BC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Malibu Boats, Inc. has a net margin of -17.23% compared to Brunswick Corp.'s net margin of -0.37%. Brunswick Corp.'s return on equity of -12.09% beat Malibu Boats, Inc.'s return on equity of 3.79%.

Brunswick Corp. has a consensus price target of $75.41, signalling downside risk potential of -0.45%. On the other hand Malibu Boats, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $35.17 which suggests that it could grow by 20.93%. Given that Malibu Boats, Inc. has higher upside potential than Brunswick Corp., analysts believe Malibu Boats, Inc. is more attractive than Brunswick Corp..

Brunswick Corp. has a beta of 1.369, which suggesting that the stock is 36.926% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Malibu Boats, Inc. has a beta of 1.201, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.142%.

Brunswick Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.43 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.26%. Malibu Boats, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Brunswick Corp. pays 87.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Malibu Boats, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Brunswick Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Brunswick Corp. quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are larger than Malibu Boats, Inc. quarterly revenues of $194.7M. Brunswick Corp.'s net income of -$234.3M is lower than Malibu Boats, Inc.'s net income of -$710K. Notably, Brunswick Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 111.70x while Malibu Boats, Inc.'s PE ratio is 29.59x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Brunswick Corp. is 0.97x versus 0.68x for Malibu Boats, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Mastercraft Boat Holdings, Inc. has a net margin of -17.23% compared to Brunswick Corp.'s net margin of 5.3%. Brunswick Corp.'s return on equity of -12.09% beat Mastercraft Boat Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 7.37%.

Brunswick Corp. has a consensus price target of $75.41, signalling downside risk potential of -0.45%. On the other hand Mastercraft Boat Holdings, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $22.80 which suggests that it could grow by 17.04%. Given that Mastercraft Boat Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than Brunswick Corp., analysts believe Mastercraft Boat Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than Brunswick Corp..

Brunswick Corp. has a beta of 1.369, which suggesting that the stock is 36.926% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mastercraft Boat Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 1.089, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.907%.

Brunswick Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.43 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.26%. Mastercraft Boat Holdings, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Brunswick Corp. pays 87.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Mastercraft Boat Holdings, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Brunswick Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Brunswick Corp. quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are larger than Mastercraft Boat Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues of $69M. Brunswick Corp.'s net income of -$234.3M is lower than Mastercraft Boat Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $3.7M. Notably, Brunswick Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 111.70x while Mastercraft Boat Holdings, Inc.'s PE ratio is 30.88x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Brunswick Corp. is 0.97x versus 1.11x for Mastercraft Boat Holdings, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Marine Products Corp. has a net margin of -17.23% compared to Brunswick Corp.'s net margin of 4.75%. Brunswick Corp.'s return on equity of -12.09% beat Marine Products Corp.'s return on equity of 10%.

Brunswick Corp. has a consensus price target of $75.41, signalling downside risk potential of -0.45%. On the other hand Marine Products Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $8.00 which suggests that it could fall by -12.09%. Given that Marine Products Corp. has more downside risk than Brunswick Corp., analysts believe Brunswick Corp. is more attractive than Marine Products Corp..

Brunswick Corp. has a beta of 1.369, which suggesting that the stock is 36.926% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Marine Products Corp. has a beta of 1.060, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.96%.

Brunswick Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.43 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.26%. Marine Products Corp. offers a yield of 6.15% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share. Brunswick Corp. pays 87.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Marine Products Corp. pays out 113.09% of its earnings as a dividend. Brunswick Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Marine Products Corp.'s is not.

Brunswick Corp. quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are larger than Marine Products Corp. quarterly revenues of $53.1M. Brunswick Corp.'s net income of -$234.3M is lower than Marine Products Corp.'s net income of $2.5M. Notably, Brunswick Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 111.70x while Marine Products Corp.'s PE ratio is 24.49x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Brunswick Corp. is 0.97x versus 1.37x for Marine Products Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Peloton Interactive, Inc. has a net margin of -17.23% compared to Brunswick Corp.'s net margin of 2.52%. Brunswick Corp.'s return on equity of -12.09% beat Peloton Interactive, Inc.'s return on equity of --.

Brunswick Corp. has a consensus price target of $75.41, signalling downside risk potential of -0.45%. On the other hand Peloton Interactive, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $10.43 which suggests that it could grow by 70.67%. Given that Peloton Interactive, Inc. has higher upside potential than Brunswick Corp., analysts believe Peloton Interactive, Inc. is more attractive than Brunswick Corp..

Brunswick Corp. has a beta of 1.369, which suggesting that the stock is 36.926% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Peloton Interactive, Inc. has a beta of 2.460, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 145.98%.

Brunswick Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.43 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.26%. Peloton Interactive, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Brunswick Corp. pays 87.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Peloton Interactive, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Brunswick Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Brunswick Corp. quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are larger than Peloton Interactive, Inc. quarterly revenues of $550.8M. Brunswick Corp.'s net income of -$234.3M is lower than Peloton Interactive, Inc.'s net income of $13.9M. Notably, Brunswick Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 111.70x while Peloton Interactive, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Brunswick Corp. is 0.97x versus 1.01x for Peloton Interactive, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.