BMSPF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Flexible Solutions International, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Biomass Secure Power, Inc.'s net margin of 3.66%. Biomass Secure Power, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat Flexible Solutions International, Inc.'s return on equity of 7.96%.

Biomass Secure Power, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Flexible Solutions International, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $11.0000 which suggests that it could grow by 56.92%. Given that Flexible Solutions International, Inc. has higher upside potential than Biomass Secure Power, Inc., analysts believe Flexible Solutions International, Inc. is more attractive than Biomass Secure Power, Inc..

Biomass Secure Power, Inc. has a beta of -7.205, which suggesting that the stock is 820.5% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Flexible Solutions International, Inc. has a beta of 1.545, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 54.501%.

Biomass Secure Power, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Flexible Solutions International, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. Biomass Secure Power, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Flexible Solutions International, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Biomass Secure Power, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Flexible Solutions International, Inc. quarterly revenues of $10.6M. Biomass Secure Power, Inc.'s net income of -- is lower than Flexible Solutions International, Inc.'s net income of $386.7K. Notably, Biomass Secure Power, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Flexible Solutions International, Inc.'s PE ratio is 48.25x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Biomass Secure Power, Inc. is -- versus 2.32x for Flexible Solutions International, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Gold Royalty Corp. has a net margin of -- compared to Biomass Secure Power, Inc.'s net margin of -27.31%. Biomass Secure Power, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat Gold Royalty Corp.'s return on equity of -1.15%.

Biomass Secure Power, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Gold Royalty Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $5.11 which suggests that it could grow by 21.31%. Given that Gold Royalty Corp. has higher upside potential than Biomass Secure Power, Inc., analysts believe Gold Royalty Corp. is more attractive than Biomass Secure Power, Inc..

Biomass Secure Power, Inc. has a beta of -7.205, which suggesting that the stock is 820.5% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gold Royalty Corp. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Biomass Secure Power, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Gold Royalty Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Biomass Secure Power, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Gold Royalty Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Biomass Secure Power, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Gold Royalty Corp. quarterly revenues of $4.1M. Biomass Secure Power, Inc.'s net income of -- is lower than Gold Royalty Corp.'s net income of -$1.1M. Notably, Biomass Secure Power, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Gold Royalty Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Biomass Secure Power, Inc. is -- versus 49.63x for Gold Royalty Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. has a net margin of -- compared to Biomass Secure Power, Inc.'s net margin of --. Biomass Secure Power, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat Paramount Gold Nevada Corp.'s return on equity of -34.36%.

Biomass Secure Power, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $1.70 which suggests that it could grow by 37.1%. Given that Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. has higher upside potential than Biomass Secure Power, Inc., analysts believe Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. is more attractive than Biomass Secure Power, Inc..

Biomass Secure Power, Inc. has a beta of -7.205, which suggesting that the stock is 820.5% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. has a beta of 1.319, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 31.91%.

Biomass Secure Power, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Biomass Secure Power, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Biomass Secure Power, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. quarterly revenues of --. Biomass Secure Power, Inc.'s net income of -- is lower than Paramount Gold Nevada Corp.'s net income of -$4.3M. Notably, Biomass Secure Power, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Paramount Gold Nevada Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Biomass Secure Power, Inc. is -- versus -- for Paramount Gold Nevada Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Solitario Resources Corp. has a net margin of -- compared to Biomass Secure Power, Inc.'s net margin of --. Biomass Secure Power, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat Solitario Resources Corp.'s return on equity of -20.59%.

Biomass Secure Power, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Solitario Resources Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $1.50 which suggests that it could grow by 117.08%. Given that Solitario Resources Corp. has higher upside potential than Biomass Secure Power, Inc., analysts believe Solitario Resources Corp. is more attractive than Biomass Secure Power, Inc..

Biomass Secure Power, Inc. has a beta of -7.205, which suggesting that the stock is 820.5% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Solitario Resources Corp. has a beta of 0.440, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 55.966%.

Biomass Secure Power, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Solitario Resources Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Biomass Secure Power, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Solitario Resources Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Biomass Secure Power, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Solitario Resources Corp. quarterly revenues of --. Biomass Secure Power, Inc.'s net income of -- is lower than Solitario Resources Corp.'s net income of -$1.9M. Notably, Biomass Secure Power, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Solitario Resources Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Biomass Secure Power, Inc. is -- versus -- for Solitario Resources Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.