CHYI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Flexible Solutions International, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Chykingyoung Investment Development Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of 3.66%. Chykingyoung Investment Development Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 9491.01% beat Flexible Solutions International, Inc.'s return on equity of 7.96%.

Chykingyoung Investment Development Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Flexible Solutions International, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $11.0000 which suggests that it could grow by 99.28%. Given that Flexible Solutions International, Inc. has higher upside potential than Chykingyoung Investment Development Holdings, Inc., analysts believe Flexible Solutions International, Inc. is more attractive than Chykingyoung Investment Development Holdings, Inc..

Chykingyoung Investment Development Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 8.484, which suggesting that the stock is 748.414% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Flexible Solutions International, Inc. has a beta of 1.626, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 62.607%.

Chykingyoung Investment Development Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Flexible Solutions International, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. Chykingyoung Investment Development Holdings, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Flexible Solutions International, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Chykingyoung Investment Development Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $20.3K, which are smaller than Flexible Solutions International, Inc. quarterly revenues of $10.6M. Chykingyoung Investment Development Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $21.2M is higher than Flexible Solutions International, Inc.'s net income of $386.7K. Notably, Chykingyoung Investment Development Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 2.80x while Flexible Solutions International, Inc.'s PE ratio is 37.99x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Chykingyoung Investment Development Holdings, Inc. is 1,460.10x versus 1.83x for Flexible Solutions International, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Muliang Viagoo Technology, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Chykingyoung Investment Development Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of --. Chykingyoung Investment Development Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 9491.01% beat Muliang Viagoo Technology, Inc.'s return on equity of --.

Chykingyoung Investment Development Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Muliang Viagoo Technology, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Chykingyoung Investment Development Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than Muliang Viagoo Technology, Inc., analysts believe Chykingyoung Investment Development Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than Muliang Viagoo Technology, Inc..

Chykingyoung Investment Development Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 8.484, which suggesting that the stock is 748.414% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Muliang Viagoo Technology, Inc. has a beta of 0.088, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 91.213%.

Chykingyoung Investment Development Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Muliang Viagoo Technology, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Chykingyoung Investment Development Holdings, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Muliang Viagoo Technology, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Chykingyoung Investment Development Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $20.3K, which are larger than Muliang Viagoo Technology, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Chykingyoung Investment Development Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $21.2M is higher than Muliang Viagoo Technology, Inc.'s net income of --. Notably, Chykingyoung Investment Development Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 2.80x while Muliang Viagoo Technology, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Chykingyoung Investment Development Holdings, Inc. is 1,460.10x versus 4.96x for Muliang Viagoo Technology, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Scotts Miracle-Gro Co. has a net margin of -- compared to Chykingyoung Investment Development Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of -13.49%. Chykingyoung Investment Development Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 9491.01% beat Scotts Miracle-Gro Co.'s return on equity of --.

Chykingyoung Investment Development Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Scotts Miracle-Gro Co. has an analysts' consensus of $71.50 which suggests that it could grow by 7.78%. Given that Scotts Miracle-Gro Co. has higher upside potential than Chykingyoung Investment Development Holdings, Inc., analysts believe Scotts Miracle-Gro Co. is more attractive than Chykingyoung Investment Development Holdings, Inc..

Chykingyoung Investment Development Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 8.484, which suggesting that the stock is 748.414% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Scotts Miracle-Gro Co. has a beta of 1.984, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 98.379%.

Chykingyoung Investment Development Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Scotts Miracle-Gro Co. offers a yield of 3.98% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.66 per share. Chykingyoung Investment Development Holdings, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Scotts Miracle-Gro Co. pays out 106.73% of its earnings as a dividend.

Chykingyoung Investment Development Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $20.3K, which are smaller than Scotts Miracle-Gro Co. quarterly revenues of $354.4M. Chykingyoung Investment Development Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $21.2M is higher than Scotts Miracle-Gro Co.'s net income of -$47.8M. Notably, Chykingyoung Investment Development Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 2.80x while Scotts Miracle-Gro Co.'s PE ratio is 44.85x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Chykingyoung Investment Development Holdings, Inc. is 1,460.10x versus 1.15x for Scotts Miracle-Gro Co.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

CVR Partners LP has a net margin of -- compared to Chykingyoung Investment Development Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of 26.34%. Chykingyoung Investment Development Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 9491.01% beat CVR Partners LP's return on equity of 41.93%.

Chykingyoung Investment Development Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand CVR Partners LP has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -90.72%. Given that CVR Partners LP has higher upside potential than Chykingyoung Investment Development Holdings, Inc., analysts believe CVR Partners LP is more attractive than Chykingyoung Investment Development Holdings, Inc..

Chykingyoung Investment Development Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 8.484, which suggesting that the stock is 748.414% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CVR Partners LP has a beta of 0.664, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.606%.

Chykingyoung Investment Development Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CVR Partners LP offers a yield of 11.64% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $4.02 per share. Chykingyoung Investment Development Holdings, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CVR Partners LP pays out 116.11% of its earnings as a dividend.

Chykingyoung Investment Development Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $20.3K, which are smaller than CVR Partners LP quarterly revenues of $163.5M. Chykingyoung Investment Development Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $21.2M is lower than CVR Partners LP's net income of $43.1M. Notably, Chykingyoung Investment Development Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 2.80x while CVR Partners LP's PE ratio is 8.51x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Chykingyoung Investment Development Holdings, Inc. is 1,460.10x versus 1.76x for CVR Partners LP. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.