Is DocuSign Stock Undervalued?
Digital signature software business DocuSign (NASDAQ:DOCU) has been struggling over…
Sell
38
PCCE Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$13.76
Seasonality move
:
-6.8%
Day range:
$13.58 - $13.58
52-week range:
$10.13 - $14.80
Dividend yield:
1.56%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
160
Avg. volume:
408
1-year change:
18.55%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PCCE
Polen Capital China Growth ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FLCH
Franklin FTSE China ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
GXC
SPDR S&P China ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
JCHI
JPMorgan Active China ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MCH
Matthews China Active ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MCHI
iShares MSCI China ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PCCE
Polen Capital China Growth ETF
|
$13.58 | -- | -- | -- | $0.21 | 1.56% | -- |
|
FLCH
Franklin FTSE China ETF
|
$24.28 | -- | -- | -- | $0.37 | 2.31% | -- |
|
GXC
SPDR S&P China ETF
|
$99.09 | -- | -- | -- | $1.32 | 2.35% | -- |
|
JCHI
JPMorgan Active China ETF
|
$55.67 | -- | -- | -- | $0.99 | 1.78% | -- |
|
MCH
Matthews China Active ETF
|
$28.86 | -- | -- | -- | $0.50 | 1.72% | -- |
|
MCHI
iShares MSCI China ETF
|
$61.27 | -- | -- | -- | $0.74 | 2.07% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PCCE
Polen Capital China Growth ETF
|
-- | 0.607 | -- | -- |
|
FLCH
Franklin FTSE China ETF
|
-- | 0.313 | -- | -- |
|
GXC
SPDR S&P China ETF
|
-- | 0.351 | -- | -- |
|
JCHI
JPMorgan Active China ETF
|
-- | 0.328 | -- | -- |
|
MCH
Matthews China Active ETF
|
-- | 0.555 | -- | -- |
|
MCHI
iShares MSCI China ETF
|
-- | 0.314 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PCCE
Polen Capital China Growth ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FLCH
Franklin FTSE China ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
GXC
SPDR S&P China ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
JCHI
JPMorgan Active China ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MCH
Matthews China Active ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MCHI
iShares MSCI China ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Polen Capital China Growth ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns PCCE or FLCH?
Franklin FTSE China ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Polen Capital China Growth ETF's net margin of --. Polen Capital China Growth ETF's return on equity of -- beat Franklin FTSE China ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital PCCEPolen Capital China Growth ETF-- -- -- FLCHFranklin FTSE China ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About PCCE or FLCH?
Polen Capital China Growth ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Franklin FTSE China ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Polen Capital China Growth ETF has higher upside potential than Franklin FTSE China ETF, analysts believe Polen Capital China Growth ETF is more attractive than Franklin FTSE China ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings PCCEPolen Capital China Growth ETF0 0 0 FLCHFranklin FTSE China ETF0 0 0 -
Is PCCE or FLCH More Risky?
Polen Capital China Growth ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Franklin FTSE China ETF has a beta of 1.023, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.305%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock PCCE or FLCH?
Polen Capital China Growth ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.56%. Franklin FTSE China ETF offers a yield of 2.31% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.37 per share. Polen Capital China Growth ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Franklin FTSE China ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios PCCE or FLCH?
Polen Capital China Growth ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Franklin FTSE China ETF quarterly revenues of --. Polen Capital China Growth ETF's net income of -- is lower than Franklin FTSE China ETF's net income of --. Notably, Polen Capital China Growth ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Franklin FTSE China ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Polen Capital China Growth ETF is -- versus -- for Franklin FTSE China ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income PCCEPolen Capital China Growth ETF-- -- -- -- FLCHFranklin FTSE China ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns PCCE or GXC?
SPDR S&P China ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Polen Capital China Growth ETF's net margin of --. Polen Capital China Growth ETF's return on equity of -- beat SPDR S&P China ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital PCCEPolen Capital China Growth ETF-- -- -- GXCSPDR S&P China ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About PCCE or GXC?
Polen Capital China Growth ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand SPDR S&P China ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Polen Capital China Growth ETF has higher upside potential than SPDR S&P China ETF, analysts believe Polen Capital China Growth ETF is more attractive than SPDR S&P China ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings PCCEPolen Capital China Growth ETF0 0 0 GXCSPDR S&P China ETF0 0 0 -
Is PCCE or GXC More Risky?
Polen Capital China Growth ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SPDR S&P China ETF has a beta of 0.990, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.99%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock PCCE or GXC?
Polen Capital China Growth ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.56%. SPDR S&P China ETF offers a yield of 2.35% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.32 per share. Polen Capital China Growth ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SPDR S&P China ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios PCCE or GXC?
Polen Capital China Growth ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than SPDR S&P China ETF quarterly revenues of --. Polen Capital China Growth ETF's net income of -- is lower than SPDR S&P China ETF's net income of --. Notably, Polen Capital China Growth ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while SPDR S&P China ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Polen Capital China Growth ETF is -- versus -- for SPDR S&P China ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income PCCEPolen Capital China Growth ETF-- -- -- -- GXCSPDR S&P China ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns PCCE or JCHI?
JPMorgan Active China ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Polen Capital China Growth ETF's net margin of --. Polen Capital China Growth ETF's return on equity of -- beat JPMorgan Active China ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital PCCEPolen Capital China Growth ETF-- -- -- JCHIJPMorgan Active China ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About PCCE or JCHI?
Polen Capital China Growth ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand JPMorgan Active China ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Polen Capital China Growth ETF has higher upside potential than JPMorgan Active China ETF, analysts believe Polen Capital China Growth ETF is more attractive than JPMorgan Active China ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings PCCEPolen Capital China Growth ETF0 0 0 JCHIJPMorgan Active China ETF0 0 0 -
Is PCCE or JCHI More Risky?
Polen Capital China Growth ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison JPMorgan Active China ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock PCCE or JCHI?
Polen Capital China Growth ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.56%. JPMorgan Active China ETF offers a yield of 1.78% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.99 per share. Polen Capital China Growth ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. JPMorgan Active China ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios PCCE or JCHI?
Polen Capital China Growth ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than JPMorgan Active China ETF quarterly revenues of --. Polen Capital China Growth ETF's net income of -- is lower than JPMorgan Active China ETF's net income of --. Notably, Polen Capital China Growth ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while JPMorgan Active China ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Polen Capital China Growth ETF is -- versus -- for JPMorgan Active China ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income PCCEPolen Capital China Growth ETF-- -- -- -- JCHIJPMorgan Active China ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns PCCE or MCH?
Matthews China Active ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Polen Capital China Growth ETF's net margin of --. Polen Capital China Growth ETF's return on equity of -- beat Matthews China Active ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital PCCEPolen Capital China Growth ETF-- -- -- MCHMatthews China Active ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About PCCE or MCH?
Polen Capital China Growth ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Matthews China Active ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Polen Capital China Growth ETF has higher upside potential than Matthews China Active ETF, analysts believe Polen Capital China Growth ETF is more attractive than Matthews China Active ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings PCCEPolen Capital China Growth ETF0 0 0 MCHMatthews China Active ETF0 0 0 -
Is PCCE or MCH More Risky?
Polen Capital China Growth ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Matthews China Active ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock PCCE or MCH?
Polen Capital China Growth ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.56%. Matthews China Active ETF offers a yield of 1.72% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. Polen Capital China Growth ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Matthews China Active ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios PCCE or MCH?
Polen Capital China Growth ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Matthews China Active ETF quarterly revenues of --. Polen Capital China Growth ETF's net income of -- is lower than Matthews China Active ETF's net income of --. Notably, Polen Capital China Growth ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Matthews China Active ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Polen Capital China Growth ETF is -- versus -- for Matthews China Active ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income PCCEPolen Capital China Growth ETF-- -- -- -- MCHMatthews China Active ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns PCCE or MCHI?
iShares MSCI China ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Polen Capital China Growth ETF's net margin of --. Polen Capital China Growth ETF's return on equity of -- beat iShares MSCI China ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital PCCEPolen Capital China Growth ETF-- -- -- MCHIiShares MSCI China ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About PCCE or MCHI?
Polen Capital China Growth ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand iShares MSCI China ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Polen Capital China Growth ETF has higher upside potential than iShares MSCI China ETF, analysts believe Polen Capital China Growth ETF is more attractive than iShares MSCI China ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings PCCEPolen Capital China Growth ETF0 0 0 MCHIiShares MSCI China ETF0 0 0 -
Is PCCE or MCHI More Risky?
Polen Capital China Growth ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iShares MSCI China ETF has a beta of 1.031, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.11%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock PCCE or MCHI?
Polen Capital China Growth ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.56%. iShares MSCI China ETF offers a yield of 2.07% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.74 per share. Polen Capital China Growth ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iShares MSCI China ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios PCCE or MCHI?
Polen Capital China Growth ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than iShares MSCI China ETF quarterly revenues of --. Polen Capital China Growth ETF's net income of -- is lower than iShares MSCI China ETF's net income of --. Notably, Polen Capital China Growth ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iShares MSCI China ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Polen Capital China Growth ETF is -- versus -- for iShares MSCI China ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income PCCEPolen Capital China Growth ETF-- -- -- -- MCHIiShares MSCI China ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is SentinelOne Stock Undervalued?
Cybersecurity major SentinelOne (NYSE:S) has struggled over several years, delivering…
Is Broadcom Stock on Sale?
Chip and software maker Broadcom (NASDAQ:AVGO) has been among the…
Stock Ideas
Buy
59
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.6T
P/E Ratio: 65x
Buy
55
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
61
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 39x
Alerts
Buy
72
GLTO alert for Dec 27
Galecto, Inc. [GLTO] is up 16.92% over the past day.
Sell
20
SMX alert for Dec 27
SMX (Security Matters) Plc [SMX] is down 15.76% over the past day.
Sell
11
CDNAF alert for Dec 27
Canadian Tire Corp. Ltd. [CDNAF] is down 10% over the past day.
