Why Did SoFi Stock Drop?
Fintech platform SoFi (NASDAQ:SOFI) has stumbled in recent days, selling…
Buy
62
FLCH Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$24.78
Seasonality move
:
5.92%
Day range:
$24.73 - $24.84
52-week range:
$17.28 - $26.51
Dividend yield:
2.43%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
2.2M
Avg. volume:
166.4K
1-year change:
32.3%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FLCH
Franklin FTSE China ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
GXC
SPDR S&P China ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
KBA
KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MCHI
iShares MSCI China ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PGJ
Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FLCH
Franklin FTSE China ETF
|
$24.82 | -- | -- | -- | $0.19 | 2.43% | -- |
|
GXC
SPDR S&P China ETF
|
$100.69 | -- | -- | -- | $1.00 | 2.49% | -- |
|
KBA
KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF
|
$30.70 | -- | -- | -- | $0.51 | 1.67% | -- |
|
MCHI
iShares MSCI China ETF
|
$62.66 | -- | -- | -- | $0.54 | 2.28% | -- |
|
PGJ
Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF
|
$30.17 | -- | -- | -- | $0.48 | 2.77% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FLCH
Franklin FTSE China ETF
|
-- | 0.313 | -- | -- |
|
GXC
SPDR S&P China ETF
|
-- | 0.351 | -- | -- |
|
KBA
KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF
|
-- | 0.467 | -- | -- |
|
MCHI
iShares MSCI China ETF
|
-- | 0.314 | -- | -- |
|
PGJ
Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF
|
-- | 0.536 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FLCH
Franklin FTSE China ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
GXC
SPDR S&P China ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
KBA
KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MCHI
iShares MSCI China ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PGJ
Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Franklin FTSE China ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns FLCH or GXC?
SPDR S&P China ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Franklin FTSE China ETF's net margin of --. Franklin FTSE China ETF's return on equity of -- beat SPDR S&P China ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FLCHFranklin FTSE China ETF-- -- -- GXCSPDR S&P China ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About FLCH or GXC?
Franklin FTSE China ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand SPDR S&P China ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Franklin FTSE China ETF has higher upside potential than SPDR S&P China ETF, analysts believe Franklin FTSE China ETF is more attractive than SPDR S&P China ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FLCHFranklin FTSE China ETF0 0 0 GXCSPDR S&P China ETF0 0 0 -
Is FLCH or GXC More Risky?
Franklin FTSE China ETF has a beta of 1.023, which suggesting that the stock is 2.305% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SPDR S&P China ETF has a beta of 0.990, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.99%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FLCH or GXC?
Franklin FTSE China ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.43%. SPDR S&P China ETF offers a yield of 2.49% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share. Franklin FTSE China ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SPDR S&P China ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FLCH or GXC?
Franklin FTSE China ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than SPDR S&P China ETF quarterly revenues of --. Franklin FTSE China ETF's net income of -- is lower than SPDR S&P China ETF's net income of --. Notably, Franklin FTSE China ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while SPDR S&P China ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Franklin FTSE China ETF is -- versus -- for SPDR S&P China ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FLCHFranklin FTSE China ETF-- -- -- -- GXCSPDR S&P China ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns FLCH or KBA?
KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Franklin FTSE China ETF's net margin of --. Franklin FTSE China ETF's return on equity of -- beat KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FLCHFranklin FTSE China ETF-- -- -- KBAKraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About FLCH or KBA?
Franklin FTSE China ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Franklin FTSE China ETF has higher upside potential than KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF, analysts believe Franklin FTSE China ETF is more attractive than KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FLCHFranklin FTSE China ETF0 0 0 KBAKraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF0 0 0 -
Is FLCH or KBA More Risky?
Franklin FTSE China ETF has a beta of 1.023, which suggesting that the stock is 2.305% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF has a beta of 0.727, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.328%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FLCH or KBA?
Franklin FTSE China ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.43%. KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF offers a yield of 1.67% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share. Franklin FTSE China ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FLCH or KBA?
Franklin FTSE China ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF quarterly revenues of --. Franklin FTSE China ETF's net income of -- is lower than KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF's net income of --. Notably, Franklin FTSE China ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Franklin FTSE China ETF is -- versus -- for KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FLCHFranklin FTSE China ETF-- -- -- -- KBAKraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns FLCH or MCHI?
iShares MSCI China ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Franklin FTSE China ETF's net margin of --. Franklin FTSE China ETF's return on equity of -- beat iShares MSCI China ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FLCHFranklin FTSE China ETF-- -- -- MCHIiShares MSCI China ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About FLCH or MCHI?
Franklin FTSE China ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand iShares MSCI China ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Franklin FTSE China ETF has higher upside potential than iShares MSCI China ETF, analysts believe Franklin FTSE China ETF is more attractive than iShares MSCI China ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FLCHFranklin FTSE China ETF0 0 0 MCHIiShares MSCI China ETF0 0 0 -
Is FLCH or MCHI More Risky?
Franklin FTSE China ETF has a beta of 1.023, which suggesting that the stock is 2.305% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iShares MSCI China ETF has a beta of 1.031, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.11%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FLCH or MCHI?
Franklin FTSE China ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.43%. iShares MSCI China ETF offers a yield of 2.28% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.54 per share. Franklin FTSE China ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iShares MSCI China ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FLCH or MCHI?
Franklin FTSE China ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than iShares MSCI China ETF quarterly revenues of --. Franklin FTSE China ETF's net income of -- is lower than iShares MSCI China ETF's net income of --. Notably, Franklin FTSE China ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iShares MSCI China ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Franklin FTSE China ETF is -- versus -- for iShares MSCI China ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FLCHFranklin FTSE China ETF-- -- -- -- MCHIiShares MSCI China ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns FLCH or PGJ?
Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Franklin FTSE China ETF's net margin of --. Franklin FTSE China ETF's return on equity of -- beat Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FLCHFranklin FTSE China ETF-- -- -- PGJInvesco Golden Dragon China ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About FLCH or PGJ?
Franklin FTSE China ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Franklin FTSE China ETF has higher upside potential than Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF, analysts believe Franklin FTSE China ETF is more attractive than Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FLCHFranklin FTSE China ETF0 0 0 PGJInvesco Golden Dragon China ETF0 0 0 -
Is FLCH or PGJ More Risky?
Franklin FTSE China ETF has a beta of 1.023, which suggesting that the stock is 2.305% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF has a beta of 1.306, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.616%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FLCH or PGJ?
Franklin FTSE China ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.43%. Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF offers a yield of 2.77% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.48 per share. Franklin FTSE China ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FLCH or PGJ?
Franklin FTSE China ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF quarterly revenues of --. Franklin FTSE China ETF's net income of -- is lower than Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF's net income of --. Notably, Franklin FTSE China ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Franklin FTSE China ETF is -- versus -- for Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FLCHFranklin FTSE China ETF-- -- -- -- PGJInvesco Golden Dragon China ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will Robinhood Win AI Investing?
Recently, online brokerage Robinhood (NASDAQ:HOOD) has been focused on introducing…
Is Amazon an AI Stock?
With the market starting to look skittish on pure-play AI…
Stock Ideas
Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.4T
P/E Ratio: 62x
Buy
56
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.1T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
81
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 40x
Alerts
Buy
56
SMX alert for Dec 6
SMX (Security Matters) Plc [SMX] is up 134.09% over the past day.
Buy
62
PRAX alert for Dec 6
Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. [PRAX] is up 30.47% over the past day.
Sell
13
PSN alert for Dec 6
Parsons Corp. [PSN] is down 21.1% over the past day.
