Financhill
Sell
50

WULF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$11.47
Seasonality move :
5.94%
Day range:
$11.65 - $12.34
52-week range:
$2.06 - $17.05
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
27.29x
P/B ratio:
20.66x
Volume:
13.4M
Avg. volume:
35.7M
1-year change:
93.26%
Market cap:
$4.9B
Revenue:
$140.1M
EPS (TTM):
-$1.42

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
WULF
TeraWulf, Inc.
$50.6M -$0.05 28.79% -121.27% $20.90
CIFR
Cipher Mining, Inc.
$76.5M $0.11 110.62% 170.27% $26.68
CLSK
CleanSpark, Inc.
$226.8M $0.54 23.4% -87.12% $23.27
HUT
Hut 8 Corp.
$65.6M -$0.12 194.81% -82.05% $63.27
MARA
MARA Holdings, Inc.
$254.5M $0.35 17.99% -66.38% $22.41
RIOT
Riot Platforms, Inc.
$172.3M -$0.09 14.11% -83.31% $26.44
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
WULF
TeraWulf, Inc.
$11.75 $20.90 $4.9B -- $0.00 0% 27.29x
CIFR
Cipher Mining, Inc.
$15.19 $26.68 $6B 58.50x $0.00 0% 27.46x
CLSK
CleanSpark, Inc.
$10.91 $23.27 $2.8B 9.89x $0.00 0% 4.21x
HUT
Hut 8 Corp.
$49.64 $63.27 $5.4B 27.01x $0.00 0% 30.84x
MARA
MARA Holdings, Inc.
$9.59 $22.41 $3.6B 5.31x $0.00 0% 4.37x
RIOT
Riot Platforms, Inc.
$13.44 $26.44 $5B 39.89x $0.00 0% 7.70x
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
WULF
TeraWulf, Inc.
81.44% 6.094 22.87% 1.01x
CIFR
Cipher Mining, Inc.
57.14% 7.945 21.07% 2.42x
CLSK
CleanSpark, Inc.
27.41% 4.656 19.93% 3.21x
HUT
Hut 8 Corp.
21.32% 5.678 9.99% 0.51x
MARA
MARA Holdings, Inc.
41.39% 3.632 52.56% 1.83x
RIOT
Riot Platforms, Inc.
19.92% 5.339 12.35% 1.21x
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
WULF
TeraWulf, Inc.
$7M -$14.2M -74.62% -233.24% -28.13% -$268.3M
CIFR
Cipher Mining, Inc.
-$29M -$37.2M -7.06% -9.74% -51.86% -$256.6M
CLSK
CleanSpark, Inc.
-$33.8M -$63.1M 14.02% 18.23% -28.21% -$130.1M
HUT
Hut 8 Corp.
$23.4M $423K 13.56% 17.82% 0.51% -$38.5M
MARA
MARA Holdings, Inc.
-$60M -$154.8M 14.15% 22.38% -61.35% -$283.9M
RIOT
Riot Platforms, Inc.
-$12.2M -$82M 4.4% 5.24% -45.5% -$245.8M

TeraWulf, Inc. vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns WULF or CIFR?

    Cipher Mining, Inc. has a net margin of -899.7% compared to TeraWulf, Inc.'s net margin of -4.58%. TeraWulf, Inc.'s return on equity of -233.24% beat Cipher Mining, Inc.'s return on equity of -9.74%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    WULF
    TeraWulf, Inc.
    13.75% -$1.13 $1.3B
    CIFR
    Cipher Mining, Inc.
    -40.47% -$0.01 $1.8B
  • What do Analysts Say About WULF or CIFR?

    TeraWulf, Inc. has a consensus price target of $20.90, signalling upside risk potential of 77.84%. On the other hand Cipher Mining, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $26.68 which suggests that it could grow by 75.63%. Given that TeraWulf, Inc. has higher upside potential than Cipher Mining, Inc., analysts believe TeraWulf, Inc. is more attractive than Cipher Mining, Inc..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    WULF
    TeraWulf, Inc.
    9 1 0
    CIFR
    Cipher Mining, Inc.
    9 0 0
  • Is WULF or CIFR More Risky?

    TeraWulf, Inc. has a beta of 3.835, which suggesting that the stock is 283.526% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cipher Mining, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock WULF or CIFR?

    TeraWulf, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Cipher Mining, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. TeraWulf, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cipher Mining, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios WULF or CIFR?

    TeraWulf, Inc. quarterly revenues are $50.6M, which are smaller than Cipher Mining, Inc. quarterly revenues of $71.7M. TeraWulf, Inc.'s net income of -$455.1M is lower than Cipher Mining, Inc.'s net income of -$3.3M. Notably, TeraWulf, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Cipher Mining, Inc.'s PE ratio is 58.50x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for TeraWulf, Inc. is 27.29x versus 27.46x for Cipher Mining, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    WULF
    TeraWulf, Inc.
    27.29x -- $50.6M -$455.1M
    CIFR
    Cipher Mining, Inc.
    27.46x 58.50x $71.7M -$3.3M
  • Which has Higher Returns WULF or CLSK?

    CleanSpark, Inc. has a net margin of -899.7% compared to TeraWulf, Inc.'s net margin of -0.41%. TeraWulf, Inc.'s return on equity of -233.24% beat CleanSpark, Inc.'s return on equity of 18.23%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    WULF
    TeraWulf, Inc.
    13.75% -$1.13 $1.3B
    CLSK
    CleanSpark, Inc.
    -15.11% -$0.00 $3B
  • What do Analysts Say About WULF or CLSK?

    TeraWulf, Inc. has a consensus price target of $20.90, signalling upside risk potential of 77.84%. On the other hand CleanSpark, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $23.27 which suggests that it could grow by 113.32%. Given that CleanSpark, Inc. has higher upside potential than TeraWulf, Inc., analysts believe CleanSpark, Inc. is more attractive than TeraWulf, Inc..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    WULF
    TeraWulf, Inc.
    9 1 0
    CLSK
    CleanSpark, Inc.
    8 0 0
  • Is WULF or CLSK More Risky?

    TeraWulf, Inc. has a beta of 3.835, which suggesting that the stock is 283.526% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CleanSpark, Inc. has a beta of 3.791, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 279.081%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock WULF or CLSK?

    TeraWulf, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CleanSpark, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. TeraWulf, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CleanSpark, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios WULF or CLSK?

    TeraWulf, Inc. quarterly revenues are $50.6M, which are smaller than CleanSpark, Inc. quarterly revenues of $223.7M. TeraWulf, Inc.'s net income of -$455.1M is lower than CleanSpark, Inc.'s net income of -$925K. Notably, TeraWulf, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while CleanSpark, Inc.'s PE ratio is 9.89x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for TeraWulf, Inc. is 27.29x versus 4.21x for CleanSpark, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    WULF
    TeraWulf, Inc.
    27.29x -- $50.6M -$455.1M
    CLSK
    CleanSpark, Inc.
    4.21x 9.89x $223.7M -$925K
  • Which has Higher Returns WULF or HUT?

    Hut 8 Corp. has a net margin of -899.7% compared to TeraWulf, Inc.'s net margin of 60.89%. TeraWulf, Inc.'s return on equity of -233.24% beat Hut 8 Corp.'s return on equity of 17.82%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    WULF
    TeraWulf, Inc.
    13.75% -$1.13 $1.3B
    HUT
    Hut 8 Corp.
    28% $0.43 $2B
  • What do Analysts Say About WULF or HUT?

    TeraWulf, Inc. has a consensus price target of $20.90, signalling upside risk potential of 77.84%. On the other hand Hut 8 Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $63.27 which suggests that it could grow by 27.45%. Given that TeraWulf, Inc. has higher upside potential than Hut 8 Corp., analysts believe TeraWulf, Inc. is more attractive than Hut 8 Corp..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    WULF
    TeraWulf, Inc.
    9 1 0
    HUT
    Hut 8 Corp.
    10 0 0
  • Is WULF or HUT More Risky?

    TeraWulf, Inc. has a beta of 3.835, which suggesting that the stock is 283.526% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hut 8 Corp. has a beta of 4.367, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 336.734%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock WULF or HUT?

    TeraWulf, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Hut 8 Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. TeraWulf, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hut 8 Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios WULF or HUT?

    TeraWulf, Inc. quarterly revenues are $50.6M, which are smaller than Hut 8 Corp. quarterly revenues of $83.5M. TeraWulf, Inc.'s net income of -$455.1M is lower than Hut 8 Corp.'s net income of $50.8M. Notably, TeraWulf, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Hut 8 Corp.'s PE ratio is 27.01x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for TeraWulf, Inc. is 27.29x versus 30.84x for Hut 8 Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    WULF
    TeraWulf, Inc.
    27.29x -- $50.6M -$455.1M
    HUT
    Hut 8 Corp.
    30.84x 27.01x $83.5M $50.8M
  • Which has Higher Returns WULF or MARA?

    MARA Holdings, Inc. has a net margin of -899.7% compared to TeraWulf, Inc.'s net margin of 48.78%. TeraWulf, Inc.'s return on equity of -233.24% beat MARA Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 22.38%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    WULF
    TeraWulf, Inc.
    13.75% -$1.13 $1.3B
    MARA
    MARA Holdings, Inc.
    -23.75% $0.27 $8.8B
  • What do Analysts Say About WULF or MARA?

    TeraWulf, Inc. has a consensus price target of $20.90, signalling upside risk potential of 77.84%. On the other hand MARA Holdings, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $22.41 which suggests that it could grow by 133.72%. Given that MARA Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than TeraWulf, Inc., analysts believe MARA Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than TeraWulf, Inc..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    WULF
    TeraWulf, Inc.
    9 1 0
    MARA
    MARA Holdings, Inc.
    6 5 0
  • Is WULF or MARA More Risky?

    TeraWulf, Inc. has a beta of 3.835, which suggesting that the stock is 283.526% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MARA Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 5.424, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 442.356%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock WULF or MARA?

    TeraWulf, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. MARA Holdings, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. TeraWulf, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. MARA Holdings, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios WULF or MARA?

    TeraWulf, Inc. quarterly revenues are $50.6M, which are smaller than MARA Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues of $252.4M. TeraWulf, Inc.'s net income of -$455.1M is lower than MARA Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $123.1M. Notably, TeraWulf, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while MARA Holdings, Inc.'s PE ratio is 5.31x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for TeraWulf, Inc. is 27.29x versus 4.37x for MARA Holdings, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    WULF
    TeraWulf, Inc.
    27.29x -- $50.6M -$455.1M
    MARA
    MARA Holdings, Inc.
    4.37x 5.31x $252.4M $123.1M
  • Which has Higher Returns WULF or RIOT?

    Riot Platforms, Inc. has a net margin of -899.7% compared to TeraWulf, Inc.'s net margin of 57.97%. TeraWulf, Inc.'s return on equity of -233.24% beat Riot Platforms, Inc.'s return on equity of 5.24%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    WULF
    TeraWulf, Inc.
    13.75% -$1.13 $1.3B
    RIOT
    Riot Platforms, Inc.
    -6.75% $0.26 $4.4B
  • What do Analysts Say About WULF or RIOT?

    TeraWulf, Inc. has a consensus price target of $20.90, signalling upside risk potential of 77.84%. On the other hand Riot Platforms, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $26.44 which suggests that it could grow by 96.76%. Given that Riot Platforms, Inc. has higher upside potential than TeraWulf, Inc., analysts believe Riot Platforms, Inc. is more attractive than TeraWulf, Inc..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    WULF
    TeraWulf, Inc.
    9 1 0
    RIOT
    Riot Platforms, Inc.
    13 0 0
  • Is WULF or RIOT More Risky?

    TeraWulf, Inc. has a beta of 3.835, which suggesting that the stock is 283.526% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Riot Platforms, Inc. has a beta of 3.841, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 284.068%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock WULF or RIOT?

    TeraWulf, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Riot Platforms, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. TeraWulf, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Riot Platforms, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios WULF or RIOT?

    TeraWulf, Inc. quarterly revenues are $50.6M, which are smaller than Riot Platforms, Inc. quarterly revenues of $180.2M. TeraWulf, Inc.'s net income of -$455.1M is lower than Riot Platforms, Inc.'s net income of $104.5M. Notably, TeraWulf, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Riot Platforms, Inc.'s PE ratio is 39.89x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for TeraWulf, Inc. is 27.29x versus 7.70x for Riot Platforms, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    WULF
    TeraWulf, Inc.
    27.29x -- $50.6M -$455.1M
    RIOT
    Riot Platforms, Inc.
    7.70x 39.89x $180.2M $104.5M

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

Is DocuSign Stock Undervalued?
Is DocuSign Stock Undervalued?

Digital signature software business DocuSign (NASDAQ:DOCU) has been struggling over…

Is SentinelOne Stock Undervalued?
Is SentinelOne Stock Undervalued?

Cybersecurity major SentinelOne (NYSE:S) has struggled over several years, delivering…

Is Broadcom Stock on Sale?
Is Broadcom Stock on Sale?

Chip and software maker Broadcom (NASDAQ:AVGO) has been among the…

Stock Ideas

Buy
59
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $4.6T
P/E Ratio: 65x

Buy
55
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 37x

Buy
61
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 39x

Alerts

Buy
72
GLTO alert for Dec 29

Galecto, Inc. [GLTO] is down 12.13% over the past day.

Sell
20
SMX alert for Dec 29

SMX (Security Matters) Plc [SMX] is down 27.67% over the past day.

Sell
11
CDNAF alert for Dec 29

Canadian Tire Corp. Ltd. [CDNAF] is up 11.94% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock