Financhill
Buy
60

BHKLY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$98.88
Seasonality move :
1.85%
Day range:
$98.81 - $99.02
52-week range:
$61.47 - $105.00
Dividend yield:
5.92%
P/E ratio:
10.09x
P/S ratio:
2.41x
P/B ratio:
2.68x
Volume:
3.4K
Avg. volume:
2.7K
1-year change:
53.02%
Market cap:
$52.3B
Revenue:
$21.2B
EPS (TTM):
$9.80

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
BHKLY
BOC Hong Kong (Holdings) Ltd.
$2.4B -- -- -- --
ABTS
Abits Group, Inc.
-- -- -- -- --
FUTU
Futu Holdings Ltd.
$713.9M $2.64 27.61% 84.01% $227.55
MATH
Metalpha Technology Holding Ltd.
-- -- -- -- --
MEGL
Magic Empire Global Ltd.
-- -- -- -- --
TROO
TROOPS, Inc.
-- -- -- -- --
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
BHKLY
BOC Hong Kong (Holdings) Ltd.
$98.88 -- $52.3B 10.09x $0.75 5.92% 2.41x
ABTS
Abits Group, Inc.
$5.31 -- $12.6M -- $0.00 0% 1.79x
FUTU
Futu Holdings Ltd.
$164.66 $227.55 $22.9B 18.40x $2.00 0% 8.66x
MATH
Metalpha Technology Holding Ltd.
$2.43 -- $96M 8.95x $0.00 0% 2.44x
MEGL
Magic Empire Global Ltd.
$1.19 -- $4.8M -- $0.01 0% 4.61x
TROO
TROOPS, Inc.
$1.91 -- $233.3M -- $0.00 0% 13.76x
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
BHKLY
BOC Hong Kong (Holdings) Ltd.
18.85% -0.754 -- 4.60x
ABTS
Abits Group, Inc.
-- 7.539 -- 0.83x
FUTU
Futu Holdings Ltd.
27.22% 2.239 7.22% 0.07x
MATH
Metalpha Technology Holding Ltd.
22.88% 1.656 9.26% 0.30x
MEGL
Magic Empire Global Ltd.
-- 2.420 -- 56.19x
TROO
TROOPS, Inc.
18.45% 5.720 6.4% 2.30x
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
BHKLY
BOC Hong Kong (Holdings) Ltd.
-- -- 9.33% 11.52% -- --
ABTS
Abits Group, Inc.
-- -- -63.52% -63.52% -- --
FUTU
Futu Holdings Ltd.
$782.8M $563.4M 24% 31.29% 68.38% --
MATH
Metalpha Technology Holding Ltd.
-- -- -27.01% -30.78% -- --
MEGL
Magic Empire Global Ltd.
-- -- -0.43% -0.43% -- --
TROO
TROOPS, Inc.
-- -- -3.12% -3.38% -- --

BOC Hong Kong (Holdings) Ltd. vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns BHKLY or ABTS?

    Abits Group, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to BOC Hong Kong (Holdings) Ltd.'s net margin of --. BOC Hong Kong (Holdings) Ltd.'s return on equity of 11.52% beat Abits Group, Inc.'s return on equity of -63.52%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    BHKLY
    BOC Hong Kong (Holdings) Ltd.
    -- -- $54.2B
    ABTS
    Abits Group, Inc.
    -- -- $11.3M
  • What do Analysts Say About BHKLY or ABTS?

    BOC Hong Kong (Holdings) Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Abits Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that BOC Hong Kong (Holdings) Ltd. has higher upside potential than Abits Group, Inc., analysts believe BOC Hong Kong (Holdings) Ltd. is more attractive than Abits Group, Inc..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    BHKLY
    BOC Hong Kong (Holdings) Ltd.
    0 0 0
    ABTS
    Abits Group, Inc.
    0 0 0
  • Is BHKLY or ABTS More Risky?

    BOC Hong Kong (Holdings) Ltd. has a beta of -0.147, which suggesting that the stock is 114.727% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Abits Group, Inc. has a beta of 2.807, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 180.687%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock BHKLY or ABTS?

    BOC Hong Kong (Holdings) Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.75 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.92%. Abits Group, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. BOC Hong Kong (Holdings) Ltd. pays 54.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Abits Group, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. BOC Hong Kong (Holdings) Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios BHKLY or ABTS?

    BOC Hong Kong (Holdings) Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Abits Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. BOC Hong Kong (Holdings) Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Abits Group, Inc.'s net income of --. Notably, BOC Hong Kong (Holdings) Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 10.09x while Abits Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BOC Hong Kong (Holdings) Ltd. is 2.41x versus 1.79x for Abits Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    BHKLY
    BOC Hong Kong (Holdings) Ltd.
    2.41x 10.09x -- --
    ABTS
    Abits Group, Inc.
    1.79x -- -- --
  • Which has Higher Returns BHKLY or FUTU?

    Futu Holdings Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to BOC Hong Kong (Holdings) Ltd.'s net margin of 50.25%. BOC Hong Kong (Holdings) Ltd.'s return on equity of 11.52% beat Futu Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of 31.29%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    BHKLY
    BOC Hong Kong (Holdings) Ltd.
    -- -- $54.2B
    FUTU
    Futu Holdings Ltd.
    95.01% $2.94 $6.5B
  • What do Analysts Say About BHKLY or FUTU?

    BOC Hong Kong (Holdings) Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Futu Holdings Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $227.55 which suggests that it could grow by 38.2%. Given that Futu Holdings Ltd. has higher upside potential than BOC Hong Kong (Holdings) Ltd., analysts believe Futu Holdings Ltd. is more attractive than BOC Hong Kong (Holdings) Ltd..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    BHKLY
    BOC Hong Kong (Holdings) Ltd.
    0 0 0
    FUTU
    Futu Holdings Ltd.
    13 1 0
  • Is BHKLY or FUTU More Risky?

    BOC Hong Kong (Holdings) Ltd. has a beta of -0.147, which suggesting that the stock is 114.727% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Futu Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.187, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 81.272%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock BHKLY or FUTU?

    BOC Hong Kong (Holdings) Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.75 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.92%. Futu Holdings Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $2.00 per share. BOC Hong Kong (Holdings) Ltd. pays 54.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Futu Holdings Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. BOC Hong Kong (Holdings) Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios BHKLY or FUTU?

    BOC Hong Kong (Holdings) Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Futu Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues of $824M. BOC Hong Kong (Holdings) Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Futu Holdings Ltd.'s net income of $414M. Notably, BOC Hong Kong (Holdings) Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 10.09x while Futu Holdings Ltd.'s PE ratio is 18.40x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BOC Hong Kong (Holdings) Ltd. is 2.41x versus 8.66x for Futu Holdings Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    BHKLY
    BOC Hong Kong (Holdings) Ltd.
    2.41x 10.09x -- --
    FUTU
    Futu Holdings Ltd.
    8.66x 18.40x $824M $414M
  • Which has Higher Returns BHKLY or MATH?

    Metalpha Technology Holding Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to BOC Hong Kong (Holdings) Ltd.'s net margin of --. BOC Hong Kong (Holdings) Ltd.'s return on equity of 11.52% beat Metalpha Technology Holding Ltd.'s return on equity of -30.78%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    BHKLY
    BOC Hong Kong (Holdings) Ltd.
    -- -- $54.2B
    MATH
    Metalpha Technology Holding Ltd.
    -- -- $21.9M
  • What do Analysts Say About BHKLY or MATH?

    BOC Hong Kong (Holdings) Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Metalpha Technology Holding Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that BOC Hong Kong (Holdings) Ltd. has higher upside potential than Metalpha Technology Holding Ltd., analysts believe BOC Hong Kong (Holdings) Ltd. is more attractive than Metalpha Technology Holding Ltd..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    BHKLY
    BOC Hong Kong (Holdings) Ltd.
    0 0 0
    MATH
    Metalpha Technology Holding Ltd.
    0 0 0
  • Is BHKLY or MATH More Risky?

    BOC Hong Kong (Holdings) Ltd. has a beta of -0.147, which suggesting that the stock is 114.727% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Metalpha Technology Holding Ltd. has a beta of -0.974, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 197.426%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock BHKLY or MATH?

    BOC Hong Kong (Holdings) Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.75 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.92%. Metalpha Technology Holding Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. BOC Hong Kong (Holdings) Ltd. pays 54.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Metalpha Technology Holding Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. BOC Hong Kong (Holdings) Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios BHKLY or MATH?

    BOC Hong Kong (Holdings) Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Metalpha Technology Holding Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. BOC Hong Kong (Holdings) Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Metalpha Technology Holding Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, BOC Hong Kong (Holdings) Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 10.09x while Metalpha Technology Holding Ltd.'s PE ratio is 8.95x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BOC Hong Kong (Holdings) Ltd. is 2.41x versus 2.44x for Metalpha Technology Holding Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    BHKLY
    BOC Hong Kong (Holdings) Ltd.
    2.41x 10.09x -- --
    MATH
    Metalpha Technology Holding Ltd.
    2.44x 8.95x -- --
  • Which has Higher Returns BHKLY or MEGL?

    Magic Empire Global Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to BOC Hong Kong (Holdings) Ltd.'s net margin of --. BOC Hong Kong (Holdings) Ltd.'s return on equity of 11.52% beat Magic Empire Global Ltd.'s return on equity of -0.43%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    BHKLY
    BOC Hong Kong (Holdings) Ltd.
    -- -- $54.2B
    MEGL
    Magic Empire Global Ltd.
    -- -- $17.3M
  • What do Analysts Say About BHKLY or MEGL?

    BOC Hong Kong (Holdings) Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Magic Empire Global Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that BOC Hong Kong (Holdings) Ltd. has higher upside potential than Magic Empire Global Ltd., analysts believe BOC Hong Kong (Holdings) Ltd. is more attractive than Magic Empire Global Ltd..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    BHKLY
    BOC Hong Kong (Holdings) Ltd.
    0 0 0
    MEGL
    Magic Empire Global Ltd.
    0 0 0
  • Is BHKLY or MEGL More Risky?

    BOC Hong Kong (Holdings) Ltd. has a beta of -0.147, which suggesting that the stock is 114.727% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Magic Empire Global Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock BHKLY or MEGL?

    BOC Hong Kong (Holdings) Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.75 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.92%. Magic Empire Global Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. BOC Hong Kong (Holdings) Ltd. pays 54.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Magic Empire Global Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. BOC Hong Kong (Holdings) Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios BHKLY or MEGL?

    BOC Hong Kong (Holdings) Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Magic Empire Global Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. BOC Hong Kong (Holdings) Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Magic Empire Global Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, BOC Hong Kong (Holdings) Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 10.09x while Magic Empire Global Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BOC Hong Kong (Holdings) Ltd. is 2.41x versus 4.61x for Magic Empire Global Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    BHKLY
    BOC Hong Kong (Holdings) Ltd.
    2.41x 10.09x -- --
    MEGL
    Magic Empire Global Ltd.
    4.61x -- -- --
  • Which has Higher Returns BHKLY or TROO?

    TROOPS, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to BOC Hong Kong (Holdings) Ltd.'s net margin of --. BOC Hong Kong (Holdings) Ltd.'s return on equity of 11.52% beat TROOPS, Inc.'s return on equity of -3.38%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    BHKLY
    BOC Hong Kong (Holdings) Ltd.
    -- -- $54.2B
    TROO
    TROOPS, Inc.
    -- -- $72.6M
  • What do Analysts Say About BHKLY or TROO?

    BOC Hong Kong (Holdings) Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand TROOPS, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that BOC Hong Kong (Holdings) Ltd. has higher upside potential than TROOPS, Inc., analysts believe BOC Hong Kong (Holdings) Ltd. is more attractive than TROOPS, Inc..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    BHKLY
    BOC Hong Kong (Holdings) Ltd.
    0 0 0
    TROO
    TROOPS, Inc.
    0 0 0
  • Is BHKLY or TROO More Risky?

    BOC Hong Kong (Holdings) Ltd. has a beta of -0.147, which suggesting that the stock is 114.727% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison TROOPS, Inc. has a beta of 3.051, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 205.095%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock BHKLY or TROO?

    BOC Hong Kong (Holdings) Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.75 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.92%. TROOPS, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. BOC Hong Kong (Holdings) Ltd. pays 54.34% of its earnings as a dividend. TROOPS, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. BOC Hong Kong (Holdings) Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios BHKLY or TROO?

    BOC Hong Kong (Holdings) Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than TROOPS, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. BOC Hong Kong (Holdings) Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than TROOPS, Inc.'s net income of --. Notably, BOC Hong Kong (Holdings) Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 10.09x while TROOPS, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BOC Hong Kong (Holdings) Ltd. is 2.41x versus 13.76x for TROOPS, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    BHKLY
    BOC Hong Kong (Holdings) Ltd.
    2.41x 10.09x -- --
    TROO
    TROOPS, Inc.
    13.76x -- -- --

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

Is Bloom Energy The Best Stock to Buy Now?
Is Bloom Energy The Best Stock to Buy Now?

Shares of energy startup Bloom Energy (NYSE:BE) have advanced by…

Is Berkshire Hathaway Stock Undervalued?
Is Berkshire Hathaway Stock Undervalued?

Berkshire Hathaway (NYSE:BRK.A,BRK.B) has undershot the market this year, returning…

Is Oracle Stock Undervalued?
Is Oracle Stock Undervalued?

Shares of Oracle (NYSE:ORCL) rocketed higher earlier this year when…

Stock Ideas

Buy
54
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $4.4T
P/E Ratio: 62x

Buy
53
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 37x

Buy
57
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.7T
P/E Ratio: 38x

Alerts

Sell
1
LW alert for Dec 20

Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. [LW] is down 25.96% over the past day.

Buy
54
BMRN alert for Dec 20

BioMarin Pharmaceutical, Inc. [BMRN] is up 17.79% over the past day.

Buy
82
RKLB alert for Dec 20

Rocket Lab Corp. [RKLB] is up 17.72% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock