LULU Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. has a net margin of 11.96% compared to lululemon athletica, Inc.'s net margin of 12.72%. lululemon athletica, Inc.'s return on equity of 40.5% beat Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.'s return on equity of 43.88%.

lululemon athletica, Inc. has a consensus price target of $208.66, signalling upside risk potential of 9.21%. On the other hand Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $45.03 which suggests that it could grow by 13.37%. Given that Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. has higher upside potential than lululemon athletica, Inc., analysts believe Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. is more attractive than lululemon athletica, Inc..

lululemon athletica, Inc. has a beta of 1.015, which suggesting that the stock is 1.475% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. has a beta of 0.974, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.612%.

lululemon athletica, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. lululemon athletica, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

lululemon athletica, Inc. quarterly revenues are $2.6B, which are smaller than Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. quarterly revenues of $3B. lululemon athletica, Inc.'s net income of $306.8M is lower than Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.'s net income of $382.1M. Notably, lululemon athletica, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 13.33x while Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.'s PE ratio is 35.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for lululemon athletica, Inc. is 2.08x versus 4.57x for Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Rivian Automotive, Inc. has a net margin of 11.96% compared to lululemon athletica, Inc.'s net margin of -74.84%. lululemon athletica, Inc.'s return on equity of 40.5% beat Rivian Automotive, Inc.'s return on equity of -59.71%.

lululemon athletica, Inc. has a consensus price target of $208.66, signalling upside risk potential of 9.21%. On the other hand Rivian Automotive, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $16.96 which suggests that it could grow by 6.33%. Given that lululemon athletica, Inc. has higher upside potential than Rivian Automotive, Inc., analysts believe lululemon athletica, Inc. is more attractive than Rivian Automotive, Inc..

lululemon athletica, Inc. has a beta of 1.015, which suggesting that the stock is 1.475% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Rivian Automotive, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

lululemon athletica, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Rivian Automotive, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. lululemon athletica, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Rivian Automotive, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

lululemon athletica, Inc. quarterly revenues are $2.6B, which are larger than Rivian Automotive, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.6B. lululemon athletica, Inc.'s net income of $306.8M is higher than Rivian Automotive, Inc.'s net income of -$1.2B. Notably, lululemon athletica, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 13.33x while Rivian Automotive, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for lululemon athletica, Inc. is 2.08x versus 3.12x for Rivian Automotive, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tesla, Inc. has a net margin of 11.96% compared to lululemon athletica, Inc.'s net margin of 4.94%. lululemon athletica, Inc.'s return on equity of 40.5% beat Tesla, Inc.'s return on equity of 7.04%.

lululemon athletica, Inc. has a consensus price target of $208.66, signalling upside risk potential of 9.21%. On the other hand Tesla, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $411.40 which suggests that it could fall by -8.39%. Given that lululemon athletica, Inc. has higher upside potential than Tesla, Inc., analysts believe lululemon athletica, Inc. is more attractive than Tesla, Inc..

lululemon athletica, Inc. has a beta of 1.015, which suggesting that the stock is 1.475% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tesla, Inc. has a beta of 1.831, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 83.075%.

lululemon athletica, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Tesla, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. lululemon athletica, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tesla, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

lululemon athletica, Inc. quarterly revenues are $2.6B, which are smaller than Tesla, Inc. quarterly revenues of $28.1B. lululemon athletica, Inc.'s net income of $306.8M is lower than Tesla, Inc.'s net income of $1.4B. Notably, lululemon athletica, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 13.33x while Tesla, Inc.'s PE ratio is 300.05x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for lululemon athletica, Inc. is 2.08x versus 16.53x for Tesla, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Vision Marine Technologies, Inc. has a net margin of 11.96% compared to lululemon athletica, Inc.'s net margin of -27.48%. lululemon athletica, Inc.'s return on equity of 40.5% beat Vision Marine Technologies, Inc.'s return on equity of -141.95%.

lululemon athletica, Inc. has a consensus price target of $208.66, signalling upside risk potential of 9.21%. On the other hand Vision Marine Technologies, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $12.01 which suggests that it could grow by 8880.2%. Given that Vision Marine Technologies, Inc. has higher upside potential than lululemon athletica, Inc., analysts believe Vision Marine Technologies, Inc. is more attractive than lululemon athletica, Inc..

lululemon athletica, Inc. has a beta of 1.015, which suggesting that the stock is 1.475% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Vision Marine Technologies, Inc. has a beta of 0.273, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 72.732%.

lululemon athletica, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Vision Marine Technologies, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. lululemon athletica, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Vision Marine Technologies, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

lululemon athletica, Inc. quarterly revenues are $2.6B, which are larger than Vision Marine Technologies, Inc. quarterly revenues of $15.7M. lululemon athletica, Inc.'s net income of $306.8M is higher than Vision Marine Technologies, Inc.'s net income of -$4.3M. Notably, lululemon athletica, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 13.33x while Vision Marine Technologies, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for lululemon athletica, Inc. is 2.08x versus 0.08x for Vision Marine Technologies, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.