CRI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Duluth Holdings has a net margin of 2.47% compared to Carter's's net margin of -1.46%. Carter's's return on equity of 19.48% beat Duluth Holdings's return on equity of -21.57%.

Carter's has a consensus price target of $29.00, signalling downside risk potential of -14.3%. On the other hand Duluth Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $2.00 which suggests that it could grow by 12.99%. Given that Duluth Holdings has higher upside potential than Carter's, analysts believe Duluth Holdings is more attractive than Carter's.

Carter's has a beta of 1.055, which suggesting that the stock is 5.474% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Duluth Holdings has a beta of 1.324, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.41%.

Carter's has a quarterly dividend of $0.80 per share corresponding to a yield of 9.46%. Duluth Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Carter's pays 62.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Duluth Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Carter's's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Carter's quarterly revenues are $629.8M, which are larger than Duluth Holdings quarterly revenues of $241.3M. Carter's's net income of $15.5M is higher than Duluth Holdings's net income of -$3.5M. Notably, Carter's's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.49x while Duluth Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Carter's is 0.43x versus 0.09x for Duluth Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Etsy has a net margin of 2.47% compared to Carter's's net margin of -8%. Carter's's return on equity of 19.48% beat Etsy's return on equity of --.

Carter's has a consensus price target of $29.00, signalling downside risk potential of -14.3%. On the other hand Etsy has an analysts' consensus of $51.60 which suggests that it could grow by 14.47%. Given that Etsy has higher upside potential than Carter's, analysts believe Etsy is more attractive than Carter's.

Carter's has a beta of 1.055, which suggesting that the stock is 5.474% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Etsy has a beta of 1.778, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 77.77%.

Carter's has a quarterly dividend of $0.80 per share corresponding to a yield of 9.46%. Etsy offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Carter's pays 62.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Etsy pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Carter's's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Carter's quarterly revenues are $629.8M, which are smaller than Etsy quarterly revenues of $651.2M. Carter's's net income of $15.5M is higher than Etsy's net income of -$52.1M. Notably, Carter's's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.49x while Etsy's PE ratio is 32.20x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Carter's is 0.43x versus 2.00x for Etsy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Natural Health Trends has a net margin of 2.47% compared to Carter's's net margin of 1.14%. Carter's's return on equity of 19.48% beat Natural Health Trends's return on equity of 1.44%.

Carter's has a consensus price target of $29.00, signalling downside risk potential of -14.3%. On the other hand Natural Health Trends has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 497.61%. Given that Natural Health Trends has higher upside potential than Carter's, analysts believe Natural Health Trends is more attractive than Carter's.

Carter's has a beta of 1.055, which suggesting that the stock is 5.474% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Natural Health Trends has a beta of 0.862, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.792%.

Carter's has a quarterly dividend of $0.80 per share corresponding to a yield of 9.46%. Natural Health Trends offers a yield of 15.94% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. Carter's pays 62.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Natural Health Trends pays out 1610.66% of its earnings as a dividend. Carter's's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Natural Health Trends's is not.

Carter's quarterly revenues are $629.8M, which are larger than Natural Health Trends quarterly revenues of $10.7M. Carter's's net income of $15.5M is higher than Natural Health Trends's net income of $122K. Notably, Carter's's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.49x while Natural Health Trends's PE ratio is 94.63x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Carter's is 0.43x versus 1.35x for Natural Health Trends. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tractor Supply has a net margin of 2.47% compared to Carter's's net margin of 5.17%. Carter's's return on equity of 19.48% beat Tractor Supply's return on equity of 48.21%.

Carter's has a consensus price target of $29.00, signalling downside risk potential of -14.3%. On the other hand Tractor Supply has an analysts' consensus of $54.37 which suggests that it could grow by 6.12%. Given that Tractor Supply has higher upside potential than Carter's, analysts believe Tractor Supply is more attractive than Carter's.

Carter's has a beta of 1.055, which suggesting that the stock is 5.474% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tractor Supply has a beta of 0.823, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.661%.

Carter's has a quarterly dividend of $0.80 per share corresponding to a yield of 9.46%. Tractor Supply offers a yield of 1.74% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share. Carter's pays 62.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Tractor Supply pays out 42.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Carter's quarterly revenues are $629.8M, which are smaller than Tractor Supply quarterly revenues of $3.5B. Carter's's net income of $15.5M is lower than Tractor Supply's net income of $179.4M. Notably, Carter's's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.49x while Tractor Supply's PE ratio is 25.44x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Carter's is 0.43x versus 1.84x for Tractor Supply. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.