WULF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Cipher Mining, Inc. has a net margin of -899.7% compared to TeraWulf, Inc.'s net margin of -4.58%. TeraWulf, Inc.'s return on equity of -233.24% beat Cipher Mining, Inc.'s return on equity of -9.74%.

TeraWulf, Inc. has a consensus price target of $23.56, signalling upside risk potential of 52.28%. On the other hand Cipher Mining, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $28.23 which suggests that it could grow by 78.69%. Given that Cipher Mining, Inc. has higher upside potential than TeraWulf, Inc., analysts believe Cipher Mining, Inc. is more attractive than TeraWulf, Inc..

TeraWulf, Inc. has a beta of 3.687, which suggesting that the stock is 268.737% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cipher Mining, Inc. has a beta of 2.947, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 194.74%.

TeraWulf, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Cipher Mining, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. TeraWulf, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cipher Mining, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

TeraWulf, Inc. quarterly revenues are $50.6M, which are smaller than Cipher Mining, Inc. quarterly revenues of $71.7M. TeraWulf, Inc.'s net income of -$455.1M is lower than Cipher Mining, Inc.'s net income of -$3.3M. Notably, TeraWulf, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Cipher Mining, Inc.'s PE ratio is 58.50x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for TeraWulf, Inc. is 35.93x versus 28.57x for Cipher Mining, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MARA Holdings, Inc. has a net margin of -899.7% compared to TeraWulf, Inc.'s net margin of 48.78%. TeraWulf, Inc.'s return on equity of -233.24% beat MARA Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 22.38%.

TeraWulf, Inc. has a consensus price target of $23.56, signalling upside risk potential of 52.28%. On the other hand MARA Holdings, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $19.60 which suggests that it could grow by 146.28%. Given that MARA Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than TeraWulf, Inc., analysts believe MARA Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than TeraWulf, Inc..

TeraWulf, Inc. has a beta of 3.687, which suggesting that the stock is 268.737% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MARA Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 5.558, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 455.759%.

TeraWulf, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. MARA Holdings, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. TeraWulf, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. MARA Holdings, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

TeraWulf, Inc. quarterly revenues are $50.6M, which are smaller than MARA Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues of $252.4M. TeraWulf, Inc.'s net income of -$455.1M is lower than MARA Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $123.1M. Notably, TeraWulf, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while MARA Holdings, Inc.'s PE ratio is 4.41x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for TeraWulf, Inc. is 35.93x versus 3.63x for MARA Holdings, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Riot Platforms, Inc. has a net margin of -899.7% compared to TeraWulf, Inc.'s net margin of 57.97%. TeraWulf, Inc.'s return on equity of -233.24% beat Riot Platforms, Inc.'s return on equity of 5.24%.

TeraWulf, Inc. has a consensus price target of $23.56, signalling upside risk potential of 52.28%. On the other hand Riot Platforms, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $26.89 which suggests that it could grow by 65.79%. Given that Riot Platforms, Inc. has higher upside potential than TeraWulf, Inc., analysts believe Riot Platforms, Inc. is more attractive than TeraWulf, Inc..

TeraWulf, Inc. has a beta of 3.687, which suggesting that the stock is 268.737% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Riot Platforms, Inc. has a beta of 3.719, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 271.912%.

TeraWulf, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Riot Platforms, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. TeraWulf, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Riot Platforms, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

TeraWulf, Inc. quarterly revenues are $50.6M, which are smaller than Riot Platforms, Inc. quarterly revenues of $180.2M. TeraWulf, Inc.'s net income of -$455.1M is lower than Riot Platforms, Inc.'s net income of $104.5M. Notably, TeraWulf, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Riot Platforms, Inc.'s PE ratio is 48.14x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for TeraWulf, Inc. is 35.93x versus 9.29x for Riot Platforms, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.