Is DocuSign Stock Undervalued?
Digital signature software business DocuSign (NASDAQ:DOCU) has been struggling over…
Sell
46
ANCTF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$54.38
Seasonality move
:
5.07%
Day range:
$54.32 - $54.45
52-week range:
$45.61 - $58.75
Dividend yield:
1.05%
P/E ratio:
19.76x
P/S ratio:
0.71x
P/B ratio:
3.27x
Volume:
44.9K
Avg. volume:
105.9K
1-year change:
-2.83%
Market cap:
$50.3B
Revenue:
$72.9B
EPS (TTM):
$2.75
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ANCTF
Alimentation Couche-Tard, Inc.
|
$17.9B | -- | 6.42% | -- | -- |
|
BGI
Birks Group, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CASY
Casey's General Stores, Inc.
|
$4.5B | $5.15 | 4.48% | 22.08% | $600.00 |
|
FLWS
1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc.
|
$217.8M | -$0.64 | -9.66% | -14.05% | $6.00 |
|
LULU
lululemon athletica, Inc.
|
$2.5B | $2.22 | -1.06% | -20.78% | $207.11 |
|
ODP
The ODP Corp.
|
$1.7B | $0.80 | -3.45% | 75.59% | $31.50 |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ANCTF
Alimentation Couche-Tard, Inc.
|
$54.38 | -- | $50.3B | 19.76x | $0.15 | 1.05% | 0.71x |
|
BGI
Birks Group, Inc.
|
$0.92 | -- | $18M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.13x |
|
CASY
Casey's General Stores, Inc.
|
$567.94 | $600.00 | $21.1B | 34.93x | $0.57 | 0.38% | 1.25x |
|
FLWS
1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc.
|
$4.13 | $6.00 | $262.9M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.16x |
|
LULU
lululemon athletica, Inc.
|
$210.40 | $207.11 | $24.7B | 14.68x | $0.00 | 0% | 2.29x |
|
ODP
The ODP Corp.
|
$28.00 | $31.50 | $843.3M | 300.11x | $0.00 | 0% | 0.13x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ANCTF
Alimentation Couche-Tard, Inc.
|
50.39% | 0.001 | 32.98% | 0.63x |
|
BGI
Birks Group, Inc.
|
109.08% | 1.323 | -- | 0.06x |
|
CASY
Casey's General Stores, Inc.
|
43.37% | 0.318 | 15.31% | 0.60x |
|
FLWS
1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc.
|
63.27% | 0.328 | 127.91% | 0.14x |
|
LULU
lululemon athletica, Inc.
|
28.14% | 0.561 | 8.72% | 0.70x |
|
ODP
The ODP Corp.
|
48.95% | 3.450 | 94.06% | 0.43x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ANCTF
Alimentation Couche-Tard, Inc.
|
$2.9B | $1.1B | 8.86% | 17.49% | 6.08% | $736.5M |
|
BGI
Birks Group, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -7.15% | -- | -- | -- |
|
CASY
Casey's General Stores, Inc.
|
$1B | $298.7M | 9.4% | 17.14% | 6.63% | $176M |
|
FLWS
1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc.
|
$63.9M | -$50.5M | -33.28% | -63.15% | -23.47% | -$145.6M |
|
LULU
lululemon athletica, Inc.
|
$1.4B | $444.7M | 29.2% | 40.5% | 17.33% | $82.4M |
|
ODP
The ODP Corp.
|
$331M | $38M | 0.27% | 0.62% | 2.34% | $78M |
Alimentation Couche-Tard, Inc. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns ANCTF or BGI?
Birks Group, Inc. has a net margin of 4.16% compared to Alimentation Couche-Tard, Inc.'s net margin of --. Alimentation Couche-Tard, Inc.'s return on equity of 17.49% beat Birks Group, Inc.'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ANCTFAlimentation Couche-Tard, Inc.16.08% $0.79 $31.1B BGIBirks Group, Inc.-- -- $67M -
What do Analysts Say About ANCTF or BGI?
Alimentation Couche-Tard, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 21.46%. On the other hand Birks Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Alimentation Couche-Tard, Inc. has higher upside potential than Birks Group, Inc., analysts believe Alimentation Couche-Tard, Inc. is more attractive than Birks Group, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ANCTFAlimentation Couche-Tard, Inc.0 0 0 BGIBirks Group, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is ANCTF or BGI More Risky?
Alimentation Couche-Tard, Inc. has a beta of 0.760, which suggesting that the stock is 23.994% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Birks Group, Inc. has a beta of 0.265, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 73.514%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ANCTF or BGI?
Alimentation Couche-Tard, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.05%. Birks Group, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Alimentation Couche-Tard, Inc. pays 20.08% of its earnings as a dividend. Birks Group, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Alimentation Couche-Tard, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ANCTF or BGI?
Alimentation Couche-Tard, Inc. quarterly revenues are $17.9B, which are larger than Birks Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Alimentation Couche-Tard, Inc.'s net income of $743.3M is higher than Birks Group, Inc.'s net income of --. Notably, Alimentation Couche-Tard, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 19.76x while Birks Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Alimentation Couche-Tard, Inc. is 0.71x versus 0.13x for Birks Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ANCTFAlimentation Couche-Tard, Inc.0.71x 19.76x $17.9B $743.3M BGIBirks Group, Inc.0.13x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns ANCTF or CASY?
Casey's General Stores, Inc. has a net margin of 4.16% compared to Alimentation Couche-Tard, Inc.'s net margin of 4.58%. Alimentation Couche-Tard, Inc.'s return on equity of 17.49% beat Casey's General Stores, Inc.'s return on equity of 17.14%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ANCTFAlimentation Couche-Tard, Inc.16.08% $0.79 $31.1B CASYCasey's General Stores, Inc.22.42% $5.53 $6.7B -
What do Analysts Say About ANCTF or CASY?
Alimentation Couche-Tard, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 21.46%. On the other hand Casey's General Stores, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $600.00 which suggests that it could grow by 5.82%. Given that Alimentation Couche-Tard, Inc. has higher upside potential than Casey's General Stores, Inc., analysts believe Alimentation Couche-Tard, Inc. is more attractive than Casey's General Stores, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ANCTFAlimentation Couche-Tard, Inc.0 0 0 CASYCasey's General Stores, Inc.11 5 0 -
Is ANCTF or CASY More Risky?
Alimentation Couche-Tard, Inc. has a beta of 0.760, which suggesting that the stock is 23.994% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Casey's General Stores, Inc. has a beta of 0.654, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 34.587%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ANCTF or CASY?
Alimentation Couche-Tard, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.05%. Casey's General Stores, Inc. offers a yield of 0.38% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.57 per share. Alimentation Couche-Tard, Inc. pays 20.08% of its earnings as a dividend. Casey's General Stores, Inc. pays out 13.67% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ANCTF or CASY?
Alimentation Couche-Tard, Inc. quarterly revenues are $17.9B, which are larger than Casey's General Stores, Inc. quarterly revenues of $4.5B. Alimentation Couche-Tard, Inc.'s net income of $743.3M is higher than Casey's General Stores, Inc.'s net income of $206.3M. Notably, Alimentation Couche-Tard, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 19.76x while Casey's General Stores, Inc.'s PE ratio is 34.93x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Alimentation Couche-Tard, Inc. is 0.71x versus 1.25x for Casey's General Stores, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ANCTFAlimentation Couche-Tard, Inc.0.71x 19.76x $17.9B $743.3M CASYCasey's General Stores, Inc.1.25x 34.93x $4.5B $206.3M
-
Which has Higher Returns ANCTF or FLWS?
1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc. has a net margin of 4.16% compared to Alimentation Couche-Tard, Inc.'s net margin of -24.61%. Alimentation Couche-Tard, Inc.'s return on equity of 17.49% beat 1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc.'s return on equity of -63.15%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ANCTFAlimentation Couche-Tard, Inc.16.08% $0.79 $31.1B FLWS1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc.29.68% -$0.83 $592.1M -
What do Analysts Say About ANCTF or FLWS?
Alimentation Couche-Tard, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 21.46%. On the other hand 1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $6.00 which suggests that it could grow by 45.28%. Given that 1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc. has higher upside potential than Alimentation Couche-Tard, Inc., analysts believe 1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc. is more attractive than Alimentation Couche-Tard, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ANCTFAlimentation Couche-Tard, Inc.0 0 0 FLWS1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc.0 1 0 -
Is ANCTF or FLWS More Risky?
Alimentation Couche-Tard, Inc. has a beta of 0.760, which suggesting that the stock is 23.994% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison 1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc. has a beta of 1.172, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.248%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ANCTF or FLWS?
Alimentation Couche-Tard, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.05%. 1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Alimentation Couche-Tard, Inc. pays 20.08% of its earnings as a dividend. 1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Alimentation Couche-Tard, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ANCTF or FLWS?
Alimentation Couche-Tard, Inc. quarterly revenues are $17.9B, which are larger than 1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc. quarterly revenues of $215.2M. Alimentation Couche-Tard, Inc.'s net income of $743.3M is higher than 1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc.'s net income of -$53M. Notably, Alimentation Couche-Tard, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 19.76x while 1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Alimentation Couche-Tard, Inc. is 0.71x versus 0.16x for 1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ANCTFAlimentation Couche-Tard, Inc.0.71x 19.76x $17.9B $743.3M FLWS1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc.0.16x -- $215.2M -$53M
-
Which has Higher Returns ANCTF or LULU?
lululemon athletica, Inc. has a net margin of 4.16% compared to Alimentation Couche-Tard, Inc.'s net margin of 11.96%. Alimentation Couche-Tard, Inc.'s return on equity of 17.49% beat lululemon athletica, Inc.'s return on equity of 40.5%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ANCTFAlimentation Couche-Tard, Inc.16.08% $0.79 $31.1B LULUlululemon athletica, Inc.55.5% $2.59 $6.3B -
What do Analysts Say About ANCTF or LULU?
Alimentation Couche-Tard, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 21.46%. On the other hand lululemon athletica, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $207.11 which suggests that it could fall by -1.56%. Given that Alimentation Couche-Tard, Inc. has higher upside potential than lululemon athletica, Inc., analysts believe Alimentation Couche-Tard, Inc. is more attractive than lululemon athletica, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ANCTFAlimentation Couche-Tard, Inc.0 0 0 LULUlululemon athletica, Inc.2 29 1 -
Is ANCTF or LULU More Risky?
Alimentation Couche-Tard, Inc. has a beta of 0.760, which suggesting that the stock is 23.994% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison lululemon athletica, Inc. has a beta of 1.011, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.107%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ANCTF or LULU?
Alimentation Couche-Tard, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.05%. lululemon athletica, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Alimentation Couche-Tard, Inc. pays 20.08% of its earnings as a dividend. lululemon athletica, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Alimentation Couche-Tard, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ANCTF or LULU?
Alimentation Couche-Tard, Inc. quarterly revenues are $17.9B, which are larger than lululemon athletica, Inc. quarterly revenues of $2.6B. Alimentation Couche-Tard, Inc.'s net income of $743.3M is higher than lululemon athletica, Inc.'s net income of $306.8M. Notably, Alimentation Couche-Tard, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 19.76x while lululemon athletica, Inc.'s PE ratio is 14.68x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Alimentation Couche-Tard, Inc. is 0.71x versus 2.29x for lululemon athletica, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ANCTFAlimentation Couche-Tard, Inc.0.71x 19.76x $17.9B $743.3M LULUlululemon athletica, Inc.2.29x 14.68x $2.6B $306.8M
-
Which has Higher Returns ANCTF or ODP?
The ODP Corp. has a net margin of 4.16% compared to Alimentation Couche-Tard, Inc.'s net margin of 1.42%. Alimentation Couche-Tard, Inc.'s return on equity of 17.49% beat The ODP Corp.'s return on equity of 0.62%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ANCTFAlimentation Couche-Tard, Inc.16.08% $0.79 $31.1B ODPThe ODP Corp.20.37% $0.77 $1.6B -
What do Analysts Say About ANCTF or ODP?
Alimentation Couche-Tard, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 21.46%. On the other hand The ODP Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $31.50 which suggests that it could grow by 12.5%. Given that Alimentation Couche-Tard, Inc. has higher upside potential than The ODP Corp., analysts believe Alimentation Couche-Tard, Inc. is more attractive than The ODP Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ANCTFAlimentation Couche-Tard, Inc.0 0 0 ODPThe ODP Corp.0 1 0 -
Is ANCTF or ODP More Risky?
Alimentation Couche-Tard, Inc. has a beta of 0.760, which suggesting that the stock is 23.994% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The ODP Corp. has a beta of 1.153, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.282%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ANCTF or ODP?
Alimentation Couche-Tard, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.05%. The ODP Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Alimentation Couche-Tard, Inc. pays 20.08% of its earnings as a dividend. The ODP Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Alimentation Couche-Tard, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ANCTF or ODP?
Alimentation Couche-Tard, Inc. quarterly revenues are $17.9B, which are larger than The ODP Corp. quarterly revenues of $1.6B. Alimentation Couche-Tard, Inc.'s net income of $743.3M is higher than The ODP Corp.'s net income of $23M. Notably, Alimentation Couche-Tard, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 19.76x while The ODP Corp.'s PE ratio is 300.11x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Alimentation Couche-Tard, Inc. is 0.71x versus 0.13x for The ODP Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ANCTFAlimentation Couche-Tard, Inc.0.71x 19.76x $17.9B $743.3M ODPThe ODP Corp.0.13x 300.11x $1.6B $23M
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is SentinelOne Stock Undervalued?
Cybersecurity major SentinelOne (NYSE:S) has struggled over several years, delivering…
Is Broadcom Stock on Sale?
Chip and software maker Broadcom (NASDAQ:AVGO) has been among the…
Stock Ideas
Buy
57
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.6T
P/E Ratio: 64x
Buy
55
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
61
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 39x
Alerts
Buy
80
TVTX alert for Dec 25
Travere Therapeutics, Inc. [TVTX] is up 14.03% over the past day.
Buy
68
KOD alert for Dec 25
Kodiak Sciences, Inc. [KOD] is up 13.41% over the past day.
Buy
64
ZCSH alert for Dec 25
Grayscale Zcash Trust (ZEC) [ZCSH] is up 5.33% over the past day.
