BC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Malibu Boats, Inc. has a net margin of 1.4% compared to Brunswick Corp.'s net margin of -0.37%. Brunswick Corp.'s return on equity of -7.61% beat Malibu Boats, Inc.'s return on equity of 3.79%.

Brunswick Corp. has a consensus price target of $82.24, signalling upside risk potential of 2%. On the other hand Malibu Boats, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $34.83 which suggests that it could grow by 8.08%. Given that Malibu Boats, Inc. has higher upside potential than Brunswick Corp., analysts believe Malibu Boats, Inc. is more attractive than Brunswick Corp..

Brunswick Corp. has a beta of 1.359, which suggesting that the stock is 35.948% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Malibu Boats, Inc. has a beta of 1.183, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.34%.

Brunswick Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.43 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.13%. Malibu Boats, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Brunswick Corp. pays 87.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Malibu Boats, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Brunswick Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Brunswick Corp. quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are larger than Malibu Boats, Inc. quarterly revenues of $194.7M. Brunswick Corp.'s net income of $18.6M is higher than Malibu Boats, Inc.'s net income of -$710K. Notably, Brunswick Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 111.70x while Malibu Boats, Inc.'s PE ratio is 32.79x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Brunswick Corp. is 0.99x versus 0.76x for Malibu Boats, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Mastercraft Boat Holdings, Inc. has a net margin of 1.4% compared to Brunswick Corp.'s net margin of 5.3%. Brunswick Corp.'s return on equity of -7.61% beat Mastercraft Boat Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 7.37%.

Brunswick Corp. has a consensus price target of $82.24, signalling upside risk potential of 2%. On the other hand Mastercraft Boat Holdings, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $22.80 which suggests that it could grow by 8.47%. Given that Mastercraft Boat Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than Brunswick Corp., analysts believe Mastercraft Boat Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than Brunswick Corp..

Brunswick Corp. has a beta of 1.359, which suggesting that the stock is 35.948% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mastercraft Boat Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 1.058, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.846%.

Brunswick Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.43 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.13%. Mastercraft Boat Holdings, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Brunswick Corp. pays 87.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Mastercraft Boat Holdings, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Brunswick Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Brunswick Corp. quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are larger than Mastercraft Boat Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues of $69M. Brunswick Corp.'s net income of $18.6M is higher than Mastercraft Boat Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $3.7M. Notably, Brunswick Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 111.70x while Mastercraft Boat Holdings, Inc.'s PE ratio is 33.32x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Brunswick Corp. is 0.99x versus 1.20x for Mastercraft Boat Holdings, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Marine Products Corp. has a net margin of 1.4% compared to Brunswick Corp.'s net margin of 4.75%. Brunswick Corp.'s return on equity of -7.61% beat Marine Products Corp.'s return on equity of 10%.

Brunswick Corp. has a consensus price target of $82.24, signalling upside risk potential of 2%. On the other hand Marine Products Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $8.00 which suggests that it could fall by -17.18%. Given that Brunswick Corp. has higher upside potential than Marine Products Corp., analysts believe Brunswick Corp. is more attractive than Marine Products Corp..

Brunswick Corp. has a beta of 1.359, which suggesting that the stock is 35.948% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Marine Products Corp. has a beta of 1.074, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.41%.

Brunswick Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.43 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.13%. Marine Products Corp. offers a yield of 5.8% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share. Brunswick Corp. pays 87.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Marine Products Corp. pays out 113.09% of its earnings as a dividend. Brunswick Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Marine Products Corp.'s is not.

Brunswick Corp. quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are larger than Marine Products Corp. quarterly revenues of $53.1M. Brunswick Corp.'s net income of $18.6M is higher than Marine Products Corp.'s net income of $2.5M. Notably, Brunswick Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 111.70x while Marine Products Corp.'s PE ratio is 26.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Brunswick Corp. is 0.99x versus 1.45x for Marine Products Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Peloton Interactive, Inc. has a net margin of 1.4% compared to Brunswick Corp.'s net margin of 2.52%. Brunswick Corp.'s return on equity of -7.61% beat Peloton Interactive, Inc.'s return on equity of --.

Brunswick Corp. has a consensus price target of $82.24, signalling upside risk potential of 2%. On the other hand Peloton Interactive, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $10.37 which suggests that it could grow by 80.9%. Given that Peloton Interactive, Inc. has higher upside potential than Brunswick Corp., analysts believe Peloton Interactive, Inc. is more attractive than Brunswick Corp..

Brunswick Corp. has a beta of 1.359, which suggesting that the stock is 35.948% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Peloton Interactive, Inc. has a beta of 2.403, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 140.269%.

Brunswick Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.43 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.13%. Peloton Interactive, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Brunswick Corp. pays 87.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Peloton Interactive, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Brunswick Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Brunswick Corp. quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are larger than Peloton Interactive, Inc. quarterly revenues of $550.8M. Brunswick Corp.'s net income of $18.6M is higher than Peloton Interactive, Inc.'s net income of $13.9M. Notably, Brunswick Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 111.70x while Peloton Interactive, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Brunswick Corp. is 0.99x versus 0.94x for Peloton Interactive, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.