Is Amazon an AI Stock?
With the market starting to look skittish on pure-play AI…
Sell
39
ANCTF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$53.28
Seasonality move
:
5.07%
Day range:
$52.31 - $52.77
52-week range:
$45.61 - $59.12
Dividend yield:
1.09%
P/E ratio:
19.09x
P/S ratio:
0.69x
P/B ratio:
3.16x
Volume:
207K
Avg. volume:
128.5K
1-year change:
-10.7%
Market cap:
$48.6B
Revenue:
$72.9B
EPS (TTM):
$2.75
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ANCTF
Alimentation Couche-Tard, Inc.
|
$17.9B | -- | 6.42% | -- | -- |
|
BGI
Birks Group, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FLWS
1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc.
|
$217.8M | -$0.64 | -9.66% | -14.05% | $6.00 |
|
LULU
lululemon athletica, Inc.
|
$2.5B | $2.21 | -1.19% | -18.25% | $189.99 |
|
ODP
The ODP Corp.
|
$1.7B | $0.80 | -4.5% | 83.08% | $34.67 |
|
TSCO
Tractor Supply Co.
|
$3.7B | $0.48 | 6.85% | 7.99% | $63.74 |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ANCTF
Alimentation Couche-Tard, Inc.
|
$52.52 | -- | $48.6B | 19.09x | $0.15 | 1.09% | 0.69x |
|
BGI
Birks Group, Inc.
|
$1.08 | -- | $21.2M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.16x |
|
FLWS
1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc.
|
$3.60 | $6.00 | $229.2M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.14x |
|
LULU
lululemon athletica, Inc.
|
$182.30 | $189.99 | $21.6B | 12.48x | $0.00 | 0% | 2.04x |
|
ODP
The ODP Corp.
|
$27.97 | $34.67 | $842.4M | 299.79x | $0.00 | 0% | 0.13x |
|
TSCO
Tractor Supply Co.
|
$54.07 | $63.74 | $28.6B | 26.10x | $0.23 | 1.7% | 1.87x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ANCTF
Alimentation Couche-Tard, Inc.
|
50.39% | 0.001 | 32.98% | 0.63x |
|
BGI
Birks Group, Inc.
|
109.08% | 1.323 | 173.04% | 0.06x |
|
FLWS
1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc.
|
63.27% | 0.328 | 127.91% | 0.14x |
|
LULU
lululemon athletica, Inc.
|
28.66% | 0.561 | 7.33% | 0.83x |
|
ODP
The ODP Corp.
|
48.95% | 3.450 | 94.06% | 0.43x |
|
TSCO
Tractor Supply Co.
|
68.98% | 0.357 | 19.02% | 0.07x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ANCTF
Alimentation Couche-Tard, Inc.
|
$2.9B | $1.1B | 8.86% | 17.49% | 6.08% | $736.5M |
|
BGI
Birks Group, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -7.15% | -- | -- | -- |
|
FLWS
1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc.
|
$63.9M | -$50.5M | -33.28% | -63.15% | -23.47% | -$145.6M |
|
LULU
lululemon athletica, Inc.
|
$1.5B | $522.4M | 30.75% | 42.48% | 20.69% | $150.8M |
|
ODP
The ODP Corp.
|
$331M | $38M | 0.27% | 0.62% | 2.34% | $78M |
|
TSCO
Tractor Supply Co.
|
$1.3B | $342.7M | 13.93% | 46.58% | 9.22% | $30.3M |
Alimentation Couche-Tard, Inc. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns ANCTF or BGI?
Birks Group, Inc. has a net margin of 4.16% compared to Alimentation Couche-Tard, Inc.'s net margin of --. Alimentation Couche-Tard, Inc.'s return on equity of 17.49% beat Birks Group, Inc.'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ANCTFAlimentation Couche-Tard, Inc.16.08% $0.79 $31.1B BGIBirks Group, Inc.-- -- $67M -
What do Analysts Say About ANCTF or BGI?
Alimentation Couche-Tard, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 25.67%. On the other hand Birks Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Alimentation Couche-Tard, Inc. has higher upside potential than Birks Group, Inc., analysts believe Alimentation Couche-Tard, Inc. is more attractive than Birks Group, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ANCTFAlimentation Couche-Tard, Inc.0 0 0 BGIBirks Group, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is ANCTF or BGI More Risky?
Alimentation Couche-Tard, Inc. has a beta of 0.760, which suggesting that the stock is 23.994% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Birks Group, Inc. has a beta of 0.265, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 73.514%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ANCTF or BGI?
Alimentation Couche-Tard, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.09%. Birks Group, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Alimentation Couche-Tard, Inc. pays 20.08% of its earnings as a dividend. Birks Group, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Alimentation Couche-Tard, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ANCTF or BGI?
Alimentation Couche-Tard, Inc. quarterly revenues are $17.9B, which are larger than Birks Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Alimentation Couche-Tard, Inc.'s net income of $743.3M is higher than Birks Group, Inc.'s net income of --. Notably, Alimentation Couche-Tard, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 19.09x while Birks Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Alimentation Couche-Tard, Inc. is 0.69x versus 0.16x for Birks Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ANCTFAlimentation Couche-Tard, Inc.0.69x 19.09x $17.9B $743.3M BGIBirks Group, Inc.0.16x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns ANCTF or FLWS?
1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc. has a net margin of 4.16% compared to Alimentation Couche-Tard, Inc.'s net margin of -24.61%. Alimentation Couche-Tard, Inc.'s return on equity of 17.49% beat 1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc.'s return on equity of -63.15%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ANCTFAlimentation Couche-Tard, Inc.16.08% $0.79 $31.1B FLWS1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc.29.68% -$0.83 $592.1M -
What do Analysts Say About ANCTF or FLWS?
Alimentation Couche-Tard, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 25.67%. On the other hand 1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $6.00 which suggests that it could grow by 66.67%. Given that 1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc. has higher upside potential than Alimentation Couche-Tard, Inc., analysts believe 1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc. is more attractive than Alimentation Couche-Tard, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ANCTFAlimentation Couche-Tard, Inc.0 0 0 FLWS1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc.0 1 0 -
Is ANCTF or FLWS More Risky?
Alimentation Couche-Tard, Inc. has a beta of 0.760, which suggesting that the stock is 23.994% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison 1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc. has a beta of 1.172, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.248%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ANCTF or FLWS?
Alimentation Couche-Tard, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.09%. 1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Alimentation Couche-Tard, Inc. pays 20.08% of its earnings as a dividend. 1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Alimentation Couche-Tard, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ANCTF or FLWS?
Alimentation Couche-Tard, Inc. quarterly revenues are $17.9B, which are larger than 1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc. quarterly revenues of $215.2M. Alimentation Couche-Tard, Inc.'s net income of $743.3M is higher than 1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc.'s net income of -$53M. Notably, Alimentation Couche-Tard, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 19.09x while 1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Alimentation Couche-Tard, Inc. is 0.69x versus 0.14x for 1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ANCTFAlimentation Couche-Tard, Inc.0.69x 19.09x $17.9B $743.3M FLWS1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc.0.14x -- $215.2M -$53M
-
Which has Higher Returns ANCTF or LULU?
lululemon athletica, Inc. has a net margin of 4.16% compared to Alimentation Couche-Tard, Inc.'s net margin of 14.69%. Alimentation Couche-Tard, Inc.'s return on equity of 17.49% beat lululemon athletica, Inc.'s return on equity of 42.48%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ANCTFAlimentation Couche-Tard, Inc.16.08% $0.79 $31.1B LULUlululemon athletica, Inc.58.43% $3.10 $6.1B -
What do Analysts Say About ANCTF or LULU?
Alimentation Couche-Tard, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 25.67%. On the other hand lululemon athletica, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $189.99 which suggests that it could grow by 4.22%. Given that Alimentation Couche-Tard, Inc. has higher upside potential than lululemon athletica, Inc., analysts believe Alimentation Couche-Tard, Inc. is more attractive than lululemon athletica, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ANCTFAlimentation Couche-Tard, Inc.0 0 0 LULUlululemon athletica, Inc.4 28 2 -
Is ANCTF or LULU More Risky?
Alimentation Couche-Tard, Inc. has a beta of 0.760, which suggesting that the stock is 23.994% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison lululemon athletica, Inc. has a beta of 1.011, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.107%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ANCTF or LULU?
Alimentation Couche-Tard, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.09%. lululemon athletica, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Alimentation Couche-Tard, Inc. pays 20.08% of its earnings as a dividend. lululemon athletica, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Alimentation Couche-Tard, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ANCTF or LULU?
Alimentation Couche-Tard, Inc. quarterly revenues are $17.9B, which are larger than lululemon athletica, Inc. quarterly revenues of $2.5B. Alimentation Couche-Tard, Inc.'s net income of $743.3M is higher than lululemon athletica, Inc.'s net income of $370.9M. Notably, Alimentation Couche-Tard, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 19.09x while lululemon athletica, Inc.'s PE ratio is 12.48x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Alimentation Couche-Tard, Inc. is 0.69x versus 2.04x for lululemon athletica, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ANCTFAlimentation Couche-Tard, Inc.0.69x 19.09x $17.9B $743.3M LULUlululemon athletica, Inc.2.04x 12.48x $2.5B $370.9M
-
Which has Higher Returns ANCTF or ODP?
The ODP Corp. has a net margin of 4.16% compared to Alimentation Couche-Tard, Inc.'s net margin of 1.42%. Alimentation Couche-Tard, Inc.'s return on equity of 17.49% beat The ODP Corp.'s return on equity of 0.62%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ANCTFAlimentation Couche-Tard, Inc.16.08% $0.79 $31.1B ODPThe ODP Corp.20.37% $0.77 $1.6B -
What do Analysts Say About ANCTF or ODP?
Alimentation Couche-Tard, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 25.67%. On the other hand The ODP Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $34.67 which suggests that it could grow by 23.94%. Given that Alimentation Couche-Tard, Inc. has higher upside potential than The ODP Corp., analysts believe Alimentation Couche-Tard, Inc. is more attractive than The ODP Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ANCTFAlimentation Couche-Tard, Inc.0 0 0 ODPThe ODP Corp.0 2 0 -
Is ANCTF or ODP More Risky?
Alimentation Couche-Tard, Inc. has a beta of 0.760, which suggesting that the stock is 23.994% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The ODP Corp. has a beta of 1.153, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.282%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ANCTF or ODP?
Alimentation Couche-Tard, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.09%. The ODP Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Alimentation Couche-Tard, Inc. pays 20.08% of its earnings as a dividend. The ODP Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Alimentation Couche-Tard, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ANCTF or ODP?
Alimentation Couche-Tard, Inc. quarterly revenues are $17.9B, which are larger than The ODP Corp. quarterly revenues of $1.6B. Alimentation Couche-Tard, Inc.'s net income of $743.3M is higher than The ODP Corp.'s net income of $23M. Notably, Alimentation Couche-Tard, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 19.09x while The ODP Corp.'s PE ratio is 299.79x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Alimentation Couche-Tard, Inc. is 0.69x versus 0.13x for The ODP Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ANCTFAlimentation Couche-Tard, Inc.0.69x 19.09x $17.9B $743.3M ODPThe ODP Corp.0.13x 299.79x $1.6B $23M
-
Which has Higher Returns ANCTF or TSCO?
Tractor Supply Co. has a net margin of 4.16% compared to Alimentation Couche-Tard, Inc.'s net margin of 6.97%. Alimentation Couche-Tard, Inc.'s return on equity of 17.49% beat Tractor Supply Co.'s return on equity of 46.58%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ANCTFAlimentation Couche-Tard, Inc.16.08% $0.79 $31.1B TSCOTractor Supply Co.34.02% $0.49 $8.3B -
What do Analysts Say About ANCTF or TSCO?
Alimentation Couche-Tard, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 25.67%. On the other hand Tractor Supply Co. has an analysts' consensus of $63.74 which suggests that it could grow by 17.89%. Given that Alimentation Couche-Tard, Inc. has higher upside potential than Tractor Supply Co., analysts believe Alimentation Couche-Tard, Inc. is more attractive than Tractor Supply Co..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ANCTFAlimentation Couche-Tard, Inc.0 0 0 TSCOTractor Supply Co.15 11 0 -
Is ANCTF or TSCO More Risky?
Alimentation Couche-Tard, Inc. has a beta of 0.760, which suggesting that the stock is 23.994% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tractor Supply Co. has a beta of 0.723, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.659%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ANCTF or TSCO?
Alimentation Couche-Tard, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.09%. Tractor Supply Co. offers a yield of 1.7% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share. Alimentation Couche-Tard, Inc. pays 20.08% of its earnings as a dividend. Tractor Supply Co. pays out 43.13% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ANCTF or TSCO?
Alimentation Couche-Tard, Inc. quarterly revenues are $17.9B, which are larger than Tractor Supply Co. quarterly revenues of $3.7B. Alimentation Couche-Tard, Inc.'s net income of $743.3M is higher than Tractor Supply Co.'s net income of $259.3M. Notably, Alimentation Couche-Tard, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 19.09x while Tractor Supply Co.'s PE ratio is 26.10x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Alimentation Couche-Tard, Inc. is 0.69x versus 1.87x for Tractor Supply Co.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ANCTFAlimentation Couche-Tard, Inc.0.69x 19.09x $17.9B $743.3M TSCOTractor Supply Co.1.87x 26.10x $3.7B $259.3M
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Google Vs NVIDIA Stock: Which Is Best?
Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOGL) and NVIDIA (NASDAQ:NVIDIA) are two of the market’s…
How High Could NVIDIA Stock Go?
NVIDIA (NASDAQ:NVDA) has been one of the best stocks to…
Stock Ideas
Buy
51
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.4T
P/E Ratio: 61x
Buy
65
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.2T
P/E Ratio: 38x
Buy
69
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 40x
Alerts
Sell
47
PSTG alert for Dec 4
Pure Storage, Inc. [PSTG] is up 5.05% over the past day.
Sell
41
SMX alert for Dec 4
SMX (Security Matters) Plc [SMX] is up 154.74% over the past day.
Sell
43
HY alert for Dec 4
Hyster-Yale, Inc. [HY] is up 1.92% over the past day.
