VMAR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Columbia Sportswear Co. has a net margin of -2502.32% compared to Vision Marine Technologies, Inc.'s net margin of 5.51%. Vision Marine Technologies, Inc.'s return on equity of -141.95% beat Columbia Sportswear Co.'s return on equity of 10.87%.

Vision Marine Technologies, Inc. has a consensus price target of $11.01, signalling upside risk potential of 1008.97%. On the other hand Columbia Sportswear Co. has an analysts' consensus of $57.57 which suggests that it could grow by 5.62%. Given that Vision Marine Technologies, Inc. has higher upside potential than Columbia Sportswear Co., analysts believe Vision Marine Technologies, Inc. is more attractive than Columbia Sportswear Co..

Vision Marine Technologies, Inc. has a beta of 0.226, which suggesting that the stock is 77.366% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Columbia Sportswear Co. has a beta of 0.919, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.058%.

Vision Marine Technologies, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Columbia Sportswear Co. offers a yield of 2.2% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share. Vision Marine Technologies, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Columbia Sportswear Co. pays out 31.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Columbia Sportswear Co.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Vision Marine Technologies, Inc. quarterly revenues are $203K, which are smaller than Columbia Sportswear Co. quarterly revenues of $943.2M. Vision Marine Technologies, Inc.'s net income of -$5.1M is lower than Columbia Sportswear Co.'s net income of $52M. Notably, Vision Marine Technologies, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Columbia Sportswear Co.'s PE ratio is 16.40x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Vision Marine Technologies, Inc. is 0.09x versus 0.88x for Columbia Sportswear Co.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Crocs, Inc. has a net margin of -2502.32% compared to Vision Marine Technologies, Inc.'s net margin of 14.64%. Vision Marine Technologies, Inc.'s return on equity of -141.95% beat Crocs, Inc.'s return on equity of 10.98%.

Vision Marine Technologies, Inc. has a consensus price target of $11.01, signalling upside risk potential of 1008.97%. On the other hand Crocs, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $89.50 which suggests that it could grow by 1.43%. Given that Vision Marine Technologies, Inc. has higher upside potential than Crocs, Inc., analysts believe Vision Marine Technologies, Inc. is more attractive than Crocs, Inc..

Vision Marine Technologies, Inc. has a beta of 0.226, which suggesting that the stock is 77.366% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Crocs, Inc. has a beta of 1.540, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 53.972%.

Vision Marine Technologies, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Crocs, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Vision Marine Technologies, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Crocs, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Vision Marine Technologies, Inc. quarterly revenues are $203K, which are smaller than Crocs, Inc. quarterly revenues of $996.3M. Vision Marine Technologies, Inc.'s net income of -$5.1M is lower than Crocs, Inc.'s net income of $145.8M. Notably, Vision Marine Technologies, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Crocs, Inc.'s PE ratio is 28.77x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Vision Marine Technologies, Inc. is 0.09x versus 1.21x for Crocs, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

lululemon athletica, Inc. has a net margin of -2502.32% compared to Vision Marine Technologies, Inc.'s net margin of 14.69%. Vision Marine Technologies, Inc.'s return on equity of -141.95% beat lululemon athletica, Inc.'s return on equity of 42.48%.

Vision Marine Technologies, Inc. has a consensus price target of $11.01, signalling upside risk potential of 1008.97%. On the other hand lululemon athletica, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $190.19 which suggests that it could grow by 3.48%. Given that Vision Marine Technologies, Inc. has higher upside potential than lululemon athletica, Inc., analysts believe Vision Marine Technologies, Inc. is more attractive than lululemon athletica, Inc..

Vision Marine Technologies, Inc. has a beta of 0.226, which suggesting that the stock is 77.366% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison lululemon athletica, Inc. has a beta of 1.011, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.107%.

Vision Marine Technologies, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. lululemon athletica, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Vision Marine Technologies, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. lululemon athletica, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Vision Marine Technologies, Inc. quarterly revenues are $203K, which are smaller than lululemon athletica, Inc. quarterly revenues of $2.5B. Vision Marine Technologies, Inc.'s net income of -$5.1M is lower than lululemon athletica, Inc.'s net income of $370.9M. Notably, Vision Marine Technologies, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while lululemon athletica, Inc.'s PE ratio is 12.57x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Vision Marine Technologies, Inc. is 0.09x versus 2.05x for lululemon athletica, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Perfect Moment Ltd. has a net margin of -2502.32% compared to Vision Marine Technologies, Inc.'s net margin of -38.63%. Vision Marine Technologies, Inc.'s return on equity of -141.95% beat Perfect Moment Ltd.'s return on equity of -1043.59%.

Vision Marine Technologies, Inc. has a consensus price target of $11.01, signalling upside risk potential of 1008.97%. On the other hand Perfect Moment Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $3.75 which suggests that it could grow by 713.45%. Given that Vision Marine Technologies, Inc. has higher upside potential than Perfect Moment Ltd., analysts believe Vision Marine Technologies, Inc. is more attractive than Perfect Moment Ltd..

Vision Marine Technologies, Inc. has a beta of 0.226, which suggesting that the stock is 77.366% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Perfect Moment Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Vision Marine Technologies, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Perfect Moment Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Vision Marine Technologies, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Perfect Moment Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Vision Marine Technologies, Inc. quarterly revenues are $203K, which are smaller than Perfect Moment Ltd. quarterly revenues of $4.8M. Vision Marine Technologies, Inc.'s net income of -$5.1M is lower than Perfect Moment Ltd.'s net income of -$1.8M. Notably, Vision Marine Technologies, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Perfect Moment Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Vision Marine Technologies, Inc. is 0.09x versus 0.44x for Perfect Moment Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.