Is DocuSign Stock Undervalued?
Digital signature software business DocuSign (NASDAQ:DOCU) has been struggling over…
Buy
58
IVRS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$35.19
Seasonality move
:
12.39%
Day range:
$35.01 - $35.01
52-week range:
$28.35 - $43.12
Dividend yield:
0.27%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
110
Avg. volume:
1.1K
1-year change:
3.62%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
IVRS
iShares Future Metaverse Tech & Communications ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
BNGE
First Trust S-Network Streaming & Gaming ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FMET
Fidelity Metaverse ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
GAMR
Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
OND
ProShares On-Demand ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SOCL
Global X Social Media ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
IVRS
iShares Future Metaverse Tech & Communications ETF
|
$35.01 | -- | -- | -- | $2.71 | 0.27% | -- |
|
BNGE
First Trust S-Network Streaming & Gaming ETF
|
$37.90 | -- | -- | -- | $0.06 | 0.88% | -- |
|
FMET
Fidelity Metaverse ETF
|
$36.40 | -- | -- | -- | $0.04 | 0.8% | -- |
|
GAMR
Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF
|
$92.38 | -- | -- | -- | $0.38 | 0.45% | -- |
|
OND
ProShares On-Demand ETF
|
$41.48 | -- | -- | -- | $0.19 | 0% | -- |
|
SOCL
Global X Social Media ETF
|
$55.03 | -- | -- | -- | $0.11 | 0.2% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
IVRS
iShares Future Metaverse Tech & Communications ETF
|
-- | 1.084 | -- | -- |
|
BNGE
First Trust S-Network Streaming & Gaming ETF
|
-- | 1.320 | -- | -- |
|
FMET
Fidelity Metaverse ETF
|
-- | 1.728 | -- | -- |
|
GAMR
Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF
|
-- | 1.613 | -- | -- |
|
OND
ProShares On-Demand ETF
|
-- | 1.679 | -- | -- |
|
SOCL
Global X Social Media ETF
|
-- | 1.652 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
IVRS
iShares Future Metaverse Tech & Communications ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
BNGE
First Trust S-Network Streaming & Gaming ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FMET
Fidelity Metaverse ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
GAMR
Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
OND
ProShares On-Demand ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SOCL
Global X Social Media ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
iShares Future Metaverse Tech & Communications ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns IVRS or BNGE?
First Trust S-Network Streaming & Gaming ETF has a net margin of -- compared to iShares Future Metaverse Tech & Communications ETF's net margin of --. iShares Future Metaverse Tech & Communications ETF's return on equity of -- beat First Trust S-Network Streaming & Gaming ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital IVRSiShares Future Metaverse Tech & Communications ETF-- -- -- BNGEFirst Trust S-Network Streaming & Gaming ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About IVRS or BNGE?
iShares Future Metaverse Tech & Communications ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand First Trust S-Network Streaming & Gaming ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that iShares Future Metaverse Tech & Communications ETF has higher upside potential than First Trust S-Network Streaming & Gaming ETF, analysts believe iShares Future Metaverse Tech & Communications ETF is more attractive than First Trust S-Network Streaming & Gaming ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings IVRSiShares Future Metaverse Tech & Communications ETF0 0 0 BNGEFirst Trust S-Network Streaming & Gaming ETF0 0 0 -
Is IVRS or BNGE More Risky?
iShares Future Metaverse Tech & Communications ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison First Trust S-Network Streaming & Gaming ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock IVRS or BNGE?
iShares Future Metaverse Tech & Communications ETF has a quarterly dividend of $2.71 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.27%. First Trust S-Network Streaming & Gaming ETF offers a yield of 0.88% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. iShares Future Metaverse Tech & Communications ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. First Trust S-Network Streaming & Gaming ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios IVRS or BNGE?
iShares Future Metaverse Tech & Communications ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than First Trust S-Network Streaming & Gaming ETF quarterly revenues of --. iShares Future Metaverse Tech & Communications ETF's net income of -- is lower than First Trust S-Network Streaming & Gaming ETF's net income of --. Notably, iShares Future Metaverse Tech & Communications ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while First Trust S-Network Streaming & Gaming ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for iShares Future Metaverse Tech & Communications ETF is -- versus -- for First Trust S-Network Streaming & Gaming ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income IVRSiShares Future Metaverse Tech & Communications ETF-- -- -- -- BNGEFirst Trust S-Network Streaming & Gaming ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns IVRS or FMET?
Fidelity Metaverse ETF has a net margin of -- compared to iShares Future Metaverse Tech & Communications ETF's net margin of --. iShares Future Metaverse Tech & Communications ETF's return on equity of -- beat Fidelity Metaverse ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital IVRSiShares Future Metaverse Tech & Communications ETF-- -- -- FMETFidelity Metaverse ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About IVRS or FMET?
iShares Future Metaverse Tech & Communications ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Fidelity Metaverse ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that iShares Future Metaverse Tech & Communications ETF has higher upside potential than Fidelity Metaverse ETF, analysts believe iShares Future Metaverse Tech & Communications ETF is more attractive than Fidelity Metaverse ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings IVRSiShares Future Metaverse Tech & Communications ETF0 0 0 FMETFidelity Metaverse ETF0 0 0 -
Is IVRS or FMET More Risky?
iShares Future Metaverse Tech & Communications ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Fidelity Metaverse ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock IVRS or FMET?
iShares Future Metaverse Tech & Communications ETF has a quarterly dividend of $2.71 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.27%. Fidelity Metaverse ETF offers a yield of 0.8% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share. iShares Future Metaverse Tech & Communications ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Fidelity Metaverse ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios IVRS or FMET?
iShares Future Metaverse Tech & Communications ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Fidelity Metaverse ETF quarterly revenues of --. iShares Future Metaverse Tech & Communications ETF's net income of -- is lower than Fidelity Metaverse ETF's net income of --. Notably, iShares Future Metaverse Tech & Communications ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Fidelity Metaverse ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for iShares Future Metaverse Tech & Communications ETF is -- versus -- for Fidelity Metaverse ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income IVRSiShares Future Metaverse Tech & Communications ETF-- -- -- -- FMETFidelity Metaverse ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns IVRS or GAMR?
Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF has a net margin of -- compared to iShares Future Metaverse Tech & Communications ETF's net margin of --. iShares Future Metaverse Tech & Communications ETF's return on equity of -- beat Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital IVRSiShares Future Metaverse Tech & Communications ETF-- -- -- GAMRAmplify Video Game Leaders ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About IVRS or GAMR?
iShares Future Metaverse Tech & Communications ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that iShares Future Metaverse Tech & Communications ETF has higher upside potential than Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF, analysts believe iShares Future Metaverse Tech & Communications ETF is more attractive than Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings IVRSiShares Future Metaverse Tech & Communications ETF0 0 0 GAMRAmplify Video Game Leaders ETF0 0 0 -
Is IVRS or GAMR More Risky?
iShares Future Metaverse Tech & Communications ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF has a beta of 1.128, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.809%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock IVRS or GAMR?
iShares Future Metaverse Tech & Communications ETF has a quarterly dividend of $2.71 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.27%. Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF offers a yield of 0.45% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.38 per share. iShares Future Metaverse Tech & Communications ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios IVRS or GAMR?
iShares Future Metaverse Tech & Communications ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF quarterly revenues of --. iShares Future Metaverse Tech & Communications ETF's net income of -- is lower than Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF's net income of --. Notably, iShares Future Metaverse Tech & Communications ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for iShares Future Metaverse Tech & Communications ETF is -- versus -- for Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income IVRSiShares Future Metaverse Tech & Communications ETF-- -- -- -- GAMRAmplify Video Game Leaders ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns IVRS or OND?
ProShares On-Demand ETF has a net margin of -- compared to iShares Future Metaverse Tech & Communications ETF's net margin of --. iShares Future Metaverse Tech & Communications ETF's return on equity of -- beat ProShares On-Demand ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital IVRSiShares Future Metaverse Tech & Communications ETF-- -- -- ONDProShares On-Demand ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About IVRS or OND?
iShares Future Metaverse Tech & Communications ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand ProShares On-Demand ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that iShares Future Metaverse Tech & Communications ETF has higher upside potential than ProShares On-Demand ETF, analysts believe iShares Future Metaverse Tech & Communications ETF is more attractive than ProShares On-Demand ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings IVRSiShares Future Metaverse Tech & Communications ETF0 0 0 ONDProShares On-Demand ETF0 0 0 -
Is IVRS or OND More Risky?
iShares Future Metaverse Tech & Communications ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ProShares On-Demand ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock IVRS or OND?
iShares Future Metaverse Tech & Communications ETF has a quarterly dividend of $2.71 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.27%. ProShares On-Demand ETF offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share. iShares Future Metaverse Tech & Communications ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. ProShares On-Demand ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios IVRS or OND?
iShares Future Metaverse Tech & Communications ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than ProShares On-Demand ETF quarterly revenues of --. iShares Future Metaverse Tech & Communications ETF's net income of -- is lower than ProShares On-Demand ETF's net income of --. Notably, iShares Future Metaverse Tech & Communications ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while ProShares On-Demand ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for iShares Future Metaverse Tech & Communications ETF is -- versus -- for ProShares On-Demand ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income IVRSiShares Future Metaverse Tech & Communications ETF-- -- -- -- ONDProShares On-Demand ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns IVRS or SOCL?
Global X Social Media ETF has a net margin of -- compared to iShares Future Metaverse Tech & Communications ETF's net margin of --. iShares Future Metaverse Tech & Communications ETF's return on equity of -- beat Global X Social Media ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital IVRSiShares Future Metaverse Tech & Communications ETF-- -- -- SOCLGlobal X Social Media ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About IVRS or SOCL?
iShares Future Metaverse Tech & Communications ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Global X Social Media ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that iShares Future Metaverse Tech & Communications ETF has higher upside potential than Global X Social Media ETF, analysts believe iShares Future Metaverse Tech & Communications ETF is more attractive than Global X Social Media ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings IVRSiShares Future Metaverse Tech & Communications ETF0 0 0 SOCLGlobal X Social Media ETF0 0 0 -
Is IVRS or SOCL More Risky?
iShares Future Metaverse Tech & Communications ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Global X Social Media ETF has a beta of 1.117, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.663%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock IVRS or SOCL?
iShares Future Metaverse Tech & Communications ETF has a quarterly dividend of $2.71 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.27%. Global X Social Media ETF offers a yield of 0.2% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share. iShares Future Metaverse Tech & Communications ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Global X Social Media ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios IVRS or SOCL?
iShares Future Metaverse Tech & Communications ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Global X Social Media ETF quarterly revenues of --. iShares Future Metaverse Tech & Communications ETF's net income of -- is lower than Global X Social Media ETF's net income of --. Notably, iShares Future Metaverse Tech & Communications ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Global X Social Media ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for iShares Future Metaverse Tech & Communications ETF is -- versus -- for Global X Social Media ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income IVRSiShares Future Metaverse Tech & Communications ETF-- -- -- -- SOCLGlobal X Social Media ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is SentinelOne Stock Undervalued?
Cybersecurity major SentinelOne (NYSE:S) has struggled over several years, delivering…
Is Broadcom Stock on Sale?
Chip and software maker Broadcom (NASDAQ:AVGO) has been among the…
Stock Ideas
Buy
59
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.6T
P/E Ratio: 65x
Buy
55
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
61
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 39x
Alerts
Buy
72
GLTO alert for Dec 27
Galecto, Inc. [GLTO] is up 16.92% over the past day.
Sell
20
SMX alert for Dec 27
SMX (Security Matters) Plc [SMX] is down 15.76% over the past day.
Sell
11
CDNAF alert for Dec 27
Canadian Tire Corp. Ltd. [CDNAF] is down 10% over the past day.
