Financhill
Buy
84

ATZAF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$85.11
Seasonality move :
-0.87%
Day range:
$84.50 - $85.79
52-week range:
$25.48 - $86.66
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
49.79x
P/S ratio:
4.53x
P/B ratio:
11.19x
Volume:
15.9K
Avg. volume:
36.6K
1-year change:
129.96%
Market cap:
$9.8B
Revenue:
$2B
EPS (TTM):
$1.71

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
ATZAF
Aritzia, Inc.
$666.1M $0.62 15.41% 4.78% --
BGI
Birks Group, Inc.
-- -- -- -- --
FLWS
1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc.
$217.8M -$0.64 -9.66% -14.05% $6.00
LULU
lululemon athletica, Inc.
$2.5B $2.22 -1.06% -20.78% $207.11
ODP
The ODP Corp.
$1.7B $0.80 -3.45% 75.59% $31.50
TSCO
Tractor Supply Co.
$3.7B $0.48 6.85% 7.9% $63.15
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
ATZAF
Aritzia, Inc.
$85.11 -- $9.8B 49.79x $0.00 0% 4.53x
BGI
Birks Group, Inc.
$0.92 -- $18M -- $0.00 0% 0.13x
FLWS
1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc.
$4.13 $6.00 $262.9M -- $0.00 0% 0.16x
LULU
lululemon athletica, Inc.
$210.40 $207.11 $24.7B 14.68x $0.00 0% 2.29x
ODP
The ODP Corp.
$28.00 $31.50 $843.3M 300.11x $0.00 0% 0.13x
TSCO
Tractor Supply Co.
$51.65 $63.15 $27.3B 24.93x $0.23 1.78% 1.79x
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
ATZAF
Aritzia, Inc.
45.48% 3.327 10.57% 0.55x
BGI
Birks Group, Inc.
109.08% 1.323 -- 0.06x
FLWS
1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc.
63.27% 0.328 127.91% 0.14x
LULU
lululemon athletica, Inc.
28.14% 0.561 8.72% 0.70x
ODP
The ODP Corp.
48.95% 3.450 94.06% 0.43x
TSCO
Tractor Supply Co.
68.98% 0.357 19.02% 0.07x
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
ATZAF
Aritzia, Inc.
$253.2M $66.5M 14.2% 26.65% 11.24% $56.5M
BGI
Birks Group, Inc.
-- -- -7.15% -- -- --
FLWS
1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc.
$63.9M -$50.5M -33.28% -63.15% -23.47% -$145.6M
LULU
lululemon athletica, Inc.
$1.4B $444.7M 29.2% 40.5% 17.33% $82.4M
ODP
The ODP Corp.
$331M $38M 0.27% 0.62% 2.34% $78M
TSCO
Tractor Supply Co.
$1.3B $342.7M 13.93% 46.58% 9.22% $30.3M

Aritzia, Inc. vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns ATZAF or BGI?

    Birks Group, Inc. has a net margin of 8.17% compared to Aritzia, Inc.'s net margin of --. Aritzia, Inc.'s return on equity of 26.65% beat Birks Group, Inc.'s return on equity of --.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    ATZAF
    Aritzia, Inc.
    42.78% $0.41 $1.6B
    BGI
    Birks Group, Inc.
    -- -- $67M
  • What do Analysts Say About ATZAF or BGI?

    Aritzia, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -80.75%. On the other hand Birks Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Aritzia, Inc. has higher upside potential than Birks Group, Inc., analysts believe Aritzia, Inc. is more attractive than Birks Group, Inc..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    ATZAF
    Aritzia, Inc.
    9 1 0
    BGI
    Birks Group, Inc.
    0 0 0
  • Is ATZAF or BGI More Risky?

    Aritzia, Inc. has a beta of 1.508, which suggesting that the stock is 50.761% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Birks Group, Inc. has a beta of 0.265, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 73.514%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock ATZAF or BGI?

    Aritzia, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Birks Group, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Aritzia, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Birks Group, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios ATZAF or BGI?

    Aritzia, Inc. quarterly revenues are $591.9M, which are larger than Birks Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Aritzia, Inc.'s net income of $48.3M is higher than Birks Group, Inc.'s net income of --. Notably, Aritzia, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 49.79x while Birks Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Aritzia, Inc. is 4.53x versus 0.13x for Birks Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    ATZAF
    Aritzia, Inc.
    4.53x 49.79x $591.9M $48.3M
    BGI
    Birks Group, Inc.
    0.13x -- -- --
  • Which has Higher Returns ATZAF or FLWS?

    1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc. has a net margin of 8.17% compared to Aritzia, Inc.'s net margin of -24.61%. Aritzia, Inc.'s return on equity of 26.65% beat 1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc.'s return on equity of -63.15%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    ATZAF
    Aritzia, Inc.
    42.78% $0.41 $1.6B
    FLWS
    1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc.
    29.68% -$0.83 $592.1M
  • What do Analysts Say About ATZAF or FLWS?

    Aritzia, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -80.75%. On the other hand 1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $6.00 which suggests that it could grow by 45.28%. Given that 1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc. has higher upside potential than Aritzia, Inc., analysts believe 1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc. is more attractive than Aritzia, Inc..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    ATZAF
    Aritzia, Inc.
    9 1 0
    FLWS
    1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc.
    0 1 0
  • Is ATZAF or FLWS More Risky?

    Aritzia, Inc. has a beta of 1.508, which suggesting that the stock is 50.761% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison 1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc. has a beta of 1.172, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.248%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock ATZAF or FLWS?

    Aritzia, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. 1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Aritzia, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. 1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios ATZAF or FLWS?

    Aritzia, Inc. quarterly revenues are $591.9M, which are larger than 1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc. quarterly revenues of $215.2M. Aritzia, Inc.'s net income of $48.3M is higher than 1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc.'s net income of -$53M. Notably, Aritzia, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 49.79x while 1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Aritzia, Inc. is 4.53x versus 0.16x for 1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    ATZAF
    Aritzia, Inc.
    4.53x 49.79x $591.9M $48.3M
    FLWS
    1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc.
    0.16x -- $215.2M -$53M
  • Which has Higher Returns ATZAF or LULU?

    lululemon athletica, Inc. has a net margin of 8.17% compared to Aritzia, Inc.'s net margin of 11.96%. Aritzia, Inc.'s return on equity of 26.65% beat lululemon athletica, Inc.'s return on equity of 40.5%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    ATZAF
    Aritzia, Inc.
    42.78% $0.41 $1.6B
    LULU
    lululemon athletica, Inc.
    55.5% $2.59 $6.3B
  • What do Analysts Say About ATZAF or LULU?

    Aritzia, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -80.75%. On the other hand lululemon athletica, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $207.11 which suggests that it could fall by -1.56%. Given that Aritzia, Inc. has more downside risk than lululemon athletica, Inc., analysts believe lululemon athletica, Inc. is more attractive than Aritzia, Inc..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    ATZAF
    Aritzia, Inc.
    9 1 0
    LULU
    lululemon athletica, Inc.
    2 29 1
  • Is ATZAF or LULU More Risky?

    Aritzia, Inc. has a beta of 1.508, which suggesting that the stock is 50.761% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison lululemon athletica, Inc. has a beta of 1.011, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.107%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock ATZAF or LULU?

    Aritzia, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. lululemon athletica, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Aritzia, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. lululemon athletica, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios ATZAF or LULU?

    Aritzia, Inc. quarterly revenues are $591.9M, which are smaller than lululemon athletica, Inc. quarterly revenues of $2.6B. Aritzia, Inc.'s net income of $48.3M is lower than lululemon athletica, Inc.'s net income of $306.8M. Notably, Aritzia, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 49.79x while lululemon athletica, Inc.'s PE ratio is 14.68x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Aritzia, Inc. is 4.53x versus 2.29x for lululemon athletica, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    ATZAF
    Aritzia, Inc.
    4.53x 49.79x $591.9M $48.3M
    LULU
    lululemon athletica, Inc.
    2.29x 14.68x $2.6B $306.8M
  • Which has Higher Returns ATZAF or ODP?

    The ODP Corp. has a net margin of 8.17% compared to Aritzia, Inc.'s net margin of 1.42%. Aritzia, Inc.'s return on equity of 26.65% beat The ODP Corp.'s return on equity of 0.62%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    ATZAF
    Aritzia, Inc.
    42.78% $0.41 $1.6B
    ODP
    The ODP Corp.
    20.37% $0.77 $1.6B
  • What do Analysts Say About ATZAF or ODP?

    Aritzia, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -80.75%. On the other hand The ODP Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $31.50 which suggests that it could grow by 12.5%. Given that The ODP Corp. has higher upside potential than Aritzia, Inc., analysts believe The ODP Corp. is more attractive than Aritzia, Inc..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    ATZAF
    Aritzia, Inc.
    9 1 0
    ODP
    The ODP Corp.
    0 1 0
  • Is ATZAF or ODP More Risky?

    Aritzia, Inc. has a beta of 1.508, which suggesting that the stock is 50.761% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The ODP Corp. has a beta of 1.153, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.282%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock ATZAF or ODP?

    Aritzia, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. The ODP Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Aritzia, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. The ODP Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios ATZAF or ODP?

    Aritzia, Inc. quarterly revenues are $591.9M, which are smaller than The ODP Corp. quarterly revenues of $1.6B. Aritzia, Inc.'s net income of $48.3M is higher than The ODP Corp.'s net income of $23M. Notably, Aritzia, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 49.79x while The ODP Corp.'s PE ratio is 300.11x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Aritzia, Inc. is 4.53x versus 0.13x for The ODP Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    ATZAF
    Aritzia, Inc.
    4.53x 49.79x $591.9M $48.3M
    ODP
    The ODP Corp.
    0.13x 300.11x $1.6B $23M
  • Which has Higher Returns ATZAF or TSCO?

    Tractor Supply Co. has a net margin of 8.17% compared to Aritzia, Inc.'s net margin of 6.97%. Aritzia, Inc.'s return on equity of 26.65% beat Tractor Supply Co.'s return on equity of 46.58%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    ATZAF
    Aritzia, Inc.
    42.78% $0.41 $1.6B
    TSCO
    Tractor Supply Co.
    34.02% $0.49 $8.3B
  • What do Analysts Say About ATZAF or TSCO?

    Aritzia, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -80.75%. On the other hand Tractor Supply Co. has an analysts' consensus of $63.15 which suggests that it could grow by 22.26%. Given that Tractor Supply Co. has higher upside potential than Aritzia, Inc., analysts believe Tractor Supply Co. is more attractive than Aritzia, Inc..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    ATZAF
    Aritzia, Inc.
    9 1 0
    TSCO
    Tractor Supply Co.
    15 11 0
  • Is ATZAF or TSCO More Risky?

    Aritzia, Inc. has a beta of 1.508, which suggesting that the stock is 50.761% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tractor Supply Co. has a beta of 0.723, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.659%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock ATZAF or TSCO?

    Aritzia, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Tractor Supply Co. offers a yield of 1.78% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share. Aritzia, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tractor Supply Co. pays out 43.13% of its earnings as a dividend. Tractor Supply Co.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios ATZAF or TSCO?

    Aritzia, Inc. quarterly revenues are $591.9M, which are smaller than Tractor Supply Co. quarterly revenues of $3.7B. Aritzia, Inc.'s net income of $48.3M is lower than Tractor Supply Co.'s net income of $259.3M. Notably, Aritzia, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 49.79x while Tractor Supply Co.'s PE ratio is 24.93x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Aritzia, Inc. is 4.53x versus 1.79x for Tractor Supply Co.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    ATZAF
    Aritzia, Inc.
    4.53x 49.79x $591.9M $48.3M
    TSCO
    Tractor Supply Co.
    1.79x 24.93x $3.7B $259.3M

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

Is DocuSign Stock Undervalued?
Is DocuSign Stock Undervalued?

Digital signature software business DocuSign (NASDAQ:DOCU) has been struggling over…

Is SentinelOne Stock Undervalued?
Is SentinelOne Stock Undervalued?

Cybersecurity major SentinelOne (NYSE:S) has struggled over several years, delivering…

Is Broadcom Stock on Sale?
Is Broadcom Stock on Sale?

Chip and software maker Broadcom (NASDAQ:AVGO) has been among the…

Stock Ideas

Buy
57
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $4.6T
P/E Ratio: 64x

Buy
55
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 37x

Buy
61
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 39x

Alerts

Buy
80
TVTX alert for Dec 25

Travere Therapeutics, Inc. [TVTX] is up 14.03% over the past day.

Buy
68
KOD alert for Dec 25

Kodiak Sciences, Inc. [KOD] is up 13.41% over the past day.

Buy
56
ZCSH alert for Dec 25

Grayscale Zcash Trust (ZEC) [ZCSH] is up 5.33% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock