LULU Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

G-III Apparel Group Ltd. has a net margin of 14.69% compared to lululemon athletica, Inc.'s net margin of 1.78%. lululemon athletica, Inc.'s return on equity of 42.48% beat G-III Apparel Group Ltd.'s return on equity of 11.07%.

lululemon athletica, Inc. has a consensus price target of $189.99, signalling upside risk potential of 4.22%. On the other hand G-III Apparel Group Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $30.25 which suggests that it could grow by 2.09%. Given that lululemon athletica, Inc. has higher upside potential than G-III Apparel Group Ltd., analysts believe lululemon athletica, Inc. is more attractive than G-III Apparel Group Ltd..

lululemon athletica, Inc. has a beta of 1.011, which suggesting that the stock is 1.107% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison G-III Apparel Group Ltd. has a beta of 1.304, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.37%.

lululemon athletica, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. G-III Apparel Group Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. lululemon athletica, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. G-III Apparel Group Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

lululemon athletica, Inc. quarterly revenues are $2.5B, which are larger than G-III Apparel Group Ltd. quarterly revenues of $613.3M. lululemon athletica, Inc.'s net income of $370.9M is higher than G-III Apparel Group Ltd.'s net income of $10.9M. Notably, lululemon athletica, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 12.48x while G-III Apparel Group Ltd.'s PE ratio is 7.34x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for lululemon athletica, Inc. is 2.04x versus 0.43x for G-III Apparel Group Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Levi Strauss & Co. has a net margin of 14.69% compared to lululemon athletica, Inc.'s net margin of 7.91%. lululemon athletica, Inc.'s return on equity of 42.48% beat Levi Strauss & Co.'s return on equity of 25.88%.

lululemon athletica, Inc. has a consensus price target of $189.99, signalling upside risk potential of 4.22%. On the other hand Levi Strauss & Co. has an analysts' consensus of $26.79 which suggests that it could grow by 19.37%. Given that Levi Strauss & Co. has higher upside potential than lululemon athletica, Inc., analysts believe Levi Strauss & Co. is more attractive than lululemon athletica, Inc..

lululemon athletica, Inc. has a beta of 1.011, which suggesting that the stock is 1.107% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Levi Strauss & Co. has a beta of 1.337, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.744%.

lululemon athletica, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Levi Strauss & Co. offers a yield of 2.41% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share. lululemon athletica, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Levi Strauss & Co. pays out 95.53% of its earnings as a dividend. Levi Strauss & Co.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

lululemon athletica, Inc. quarterly revenues are $2.5B, which are larger than Levi Strauss & Co. quarterly revenues of $1.5B. lululemon athletica, Inc.'s net income of $370.9M is higher than Levi Strauss & Co.'s net income of $122M. Notably, lululemon athletica, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 12.48x while Levi Strauss & Co.'s PE ratio is 19.36x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for lululemon athletica, Inc. is 2.04x versus 1.41x for Levi Strauss & Co.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NIKE, Inc. has a net margin of 14.69% compared to lululemon athletica, Inc.'s net margin of 6.2%. lululemon athletica, Inc.'s return on equity of 42.48% beat NIKE, Inc.'s return on equity of 21.08%.

lululemon athletica, Inc. has a consensus price target of $189.99, signalling upside risk potential of 4.22%. On the other hand NIKE, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $83.30 which suggests that it could grow by 26.89%. Given that NIKE, Inc. has higher upside potential than lululemon athletica, Inc., analysts believe NIKE, Inc. is more attractive than lululemon athletica, Inc..

lululemon athletica, Inc. has a beta of 1.011, which suggesting that the stock is 1.107% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NIKE, Inc. has a beta of 1.287, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 28.707%.

lululemon athletica, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. NIKE, Inc. offers a yield of 2.45% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.41 per share. lululemon athletica, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. NIKE, Inc. pays out 72.55% of its earnings as a dividend. NIKE, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

lululemon athletica, Inc. quarterly revenues are $2.5B, which are smaller than NIKE, Inc. quarterly revenues of $11.7B. lululemon athletica, Inc.'s net income of $370.9M is lower than NIKE, Inc.'s net income of $727M. Notably, lululemon athletica, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 12.48x while NIKE, Inc.'s PE ratio is 33.65x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for lululemon athletica, Inc. is 2.04x versus 2.09x for NIKE, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ralph Lauren Corp. has a net margin of 14.69% compared to lululemon athletica, Inc.'s net margin of 10.32%. lululemon athletica, Inc.'s return on equity of 42.48% beat Ralph Lauren Corp.'s return on equity of 33.72%.

lululemon athletica, Inc. has a consensus price target of $189.99, signalling upside risk potential of 4.22%. On the other hand Ralph Lauren Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $369.46 which suggests that it could grow by 3.16%. Given that lululemon athletica, Inc. has higher upside potential than Ralph Lauren Corp., analysts believe lululemon athletica, Inc. is more attractive than Ralph Lauren Corp..

lululemon athletica, Inc. has a beta of 1.011, which suggesting that the stock is 1.107% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ralph Lauren Corp. has a beta of 1.519, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 51.947%.

lululemon athletica, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ralph Lauren Corp. offers a yield of 0.97% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.91 per share. lululemon athletica, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ralph Lauren Corp. pays out 28.43% of its earnings as a dividend. Ralph Lauren Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

lululemon athletica, Inc. quarterly revenues are $2.5B, which are larger than Ralph Lauren Corp. quarterly revenues of $2B. lululemon athletica, Inc.'s net income of $370.9M is higher than Ralph Lauren Corp.'s net income of $207.5M. Notably, lululemon athletica, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 12.48x while Ralph Lauren Corp.'s PE ratio is 26.45x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for lululemon athletica, Inc. is 2.04x versus 2.99x for Ralph Lauren Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.