BBW Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Dick's Sporting Goods has a net margin of 8.26% compared to Build-A-Bear Workshop's net margin of 7.45%. Build-A-Bear Workshop's return on equity of 41.97% beat Dick's Sporting Goods's return on equity of 42.47%.

Build-A-Bear Workshop has a consensus price target of $54.33, signalling upside risk potential of 18.32%. On the other hand Dick's Sporting Goods has an analysts' consensus of $223.99 which suggests that it could grow by 6.03%. Given that Build-A-Bear Workshop has higher upside potential than Dick's Sporting Goods, analysts believe Build-A-Bear Workshop is more attractive than Dick's Sporting Goods.

Build-A-Bear Workshop has a beta of 1.533, which suggesting that the stock is 53.286% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Dick's Sporting Goods has a beta of 1.611, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 61.091%.

Build-A-Bear Workshop has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.74%. Dick's Sporting Goods offers a yield of 1.95% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.10 per share. Build-A-Bear Workshop pays 41.78% of its earnings as a dividend. Dick's Sporting Goods pays out 33.56% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Build-A-Bear Workshop quarterly revenues are $119.4M, which are smaller than Dick's Sporting Goods quarterly revenues of $3.1B. Build-A-Bear Workshop's net income of $9.9M is lower than Dick's Sporting Goods's net income of $227.8M. Notably, Build-A-Bear Workshop's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.21x while Dick's Sporting Goods's PE ratio is 16.12x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Build-A-Bear Workshop is 1.28x versus 1.39x for Dick's Sporting Goods. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MarineMax has a net margin of 8.26% compared to Build-A-Bear Workshop's net margin of 0.71%. Build-A-Bear Workshop's return on equity of 41.97% beat MarineMax's return on equity of 4%.

Build-A-Bear Workshop has a consensus price target of $54.33, signalling upside risk potential of 18.32%. On the other hand MarineMax has an analysts' consensus of $39.63 which suggests that it could grow by 38.84%. Given that MarineMax has higher upside potential than Build-A-Bear Workshop, analysts believe MarineMax is more attractive than Build-A-Bear Workshop.

Build-A-Bear Workshop has a beta of 1.533, which suggesting that the stock is 53.286% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MarineMax has a beta of 1.866, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 86.554%.

Build-A-Bear Workshop has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.74%. MarineMax offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Build-A-Bear Workshop pays 41.78% of its earnings as a dividend. MarineMax pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Build-A-Bear Workshop's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Build-A-Bear Workshop quarterly revenues are $119.4M, which are smaller than MarineMax quarterly revenues of $563.1M. Build-A-Bear Workshop's net income of $9.9M is higher than MarineMax's net income of $4M. Notably, Build-A-Bear Workshop's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.21x while MarineMax's PE ratio is 17.30x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Build-A-Bear Workshop is 1.28x versus 0.27x for MarineMax. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Nordstrom has a net margin of 8.26% compared to Build-A-Bear Workshop's net margin of 1.33%. Build-A-Bear Workshop's return on equity of 41.97% beat Nordstrom's return on equity of 30.24%.

Build-A-Bear Workshop has a consensus price target of $54.33, signalling upside risk potential of 18.32%. On the other hand Nordstrom has an analysts' consensus of $22.73 which suggests that it could fall by -6.13%. Given that Build-A-Bear Workshop has higher upside potential than Nordstrom, analysts believe Build-A-Bear Workshop is more attractive than Nordstrom.

Build-A-Bear Workshop has a beta of 1.533, which suggesting that the stock is 53.286% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nordstrom has a beta of 2.562, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 156.165%.

Build-A-Bear Workshop has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.74%. Nordstrom offers a yield of 3.14% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share. Build-A-Bear Workshop pays 41.78% of its earnings as a dividend. Nordstrom pays out 91.79% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Build-A-Bear Workshop quarterly revenues are $119.4M, which are smaller than Nordstrom quarterly revenues of $3.5B. Build-A-Bear Workshop's net income of $9.9M is lower than Nordstrom's net income of $46M. Notably, Build-A-Bear Workshop's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.21x while Nordstrom's PE ratio is 15.42x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Build-A-Bear Workshop is 1.28x versus 0.27x for Nordstrom. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lands' End has a net margin of 8.26% compared to Build-A-Bear Workshop's net margin of -0.19%. Build-A-Bear Workshop's return on equity of 41.97% beat Lands' End's return on equity of -8.88%.

Build-A-Bear Workshop has a consensus price target of $54.33, signalling upside risk potential of 18.32%. On the other hand Lands' End has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 40.02%. Given that Lands' End has higher upside potential than Build-A-Bear Workshop, analysts believe Lands' End is more attractive than Build-A-Bear Workshop.

Build-A-Bear Workshop has a beta of 1.533, which suggesting that the stock is 53.286% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lands' End has a beta of 2.759, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 175.865%.

Build-A-Bear Workshop has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.74%. Lands' End offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Build-A-Bear Workshop pays 41.78% of its earnings as a dividend. Lands' End pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Build-A-Bear Workshop's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Build-A-Bear Workshop quarterly revenues are $119.4M, which are smaller than Lands' End quarterly revenues of $318.6M. Build-A-Bear Workshop's net income of $9.9M is higher than Lands' End's net income of -$593K. Notably, Build-A-Bear Workshop's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.21x while Lands' End's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Build-A-Bear Workshop is 1.28x versus 0.30x for Lands' End. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.