Will UnitedHealth Stock Recover?
Shares of embattled health insurance giant UnitedHealth (NYSE:UNH) plummeted by…
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ASHR
Xtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ACWX
iShares MSCI ACWI ex US ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ASHS
Xtrackers Hvst CSI500 China A-Shs SC ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
EWH
iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
EWL
iShares MSCI Switzerland ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
GXC
State Street SPDR S&P China ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ASHR
Xtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF
|
$34.01 | -- | -- | -- | $0.76 | 2.23% | -- |
|
ACWX
iShares MSCI ACWI ex US ETF
|
$73.76 | -- | -- | -- | $1.05 | 2.57% | -- |
|
ASHS
Xtrackers Hvst CSI500 China A-Shs SC ETF
|
$43.61 | -- | -- | -- | $0.19 | 0% | -- |
|
EWH
iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF
|
$23.80 | -- | -- | -- | $0.69 | 4.64% | -- |
|
EWL
iShares MSCI Switzerland ETF
|
$63.24 | -- | -- | -- | $1.02 | 1.62% | -- |
|
GXC
State Street SPDR S&P China ETF
|
$102.11 | -- | -- | -- | $1.32 | 2.28% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ASHR
Xtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF
|
-- | 0.451 | -- | -- |
|
ACWX
iShares MSCI ACWI ex US ETF
|
-- | 0.930 | -- | -- |
|
ASHS
Xtrackers Hvst CSI500 China A-Shs SC ETF
|
-- | 1.242 | -- | -- |
|
EWH
iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF
|
-- | 0.771 | -- | -- |
|
EWL
iShares MSCI Switzerland ETF
|
-- | 0.441 | -- | -- |
|
GXC
State Street SPDR S&P China ETF
|
-- | 0.377 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ASHR
Xtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ACWX
iShares MSCI ACWI ex US ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ASHS
Xtrackers Hvst CSI500 China A-Shs SC ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
EWH
iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
EWL
iShares MSCI Switzerland ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
GXC
State Street SPDR S&P China ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
iShares MSCI ACWI ex US ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Xtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF's net margin of --. Xtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF's return on equity of -- beat iShares MSCI ACWI ex US ETF's return on equity of --.
| Company | Gross Margin | Earnings Per Share | Invested Capital |
|---|---|---|---|
|
ASHR
Xtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF
|
-- | -- | -- |
|
ACWX
iShares MSCI ACWI ex US ETF
|
-- | -- | -- |
Xtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand iShares MSCI ACWI ex US ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Xtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF has higher upside potential than iShares MSCI ACWI ex US ETF, analysts believe Xtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF is more attractive than iShares MSCI ACWI ex US ETF.
| Company | Buy Ratings | Hold Ratings | Sell Ratings |
|---|---|---|---|
|
ASHR
Xtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF
|
0 | 0 | 0 |
|
ACWX
iShares MSCI ACWI ex US ETF
|
0 | 0 | 0 |
Xtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF has a beta of 0.734, which suggesting that the stock is 26.634% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iShares MSCI ACWI ex US ETF has a beta of 1.019, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.91%.
Xtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.76 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.23%. iShares MSCI ACWI ex US ETF offers a yield of 2.57% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.05 per share. Xtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iShares MSCI ACWI ex US ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
Xtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than iShares MSCI ACWI ex US ETF quarterly revenues of --. Xtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF's net income of -- is lower than iShares MSCI ACWI ex US ETF's net income of --. Notably, Xtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iShares MSCI ACWI ex US ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Xtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF is -- versus -- for iShares MSCI ACWI ex US ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
| Company | Price/Sales Ratio | Price/Earnings Ratio | Quarterly Revenue | Quarterly Net Income |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ASHR
Xtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ACWX
iShares MSCI ACWI ex US ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- |
Xtrackers Hvst CSI500 China A-Shs SC ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Xtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF's net margin of --. Xtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF's return on equity of -- beat Xtrackers Hvst CSI500 China A-Shs SC ETF's return on equity of --.
| Company | Gross Margin | Earnings Per Share | Invested Capital |
|---|---|---|---|
|
ASHR
Xtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF
|
-- | -- | -- |
|
ASHS
Xtrackers Hvst CSI500 China A-Shs SC ETF
|
-- | -- | -- |
Xtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Xtrackers Hvst CSI500 China A-Shs SC ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Xtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF has higher upside potential than Xtrackers Hvst CSI500 China A-Shs SC ETF, analysts believe Xtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF is more attractive than Xtrackers Hvst CSI500 China A-Shs SC ETF.
| Company | Buy Ratings | Hold Ratings | Sell Ratings |
|---|---|---|---|
|
ASHR
Xtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF
|
0 | 0 | 0 |
|
ASHS
Xtrackers Hvst CSI500 China A-Shs SC ETF
|
0 | 0 | 0 |
Xtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF has a beta of 0.734, which suggesting that the stock is 26.634% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Xtrackers Hvst CSI500 China A-Shs SC ETF has a beta of 0.776, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.351%.
Xtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.76 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.23%. Xtrackers Hvst CSI500 China A-Shs SC ETF offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share. Xtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Xtrackers Hvst CSI500 China A-Shs SC ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
Xtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Xtrackers Hvst CSI500 China A-Shs SC ETF quarterly revenues of --. Xtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF's net income of -- is lower than Xtrackers Hvst CSI500 China A-Shs SC ETF's net income of --. Notably, Xtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Xtrackers Hvst CSI500 China A-Shs SC ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Xtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF is -- versus -- for Xtrackers Hvst CSI500 China A-Shs SC ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
| Company | Price/Sales Ratio | Price/Earnings Ratio | Quarterly Revenue | Quarterly Net Income |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ASHR
Xtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ASHS
Xtrackers Hvst CSI500 China A-Shs SC ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- |
iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Xtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF's net margin of --. Xtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF's return on equity of -- beat iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF's return on equity of --.
| Company | Gross Margin | Earnings Per Share | Invested Capital |
|---|---|---|---|
|
ASHR
Xtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF
|
-- | -- | -- |
|
EWH
iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF
|
-- | -- | -- |
Xtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Xtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF has higher upside potential than iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF, analysts believe Xtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF is more attractive than iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF.
| Company | Buy Ratings | Hold Ratings | Sell Ratings |
|---|---|---|---|
|
ASHR
Xtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF
|
0 | 0 | 0 |
|
EWH
iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF
|
0 | 0 | 0 |
Xtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF has a beta of 0.734, which suggesting that the stock is 26.634% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF has a beta of 0.954, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.572%.
Xtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.76 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.23%. iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF offers a yield of 4.64% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.69 per share. Xtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
Xtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF quarterly revenues of --. Xtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF's net income of -- is lower than iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF's net income of --. Notably, Xtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Xtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF is -- versus -- for iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
| Company | Price/Sales Ratio | Price/Earnings Ratio | Quarterly Revenue | Quarterly Net Income |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ASHR
Xtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- |
|
EWH
iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- |
iShares MSCI Switzerland ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Xtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF's net margin of --. Xtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF's return on equity of -- beat iShares MSCI Switzerland ETF's return on equity of --.
| Company | Gross Margin | Earnings Per Share | Invested Capital |
|---|---|---|---|
|
ASHR
Xtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF
|
-- | -- | -- |
|
EWL
iShares MSCI Switzerland ETF
|
-- | -- | -- |
Xtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand iShares MSCI Switzerland ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Xtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF has higher upside potential than iShares MSCI Switzerland ETF, analysts believe Xtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF is more attractive than iShares MSCI Switzerland ETF.
| Company | Buy Ratings | Hold Ratings | Sell Ratings |
|---|---|---|---|
|
ASHR
Xtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF
|
0 | 0 | 0 |
|
EWL
iShares MSCI Switzerland ETF
|
0 | 0 | 0 |
Xtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF has a beta of 0.734, which suggesting that the stock is 26.634% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iShares MSCI Switzerland ETF has a beta of 0.970, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.01%.
Xtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.76 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.23%. iShares MSCI Switzerland ETF offers a yield of 1.62% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.02 per share. Xtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iShares MSCI Switzerland ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
Xtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than iShares MSCI Switzerland ETF quarterly revenues of --. Xtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF's net income of -- is lower than iShares MSCI Switzerland ETF's net income of --. Notably, Xtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iShares MSCI Switzerland ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Xtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF is -- versus -- for iShares MSCI Switzerland ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
| Company | Price/Sales Ratio | Price/Earnings Ratio | Quarterly Revenue | Quarterly Net Income |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ASHR
Xtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- |
|
EWL
iShares MSCI Switzerland ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- |
State Street SPDR S&P China ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Xtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF's net margin of --. Xtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF's return on equity of -- beat State Street SPDR S&P China ETF's return on equity of --.
| Company | Gross Margin | Earnings Per Share | Invested Capital |
|---|---|---|---|
|
ASHR
Xtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF
|
-- | -- | -- |
|
GXC
State Street SPDR S&P China ETF
|
-- | -- | -- |
Xtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand State Street SPDR S&P China ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Xtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF has higher upside potential than State Street SPDR S&P China ETF, analysts believe Xtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF is more attractive than State Street SPDR S&P China ETF.
| Company | Buy Ratings | Hold Ratings | Sell Ratings |
|---|---|---|---|
|
ASHR
Xtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF
|
0 | 0 | 0 |
|
GXC
State Street SPDR S&P China ETF
|
0 | 0 | 0 |
Xtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF has a beta of 0.734, which suggesting that the stock is 26.634% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison State Street SPDR S&P China ETF has a beta of 0.999, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.063000000000002%.
Xtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.76 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.23%. State Street SPDR S&P China ETF offers a yield of 2.28% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.32 per share. Xtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. State Street SPDR S&P China ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
Xtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than State Street SPDR S&P China ETF quarterly revenues of --. Xtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF's net income of -- is lower than State Street SPDR S&P China ETF's net income of --. Notably, Xtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while State Street SPDR S&P China ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Xtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF is -- versus -- for State Street SPDR S&P China ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
| Company | Price/Sales Ratio | Price/Earnings Ratio | Quarterly Revenue | Quarterly Net Income |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ASHR
Xtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- |
|
GXC
State Street SPDR S&P China ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- |
Signup to receive the latest stock alerts
Shares of embattled health insurance giant UnitedHealth (NYSE:UNH) plummeted by…
Though certainly less well-known than the huge tech businesses that…
Planet Fitness (NYSE:PLNT) has had a difficult 12 months, retreating…
Market Cap: $4.6T
P/E Ratio: 65x
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 29x
Teradata Corp. [TDC] is down 11.64% over the past day.
Diodes, Inc. [DIOD] is down 7.63% over the past day.
Vertiv Holdings Co. [VRT] is down 4.79% over the past day.