Is Celestica The Best AI Stock to Buy Now?
Technology and hardware business Celestica (NYSE:CLS) has seen massive upward…
Buy
56
EWH Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$23.77
Seasonality move
:
2.38%
Day range:
$23.46 - $23.59
52-week range:
$15.04 - $23.85
Dividend yield:
4.68%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
4M
Avg. volume:
4.4M
1-year change:
39.44%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
EWH
iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ASHR
Xtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ASHS
Xtrackers Hvst CSI500 China A-Shs SC ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
EWI
iShares MSCI Italy ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
GXC
State Street SPDR S&P China ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
IPKW
Invesco International BuyBack Achievers ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
EWH
iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF
|
$23.58 | -- | -- | -- | $0.69 | 4.68% | -- |
|
ASHR
Xtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF
|
$33.88 | -- | -- | -- | $0.76 | 2.24% | -- |
|
ASHS
Xtrackers Hvst CSI500 China A-Shs SC ETF
|
$43.75 | -- | -- | -- | $0.19 | 0% | -- |
|
EWI
iShares MSCI Italy ETF
|
$55.89 | -- | -- | -- | $0.70 | 2.73% | -- |
|
GXC
State Street SPDR S&P China ETF
|
$100.44 | -- | -- | -- | $1.32 | 2.32% | -- |
|
IPKW
Invesco International BuyBack Achievers ETF
|
$59.26 | -- | -- | -- | $0.74 | 3.33% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
EWH
iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF
|
-- | 0.771 | -- | -- |
|
ASHR
Xtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF
|
-- | 0.451 | -- | -- |
|
ASHS
Xtrackers Hvst CSI500 China A-Shs SC ETF
|
-- | 1.242 | -- | -- |
|
EWI
iShares MSCI Italy ETF
|
-- | 0.435 | -- | -- |
|
GXC
State Street SPDR S&P China ETF
|
-- | 0.377 | -- | -- |
|
IPKW
Invesco International BuyBack Achievers ETF
|
-- | 0.262 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
EWH
iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ASHR
Xtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ASHS
Xtrackers Hvst CSI500 China A-Shs SC ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
EWI
iShares MSCI Italy ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
GXC
State Street SPDR S&P China ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
IPKW
Invesco International BuyBack Achievers ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns EWH or ASHR?
Xtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF has a net margin of -- compared to iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF's net margin of --. iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF's return on equity of -- beat Xtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital EWHiShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF-- -- -- ASHRXtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About EWH or ASHR?
iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Xtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF has higher upside potential than Xtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF, analysts believe iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF is more attractive than Xtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings EWHiShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF0 0 0 ASHRXtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF0 0 0 -
Is EWH or ASHR More Risky?
iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF has a beta of 0.954, which suggesting that the stock is 4.572% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Xtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF has a beta of 0.734, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.634%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock EWH or ASHR?
iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.69 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.68%. Xtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF offers a yield of 2.24% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.76 per share. iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Xtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios EWH or ASHR?
iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Xtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF quarterly revenues of --. iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF's net income of -- is lower than Xtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF's net income of --. Notably, iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Xtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF is -- versus -- for Xtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income EWHiShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF-- -- -- -- ASHRXtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns EWH or ASHS?
Xtrackers Hvst CSI500 China A-Shs SC ETF has a net margin of -- compared to iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF's net margin of --. iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF's return on equity of -- beat Xtrackers Hvst CSI500 China A-Shs SC ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital EWHiShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF-- -- -- ASHSXtrackers Hvst CSI500 China A-Shs SC ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About EWH or ASHS?
iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Xtrackers Hvst CSI500 China A-Shs SC ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF has higher upside potential than Xtrackers Hvst CSI500 China A-Shs SC ETF, analysts believe iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF is more attractive than Xtrackers Hvst CSI500 China A-Shs SC ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings EWHiShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF0 0 0 ASHSXtrackers Hvst CSI500 China A-Shs SC ETF0 0 0 -
Is EWH or ASHS More Risky?
iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF has a beta of 0.954, which suggesting that the stock is 4.572% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Xtrackers Hvst CSI500 China A-Shs SC ETF has a beta of 0.776, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.351%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock EWH or ASHS?
iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.69 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.68%. Xtrackers Hvst CSI500 China A-Shs SC ETF offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share. iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Xtrackers Hvst CSI500 China A-Shs SC ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios EWH or ASHS?
iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Xtrackers Hvst CSI500 China A-Shs SC ETF quarterly revenues of --. iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF's net income of -- is lower than Xtrackers Hvst CSI500 China A-Shs SC ETF's net income of --. Notably, iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Xtrackers Hvst CSI500 China A-Shs SC ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF is -- versus -- for Xtrackers Hvst CSI500 China A-Shs SC ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income EWHiShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF-- -- -- -- ASHSXtrackers Hvst CSI500 China A-Shs SC ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns EWH or EWI?
iShares MSCI Italy ETF has a net margin of -- compared to iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF's net margin of --. iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF's return on equity of -- beat iShares MSCI Italy ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital EWHiShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF-- -- -- EWIiShares MSCI Italy ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About EWH or EWI?
iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand iShares MSCI Italy ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF has higher upside potential than iShares MSCI Italy ETF, analysts believe iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF is more attractive than iShares MSCI Italy ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings EWHiShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF0 0 0 EWIiShares MSCI Italy ETF0 0 0 -
Is EWH or EWI More Risky?
iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF has a beta of 0.954, which suggesting that the stock is 4.572% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iShares MSCI Italy ETF has a beta of 1.209, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.94%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock EWH or EWI?
iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.69 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.68%. iShares MSCI Italy ETF offers a yield of 2.73% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.70 per share. iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iShares MSCI Italy ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios EWH or EWI?
iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than iShares MSCI Italy ETF quarterly revenues of --. iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF's net income of -- is lower than iShares MSCI Italy ETF's net income of --. Notably, iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iShares MSCI Italy ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF is -- versus -- for iShares MSCI Italy ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income EWHiShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF-- -- -- -- EWIiShares MSCI Italy ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns EWH or GXC?
State Street SPDR S&P China ETF has a net margin of -- compared to iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF's net margin of --. iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF's return on equity of -- beat State Street SPDR S&P China ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital EWHiShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF-- -- -- GXCState Street SPDR S&P China ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About EWH or GXC?
iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand State Street SPDR S&P China ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF has higher upside potential than State Street SPDR S&P China ETF, analysts believe iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF is more attractive than State Street SPDR S&P China ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings EWHiShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF0 0 0 GXCState Street SPDR S&P China ETF0 0 0 -
Is EWH or GXC More Risky?
iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF has a beta of 0.954, which suggesting that the stock is 4.572% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison State Street SPDR S&P China ETF has a beta of 0.999, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.063000000000002%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock EWH or GXC?
iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.69 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.68%. State Street SPDR S&P China ETF offers a yield of 2.32% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.32 per share. iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. State Street SPDR S&P China ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios EWH or GXC?
iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than State Street SPDR S&P China ETF quarterly revenues of --. iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF's net income of -- is lower than State Street SPDR S&P China ETF's net income of --. Notably, iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while State Street SPDR S&P China ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF is -- versus -- for State Street SPDR S&P China ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income EWHiShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF-- -- -- -- GXCState Street SPDR S&P China ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns EWH or IPKW?
Invesco International BuyBack Achievers ETF has a net margin of -- compared to iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF's net margin of --. iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF's return on equity of -- beat Invesco International BuyBack Achievers ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital EWHiShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF-- -- -- IPKWInvesco International BuyBack Achievers ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About EWH or IPKW?
iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Invesco International BuyBack Achievers ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF has higher upside potential than Invesco International BuyBack Achievers ETF, analysts believe iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF is more attractive than Invesco International BuyBack Achievers ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings EWHiShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF0 0 0 IPKWInvesco International BuyBack Achievers ETF0 0 0 -
Is EWH or IPKW More Risky?
iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF has a beta of 0.954, which suggesting that the stock is 4.572% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Invesco International BuyBack Achievers ETF has a beta of 0.958, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.236%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock EWH or IPKW?
iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.69 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.68%. Invesco International BuyBack Achievers ETF offers a yield of 3.33% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.74 per share. iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Invesco International BuyBack Achievers ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios EWH or IPKW?
iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Invesco International BuyBack Achievers ETF quarterly revenues of --. iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF's net income of -- is lower than Invesco International BuyBack Achievers ETF's net income of --. Notably, iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Invesco International BuyBack Achievers ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF is -- versus -- for Invesco International BuyBack Achievers ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income EWHiShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF-- -- -- -- IPKWInvesco International BuyBack Achievers ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will AI Disrupt SaaS Software Stocks?
Since January 28th, software stocks in the United States have…
Why Is Meta Stock Going Higher?
Over the last five days, shares of Instagram and Facebook…
Stock Ideas
Buy
56
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.6T
P/E Ratio: 64x
Sell
49
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 35x
Sell
44
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.7T
P/E Ratio: 28x
Alerts
Sell
23
CAR alert for Feb 20
Avis Budget Group, Inc. [CAR] is down 0.3% over the past day.
Buy
75
HYMC alert for Feb 20
Hycroft Mining Holding Corp. [HYMC] is down 2.47% over the past day.
Sell
1
EPAM alert for Feb 20
EPAM Systems, Inc. [EPAM] is down 0.11% over the past day.
