net income of -$29.2M is lower than Soluna Holdings's net income of -$7.2M. Notably, TeraWulf's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Soluna Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for TeraWulf is 7.55x versus 0.15x for Soluna Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.