Is DocuSign Stock Undervalued?
Digital signature software business DocuSign (NASDAQ:DOCU) has been struggling over…
Buy
75
MCH Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$28.60
Seasonality move
:
3.14%
Day range:
$28.82 - $28.88
52-week range:
$20.06 - $30.97
Dividend yield:
1.72%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
4.4K
Avg. volume:
3K
1-year change:
27.78%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MCH
Matthews China Active ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FLCH
Franklin FTSE China ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
GXC
SPDR S&P China ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
JCHI
JPMorgan Active China ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
KGRN
KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MCHI
iShares MSCI China ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MCH
Matthews China Active ETF
|
$28.86 | -- | -- | -- | $0.50 | 1.72% | -- |
|
FLCH
Franklin FTSE China ETF
|
$24.28 | -- | -- | -- | $0.37 | 2.31% | -- |
|
GXC
SPDR S&P China ETF
|
$99.09 | -- | -- | -- | $1.32 | 2.35% | -- |
|
JCHI
JPMorgan Active China ETF
|
$55.67 | -- | -- | -- | $0.99 | 1.78% | -- |
|
KGRN
KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF
|
$27.77 | -- | -- | -- | $0.23 | 0.83% | -- |
|
MCHI
iShares MSCI China ETF
|
$61.27 | -- | -- | -- | $0.74 | 2.07% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MCH
Matthews China Active ETF
|
-- | 0.555 | -- | -- |
|
FLCH
Franklin FTSE China ETF
|
-- | 0.313 | -- | -- |
|
GXC
SPDR S&P China ETF
|
-- | 0.351 | -- | -- |
|
JCHI
JPMorgan Active China ETF
|
-- | 0.328 | -- | -- |
|
KGRN
KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF
|
-- | 0.445 | -- | -- |
|
MCHI
iShares MSCI China ETF
|
-- | 0.314 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MCH
Matthews China Active ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FLCH
Franklin FTSE China ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
GXC
SPDR S&P China ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
JCHI
JPMorgan Active China ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
KGRN
KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MCHI
iShares MSCI China ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Matthews China Active ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns MCH or FLCH?
Franklin FTSE China ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Matthews China Active ETF's net margin of --. Matthews China Active ETF's return on equity of -- beat Franklin FTSE China ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MCHMatthews China Active ETF-- -- -- FLCHFranklin FTSE China ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About MCH or FLCH?
Matthews China Active ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Franklin FTSE China ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Matthews China Active ETF has higher upside potential than Franklin FTSE China ETF, analysts believe Matthews China Active ETF is more attractive than Franklin FTSE China ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MCHMatthews China Active ETF0 0 0 FLCHFranklin FTSE China ETF0 0 0 -
Is MCH or FLCH More Risky?
Matthews China Active ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Franklin FTSE China ETF has a beta of 1.023, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.305%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MCH or FLCH?
Matthews China Active ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.72%. Franklin FTSE China ETF offers a yield of 2.31% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.37 per share. Matthews China Active ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Franklin FTSE China ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MCH or FLCH?
Matthews China Active ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Franklin FTSE China ETF quarterly revenues of --. Matthews China Active ETF's net income of -- is lower than Franklin FTSE China ETF's net income of --. Notably, Matthews China Active ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Franklin FTSE China ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Matthews China Active ETF is -- versus -- for Franklin FTSE China ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MCHMatthews China Active ETF-- -- -- -- FLCHFranklin FTSE China ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns MCH or GXC?
SPDR S&P China ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Matthews China Active ETF's net margin of --. Matthews China Active ETF's return on equity of -- beat SPDR S&P China ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MCHMatthews China Active ETF-- -- -- GXCSPDR S&P China ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About MCH or GXC?
Matthews China Active ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand SPDR S&P China ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Matthews China Active ETF has higher upside potential than SPDR S&P China ETF, analysts believe Matthews China Active ETF is more attractive than SPDR S&P China ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MCHMatthews China Active ETF0 0 0 GXCSPDR S&P China ETF0 0 0 -
Is MCH or GXC More Risky?
Matthews China Active ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SPDR S&P China ETF has a beta of 0.990, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.99%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MCH or GXC?
Matthews China Active ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.72%. SPDR S&P China ETF offers a yield of 2.35% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.32 per share. Matthews China Active ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SPDR S&P China ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MCH or GXC?
Matthews China Active ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than SPDR S&P China ETF quarterly revenues of --. Matthews China Active ETF's net income of -- is lower than SPDR S&P China ETF's net income of --. Notably, Matthews China Active ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while SPDR S&P China ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Matthews China Active ETF is -- versus -- for SPDR S&P China ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MCHMatthews China Active ETF-- -- -- -- GXCSPDR S&P China ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns MCH or JCHI?
JPMorgan Active China ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Matthews China Active ETF's net margin of --. Matthews China Active ETF's return on equity of -- beat JPMorgan Active China ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MCHMatthews China Active ETF-- -- -- JCHIJPMorgan Active China ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About MCH or JCHI?
Matthews China Active ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand JPMorgan Active China ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Matthews China Active ETF has higher upside potential than JPMorgan Active China ETF, analysts believe Matthews China Active ETF is more attractive than JPMorgan Active China ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MCHMatthews China Active ETF0 0 0 JCHIJPMorgan Active China ETF0 0 0 -
Is MCH or JCHI More Risky?
Matthews China Active ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison JPMorgan Active China ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MCH or JCHI?
Matthews China Active ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.72%. JPMorgan Active China ETF offers a yield of 1.78% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.99 per share. Matthews China Active ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. JPMorgan Active China ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MCH or JCHI?
Matthews China Active ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than JPMorgan Active China ETF quarterly revenues of --. Matthews China Active ETF's net income of -- is lower than JPMorgan Active China ETF's net income of --. Notably, Matthews China Active ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while JPMorgan Active China ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Matthews China Active ETF is -- versus -- for JPMorgan Active China ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MCHMatthews China Active ETF-- -- -- -- JCHIJPMorgan Active China ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns MCH or KGRN?
KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Matthews China Active ETF's net margin of --. Matthews China Active ETF's return on equity of -- beat KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MCHMatthews China Active ETF-- -- -- KGRNKraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About MCH or KGRN?
Matthews China Active ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Matthews China Active ETF has higher upside potential than KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF, analysts believe Matthews China Active ETF is more attractive than KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MCHMatthews China Active ETF0 0 0 KGRNKraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF0 0 0 -
Is MCH or KGRN More Risky?
Matthews China Active ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF has a beta of 1.036, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.563%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MCH or KGRN?
Matthews China Active ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.72%. KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF offers a yield of 0.83% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share. Matthews China Active ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MCH or KGRN?
Matthews China Active ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF quarterly revenues of --. Matthews China Active ETF's net income of -- is lower than KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF's net income of --. Notably, Matthews China Active ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Matthews China Active ETF is -- versus -- for KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MCHMatthews China Active ETF-- -- -- -- KGRNKraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns MCH or MCHI?
iShares MSCI China ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Matthews China Active ETF's net margin of --. Matthews China Active ETF's return on equity of -- beat iShares MSCI China ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MCHMatthews China Active ETF-- -- -- MCHIiShares MSCI China ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About MCH or MCHI?
Matthews China Active ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand iShares MSCI China ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Matthews China Active ETF has higher upside potential than iShares MSCI China ETF, analysts believe Matthews China Active ETF is more attractive than iShares MSCI China ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MCHMatthews China Active ETF0 0 0 MCHIiShares MSCI China ETF0 0 0 -
Is MCH or MCHI More Risky?
Matthews China Active ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iShares MSCI China ETF has a beta of 1.031, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.11%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MCH or MCHI?
Matthews China Active ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.72%. iShares MSCI China ETF offers a yield of 2.07% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.74 per share. Matthews China Active ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iShares MSCI China ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MCH or MCHI?
Matthews China Active ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than iShares MSCI China ETF quarterly revenues of --. Matthews China Active ETF's net income of -- is lower than iShares MSCI China ETF's net income of --. Notably, Matthews China Active ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iShares MSCI China ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Matthews China Active ETF is -- versus -- for iShares MSCI China ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MCHMatthews China Active ETF-- -- -- -- MCHIiShares MSCI China ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is SentinelOne Stock Undervalued?
Cybersecurity major SentinelOne (NYSE:S) has struggled over several years, delivering…
Is Broadcom Stock on Sale?
Chip and software maker Broadcom (NASDAQ:AVGO) has been among the…
Stock Ideas
Buy
59
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.6T
P/E Ratio: 65x
Buy
55
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
61
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 39x
Alerts
Buy
72
GLTO alert for Dec 27
Galecto, Inc. [GLTO] is up 16.92% over the past day.
Sell
20
SMX alert for Dec 27
SMX (Security Matters) Plc [SMX] is down 15.76% over the past day.
Sell
11
CDNAF alert for Dec 27
Canadian Tire Corp. Ltd. [CDNAF] is down 10% over the past day.
