FIVE Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Best Buy has a net margin of 0.2% compared to Five Below's net margin of 2.89%. Five Below's return on equity of 17.27% beat Best Buy's return on equity of 41.95%.

Five Below has a consensus price target of $122.80, signalling upside risk potential of 20.78%. On the other hand Best Buy has an analysts' consensus of $98.50 which suggests that it could grow by 16.2%. Given that Five Below has higher upside potential than Best Buy, analysts believe Five Below is more attractive than Best Buy.

Five Below has a beta of 1.145, which suggesting that the stock is 14.522% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Best Buy has a beta of 1.435, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 43.468%.

Five Below has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Best Buy offers a yield of 4.44% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.94 per share. Five Below pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Best Buy pays out 64.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Best Buy's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Five Below quarterly revenues are $843.7M, which are smaller than Best Buy quarterly revenues of $9.4B. Five Below's net income of $1.7M is lower than Best Buy's net income of $273M. Notably, Five Below's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.96x while Best Buy's PE ratio is 14.49x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Five Below is 1.47x versus 0.44x for Best Buy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Foot Locker has a net margin of 0.2% compared to Five Below's net margin of -1.68%. Five Below's return on equity of 17.27% beat Foot Locker's return on equity of -14.45%.

Five Below has a consensus price target of $122.80, signalling upside risk potential of 20.78%. On the other hand Foot Locker has an analysts' consensus of $27.53 which suggests that it could grow by 13.15%. Given that Five Below has higher upside potential than Foot Locker, analysts believe Five Below is more attractive than Foot Locker.

Five Below has a beta of 1.145, which suggesting that the stock is 14.522% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Foot Locker has a beta of 1.491, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 49.132%.

Five Below has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Foot Locker offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. Five Below pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Foot Locker pays out -34.24% of its earnings as a dividend.

Five Below quarterly revenues are $843.7M, which are smaller than Foot Locker quarterly revenues of $2B. Five Below's net income of $1.7M is higher than Foot Locker's net income of -$33M. Notably, Five Below's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.96x while Foot Locker's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Five Below is 1.47x versus 0.25x for Foot Locker. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ross Stores has a net margin of 0.2% compared to Five Below's net margin of 9.64%. Five Below's return on equity of 17.27% beat Ross Stores's return on equity of 42.62%.

Five Below has a consensus price target of $122.80, signalling upside risk potential of 20.78%. On the other hand Ross Stores has an analysts' consensus of $169.00 which suggests that it could grow by 9.07%. Given that Five Below has higher upside potential than Ross Stores, analysts believe Five Below is more attractive than Ross Stores.

Five Below has a beta of 1.145, which suggesting that the stock is 14.522% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ross Stores has a beta of 1.105, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.503%.

Five Below has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ross Stores offers a yield of 0.95% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.37 per share. Five Below pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ross Stores pays out 24.26% of its earnings as a dividend. Ross Stores's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Five Below quarterly revenues are $843.7M, which are smaller than Ross Stores quarterly revenues of $5.1B. Five Below's net income of $1.7M is lower than Ross Stores's net income of $488.8M. Notably, Five Below's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.96x while Ross Stores's PE ratio is 24.40x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Five Below is 1.47x versus 2.43x for Ross Stores. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ulta Beauty has a net margin of 0.2% compared to Five Below's net margin of 9.57%. Five Below's return on equity of 17.27% beat Ulta Beauty's return on equity of 53.26%.

Five Below has a consensus price target of $122.80, signalling upside risk potential of 20.78%. On the other hand Ulta Beauty has an analysts' consensus of $442.04 which suggests that it could grow by 1.63%. Given that Five Below has higher upside potential than Ulta Beauty, analysts believe Five Below is more attractive than Ulta Beauty.

Five Below has a beta of 1.145, which suggesting that the stock is 14.522% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ulta Beauty has a beta of 1.284, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 28.415%.

Five Below has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ulta Beauty offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Five Below pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ulta Beauty pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Five Below quarterly revenues are $843.7M, which are smaller than Ulta Beauty quarterly revenues of $2.5B. Five Below's net income of $1.7M is lower than Ulta Beauty's net income of $242.2M. Notably, Five Below's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.96x while Ulta Beauty's PE ratio is 17.26x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Five Below is 1.47x versus 1.82x for Ulta Beauty. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.