Financhill
Sell
24

GXC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$70.95
Seasonality move :
1.47%
Day range:
$70.92 - $71.77
52-week range:
$59.45 - $97.17
Dividend yield:
3%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
86.1K
Avg. volume:
40.6K
1-year change:
10.75%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
GXC
SPDR S&P China ETF
-- -- -- -- --
CXSE
WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund
-- -- -- -- --
FLCH
Franklin FTSE China ETF
-- -- -- -- --
KBA
KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF
-- -- -- -- --
PGJ
Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF
-- -- -- -- --
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
GXC
SPDR S&P China ETF
$70.96 -- -- -- $1.50 3% --
CXSE
WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund
$27.92 -- -- -- $0.09 1.82% --
FLCH
Franklin FTSE China ETF
$17.31 -- -- -- $0.41 3.06% --
KBA
KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF
$22.16 -- -- -- $0.51 2.31% --
PGJ
Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF
$24.65 -- -- -- $0.07 4.99% --
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
GXC
SPDR S&P China ETF
-- 1.328 -- --
CXSE
WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund
-- 1.759 -- --
FLCH
Franklin FTSE China ETF
-- 1.401 -- --
KBA
KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF
-- 1.310 -- --
PGJ
Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF
-- 1.854 -- --
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
GXC
SPDR S&P China ETF
-- -- -- -- -- --
CXSE
WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund
-- -- -- -- -- --
FLCH
Franklin FTSE China ETF
-- -- -- -- -- --
KBA
KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF
-- -- -- -- -- --
PGJ
Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF
-- -- -- -- -- --

SPDR S&P China ETF vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns GXC or CXSE?

    WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund has a net margin of -- compared to SPDR S&P China ETF's net margin of --. SPDR S&P China ETF's return on equity of -- beat WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund's return on equity of --.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    GXC
    SPDR S&P China ETF
    -- -- --
    CXSE
    WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund
    -- -- --
  • What do Analysts Say About GXC or CXSE?

    SPDR S&P China ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that SPDR S&P China ETF has higher upside potential than WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund, analysts believe SPDR S&P China ETF is more attractive than WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    GXC
    SPDR S&P China ETF
    0 0 0
    CXSE
    WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund
    0 0 0
  • Is GXC or CXSE More Risky?

    SPDR S&P China ETF has a beta of 0.785, which suggesting that the stock is 21.456% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund has a beta of 0.856, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.373%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock GXC or CXSE?

    SPDR S&P China ETF has a quarterly dividend of $1.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 3%. WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund offers a yield of 1.82% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share. SPDR S&P China ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios GXC or CXSE?

    SPDR S&P China ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund quarterly revenues of --. SPDR S&P China ETF's net income of -- is lower than WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund's net income of --. Notably, SPDR S&P China ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SPDR S&P China ETF is -- versus -- for WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    GXC
    SPDR S&P China ETF
    -- -- -- --
    CXSE
    WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund
    -- -- -- --
  • Which has Higher Returns GXC or FLCH?

    Franklin FTSE China ETF has a net margin of -- compared to SPDR S&P China ETF's net margin of --. SPDR S&P China ETF's return on equity of -- beat Franklin FTSE China ETF's return on equity of --.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    GXC
    SPDR S&P China ETF
    -- -- --
    FLCH
    Franklin FTSE China ETF
    -- -- --
  • What do Analysts Say About GXC or FLCH?

    SPDR S&P China ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Franklin FTSE China ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that SPDR S&P China ETF has higher upside potential than Franklin FTSE China ETF, analysts believe SPDR S&P China ETF is more attractive than Franklin FTSE China ETF.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    GXC
    SPDR S&P China ETF
    0 0 0
    FLCH
    Franklin FTSE China ETF
    0 0 0
  • Is GXC or FLCH More Risky?

    SPDR S&P China ETF has a beta of 0.785, which suggesting that the stock is 21.456% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Franklin FTSE China ETF has a beta of 0.797, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.261%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock GXC or FLCH?

    SPDR S&P China ETF has a quarterly dividend of $1.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 3%. Franklin FTSE China ETF offers a yield of 3.06% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.41 per share. SPDR S&P China ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Franklin FTSE China ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios GXC or FLCH?

    SPDR S&P China ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Franklin FTSE China ETF quarterly revenues of --. SPDR S&P China ETF's net income of -- is lower than Franklin FTSE China ETF's net income of --. Notably, SPDR S&P China ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Franklin FTSE China ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SPDR S&P China ETF is -- versus -- for Franklin FTSE China ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    GXC
    SPDR S&P China ETF
    -- -- -- --
    FLCH
    Franklin FTSE China ETF
    -- -- -- --
  • Which has Higher Returns GXC or KBA?

    KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF has a net margin of -- compared to SPDR S&P China ETF's net margin of --. SPDR S&P China ETF's return on equity of -- beat KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF's return on equity of --.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    GXC
    SPDR S&P China ETF
    -- -- --
    KBA
    KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF
    -- -- --
  • What do Analysts Say About GXC or KBA?

    SPDR S&P China ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that SPDR S&P China ETF has higher upside potential than KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF, analysts believe SPDR S&P China ETF is more attractive than KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    GXC
    SPDR S&P China ETF
    0 0 0
    KBA
    KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF
    0 0 0
  • Is GXC or KBA More Risky?

    SPDR S&P China ETF has a beta of 0.785, which suggesting that the stock is 21.456% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF has a beta of 0.628, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 37.246%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock GXC or KBA?

    SPDR S&P China ETF has a quarterly dividend of $1.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 3%. KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF offers a yield of 2.31% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share. SPDR S&P China ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios GXC or KBA?

    SPDR S&P China ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF quarterly revenues of --. SPDR S&P China ETF's net income of -- is lower than KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF's net income of --. Notably, SPDR S&P China ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SPDR S&P China ETF is -- versus -- for KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    GXC
    SPDR S&P China ETF
    -- -- -- --
    KBA
    KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF
    -- -- -- --
  • Which has Higher Returns GXC or PGJ?

    Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF has a net margin of -- compared to SPDR S&P China ETF's net margin of --. SPDR S&P China ETF's return on equity of -- beat Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF's return on equity of --.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    GXC
    SPDR S&P China ETF
    -- -- --
    PGJ
    Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF
    -- -- --
  • What do Analysts Say About GXC or PGJ?

    SPDR S&P China ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that SPDR S&P China ETF has higher upside potential than Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF, analysts believe SPDR S&P China ETF is more attractive than Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    GXC
    SPDR S&P China ETF
    0 0 0
    PGJ
    Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF
    0 0 0
  • Is GXC or PGJ More Risky?

    SPDR S&P China ETF has a beta of 0.785, which suggesting that the stock is 21.456% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF has a beta of 1.051, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.1%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock GXC or PGJ?

    SPDR S&P China ETF has a quarterly dividend of $1.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 3%. Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF offers a yield of 4.99% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share. SPDR S&P China ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios GXC or PGJ?

    SPDR S&P China ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF quarterly revenues of --. SPDR S&P China ETF's net income of -- is lower than Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF's net income of --. Notably, SPDR S&P China ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SPDR S&P China ETF is -- versus -- for Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    GXC
    SPDR S&P China ETF
    -- -- -- --
    PGJ
    Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF
    -- -- -- --

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

Is Broadcom Stock Overvalued?
Is Broadcom Stock Overvalued?

The semiconductor company Broadcom Inc. (NASDAQ:AVGO) is having a stellar…

4 Top Dividend Stocks to Buy Now
4 Top Dividend Stocks to Buy Now

If you’re looking for steady income, dividend stocks are a…

Will Uber Stock Recover?
Will Uber Stock Recover?

Shares of Uber Technologies (NYSE:UBER) have had a rough few…

Stock Ideas

Sell
48
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.6T
P/E Ratio: 39x

Sell
47
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.3T
P/E Ratio: 114x

Sell
39
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.1T
P/E Ratio: 36x

Alerts

Buy
87
CEG alert for Jan 11

Constellation Energy [CEG] is up 25.15% over the past day.

Sell
1
MCY alert for Jan 11

Mercury General [MCY] is down 19.87% over the past day.

Buy
84
ATZAF alert for Jan 11

Aritzia [ATZAF] is up 17.63% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock