RUSHA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

AutoNation has a net margin of 3.72% compared to Rush Enterprises's net margin of 2.58%. Rush Enterprises's return on equity of 15.01% beat AutoNation's return on equity of 29.88%.

Rush Enterprises has a consensus price target of $61.50, signalling upside risk potential of 16.65%. On the other hand AutoNation has an analysts' consensus of $205.27 which suggests that it could grow by 25.24%. Given that AutoNation has higher upside potential than Rush Enterprises, analysts believe AutoNation is more attractive than Rush Enterprises.

Rush Enterprises has a beta of 0.965, which suggesting that the stock is 3.544% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison AutoNation has a beta of 1.151, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.069%.

Rush Enterprises has a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.35%. AutoNation offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Rush Enterprises pays 18.25% of its earnings as a dividend. AutoNation pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Rush Enterprises's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Rush Enterprises quarterly revenues are $2B, which are smaller than AutoNation quarterly revenues of $7.2B. Rush Enterprises's net income of $74.8M is lower than AutoNation's net income of $186.1M. Notably, Rush Enterprises's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.13x while AutoNation's PE ratio is 9.68x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Rush Enterprises is 0.55x versus 0.25x for AutoNation. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lithia Motors has a net margin of 3.72% compared to Rush Enterprises's net margin of 2.36%. Rush Enterprises's return on equity of 15.01% beat Lithia Motors's return on equity of 12.36%.

Rush Enterprises has a consensus price target of $61.50, signalling upside risk potential of 16.65%. On the other hand Lithia Motors has an analysts' consensus of $425.63 which suggests that it could grow by 46.32%. Given that Lithia Motors has higher upside potential than Rush Enterprises, analysts believe Lithia Motors is more attractive than Rush Enterprises.

Rush Enterprises has a beta of 0.965, which suggesting that the stock is 3.544% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lithia Motors has a beta of 1.609, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 60.889%.

Rush Enterprises has a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.35%. Lithia Motors offers a yield of 0.73% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.53 per share. Rush Enterprises pays 18.25% of its earnings as a dividend. Lithia Motors pays out 7.05% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Rush Enterprises quarterly revenues are $2B, which are smaller than Lithia Motors quarterly revenues of $9.2B. Rush Enterprises's net income of $74.8M is lower than Lithia Motors's net income of $216.2M. Notably, Rush Enterprises's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.13x while Lithia Motors's PE ratio is 9.80x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Rush Enterprises is 0.55x versus 0.22x for Lithia Motors. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Penske Automotive Group has a net margin of 3.72% compared to Rush Enterprises's net margin of 3.06%. Rush Enterprises's return on equity of 15.01% beat Penske Automotive Group's return on equity of 18.34%.

Rush Enterprises has a consensus price target of $61.50, signalling upside risk potential of 16.65%. On the other hand Penske Automotive Group has an analysts' consensus of $170.04 which suggests that it could grow by 12.83%. Given that Rush Enterprises has higher upside potential than Penske Automotive Group, analysts believe Rush Enterprises is more attractive than Penske Automotive Group.

Rush Enterprises has a beta of 0.965, which suggesting that the stock is 3.544% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Penske Automotive Group has a beta of 1.034, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.403%.

Rush Enterprises has a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.35%. Penske Automotive Group offers a yield of 2.95% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.22 per share. Rush Enterprises pays 18.25% of its earnings as a dividend. Penske Automotive Group pays out 29.86% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Rush Enterprises quarterly revenues are $2B, which are smaller than Penske Automotive Group quarterly revenues of $7.7B. Rush Enterprises's net income of $74.8M is lower than Penske Automotive Group's net income of $236.4M. Notably, Rush Enterprises's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.13x while Penske Automotive Group's PE ratio is 10.96x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Rush Enterprises is 0.55x versus 0.33x for Penske Automotive Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sonic Automotive has a net margin of 3.72% compared to Rush Enterprises's net margin of 1.5%. Rush Enterprises's return on equity of 15.01% beat Sonic Automotive's return on equity of 22.42%.

Rush Enterprises has a consensus price target of $61.50, signalling upside risk potential of 16.65%. On the other hand Sonic Automotive has an analysts' consensus of $75.11 which suggests that it could grow by 28.55%. Given that Sonic Automotive has higher upside potential than Rush Enterprises, analysts believe Sonic Automotive is more attractive than Rush Enterprises.

Rush Enterprises has a beta of 0.965, which suggesting that the stock is 3.544% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sonic Automotive has a beta of 1.427, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.707%.

Rush Enterprises has a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.35%. Sonic Automotive offers a yield of 2.23% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share. Rush Enterprises pays 18.25% of its earnings as a dividend. Sonic Automotive pays out 18.89% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Rush Enterprises quarterly revenues are $2B, which are smaller than Sonic Automotive quarterly revenues of $3.9B. Rush Enterprises's net income of $74.8M is higher than Sonic Automotive's net income of $58.6M. Notably, Rush Enterprises's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.13x while Sonic Automotive's PE ratio is 9.45x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Rush Enterprises is 0.55x versus 0.14x for Sonic Automotive. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.