SMG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Century Aluminum Co. has a net margin of -13.49% compared to Scotts Miracle-Gro Co.'s net margin of -0.58%. Scotts Miracle-Gro Co.'s return on equity of -- beat Century Aluminum Co.'s return on equity of 3.2%.

Scotts Miracle-Gro Co. has a consensus price target of $74.00, signalling upside risk potential of 5.53%. On the other hand Century Aluminum Co. has an analysts' consensus of $63.33 which suggests that it could grow by 22.83%. Given that Century Aluminum Co. has higher upside potential than Scotts Miracle-Gro Co., analysts believe Century Aluminum Co. is more attractive than Scotts Miracle-Gro Co..

Scotts Miracle-Gro Co. has a beta of 1.984, which suggesting that the stock is 98.379% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Century Aluminum Co. has a beta of 2.237, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 123.674%.

Scotts Miracle-Gro Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.66 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.77%. Century Aluminum Co. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Scotts Miracle-Gro Co. pays 106.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Century Aluminum Co. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Scotts Miracle-Gro Co. quarterly revenues are $354.4M, which are smaller than Century Aluminum Co. quarterly revenues of $633.7M. Scotts Miracle-Gro Co.'s net income of -$47.8M is lower than Century Aluminum Co.'s net income of -$3.7M. Notably, Scotts Miracle-Gro Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 47.41x while Century Aluminum Co.'s PE ratio is 130.37x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Scotts Miracle-Gro Co. is 1.22x versus 1.99x for Century Aluminum Co.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

CF Industries Holdings, Inc. has a net margin of -13.49% compared to Scotts Miracle-Gro Co.'s net margin of 26.44%. Scotts Miracle-Gro Co.'s return on equity of -- beat CF Industries Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 23.55%.

Scotts Miracle-Gro Co. has a consensus price target of $74.00, signalling upside risk potential of 5.53%. On the other hand CF Industries Holdings, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $96.68 which suggests that it could fall by -2.87%. Given that Scotts Miracle-Gro Co. has higher upside potential than CF Industries Holdings, Inc., analysts believe Scotts Miracle-Gro Co. is more attractive than CF Industries Holdings, Inc..

Scotts Miracle-Gro Co. has a beta of 1.984, which suggesting that the stock is 98.379% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CF Industries Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.704, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.65%.

Scotts Miracle-Gro Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.66 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.77%. CF Industries Holdings, Inc. offers a yield of 2.01% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. Scotts Miracle-Gro Co. pays 106.73% of its earnings as a dividend. CF Industries Holdings, Inc. pays out 22.3% of its earnings as a dividend. CF Industries Holdings, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Scotts Miracle-Gro Co.'s is not.

Scotts Miracle-Gro Co. quarterly revenues are $354.4M, which are smaller than CF Industries Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.9B. Scotts Miracle-Gro Co.'s net income of -$47.8M is lower than CF Industries Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $495M. Notably, Scotts Miracle-Gro Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 47.41x while CF Industries Holdings, Inc.'s PE ratio is 11.07x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Scotts Miracle-Gro Co. is 1.22x versus 2.28x for CF Industries Holdings, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kaiser Aluminum Corp. has a net margin of -13.49% compared to Scotts Miracle-Gro Co.'s net margin of 3.04%. Scotts Miracle-Gro Co.'s return on equity of -- beat Kaiser Aluminum Corp.'s return on equity of 14.39%.

Scotts Miracle-Gro Co. has a consensus price target of $74.00, signalling upside risk potential of 5.53%. On the other hand Kaiser Aluminum Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $124.50 which suggests that it could fall by -4.33%. Given that Scotts Miracle-Gro Co. has higher upside potential than Kaiser Aluminum Corp., analysts believe Scotts Miracle-Gro Co. is more attractive than Kaiser Aluminum Corp..

Scotts Miracle-Gro Co. has a beta of 1.984, which suggesting that the stock is 98.379% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kaiser Aluminum Corp. has a beta of 1.421, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.06%.

Scotts Miracle-Gro Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.66 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.77%. Kaiser Aluminum Corp. offers a yield of 2.37% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.77 per share. Scotts Miracle-Gro Co. pays 106.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Kaiser Aluminum Corp. pays out 45.51% of its earnings as a dividend. Kaiser Aluminum Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Scotts Miracle-Gro Co.'s is not.

Scotts Miracle-Gro Co. quarterly revenues are $354.4M, which are smaller than Kaiser Aluminum Corp. quarterly revenues of $929M. Scotts Miracle-Gro Co.'s net income of -$47.8M is lower than Kaiser Aluminum Corp.'s net income of $28.2M. Notably, Scotts Miracle-Gro Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 47.41x while Kaiser Aluminum Corp.'s PE ratio is 19.18x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Scotts Miracle-Gro Co. is 1.22x versus 0.64x for Kaiser Aluminum Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

CVR Partners LP has a net margin of -13.49% compared to Scotts Miracle-Gro Co.'s net margin of -7.83%. Scotts Miracle-Gro Co.'s return on equity of -- beat CVR Partners LP's return on equity of 32.99%.

Scotts Miracle-Gro Co. has a consensus price target of $74.00, signalling upside risk potential of 5.53%. On the other hand CVR Partners LP has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -90.46%. Given that Scotts Miracle-Gro Co. has higher upside potential than CVR Partners LP, analysts believe Scotts Miracle-Gro Co. is more attractive than CVR Partners LP.

Scotts Miracle-Gro Co. has a beta of 1.984, which suggesting that the stock is 98.379% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CVR Partners LP has a beta of 0.664, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.606%.

Scotts Miracle-Gro Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.66 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.77%. CVR Partners LP offers a yield of 11.97% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $4.02 per share. Scotts Miracle-Gro Co. pays 106.73% of its earnings as a dividend. CVR Partners LP pays out 127.7% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Scotts Miracle-Gro Co. quarterly revenues are $354.4M, which are larger than CVR Partners LP quarterly revenues of $131.1M. Scotts Miracle-Gro Co.'s net income of -$47.8M is lower than CVR Partners LP's net income of -$10.3M. Notably, Scotts Miracle-Gro Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 47.41x while CVR Partners LP's PE ratio is 10.67x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Scotts Miracle-Gro Co. is 1.22x versus 1.74x for CVR Partners LP. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.