CASY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Boot Barn Holdings has a net margin of 4.58% compared to Casey's General Stores's net margin of 6.91%. Casey's General Stores's return on equity of 17.42% beat Boot Barn Holdings's return on equity of 16.3%.

Casey's General Stores has a consensus price target of $427.77, signalling upside risk potential of 6.1%. On the other hand Boot Barn Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $99.23 which suggests that it could grow by 19.57%. Given that Boot Barn Holdings has higher upside potential than Casey's General Stores, analysts believe Boot Barn Holdings is more attractive than Casey's General Stores.

Casey's General Stores has a beta of 0.799, which suggesting that the stock is 20.104% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Boot Barn Holdings has a beta of 2.141, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 114.123%.

Casey's General Stores has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.46%. Boot Barn Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Casey's General Stores pays 12.53% of its earnings as a dividend. Boot Barn Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Casey's General Stores's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Casey's General Stores quarterly revenues are $3.9B, which are larger than Boot Barn Holdings quarterly revenues of $425.8M. Casey's General Stores's net income of $180.9M is higher than Boot Barn Holdings's net income of $29.4M. Notably, Casey's General Stores's price-to-earnings ratio is 28.09x while Boot Barn Holdings's PE ratio is 29.67x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Casey's General Stores is 1.00x versus 2.59x for Boot Barn Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Envela has a net margin of 4.58% compared to Casey's General Stores's net margin of 3.59%. Casey's General Stores's return on equity of 17.42% beat Envela's return on equity of 13.11%.

Casey's General Stores has a consensus price target of $427.77, signalling upside risk potential of 6.1%. On the other hand Envela has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 7.67%. Given that Envela has higher upside potential than Casey's General Stores, analysts believe Envela is more attractive than Casey's General Stores.

Casey's General Stores has a beta of 0.799, which suggesting that the stock is 20.104% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Envela has a beta of 0.310, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 68.983%.

Casey's General Stores has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.46%. Envela offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Casey's General Stores pays 12.53% of its earnings as a dividend. Envela pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Casey's General Stores's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Casey's General Stores quarterly revenues are $3.9B, which are larger than Envela quarterly revenues of $46.9M. Casey's General Stores's net income of $180.9M is higher than Envela's net income of $1.7M. Notably, Casey's General Stores's price-to-earnings ratio is 28.09x while Envela's PE ratio is 30.96x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Casey's General Stores is 1.00x versus 1.18x for Envela. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Urban Outfitters has a net margin of 4.58% compared to Casey's General Stores's net margin of 7.56%. Casey's General Stores's return on equity of 17.42% beat Urban Outfitters's return on equity of 15.11%.

Casey's General Stores has a consensus price target of $427.77, signalling upside risk potential of 6.1%. On the other hand Urban Outfitters has an analysts' consensus of $44.03 which suggests that it could fall by -14.9%. Given that Casey's General Stores has higher upside potential than Urban Outfitters, analysts believe Casey's General Stores is more attractive than Urban Outfitters.

Casey's General Stores has a beta of 0.799, which suggesting that the stock is 20.104% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Urban Outfitters has a beta of 1.595, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 59.524%.

Casey's General Stores has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.46%. Urban Outfitters offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Casey's General Stores pays 12.53% of its earnings as a dividend. Urban Outfitters pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Casey's General Stores's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Casey's General Stores quarterly revenues are $3.9B, which are larger than Urban Outfitters quarterly revenues of $1.4B. Casey's General Stores's net income of $180.9M is higher than Urban Outfitters's net income of $102.9M. Notably, Casey's General Stores's price-to-earnings ratio is 28.09x while Urban Outfitters's PE ratio is 15.79x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Casey's General Stores is 1.00x versus 0.96x for Urban Outfitters. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Victoria's Secret & has a net margin of 4.58% compared to Casey's General Stores's net margin of -4.16%. Casey's General Stores's return on equity of 17.42% beat Victoria's Secret &'s return on equity of 36.99%.

Casey's General Stores has a consensus price target of $427.77, signalling upside risk potential of 6.1%. On the other hand Victoria's Secret & has an analysts' consensus of $21.49 which suggests that it could fall by -0.57%. Given that Casey's General Stores has higher upside potential than Victoria's Secret &, analysts believe Casey's General Stores is more attractive than Victoria's Secret &.

Casey's General Stores has a beta of 0.799, which suggesting that the stock is 20.104% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Victoria's Secret & has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Casey's General Stores has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.46%. Victoria's Secret & offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Casey's General Stores pays 12.53% of its earnings as a dividend. Victoria's Secret & pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Casey's General Stores's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Casey's General Stores quarterly revenues are $3.9B, which are larger than Victoria's Secret & quarterly revenues of $1.3B. Casey's General Stores's net income of $180.9M is higher than Victoria's Secret &'s net income of -$56M. Notably, Casey's General Stores's price-to-earnings ratio is 28.09x while Victoria's Secret &'s PE ratio is 23.30x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Casey's General Stores is 1.00x versus 0.58x for Victoria's Secret &. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.