ALTB Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Alpine Auto Brokers, Inc.'s net margin of -24.61%. Alpine Auto Brokers, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat 1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc.'s return on equity of -63.15%.

Alpine Auto Brokers, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand 1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $6.00 which suggests that it could grow by 36.83%. Given that 1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc. has higher upside potential than Alpine Auto Brokers, Inc., analysts believe 1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc. is more attractive than Alpine Auto Brokers, Inc..

Alpine Auto Brokers, Inc. has a beta of 1.931, which suggesting that the stock is 93.139% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison 1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc. has a beta of 1.172, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.248%.

Alpine Auto Brokers, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. 1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Alpine Auto Brokers, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. 1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Alpine Auto Brokers, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than 1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc. quarterly revenues of $215.2M. Alpine Auto Brokers, Inc.'s net income of -- is lower than 1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc.'s net income of -$53M. Notably, Alpine Auto Brokers, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while 1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Alpine Auto Brokers, Inc. is 16,525.10x versus 0.17x for 1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The ODP Corp. has a net margin of -- compared to Alpine Auto Brokers, Inc.'s net margin of 1.42%. Alpine Auto Brokers, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat The ODP Corp.'s return on equity of 0.62%.

Alpine Auto Brokers, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand The ODP Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $34.67 which suggests that it could grow by 23.81%. Given that The ODP Corp. has higher upside potential than Alpine Auto Brokers, Inc., analysts believe The ODP Corp. is more attractive than Alpine Auto Brokers, Inc..

Alpine Auto Brokers, Inc. has a beta of 1.931, which suggesting that the stock is 93.139% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The ODP Corp. has a beta of 1.153, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.282%.

Alpine Auto Brokers, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. The ODP Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Alpine Auto Brokers, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. The ODP Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Alpine Auto Brokers, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than The ODP Corp. quarterly revenues of $1.6B. Alpine Auto Brokers, Inc.'s net income of -- is lower than The ODP Corp.'s net income of $23M. Notably, Alpine Auto Brokers, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while The ODP Corp.'s PE ratio is 300.11x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Alpine Auto Brokers, Inc. is 16,525.10x versus 0.13x for The ODP Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Rush Enterprises, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Alpine Auto Brokers, Inc.'s net margin of 3.6%. Alpine Auto Brokers, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat Rush Enterprises, Inc.'s return on equity of 12.73%.

Alpine Auto Brokers, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Rush Enterprises, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $57.50 which suggests that it could fall by -2.24%. Given that Rush Enterprises, Inc. has higher upside potential than Alpine Auto Brokers, Inc., analysts believe Rush Enterprises, Inc. is more attractive than Alpine Auto Brokers, Inc..

Alpine Auto Brokers, Inc. has a beta of 1.931, which suggesting that the stock is 93.139% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Rush Enterprises, Inc. has a beta of 0.932, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.842%.

Alpine Auto Brokers, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Rush Enterprises, Inc. offers a yield of 1.26% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share. Alpine Auto Brokers, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Rush Enterprises, Inc. pays out 18.83% of its earnings as a dividend. Rush Enterprises, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Alpine Auto Brokers, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Rush Enterprises, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.9B. Alpine Auto Brokers, Inc.'s net income of -- is lower than Rush Enterprises, Inc.'s net income of $67.7M. Notably, Alpine Auto Brokers, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Rush Enterprises, Inc.'s PE ratio is 17.47x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Alpine Auto Brokers, Inc. is 16,525.10x versus 0.62x for Rush Enterprises, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tractor Supply Co. has a net margin of -- compared to Alpine Auto Brokers, Inc.'s net margin of 6.97%. Alpine Auto Brokers, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat Tractor Supply Co.'s return on equity of 46.58%.

Alpine Auto Brokers, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Tractor Supply Co. has an analysts' consensus of $63.74 which suggests that it could grow by 23.03%. Given that Tractor Supply Co. has higher upside potential than Alpine Auto Brokers, Inc., analysts believe Tractor Supply Co. is more attractive than Alpine Auto Brokers, Inc..

Alpine Auto Brokers, Inc. has a beta of 1.931, which suggesting that the stock is 93.139% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tractor Supply Co. has a beta of 0.723, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.659%.

Alpine Auto Brokers, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Tractor Supply Co. offers a yield of 1.78% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share. Alpine Auto Brokers, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tractor Supply Co. pays out 43.13% of its earnings as a dividend. Tractor Supply Co.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Alpine Auto Brokers, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Tractor Supply Co. quarterly revenues of $3.7B. Alpine Auto Brokers, Inc.'s net income of -- is lower than Tractor Supply Co.'s net income of $259.3M. Notably, Alpine Auto Brokers, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Tractor Supply Co.'s PE ratio is 25.01x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Alpine Auto Brokers, Inc. is 16,525.10x versus 1.80x for Tractor Supply Co.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.