BMSPF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Chykingyoung Investment Development Holdings, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Biomass Secure Power, Inc.'s net margin of --. Biomass Secure Power, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat Chykingyoung Investment Development Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 9491.01%.

Biomass Secure Power, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Chykingyoung Investment Development Holdings, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Biomass Secure Power, Inc. has higher upside potential than Chykingyoung Investment Development Holdings, Inc., analysts believe Biomass Secure Power, Inc. is more attractive than Chykingyoung Investment Development Holdings, Inc..

Biomass Secure Power, Inc. has a beta of -6.945, which suggesting that the stock is 794.506% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Chykingyoung Investment Development Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 8.484, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 748.414%.

Biomass Secure Power, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Chykingyoung Investment Development Holdings, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Biomass Secure Power, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Chykingyoung Investment Development Holdings, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Biomass Secure Power, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Chykingyoung Investment Development Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues of $20.3K. Biomass Secure Power, Inc.'s net income of -- is lower than Chykingyoung Investment Development Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $21.2M. Notably, Biomass Secure Power, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Chykingyoung Investment Development Holdings, Inc.'s PE ratio is 2.80x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Biomass Secure Power, Inc. is -- versus 1,460.10x for Chykingyoung Investment Development Holdings, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Flexible Solutions International, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Biomass Secure Power, Inc.'s net margin of 3.66%. Biomass Secure Power, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat Flexible Solutions International, Inc.'s return on equity of 7.96%.

Biomass Secure Power, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Flexible Solutions International, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $11.0000 which suggests that it could grow by 105.22%. Given that Flexible Solutions International, Inc. has higher upside potential than Biomass Secure Power, Inc., analysts believe Flexible Solutions International, Inc. is more attractive than Biomass Secure Power, Inc..

Biomass Secure Power, Inc. has a beta of -6.945, which suggesting that the stock is 794.506% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Flexible Solutions International, Inc. has a beta of 1.626, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 62.607%.

Biomass Secure Power, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Flexible Solutions International, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. Biomass Secure Power, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Flexible Solutions International, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Biomass Secure Power, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Flexible Solutions International, Inc. quarterly revenues of $10.6M. Biomass Secure Power, Inc.'s net income of -- is lower than Flexible Solutions International, Inc.'s net income of $386.7K. Notably, Biomass Secure Power, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Flexible Solutions International, Inc.'s PE ratio is 36.89x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Biomass Secure Power, Inc. is -- versus 1.77x for Flexible Solutions International, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Loop Industries, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Biomass Secure Power, Inc.'s net margin of -3423.26%. Biomass Secure Power, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat Loop Industries, Inc.'s return on equity of -1369.4%.

Biomass Secure Power, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Loop Industries, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $4.55 which suggests that it could grow by 250%. Given that Loop Industries, Inc. has higher upside potential than Biomass Secure Power, Inc., analysts believe Loop Industries, Inc. is more attractive than Biomass Secure Power, Inc..

Biomass Secure Power, Inc. has a beta of -6.945, which suggesting that the stock is 794.506% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Loop Industries, Inc. has a beta of 1.676, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 67.604%.

Biomass Secure Power, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Loop Industries, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Biomass Secure Power, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Loop Industries, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Biomass Secure Power, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Loop Industries, Inc. quarterly revenues of $86K. Biomass Secure Power, Inc.'s net income of -- is lower than Loop Industries, Inc.'s net income of -$2.9M. Notably, Biomass Secure Power, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Loop Industries, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Biomass Secure Power, Inc. is -- versus 5.57x for Loop Industries, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Biomass Secure Power, Inc.'s net margin of 10.42%. Biomass Secure Power, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc.'s return on equity of 17.91%.

Biomass Secure Power, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $213.00 which suggests that it could grow by 6.49%. Given that Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc. has higher upside potential than Biomass Secure Power, Inc., analysts believe Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc. is more attractive than Biomass Secure Power, Inc..

Biomass Secure Power, Inc. has a beta of -6.945, which suggesting that the stock is 794.506% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc. has a beta of 1.372, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 37.239%.

Biomass Secure Power, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc. offers a yield of 0.58% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share. Biomass Secure Power, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc. pays out 13.96% of its earnings as a dividend. Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Biomass Secure Power, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc. quarterly revenues of $539.3M. Biomass Secure Power, Inc.'s net income of -- is lower than Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc.'s net income of $56.2M. Notably, Biomass Secure Power, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc.'s PE ratio is 24.23x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Biomass Secure Power, Inc. is -- versus 3.58x for Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.