Is DocuSign Stock Undervalued?
Digital signature software business DocuSign (NASDAQ:DOCU) has been struggling over…
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FLWS
1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc.
|
$217.8M | -$0.64 | -9.66% | -14.05% | $6.00 |
|
CASY
Casey's General Stores, Inc.
|
$4.5B | $5.15 | 4.48% | 22.08% | $600.00 |
|
FIVE
Five Below, Inc.
|
$983.5M | $0.26 | 15.39% | 3.78% | $186.24 |
|
ODP
The ODP Corp.
|
$1.7B | $0.80 | -3.45% | 75.59% | $31.50 |
|
SPWH
Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings, Inc.
|
$331.1M | $0.08 | -3.1% | -20.63% | $2.95 |
|
TSCO
Tractor Supply Co.
|
$3.7B | $0.48 | 6.85% | 7.9% | $63.15 |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FLWS
1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc.
|
$4.13 | $6.00 | $262.9M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.16x |
|
CASY
Casey's General Stores, Inc.
|
$567.94 | $600.00 | $21.1B | 34.93x | $0.57 | 0.38% | 1.25x |
|
FIVE
Five Below, Inc.
|
$188.67 | $186.24 | $10.4B | 33.88x | $0.00 | 0% | 2.36x |
|
ODP
The ODP Corp.
|
$28.00 | $31.50 | $843.3M | 300.11x | $0.00 | 0% | 0.13x |
|
SPWH
Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings, Inc.
|
$1.40 | $2.95 | $53.9M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.04x |
|
TSCO
Tractor Supply Co.
|
$51.08 | $63.15 | $27B | 24.65x | $0.23 | 1.8% | 1.77x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FLWS
1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc.
|
63.27% | 0.328 | 127.91% | 0.14x |
|
CASY
Casey's General Stores, Inc.
|
43.37% | 0.318 | 15.31% | 0.60x |
|
FIVE
Five Below, Inc.
|
50.81% | 3.164 | 23.22% | 0.48x |
|
ODP
The ODP Corp.
|
48.95% | 3.450 | 94.06% | 0.43x |
|
SPWH
Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings, Inc.
|
72.53% | 3.158 | 582.66% | 0.02x |
|
TSCO
Tractor Supply Co.
|
68.98% | 0.357 | 19.02% | 0.07x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FLWS
1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc.
|
$63.9M | -$50.5M | -33.28% | -63.15% | -23.47% | -$145.6M |
|
CASY
Casey's General Stores, Inc.
|
$1B | $298.7M | 9.4% | 17.14% | 6.63% | $176M |
|
FIVE
Five Below, Inc.
|
$302.5M | $43.3M | 8.06% | 16.84% | 4.17% | -$133.2M |
|
ODP
The ODP Corp.
|
$331M | $38M | 0.27% | 0.62% | 2.34% | $78M |
|
SPWH
Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings, Inc.
|
$99.1M | $5.2M | -4.88% | -16.65% | 1.58% | $8.7M |
|
TSCO
Tractor Supply Co.
|
$1.3B | $342.7M | 13.93% | 46.58% | 9.22% | $30.3M |
Casey's General Stores, Inc. has a net margin of -24.61% compared to 1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc.'s net margin of 4.58%. 1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc.'s return on equity of -63.15% beat Casey's General Stores, Inc.'s return on equity of 17.14%.
| Company | Gross Margin | Earnings Per Share | Invested Capital |
|---|---|---|---|
|
FLWS
1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc.
|
29.68% | -$0.83 | $592.1M |
|
CASY
Casey's General Stores, Inc.
|
22.42% | $5.53 | $6.7B |
1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc. has a consensus price target of $6.00, signalling upside risk potential of 45.28%. On the other hand Casey's General Stores, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $600.00 which suggests that it could grow by 5.82%. Given that 1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc. has higher upside potential than Casey's General Stores, Inc., analysts believe 1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc. is more attractive than Casey's General Stores, Inc..
| Company | Buy Ratings | Hold Ratings | Sell Ratings |
|---|---|---|---|
|
FLWS
1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc.
|
0 | 1 | 0 |
|
CASY
Casey's General Stores, Inc.
|
11 | 5 | 0 |
1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc. has a beta of 1.172, which suggesting that the stock is 17.248% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Casey's General Stores, Inc. has a beta of 0.654, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 34.587%.
1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Casey's General Stores, Inc. offers a yield of 0.38% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.57 per share. 1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Casey's General Stores, Inc. pays out 13.67% of its earnings as a dividend. Casey's General Stores, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc. quarterly revenues are $215.2M, which are smaller than Casey's General Stores, Inc. quarterly revenues of $4.5B. 1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc.'s net income of -$53M is lower than Casey's General Stores, Inc.'s net income of $206.3M. Notably, 1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Casey's General Stores, Inc.'s PE ratio is 34.93x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for 1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc. is 0.16x versus 1.25x for Casey's General Stores, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
| Company | Price/Sales Ratio | Price/Earnings Ratio | Quarterly Revenue | Quarterly Net Income |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FLWS
1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc.
|
0.16x | -- | $215.2M | -$53M |
|
CASY
Casey's General Stores, Inc.
|
1.25x | 34.93x | $4.5B | $206.3M |
Five Below, Inc. has a net margin of -24.61% compared to 1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc.'s net margin of 3.52%. 1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc.'s return on equity of -63.15% beat Five Below, Inc.'s return on equity of 16.84%.
| Company | Gross Margin | Earnings Per Share | Invested Capital |
|---|---|---|---|
|
FLWS
1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc.
|
29.68% | -$0.83 | $592.1M |
|
FIVE
Five Below, Inc.
|
29.14% | $0.66 | $4B |
1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc. has a consensus price target of $6.00, signalling upside risk potential of 45.28%. On the other hand Five Below, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $186.24 which suggests that it could fall by -1.29%. Given that 1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc. has higher upside potential than Five Below, Inc., analysts believe 1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc. is more attractive than Five Below, Inc..
| Company | Buy Ratings | Hold Ratings | Sell Ratings |
|---|---|---|---|
|
FLWS
1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc.
|
0 | 1 | 0 |
|
FIVE
Five Below, Inc.
|
11 | 10 | 0 |
1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc. has a beta of 1.172, which suggesting that the stock is 17.248% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Five Below, Inc. has a beta of 1.167, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.681%.
1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Five Below, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. 1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Five Below, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc. quarterly revenues are $215.2M, which are smaller than Five Below, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1B. 1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc.'s net income of -$53M is lower than Five Below, Inc.'s net income of $36.5M. Notably, 1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Five Below, Inc.'s PE ratio is 33.88x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for 1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc. is 0.16x versus 2.36x for Five Below, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
| Company | Price/Sales Ratio | Price/Earnings Ratio | Quarterly Revenue | Quarterly Net Income |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FLWS
1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc.
|
0.16x | -- | $215.2M | -$53M |
|
FIVE
Five Below, Inc.
|
2.36x | 33.88x | $1B | $36.5M |
The ODP Corp. has a net margin of -24.61% compared to 1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc.'s net margin of 1.42%. 1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc.'s return on equity of -63.15% beat The ODP Corp.'s return on equity of 0.62%.
| Company | Gross Margin | Earnings Per Share | Invested Capital |
|---|---|---|---|
|
FLWS
1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc.
|
29.68% | -$0.83 | $592.1M |
|
ODP
The ODP Corp.
|
20.37% | $0.77 | $1.6B |
1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc. has a consensus price target of $6.00, signalling upside risk potential of 45.28%. On the other hand The ODP Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $31.50 which suggests that it could grow by 12.5%. Given that 1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc. has higher upside potential than The ODP Corp., analysts believe 1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc. is more attractive than The ODP Corp..
| Company | Buy Ratings | Hold Ratings | Sell Ratings |
|---|---|---|---|
|
FLWS
1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc.
|
0 | 1 | 0 |
|
ODP
The ODP Corp.
|
0 | 1 | 0 |
1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc. has a beta of 1.172, which suggesting that the stock is 17.248% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The ODP Corp. has a beta of 1.153, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.282%.
1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. The ODP Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. 1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. The ODP Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc. quarterly revenues are $215.2M, which are smaller than The ODP Corp. quarterly revenues of $1.6B. 1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc.'s net income of -$53M is lower than The ODP Corp.'s net income of $23M. Notably, 1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while The ODP Corp.'s PE ratio is 300.11x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for 1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc. is 0.16x versus 0.13x for The ODP Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
| Company | Price/Sales Ratio | Price/Earnings Ratio | Quarterly Revenue | Quarterly Net Income |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FLWS
1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc.
|
0.16x | -- | $215.2M | -$53M |
|
ODP
The ODP Corp.
|
0.13x | 300.11x | $1.6B | $23M |
Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings, Inc. has a net margin of -24.61% compared to 1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc.'s net margin of 0%. 1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc.'s return on equity of -63.15% beat Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of -16.65%.
| Company | Gross Margin | Earnings Per Share | Invested Capital |
|---|---|---|---|
|
FLWS
1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc.
|
29.68% | -$0.83 | $592.1M |
|
SPWH
Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings, Inc.
|
29.91% | $0.00 | $762.6M |
1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc. has a consensus price target of $6.00, signalling upside risk potential of 45.28%. On the other hand Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $2.95 which suggests that it could grow by 110.71%. Given that Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than 1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc., analysts believe Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than 1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc..
| Company | Buy Ratings | Hold Ratings | Sell Ratings |
|---|---|---|---|
|
FLWS
1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc.
|
0 | 1 | 0 |
|
SPWH
Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings, Inc.
|
4 | 1 | 0 |
1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc. has a beta of 1.172, which suggesting that the stock is 17.248% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.596, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 40.374%.
1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. 1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc. quarterly revenues are $215.2M, which are smaller than Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues of $331.3M. 1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc.'s net income of -$53M is lower than Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $8K. Notably, 1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for 1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc. is 0.16x versus 0.04x for Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
| Company | Price/Sales Ratio | Price/Earnings Ratio | Quarterly Revenue | Quarterly Net Income |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FLWS
1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc.
|
0.16x | -- | $215.2M | -$53M |
|
SPWH
Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings, Inc.
|
0.04x | -- | $331.3M | $8K |
Tractor Supply Co. has a net margin of -24.61% compared to 1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc.'s net margin of 6.97%. 1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc.'s return on equity of -63.15% beat Tractor Supply Co.'s return on equity of 46.58%.
| Company | Gross Margin | Earnings Per Share | Invested Capital |
|---|---|---|---|
|
FLWS
1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc.
|
29.68% | -$0.83 | $592.1M |
|
TSCO
Tractor Supply Co.
|
34.02% | $0.49 | $8.3B |
1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc. has a consensus price target of $6.00, signalling upside risk potential of 45.28%. On the other hand Tractor Supply Co. has an analysts' consensus of $63.15 which suggests that it could grow by 23.63%. Given that 1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc. has higher upside potential than Tractor Supply Co., analysts believe 1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc. is more attractive than Tractor Supply Co..
| Company | Buy Ratings | Hold Ratings | Sell Ratings |
|---|---|---|---|
|
FLWS
1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc.
|
0 | 1 | 0 |
|
TSCO
Tractor Supply Co.
|
15 | 11 | 0 |
1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc. has a beta of 1.172, which suggesting that the stock is 17.248% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tractor Supply Co. has a beta of 0.723, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.659%.
1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Tractor Supply Co. offers a yield of 1.8% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share. 1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tractor Supply Co. pays out 43.13% of its earnings as a dividend. Tractor Supply Co.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc. quarterly revenues are $215.2M, which are smaller than Tractor Supply Co. quarterly revenues of $3.7B. 1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc.'s net income of -$53M is lower than Tractor Supply Co.'s net income of $259.3M. Notably, 1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Tractor Supply Co.'s PE ratio is 24.65x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for 1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc. is 0.16x versus 1.77x for Tractor Supply Co.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
| Company | Price/Sales Ratio | Price/Earnings Ratio | Quarterly Revenue | Quarterly Net Income |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FLWS
1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc.
|
0.16x | -- | $215.2M | -$53M |
|
TSCO
Tractor Supply Co.
|
1.77x | 24.65x | $3.7B | $259.3M |
Signup to receive the latest stock alerts
Digital signature software business DocuSign (NASDAQ:DOCU) has been struggling over…
Cybersecurity major SentinelOne (NYSE:S) has struggled over several years, delivering…
Chip and software maker Broadcom (NASDAQ:AVGO) has been among the…
Market Cap: $4.6T
P/E Ratio: 64x
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 39x
Hut 8 Corp. [HUT] is up 0.65% over the past day.
Travere Therapeutics, Inc. [TVTX] is up 14.03% over the past day.
Structure Therapeutics, Inc. [GPCR] is down 2.36% over the past day.