Is DocuSign Stock Undervalued?
Digital signature software business DocuSign (NASDAQ:DOCU) has been struggling over…
Buy
65
BHKLY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$102.18
Seasonality move
:
1.85%
Day range:
$101.90 - $102.35
52-week range:
$61.47 - $105.00
Dividend yield:
5.73%
P/E ratio:
10.43x
P/S ratio:
2.50x
P/B ratio:
2.77x
Volume:
2.4K
Avg. volume:
2.9K
1-year change:
57.05%
Market cap:
$54B
Revenue:
$21.2B
EPS (TTM):
$9.80
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
BHKLY
BOC Hong Kong (Holdings) Ltd.
|
$2.4B | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ABTS
Abits Group, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FUTU
Futu Holdings Ltd.
|
$713.9M | $3.43 | 27.61% | 84.01% | $227.55 |
|
MATH
Metalpha Technology Holding Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MEGL
Magic Empire Global Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
TROO
TROOPS, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
BHKLY
BOC Hong Kong (Holdings) Ltd.
|
$102.18 | -- | $54B | 10.43x | $0.75 | 5.73% | 2.50x |
|
ABTS
Abits Group, Inc.
|
$5.31 | -- | $12.6M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 1.79x |
|
FUTU
Futu Holdings Ltd.
|
$165.19 | $227.55 | $23B | 18.46x | $2.00 | 0% | 8.69x |
|
MATH
Metalpha Technology Holding Ltd.
|
$2.38 | -- | $94M | 8.95x | $0.00 | 0% | 2.44x |
|
MEGL
Magic Empire Global Ltd.
|
$1.20 | -- | $4.9M | -- | $0.01 | 0% | 4.65x |
|
TROO
TROOPS, Inc.
|
$1.93 | -- | $235.8M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 13.91x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
BHKLY
BOC Hong Kong (Holdings) Ltd.
|
18.85% | -0.754 | -- | 4.60x |
|
ABTS
Abits Group, Inc.
|
-- | 7.539 | -- | 0.83x |
|
FUTU
Futu Holdings Ltd.
|
27.22% | 2.239 | 7.22% | 0.07x |
|
MATH
Metalpha Technology Holding Ltd.
|
22.88% | 1.656 | 9.26% | 0.30x |
|
MEGL
Magic Empire Global Ltd.
|
-- | 2.420 | -- | 56.19x |
|
TROO
TROOPS, Inc.
|
18.45% | 5.720 | 6.4% | 2.30x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
BHKLY
BOC Hong Kong (Holdings) Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 9.33% | 11.52% | -- | -- |
|
ABTS
Abits Group, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -63.52% | -63.52% | -- | -- |
|
FUTU
Futu Holdings Ltd.
|
$782.8M | $563.4M | 24% | 31.29% | 68.38% | -- |
|
MATH
Metalpha Technology Holding Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -27.01% | -30.78% | -- | -- |
|
MEGL
Magic Empire Global Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -0.43% | -0.43% | -- | -- |
|
TROO
TROOPS, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -3.12% | -3.38% | -- | -- |
BOC Hong Kong (Holdings) Ltd. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns BHKLY or ABTS?
Abits Group, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to BOC Hong Kong (Holdings) Ltd.'s net margin of --. BOC Hong Kong (Holdings) Ltd.'s return on equity of 11.52% beat Abits Group, Inc.'s return on equity of -63.52%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital BHKLYBOC Hong Kong (Holdings) Ltd.-- -- $54.2B ABTSAbits Group, Inc.-- -- $11.3M -
What do Analysts Say About BHKLY or ABTS?
BOC Hong Kong (Holdings) Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Abits Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that BOC Hong Kong (Holdings) Ltd. has higher upside potential than Abits Group, Inc., analysts believe BOC Hong Kong (Holdings) Ltd. is more attractive than Abits Group, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings BHKLYBOC Hong Kong (Holdings) Ltd.0 0 0 ABTSAbits Group, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is BHKLY or ABTS More Risky?
BOC Hong Kong (Holdings) Ltd. has a beta of -0.147, which suggesting that the stock is 114.727% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Abits Group, Inc. has a beta of 2.807, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 180.687%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock BHKLY or ABTS?
BOC Hong Kong (Holdings) Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.75 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.73%. Abits Group, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. BOC Hong Kong (Holdings) Ltd. pays 54.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Abits Group, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. BOC Hong Kong (Holdings) Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios BHKLY or ABTS?
BOC Hong Kong (Holdings) Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Abits Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. BOC Hong Kong (Holdings) Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Abits Group, Inc.'s net income of --. Notably, BOC Hong Kong (Holdings) Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 10.43x while Abits Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BOC Hong Kong (Holdings) Ltd. is 2.50x versus 1.79x for Abits Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income BHKLYBOC Hong Kong (Holdings) Ltd.2.50x 10.43x -- -- ABTSAbits Group, Inc.1.79x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns BHKLY or FUTU?
Futu Holdings Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to BOC Hong Kong (Holdings) Ltd.'s net margin of 50.25%. BOC Hong Kong (Holdings) Ltd.'s return on equity of 11.52% beat Futu Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of 31.29%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital BHKLYBOC Hong Kong (Holdings) Ltd.-- -- $54.2B FUTUFutu Holdings Ltd.95.01% $2.94 $6.5B -
What do Analysts Say About BHKLY or FUTU?
BOC Hong Kong (Holdings) Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Futu Holdings Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $227.55 which suggests that it could grow by 37.75%. Given that Futu Holdings Ltd. has higher upside potential than BOC Hong Kong (Holdings) Ltd., analysts believe Futu Holdings Ltd. is more attractive than BOC Hong Kong (Holdings) Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings BHKLYBOC Hong Kong (Holdings) Ltd.0 0 0 FUTUFutu Holdings Ltd.13 1 0 -
Is BHKLY or FUTU More Risky?
BOC Hong Kong (Holdings) Ltd. has a beta of -0.147, which suggesting that the stock is 114.727% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Futu Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.187, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 81.272%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock BHKLY or FUTU?
BOC Hong Kong (Holdings) Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.75 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.73%. Futu Holdings Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $2.00 per share. BOC Hong Kong (Holdings) Ltd. pays 54.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Futu Holdings Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. BOC Hong Kong (Holdings) Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios BHKLY or FUTU?
BOC Hong Kong (Holdings) Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Futu Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues of $824M. BOC Hong Kong (Holdings) Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Futu Holdings Ltd.'s net income of $414M. Notably, BOC Hong Kong (Holdings) Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 10.43x while Futu Holdings Ltd.'s PE ratio is 18.46x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BOC Hong Kong (Holdings) Ltd. is 2.50x versus 8.69x for Futu Holdings Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income BHKLYBOC Hong Kong (Holdings) Ltd.2.50x 10.43x -- -- FUTUFutu Holdings Ltd.8.69x 18.46x $824M $414M
-
Which has Higher Returns BHKLY or MATH?
Metalpha Technology Holding Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to BOC Hong Kong (Holdings) Ltd.'s net margin of --. BOC Hong Kong (Holdings) Ltd.'s return on equity of 11.52% beat Metalpha Technology Holding Ltd.'s return on equity of -30.78%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital BHKLYBOC Hong Kong (Holdings) Ltd.-- -- $54.2B MATHMetalpha Technology Holding Ltd.-- -- $21.9M -
What do Analysts Say About BHKLY or MATH?
BOC Hong Kong (Holdings) Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Metalpha Technology Holding Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that BOC Hong Kong (Holdings) Ltd. has higher upside potential than Metalpha Technology Holding Ltd., analysts believe BOC Hong Kong (Holdings) Ltd. is more attractive than Metalpha Technology Holding Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings BHKLYBOC Hong Kong (Holdings) Ltd.0 0 0 MATHMetalpha Technology Holding Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is BHKLY or MATH More Risky?
BOC Hong Kong (Holdings) Ltd. has a beta of -0.147, which suggesting that the stock is 114.727% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Metalpha Technology Holding Ltd. has a beta of -0.974, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 197.426%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock BHKLY or MATH?
BOC Hong Kong (Holdings) Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.75 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.73%. Metalpha Technology Holding Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. BOC Hong Kong (Holdings) Ltd. pays 54.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Metalpha Technology Holding Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. BOC Hong Kong (Holdings) Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios BHKLY or MATH?
BOC Hong Kong (Holdings) Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Metalpha Technology Holding Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. BOC Hong Kong (Holdings) Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Metalpha Technology Holding Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, BOC Hong Kong (Holdings) Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 10.43x while Metalpha Technology Holding Ltd.'s PE ratio is 8.95x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BOC Hong Kong (Holdings) Ltd. is 2.50x versus 2.44x for Metalpha Technology Holding Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income BHKLYBOC Hong Kong (Holdings) Ltd.2.50x 10.43x -- -- MATHMetalpha Technology Holding Ltd.2.44x 8.95x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns BHKLY or MEGL?
Magic Empire Global Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to BOC Hong Kong (Holdings) Ltd.'s net margin of --. BOC Hong Kong (Holdings) Ltd.'s return on equity of 11.52% beat Magic Empire Global Ltd.'s return on equity of -0.43%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital BHKLYBOC Hong Kong (Holdings) Ltd.-- -- $54.2B MEGLMagic Empire Global Ltd.-- -- $17.3M -
What do Analysts Say About BHKLY or MEGL?
BOC Hong Kong (Holdings) Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Magic Empire Global Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that BOC Hong Kong (Holdings) Ltd. has higher upside potential than Magic Empire Global Ltd., analysts believe BOC Hong Kong (Holdings) Ltd. is more attractive than Magic Empire Global Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings BHKLYBOC Hong Kong (Holdings) Ltd.0 0 0 MEGLMagic Empire Global Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is BHKLY or MEGL More Risky?
BOC Hong Kong (Holdings) Ltd. has a beta of -0.147, which suggesting that the stock is 114.727% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Magic Empire Global Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock BHKLY or MEGL?
BOC Hong Kong (Holdings) Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.75 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.73%. Magic Empire Global Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. BOC Hong Kong (Holdings) Ltd. pays 54.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Magic Empire Global Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. BOC Hong Kong (Holdings) Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios BHKLY or MEGL?
BOC Hong Kong (Holdings) Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Magic Empire Global Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. BOC Hong Kong (Holdings) Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Magic Empire Global Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, BOC Hong Kong (Holdings) Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 10.43x while Magic Empire Global Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BOC Hong Kong (Holdings) Ltd. is 2.50x versus 4.65x for Magic Empire Global Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income BHKLYBOC Hong Kong (Holdings) Ltd.2.50x 10.43x -- -- MEGLMagic Empire Global Ltd.4.65x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns BHKLY or TROO?
TROOPS, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to BOC Hong Kong (Holdings) Ltd.'s net margin of --. BOC Hong Kong (Holdings) Ltd.'s return on equity of 11.52% beat TROOPS, Inc.'s return on equity of -3.38%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital BHKLYBOC Hong Kong (Holdings) Ltd.-- -- $54.2B TROOTROOPS, Inc.-- -- $72.6M -
What do Analysts Say About BHKLY or TROO?
BOC Hong Kong (Holdings) Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand TROOPS, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that BOC Hong Kong (Holdings) Ltd. has higher upside potential than TROOPS, Inc., analysts believe BOC Hong Kong (Holdings) Ltd. is more attractive than TROOPS, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings BHKLYBOC Hong Kong (Holdings) Ltd.0 0 0 TROOTROOPS, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is BHKLY or TROO More Risky?
BOC Hong Kong (Holdings) Ltd. has a beta of -0.147, which suggesting that the stock is 114.727% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison TROOPS, Inc. has a beta of 3.051, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 205.095%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock BHKLY or TROO?
BOC Hong Kong (Holdings) Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.75 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.73%. TROOPS, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. BOC Hong Kong (Holdings) Ltd. pays 54.34% of its earnings as a dividend. TROOPS, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. BOC Hong Kong (Holdings) Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios BHKLY or TROO?
BOC Hong Kong (Holdings) Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than TROOPS, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. BOC Hong Kong (Holdings) Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than TROOPS, Inc.'s net income of --. Notably, BOC Hong Kong (Holdings) Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 10.43x while TROOPS, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BOC Hong Kong (Holdings) Ltd. is 2.50x versus 13.91x for TROOPS, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income BHKLYBOC Hong Kong (Holdings) Ltd.2.50x 10.43x -- -- TROOTROOPS, Inc.13.91x -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is SentinelOne Stock Undervalued?
Cybersecurity major SentinelOne (NYSE:S) has struggled over several years, delivering…
Is Broadcom Stock on Sale?
Chip and software maker Broadcom (NASDAQ:AVGO) has been among the…
Stock Ideas
Buy
59
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.6T
P/E Ratio: 65x
Buy
55
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
61
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 39x
Alerts
Buy
72
GLTO alert for Dec 27
Galecto, Inc. [GLTO] is up 16.92% over the past day.
Sell
20
SMX alert for Dec 27
SMX (Security Matters) Plc [SMX] is down 15.76% over the past day.
Sell
11
CDNAF alert for Dec 27
Canadian Tire Corp. Ltd. [CDNAF] is down 10% over the past day.
