Financhill
Buy
67

GOLF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$83.88
Seasonality move :
2.63%
Day range:
$83.09 - $84.17
52-week range:
$55.31 - $85.95
Dividend yield:
1.1%
P/E ratio:
22.94x
P/S ratio:
2.03x
P/B ratio:
5.77x
Volume:
215.1K
Avg. volume:
307.1K
1-year change:
11.76%
Market cap:
$4.9B
Revenue:
$2.5B
EPS (TTM):
$3.66

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
GOLF
Acushnet Holdings Corp.
$632.7M $0.87 1.72% -992.61% $77.86
JRSH
Jerash Holdings (US), Inc.
$41M $0.14 19.54% 166.16% $4.50
LEVI
Levi Strauss & Co.
$1.7B $0.39 -7.12% -14.41% $27.31
MODG
Topgolf Callaway Brands Corp.
$903.4M -$0.22 -14.93% -94.65% $12.50
PTON
Peloton Interactive, Inc.
$541.1M $0.01 0.06% -91.62% $10.43
VFC
VF Corp.
$2.7B $0.42 -0.94% 4.11% $16.05
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
GOLF
Acushnet Holdings Corp.
$83.90 $77.86 $4.9B 22.94x $0.24 1.1% 2.03x
JRSH
Jerash Holdings (US), Inc.
$3.09 $4.50 $39.2M 65.33x $0.05 6.47% 0.27x
LEVI
Levi Strauss & Co.
$22.19 $27.31 $8.7B 19.15x $0.14 2.43% 1.40x
MODG
Topgolf Callaway Brands Corp.
$11.81 $12.50 $2.2B 100.60x $0.00 0% 0.54x
PTON
Peloton Interactive, Inc.
$6.56 $10.43 $2.7B -- $0.00 0% 1.08x
VFC
VF Corp.
$18.67 $16.05 $7.3B 82.50x $0.09 1.93% 0.77x
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
GOLF
Acushnet Holdings Corp.
51.41% 0.030 19.57% 1.00x
JRSH
Jerash Holdings (US), Inc.
8.19% 1.068 13.26% 0.87x
LEVI
Levi Strauss & Co.
51.39% 1.540 26.15% 0.72x
MODG
Topgolf Callaway Brands Corp.
64.27% 0.998 254.94% 1.18x
PTON
Peloton Interactive, Inc.
121.48% 1.502 52.22% 1.48x
VFC
VF Corp.
79.67% 2.539 102.72% 0.62x
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
GOLF
Acushnet Holdings Corp.
$316.3M $92.6M 12.57% 25.74% 14.08% $136.9M
JRSH
Jerash Holdings (US), Inc.
$6.2M $1.1M 0.98% 1.06% 2.6% $6.4M
LEVI
Levi Strauss & Co.
$946.5M $177.2M 12.33% 25.88% 11.48% -$39.4M
MODG
Topgolf Callaway Brands Corp.
$605M $38.3M -20.95% -54.79% 4.1% $162M
PTON
Peloton Interactive, Inc.
$274.6M $54M -6.7% -- 9.8% $67.4M
VFC
VF Corp.
$1.5B $318.1M 1.24% 6.28% 11.35% -$274.8M

Acushnet Holdings Corp. vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns GOLF or JRSH?

    Jerash Holdings (US), Inc. has a net margin of 7.3% compared to Acushnet Holdings Corp.'s net margin of 1.14%. Acushnet Holdings Corp.'s return on equity of 25.74% beat Jerash Holdings (US), Inc.'s return on equity of 1.06%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    GOLF
    Acushnet Holdings Corp.
    48.1% $0.81 $1.8B
    JRSH
    Jerash Holdings (US), Inc.
    14.71% $0.04 $68.4M
  • What do Analysts Say About GOLF or JRSH?

    Acushnet Holdings Corp. has a consensus price target of $77.86, signalling downside risk potential of -6.01%. On the other hand Jerash Holdings (US), Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $4.50 which suggests that it could grow by 45.63%. Given that Jerash Holdings (US), Inc. has higher upside potential than Acushnet Holdings Corp., analysts believe Jerash Holdings (US), Inc. is more attractive than Acushnet Holdings Corp..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    GOLF
    Acushnet Holdings Corp.
    1 6 0
    JRSH
    Jerash Holdings (US), Inc.
    2 0 0
  • Is GOLF or JRSH More Risky?

    Acushnet Holdings Corp. has a beta of 0.889, which suggesting that the stock is 11.121% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Jerash Holdings (US), Inc. has a beta of 1.065, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.517%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock GOLF or JRSH?

    Acushnet Holdings Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.1%. Jerash Holdings (US), Inc. offers a yield of 6.47% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Acushnet Holdings Corp. pays 25.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Jerash Holdings (US), Inc. pays out 292.77% of its earnings as a dividend. Acushnet Holdings Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Jerash Holdings (US), Inc.'s is not.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios GOLF or JRSH?

    Acushnet Holdings Corp. quarterly revenues are $657.7M, which are larger than Jerash Holdings (US), Inc. quarterly revenues of $42M. Acushnet Holdings Corp.'s net income of $48M is higher than Jerash Holdings (US), Inc.'s net income of $479.3K. Notably, Acushnet Holdings Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 22.94x while Jerash Holdings (US), Inc.'s PE ratio is 65.33x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Acushnet Holdings Corp. is 2.03x versus 0.27x for Jerash Holdings (US), Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    GOLF
    Acushnet Holdings Corp.
    2.03x 22.94x $657.7M $48M
    JRSH
    Jerash Holdings (US), Inc.
    0.27x 65.33x $42M $479.3K
  • Which has Higher Returns GOLF or LEVI?

    Levi Strauss & Co. has a net margin of 7.3% compared to Acushnet Holdings Corp.'s net margin of 7.91%. Acushnet Holdings Corp.'s return on equity of 25.74% beat Levi Strauss & Co.'s return on equity of 25.88%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    GOLF
    Acushnet Holdings Corp.
    48.1% $0.81 $1.8B
    LEVI
    Levi Strauss & Co.
    61.34% $0.20 $4.4B
  • What do Analysts Say About GOLF or LEVI?

    Acushnet Holdings Corp. has a consensus price target of $77.86, signalling downside risk potential of -6.01%. On the other hand Levi Strauss & Co. has an analysts' consensus of $27.31 which suggests that it could grow by 20.71%. Given that Levi Strauss & Co. has higher upside potential than Acushnet Holdings Corp., analysts believe Levi Strauss & Co. is more attractive than Acushnet Holdings Corp..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    GOLF
    Acushnet Holdings Corp.
    1 6 0
    LEVI
    Levi Strauss & Co.
    7 2 0
  • Is GOLF or LEVI More Risky?

    Acushnet Holdings Corp. has a beta of 0.889, which suggesting that the stock is 11.121% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Levi Strauss & Co. has a beta of 1.337, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.744%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock GOLF or LEVI?

    Acushnet Holdings Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.1%. Levi Strauss & Co. offers a yield of 2.43% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share. Acushnet Holdings Corp. pays 25.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Levi Strauss & Co. pays out 95.53% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios GOLF or LEVI?

    Acushnet Holdings Corp. quarterly revenues are $657.7M, which are smaller than Levi Strauss & Co. quarterly revenues of $1.5B. Acushnet Holdings Corp.'s net income of $48M is lower than Levi Strauss & Co.'s net income of $122M. Notably, Acushnet Holdings Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 22.94x while Levi Strauss & Co.'s PE ratio is 19.15x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Acushnet Holdings Corp. is 2.03x versus 1.40x for Levi Strauss & Co.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    GOLF
    Acushnet Holdings Corp.
    2.03x 22.94x $657.7M $48M
    LEVI
    Levi Strauss & Co.
    1.40x 19.15x $1.5B $122M
  • Which has Higher Returns GOLF or MODG?

    Topgolf Callaway Brands Corp. has a net margin of 7.3% compared to Acushnet Holdings Corp.'s net margin of -1.57%. Acushnet Holdings Corp.'s return on equity of 25.74% beat Topgolf Callaway Brands Corp.'s return on equity of -54.79%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    GOLF
    Acushnet Holdings Corp.
    48.1% $0.81 $1.8B
    MODG
    Topgolf Callaway Brands Corp.
    64.78% -$0.08 $6.9B
  • What do Analysts Say About GOLF or MODG?

    Acushnet Holdings Corp. has a consensus price target of $77.86, signalling downside risk potential of -6.01%. On the other hand Topgolf Callaway Brands Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $12.50 which suggests that it could grow by 5.84%. Given that Topgolf Callaway Brands Corp. has higher upside potential than Acushnet Holdings Corp., analysts believe Topgolf Callaway Brands Corp. is more attractive than Acushnet Holdings Corp..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    GOLF
    Acushnet Holdings Corp.
    1 6 0
    MODG
    Topgolf Callaway Brands Corp.
    4 6 0
  • Is GOLF or MODG More Risky?

    Acushnet Holdings Corp. has a beta of 0.889, which suggesting that the stock is 11.121% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Topgolf Callaway Brands Corp. has a beta of 0.938, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.228%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock GOLF or MODG?

    Acushnet Holdings Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.1%. Topgolf Callaway Brands Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Acushnet Holdings Corp. pays 25.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Topgolf Callaway Brands Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Acushnet Holdings Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios GOLF or MODG?

    Acushnet Holdings Corp. quarterly revenues are $657.7M, which are smaller than Topgolf Callaway Brands Corp. quarterly revenues of $934M. Acushnet Holdings Corp.'s net income of $48M is higher than Topgolf Callaway Brands Corp.'s net income of -$14.7M. Notably, Acushnet Holdings Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 22.94x while Topgolf Callaway Brands Corp.'s PE ratio is 100.60x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Acushnet Holdings Corp. is 2.03x versus 0.54x for Topgolf Callaway Brands Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    GOLF
    Acushnet Holdings Corp.
    2.03x 22.94x $657.7M $48M
    MODG
    Topgolf Callaway Brands Corp.
    0.54x 100.60x $934M -$14.7M
  • Which has Higher Returns GOLF or PTON?

    Peloton Interactive, Inc. has a net margin of 7.3% compared to Acushnet Holdings Corp.'s net margin of 2.52%. Acushnet Holdings Corp.'s return on equity of 25.74% beat Peloton Interactive, Inc.'s return on equity of --.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    GOLF
    Acushnet Holdings Corp.
    48.1% $0.81 $1.8B
    PTON
    Peloton Interactive, Inc.
    49.86% $0.03 $1.6B
  • What do Analysts Say About GOLF or PTON?

    Acushnet Holdings Corp. has a consensus price target of $77.86, signalling downside risk potential of -6.01%. On the other hand Peloton Interactive, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $10.43 which suggests that it could grow by 58.97%. Given that Peloton Interactive, Inc. has higher upside potential than Acushnet Holdings Corp., analysts believe Peloton Interactive, Inc. is more attractive than Acushnet Holdings Corp..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    GOLF
    Acushnet Holdings Corp.
    1 6 0
    PTON
    Peloton Interactive, Inc.
    10 9 0
  • Is GOLF or PTON More Risky?

    Acushnet Holdings Corp. has a beta of 0.889, which suggesting that the stock is 11.121% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Peloton Interactive, Inc. has a beta of 2.460, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 145.98%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock GOLF or PTON?

    Acushnet Holdings Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.1%. Peloton Interactive, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Acushnet Holdings Corp. pays 25.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Peloton Interactive, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Acushnet Holdings Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios GOLF or PTON?

    Acushnet Holdings Corp. quarterly revenues are $657.7M, which are larger than Peloton Interactive, Inc. quarterly revenues of $550.8M. Acushnet Holdings Corp.'s net income of $48M is higher than Peloton Interactive, Inc.'s net income of $13.9M. Notably, Acushnet Holdings Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 22.94x while Peloton Interactive, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Acushnet Holdings Corp. is 2.03x versus 1.08x for Peloton Interactive, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    GOLF
    Acushnet Holdings Corp.
    2.03x 22.94x $657.7M $48M
    PTON
    Peloton Interactive, Inc.
    1.08x -- $550.8M $13.9M
  • Which has Higher Returns GOLF or VFC?

    VF Corp. has a net margin of 7.3% compared to Acushnet Holdings Corp.'s net margin of 6.77%. Acushnet Holdings Corp.'s return on equity of 25.74% beat VF Corp.'s return on equity of 6.28%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    GOLF
    Acushnet Holdings Corp.
    48.1% $0.81 $1.8B
    VFC
    VF Corp.
    52.2% $0.48 $7.3B
  • What do Analysts Say About GOLF or VFC?

    Acushnet Holdings Corp. has a consensus price target of $77.86, signalling downside risk potential of -6.01%. On the other hand VF Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $16.05 which suggests that it could fall by -14.03%. Given that VF Corp. has more downside risk than Acushnet Holdings Corp., analysts believe Acushnet Holdings Corp. is more attractive than VF Corp..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    GOLF
    Acushnet Holdings Corp.
    1 6 0
    VFC
    VF Corp.
    3 15 1
  • Is GOLF or VFC More Risky?

    Acushnet Holdings Corp. has a beta of 0.889, which suggesting that the stock is 11.121% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison VF Corp. has a beta of 1.673, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 67.266%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock GOLF or VFC?

    Acushnet Holdings Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.1%. VF Corp. offers a yield of 1.93% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share. Acushnet Holdings Corp. pays 25.54% of its earnings as a dividend. VF Corp. pays out -202.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Acushnet Holdings Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios GOLF or VFC?

    Acushnet Holdings Corp. quarterly revenues are $657.7M, which are smaller than VF Corp. quarterly revenues of $2.8B. Acushnet Holdings Corp.'s net income of $48M is lower than VF Corp.'s net income of $189.8M. Notably, Acushnet Holdings Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 22.94x while VF Corp.'s PE ratio is 82.50x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Acushnet Holdings Corp. is 2.03x versus 0.77x for VF Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    GOLF
    Acushnet Holdings Corp.
    2.03x 22.94x $657.7M $48M
    VFC
    VF Corp.
    0.77x 82.50x $2.8B $189.8M

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

Is Amazon an AI Stock?
Is Amazon an AI Stock?

With the market starting to look skittish on pure-play AI…

Google Vs NVIDIA Stock: Which Is Best?
Google Vs NVIDIA Stock: Which Is Best?

Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOGL) and NVIDIA (NASDAQ:NVIDIA) are two of the market’s…

How High Could NVIDIA Stock Go?
How High Could NVIDIA Stock Go?

NVIDIA (NASDAQ:NVDA) has been one of the best stocks to…

Stock Ideas

Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $4.5T
P/E Ratio: 62x

Buy
61
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $4.1T
P/E Ratio: 38x

Buy
63
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 40x

Alerts

Sell
44
PSTG alert for Dec 5

Pure Storage, Inc. [PSTG] is up 5.05% over the past day.

Sell
15
HOV alert for Dec 5

Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc. [HOV] is down 22.58% over the past day.

Buy
69
ASTS alert for Dec 5

AST Spacemobile, Inc. [ASTS] is up 18.25% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock