Is DocuSign Stock Undervalued?
Digital signature software business DocuSign (NASDAQ:DOCU) has been struggling over…
Buy
63
FLCH Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$24.27
Seasonality move
:
5.92%
Day range:
$24.13 - $24.32
52-week range:
$17.28 - $26.51
Dividend yield:
2.31%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
89.8K
Avg. volume:
145.2K
1-year change:
28.57%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FLCH
Franklin FTSE China ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ASHR
Xtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
GXC
SPDR S&P China ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
KGRN
KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MCHI
iShares MSCI China ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FLCH
Franklin FTSE China ETF
|
$24.28 | -- | -- | -- | $0.37 | 2.31% | -- |
|
ASHR
Xtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF
|
$33.11 | -- | -- | -- | $0.76 | 2.29% | -- |
|
GXC
SPDR S&P China ETF
|
$99.09 | -- | -- | -- | $1.32 | 2.35% | -- |
|
KGRN
KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF
|
$27.77 | -- | -- | -- | $0.23 | 0.83% | -- |
|
MCHI
iShares MSCI China ETF
|
$61.27 | -- | -- | -- | $0.74 | 2.07% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FLCH
Franklin FTSE China ETF
|
-- | 0.313 | -- | -- |
|
ASHR
Xtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF
|
-- | 0.586 | -- | -- |
|
GXC
SPDR S&P China ETF
|
-- | 0.351 | -- | -- |
|
KGRN
KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF
|
-- | 0.445 | -- | -- |
|
MCHI
iShares MSCI China ETF
|
-- | 0.314 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FLCH
Franklin FTSE China ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ASHR
Xtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
GXC
SPDR S&P China ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
KGRN
KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MCHI
iShares MSCI China ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Franklin FTSE China ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns FLCH or ASHR?
Xtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Franklin FTSE China ETF's net margin of --. Franklin FTSE China ETF's return on equity of -- beat Xtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FLCHFranklin FTSE China ETF-- -- -- ASHRXtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About FLCH or ASHR?
Franklin FTSE China ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Xtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Franklin FTSE China ETF has higher upside potential than Xtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF, analysts believe Franklin FTSE China ETF is more attractive than Xtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FLCHFranklin FTSE China ETF0 0 0 ASHRXtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF0 0 0 -
Is FLCH or ASHR More Risky?
Franklin FTSE China ETF has a beta of 1.023, which suggesting that the stock is 2.305% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Xtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF has a beta of 0.749, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.083%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FLCH or ASHR?
Franklin FTSE China ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.37 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.31%. Xtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF offers a yield of 2.29% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.76 per share. Franklin FTSE China ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Xtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FLCH or ASHR?
Franklin FTSE China ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Xtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF quarterly revenues of --. Franklin FTSE China ETF's net income of -- is lower than Xtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF's net income of --. Notably, Franklin FTSE China ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Xtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Franklin FTSE China ETF is -- versus -- for Xtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FLCHFranklin FTSE China ETF-- -- -- -- ASHRXtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns FLCH or GXC?
SPDR S&P China ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Franklin FTSE China ETF's net margin of --. Franklin FTSE China ETF's return on equity of -- beat SPDR S&P China ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FLCHFranklin FTSE China ETF-- -- -- GXCSPDR S&P China ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About FLCH or GXC?
Franklin FTSE China ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand SPDR S&P China ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Franklin FTSE China ETF has higher upside potential than SPDR S&P China ETF, analysts believe Franklin FTSE China ETF is more attractive than SPDR S&P China ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FLCHFranklin FTSE China ETF0 0 0 GXCSPDR S&P China ETF0 0 0 -
Is FLCH or GXC More Risky?
Franklin FTSE China ETF has a beta of 1.023, which suggesting that the stock is 2.305% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SPDR S&P China ETF has a beta of 0.990, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.99%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FLCH or GXC?
Franklin FTSE China ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.37 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.31%. SPDR S&P China ETF offers a yield of 2.35% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.32 per share. Franklin FTSE China ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SPDR S&P China ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FLCH or GXC?
Franklin FTSE China ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than SPDR S&P China ETF quarterly revenues of --. Franklin FTSE China ETF's net income of -- is lower than SPDR S&P China ETF's net income of --. Notably, Franklin FTSE China ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while SPDR S&P China ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Franklin FTSE China ETF is -- versus -- for SPDR S&P China ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FLCHFranklin FTSE China ETF-- -- -- -- GXCSPDR S&P China ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns FLCH or KGRN?
KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Franklin FTSE China ETF's net margin of --. Franklin FTSE China ETF's return on equity of -- beat KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FLCHFranklin FTSE China ETF-- -- -- KGRNKraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About FLCH or KGRN?
Franklin FTSE China ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Franklin FTSE China ETF has higher upside potential than KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF, analysts believe Franklin FTSE China ETF is more attractive than KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FLCHFranklin FTSE China ETF0 0 0 KGRNKraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF0 0 0 -
Is FLCH or KGRN More Risky?
Franklin FTSE China ETF has a beta of 1.023, which suggesting that the stock is 2.305% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF has a beta of 1.036, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.563%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FLCH or KGRN?
Franklin FTSE China ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.37 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.31%. KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF offers a yield of 0.83% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share. Franklin FTSE China ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FLCH or KGRN?
Franklin FTSE China ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF quarterly revenues of --. Franklin FTSE China ETF's net income of -- is lower than KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF's net income of --. Notably, Franklin FTSE China ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Franklin FTSE China ETF is -- versus -- for KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FLCHFranklin FTSE China ETF-- -- -- -- KGRNKraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns FLCH or MCHI?
iShares MSCI China ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Franklin FTSE China ETF's net margin of --. Franklin FTSE China ETF's return on equity of -- beat iShares MSCI China ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FLCHFranklin FTSE China ETF-- -- -- MCHIiShares MSCI China ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About FLCH or MCHI?
Franklin FTSE China ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand iShares MSCI China ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Franklin FTSE China ETF has higher upside potential than iShares MSCI China ETF, analysts believe Franklin FTSE China ETF is more attractive than iShares MSCI China ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FLCHFranklin FTSE China ETF0 0 0 MCHIiShares MSCI China ETF0 0 0 -
Is FLCH or MCHI More Risky?
Franklin FTSE China ETF has a beta of 1.023, which suggesting that the stock is 2.305% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iShares MSCI China ETF has a beta of 1.031, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.11%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FLCH or MCHI?
Franklin FTSE China ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.37 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.31%. iShares MSCI China ETF offers a yield of 2.07% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.74 per share. Franklin FTSE China ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iShares MSCI China ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FLCH or MCHI?
Franklin FTSE China ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than iShares MSCI China ETF quarterly revenues of --. Franklin FTSE China ETF's net income of -- is lower than iShares MSCI China ETF's net income of --. Notably, Franklin FTSE China ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iShares MSCI China ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Franklin FTSE China ETF is -- versus -- for iShares MSCI China ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FLCHFranklin FTSE China ETF-- -- -- -- MCHIiShares MSCI China ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is SentinelOne Stock Undervalued?
Cybersecurity major SentinelOne (NYSE:S) has struggled over several years, delivering…
Is Broadcom Stock on Sale?
Chip and software maker Broadcom (NASDAQ:AVGO) has been among the…
Stock Ideas
Buy
59
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.6T
P/E Ratio: 65x
Buy
55
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
61
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 39x
Alerts
Buy
72
GLTO alert for Dec 27
Galecto, Inc. [GLTO] is up 16.92% over the past day.
Sell
20
SMX alert for Dec 27
SMX (Security Matters) Plc [SMX] is down 15.76% over the past day.
Sell
11
CDNAF alert for Dec 27
Canadian Tire Corp. Ltd. [CDNAF] is down 10% over the past day.
