LULU Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Ford Motor has a net margin of 20.72% compared to Lululemon Athletica's net margin of 1.16%. Lululemon Athletica's return on equity of 43.64% beat Ford Motor's return on equity of 11.39%.

Lululemon Athletica has a consensus price target of $332.59, signalling upside risk potential of 17.76%. On the other hand Ford Motor has an analysts' consensus of $10.17 which suggests that it could fall by -1.07%. Given that Lululemon Athletica has higher upside potential than Ford Motor, analysts believe Lululemon Athletica is more attractive than Ford Motor.

Lululemon Athletica has a beta of 1.300, which suggesting that the stock is 30.018% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ford Motor has a beta of 1.529, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 52.867%.

Lululemon Athletica has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ford Motor offers a yield of 7.3% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share. Lululemon Athletica pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ford Motor pays out 53.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Ford Motor's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lululemon Athletica quarterly revenues are $3.6B, which are smaller than Ford Motor quarterly revenues of $40.7B. Lululemon Athletica's net income of $748.4M is higher than Ford Motor's net income of $471M. Notably, Lululemon Athletica's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.21x while Ford Motor's PE ratio is 8.22x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lululemon Athletica is 3.31x versus 0.23x for Ford Motor. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

General Motors has a net margin of 20.72% compared to Lululemon Athletica's net margin of 6.32%. Lululemon Athletica's return on equity of 43.64% beat General Motors's return on equity of 8.33%.

Lululemon Athletica has a consensus price target of $332.59, signalling upside risk potential of 17.76%. On the other hand General Motors has an analysts' consensus of $54.39 which suggests that it could grow by 14.86%. Given that Lululemon Athletica has higher upside potential than General Motors, analysts believe Lululemon Athletica is more attractive than General Motors.

Lululemon Athletica has a beta of 1.300, which suggesting that the stock is 30.018% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison General Motors has a beta of 1.361, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 36.127%.

Lululemon Athletica has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. General Motors offers a yield of 1.01% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share. Lululemon Athletica pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. General Motors pays out 10.87% of its earnings as a dividend. General Motors's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lululemon Athletica quarterly revenues are $3.6B, which are smaller than General Motors quarterly revenues of $44B. Lululemon Athletica's net income of $748.4M is lower than General Motors's net income of $2.8B. Notably, Lululemon Athletica's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.21x while General Motors's PE ratio is 6.59x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lululemon Athletica is 3.31x versus 0.27x for General Motors. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tesla has a net margin of 20.72% compared to Lululemon Athletica's net margin of 2.12%. Lululemon Athletica's return on equity of 43.64% beat Tesla's return on equity of 9.1%.

Lululemon Athletica has a consensus price target of $332.59, signalling upside risk potential of 17.76%. On the other hand Tesla has an analysts' consensus of $289.44 which suggests that it could grow by 1.62%. Given that Lululemon Athletica has higher upside potential than Tesla, analysts believe Lululemon Athletica is more attractive than Tesla.

Lululemon Athletica has a beta of 1.300, which suggesting that the stock is 30.018% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tesla has a beta of 2.429, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 142.869%.

Lululemon Athletica has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Tesla offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lululemon Athletica pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tesla pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Lululemon Athletica quarterly revenues are $3.6B, which are smaller than Tesla quarterly revenues of $19.3B. Lululemon Athletica's net income of $748.4M is higher than Tesla's net income of $409M. Notably, Lululemon Athletica's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.21x while Tesla's PE ratio is 156.49x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lululemon Athletica is 3.31x versus 10.43x for Tesla. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Urban Outfitters has a net margin of 20.72% compared to Lululemon Athletica's net margin of 7.35%. Lululemon Athletica's return on equity of 43.64% beat Urban Outfitters's return on equity of 17.74%.

Lululemon Athletica has a consensus price target of $332.59, signalling upside risk potential of 17.76%. On the other hand Urban Outfitters has an analysts' consensus of $55.00 which suggests that it could grow by 6.19%. Given that Lululemon Athletica has higher upside potential than Urban Outfitters, analysts believe Lululemon Athletica is more attractive than Urban Outfitters.

Lululemon Athletica has a beta of 1.300, which suggesting that the stock is 30.018% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Urban Outfitters has a beta of 1.333, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.282%.

Lululemon Athletica has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Urban Outfitters offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lululemon Athletica pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Urban Outfitters pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Lululemon Athletica quarterly revenues are $3.6B, which are larger than Urban Outfitters quarterly revenues of $1.6B. Lululemon Athletica's net income of $748.4M is higher than Urban Outfitters's net income of $120.3M. Notably, Lululemon Athletica's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.21x while Urban Outfitters's PE ratio is 12.13x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lululemon Athletica is 3.31x versus 0.88x for Urban Outfitters. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.