BC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Levi Strauss & Co. has a net margin of -17.23% compared to Brunswick Corp.'s net margin of 7.91%. Brunswick Corp.'s return on equity of -12.09% beat Levi Strauss & Co.'s return on equity of 25.88%.

Brunswick Corp. has a consensus price target of $74.53, signalling upside risk potential of 6.89%. On the other hand Levi Strauss & Co. has an analysts' consensus of $27.31 which suggests that it could grow by 20.71%. Given that Levi Strauss & Co. has higher upside potential than Brunswick Corp., analysts believe Levi Strauss & Co. is more attractive than Brunswick Corp..

Brunswick Corp. has a beta of 1.369, which suggesting that the stock is 36.926% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Levi Strauss & Co. has a beta of 1.337, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.744%.

Brunswick Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.43 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.47%. Levi Strauss & Co. offers a yield of 2.43% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share. Brunswick Corp. pays 87.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Levi Strauss & Co. pays out 95.53% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Brunswick Corp. quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are smaller than Levi Strauss & Co. quarterly revenues of $1.5B. Brunswick Corp.'s net income of -$234.3M is lower than Levi Strauss & Co.'s net income of $122M. Notably, Brunswick Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 111.70x while Levi Strauss & Co.'s PE ratio is 19.15x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Brunswick Corp. is 0.89x versus 1.40x for Levi Strauss & Co.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Malibu Boats, Inc. has a net margin of -17.23% compared to Brunswick Corp.'s net margin of -0.37%. Brunswick Corp.'s return on equity of -12.09% beat Malibu Boats, Inc.'s return on equity of 3.79%.

Brunswick Corp. has a consensus price target of $74.53, signalling upside risk potential of 6.89%. On the other hand Malibu Boats, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $35.21 which suggests that it could grow by 27.63%. Given that Malibu Boats, Inc. has higher upside potential than Brunswick Corp., analysts believe Malibu Boats, Inc. is more attractive than Brunswick Corp..

Brunswick Corp. has a beta of 1.369, which suggesting that the stock is 36.926% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Malibu Boats, Inc. has a beta of 1.201, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.142%.

Brunswick Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.43 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.47%. Malibu Boats, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Brunswick Corp. pays 87.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Malibu Boats, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Brunswick Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Brunswick Corp. quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are larger than Malibu Boats, Inc. quarterly revenues of $194.7M. Brunswick Corp.'s net income of -$234.3M is lower than Malibu Boats, Inc.'s net income of -$710K. Notably, Brunswick Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 111.70x while Malibu Boats, Inc.'s PE ratio is 28.07x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Brunswick Corp. is 0.89x versus 0.65x for Malibu Boats, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Mastercraft Boat Holdings, Inc. has a net margin of -17.23% compared to Brunswick Corp.'s net margin of 5.3%. Brunswick Corp.'s return on equity of -12.09% beat Mastercraft Boat Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 7.37%.

Brunswick Corp. has a consensus price target of $74.53, signalling upside risk potential of 6.89%. On the other hand Mastercraft Boat Holdings, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $23.25 which suggests that it could grow by 25.07%. Given that Mastercraft Boat Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than Brunswick Corp., analysts believe Mastercraft Boat Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than Brunswick Corp..

Brunswick Corp. has a beta of 1.369, which suggesting that the stock is 36.926% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mastercraft Boat Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 1.089, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.907%.

Brunswick Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.43 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.47%. Mastercraft Boat Holdings, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Brunswick Corp. pays 87.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Mastercraft Boat Holdings, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Brunswick Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Brunswick Corp. quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are larger than Mastercraft Boat Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues of $69M. Brunswick Corp.'s net income of -$234.3M is lower than Mastercraft Boat Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $3.7M. Notably, Brunswick Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 111.70x while Mastercraft Boat Holdings, Inc.'s PE ratio is 29.47x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Brunswick Corp. is 0.89x versus 1.06x for Mastercraft Boat Holdings, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Perfect Moment Ltd. has a net margin of -17.23% compared to Brunswick Corp.'s net margin of -38.63%. Brunswick Corp.'s return on equity of -12.09% beat Perfect Moment Ltd.'s return on equity of -1043.59%.

Brunswick Corp. has a consensus price target of $74.53, signalling upside risk potential of 6.89%. On the other hand Perfect Moment Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $3.75 which suggests that it could grow by 713.45%. Given that Perfect Moment Ltd. has higher upside potential than Brunswick Corp., analysts believe Perfect Moment Ltd. is more attractive than Brunswick Corp..

Brunswick Corp. has a beta of 1.369, which suggesting that the stock is 36.926% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Perfect Moment Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Brunswick Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.43 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.47%. Perfect Moment Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Brunswick Corp. pays 87.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Perfect Moment Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Brunswick Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Brunswick Corp. quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are larger than Perfect Moment Ltd. quarterly revenues of $4.8M. Brunswick Corp.'s net income of -$234.3M is lower than Perfect Moment Ltd.'s net income of -$1.8M. Notably, Brunswick Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 111.70x while Perfect Moment Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Brunswick Corp. is 0.89x versus 0.44x for Perfect Moment Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.