CHYI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Friedman Industries has a net margin of -- compared to Chykingyoung Investment Development Holdings's net margin of -0.63%. Chykingyoung Investment Development Holdings's return on equity of -- beat Friedman Industries's return on equity of 6.32%.

Chykingyoung Investment Development Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Friedman Industries has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Chykingyoung Investment Development Holdings has higher upside potential than Friedman Industries, analysts believe Chykingyoung Investment Development Holdings is more attractive than Friedman Industries.

Chykingyoung Investment Development Holdings has a beta of 4.175, which suggesting that the stock is 317.491% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Friedman Industries has a beta of 1.410, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 41.002%.

Chykingyoung Investment Development Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Friedman Industries offers a yield of 0.88% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share. Chykingyoung Investment Development Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Friedman Industries pays out 3.35% of its earnings as a dividend. Friedman Industries's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Chykingyoung Investment Development Holdings quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Friedman Industries quarterly revenues of $106.8M. Chykingyoung Investment Development Holdings's net income of -- is lower than Friedman Industries's net income of -$675K. Notably, Chykingyoung Investment Development Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Friedman Industries's PE ratio is 13.97x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Chykingyoung Investment Development Holdings is -- versus 0.24x for Friedman Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Graphex Group has a net margin of -- compared to Chykingyoung Investment Development Holdings's net margin of --. Chykingyoung Investment Development Holdings's return on equity of -- beat Graphex Group's return on equity of -36.3%.

Chykingyoung Investment Development Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Graphex Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 96.08%. Given that Graphex Group has higher upside potential than Chykingyoung Investment Development Holdings, analysts believe Graphex Group is more attractive than Chykingyoung Investment Development Holdings.

Chykingyoung Investment Development Holdings has a beta of 4.175, which suggesting that the stock is 317.491% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Graphex Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Chykingyoung Investment Development Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Graphex Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Chykingyoung Investment Development Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Graphex Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Chykingyoung Investment Development Holdings quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Graphex Group quarterly revenues of --. Chykingyoung Investment Development Holdings's net income of -- is lower than Graphex Group's net income of --. Notably, Chykingyoung Investment Development Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Graphex Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Chykingyoung Investment Development Holdings is -- versus 0.29x for Graphex Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Paramount Gold Nevada has a net margin of -- compared to Chykingyoung Investment Development Holdings's net margin of --. Chykingyoung Investment Development Holdings's return on equity of -- beat Paramount Gold Nevada's return on equity of --.

Chykingyoung Investment Development Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Paramount Gold Nevada has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 257.04%. Given that Paramount Gold Nevada has higher upside potential than Chykingyoung Investment Development Holdings, analysts believe Paramount Gold Nevada is more attractive than Chykingyoung Investment Development Holdings.

Chykingyoung Investment Development Holdings has a beta of 4.175, which suggesting that the stock is 317.491% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Paramount Gold Nevada has a beta of 1.854, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 85.435%.

Chykingyoung Investment Development Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Paramount Gold Nevada offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Chykingyoung Investment Development Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Paramount Gold Nevada pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Chykingyoung Investment Development Holdings quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Paramount Gold Nevada quarterly revenues of --. Chykingyoung Investment Development Holdings's net income of -- is lower than Paramount Gold Nevada's net income of -$1.6M. Notably, Chykingyoung Investment Development Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Paramount Gold Nevada's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Chykingyoung Investment Development Holdings is -- versus -- for Paramount Gold Nevada. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Solitario Resources has a net margin of -- compared to Chykingyoung Investment Development Holdings's net margin of --. Chykingyoung Investment Development Holdings's return on equity of -- beat Solitario Resources's return on equity of --.

Chykingyoung Investment Development Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Solitario Resources has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 155.97%. Given that Solitario Resources has higher upside potential than Chykingyoung Investment Development Holdings, analysts believe Solitario Resources is more attractive than Chykingyoung Investment Development Holdings.

Chykingyoung Investment Development Holdings has a beta of 4.175, which suggesting that the stock is 317.491% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Solitario Resources has a beta of 0.895, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.55%.

Chykingyoung Investment Development Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Solitario Resources offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Chykingyoung Investment Development Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Solitario Resources pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Chykingyoung Investment Development Holdings quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Solitario Resources quarterly revenues of --. Chykingyoung Investment Development Holdings's net income of -- is lower than Solitario Resources's net income of -$2.3M. Notably, Chykingyoung Investment Development Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Solitario Resources's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Chykingyoung Investment Development Holdings is -- versus -- for Solitario Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.