LULU Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Deckers Outdoor Corp. has a net margin of 11.96% compared to lululemon athletica, Inc.'s net margin of 18.85%. lululemon athletica, Inc.'s return on equity of 40.5% beat Deckers Outdoor Corp.'s return on equity of 41.28%.

lululemon athletica, Inc. has a consensus price target of $207.11, signalling downside risk potential of -2.48%. On the other hand Deckers Outdoor Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $111.40 which suggests that it could grow by 10.65%. Given that Deckers Outdoor Corp. has higher upside potential than lululemon athletica, Inc., analysts believe Deckers Outdoor Corp. is more attractive than lululemon athletica, Inc..

lululemon athletica, Inc. has a beta of 1.011, which suggesting that the stock is 1.107% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Deckers Outdoor Corp. has a beta of 1.188, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.76%.

lululemon athletica, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Deckers Outdoor Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. lululemon athletica, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Deckers Outdoor Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

lululemon athletica, Inc. quarterly revenues are $2.6B, which are larger than Deckers Outdoor Corp. quarterly revenues of $1.4B. lululemon athletica, Inc.'s net income of $306.8M is higher than Deckers Outdoor Corp.'s net income of $268.2M. Notably, lululemon athletica, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 14.82x while Deckers Outdoor Corp.'s PE ratio is 14.93x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for lululemon athletica, Inc. is 2.32x versus 2.89x for Deckers Outdoor Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Rivian Automotive, Inc. has a net margin of 11.96% compared to lululemon athletica, Inc.'s net margin of -74.84%. lululemon athletica, Inc.'s return on equity of 40.5% beat Rivian Automotive, Inc.'s return on equity of -59.71%.

lululemon athletica, Inc. has a consensus price target of $207.11, signalling downside risk potential of -2.48%. On the other hand Rivian Automotive, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $16.58 which suggests that it could fall by -23.76%. Given that Rivian Automotive, Inc. has more downside risk than lululemon athletica, Inc., analysts believe lululemon athletica, Inc. is more attractive than Rivian Automotive, Inc..

lululemon athletica, Inc. has a beta of 1.011, which suggesting that the stock is 1.107% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Rivian Automotive, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

lululemon athletica, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Rivian Automotive, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. lululemon athletica, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Rivian Automotive, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

lululemon athletica, Inc. quarterly revenues are $2.6B, which are larger than Rivian Automotive, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.6B. lululemon athletica, Inc.'s net income of $306.8M is higher than Rivian Automotive, Inc.'s net income of -$1.2B. Notably, lululemon athletica, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 14.82x while Rivian Automotive, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for lululemon athletica, Inc. is 2.32x versus 4.26x for Rivian Automotive, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tesla, Inc. has a net margin of 11.96% compared to lululemon athletica, Inc.'s net margin of 4.94%. lululemon athletica, Inc.'s return on equity of 40.5% beat Tesla, Inc.'s return on equity of 7.04%.

lululemon athletica, Inc. has a consensus price target of $207.11, signalling downside risk potential of -2.48%. On the other hand Tesla, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $399.15 which suggests that it could fall by -18.68%. Given that Tesla, Inc. has more downside risk than lululemon athletica, Inc., analysts believe lululemon athletica, Inc. is more attractive than Tesla, Inc..

lululemon athletica, Inc. has a beta of 1.011, which suggesting that the stock is 1.107% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tesla, Inc. has a beta of 1.874, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 87.392%.

lululemon athletica, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Tesla, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. lululemon athletica, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tesla, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

lululemon athletica, Inc. quarterly revenues are $2.6B, which are smaller than Tesla, Inc. quarterly revenues of $28.1B. lululemon athletica, Inc.'s net income of $306.8M is lower than Tesla, Inc.'s net income of $1.4B. Notably, lululemon athletica, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 14.82x while Tesla, Inc.'s PE ratio is 326.56x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for lululemon athletica, Inc. is 2.32x versus 17.99x for Tesla, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Vision Marine Technologies, Inc. has a net margin of 11.96% compared to lululemon athletica, Inc.'s net margin of -2502.32%. lululemon athletica, Inc.'s return on equity of 40.5% beat Vision Marine Technologies, Inc.'s return on equity of -141.95%.

lululemon athletica, Inc. has a consensus price target of $207.11, signalling downside risk potential of -2.48%. On the other hand Vision Marine Technologies, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $12.01 which suggests that it could grow by 4041.73%. Given that Vision Marine Technologies, Inc. has higher upside potential than lululemon athletica, Inc., analysts believe Vision Marine Technologies, Inc. is more attractive than lululemon athletica, Inc..

lululemon athletica, Inc. has a beta of 1.011, which suggesting that the stock is 1.107% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Vision Marine Technologies, Inc. has a beta of 0.226, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 77.366%.

lululemon athletica, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Vision Marine Technologies, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. lululemon athletica, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Vision Marine Technologies, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

lululemon athletica, Inc. quarterly revenues are $2.6B, which are larger than Vision Marine Technologies, Inc. quarterly revenues of $203K. lululemon athletica, Inc.'s net income of $306.8M is higher than Vision Marine Technologies, Inc.'s net income of -$5.1M. Notably, lululemon athletica, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 14.82x while Vision Marine Technologies, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for lululemon athletica, Inc. is 2.32x versus 0.17x for Vision Marine Technologies, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.