Is Celestica The Best AI Stock to Buy Now?
Technology and hardware business Celestica (NYSE:CLS) has seen massive upward…
Sell
36
IVRS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$30.06
Seasonality move
:
-0.56%
Day range:
$30.01 - $30.10
52-week range:
$28.35 - $43.12
Dividend yield:
0.31%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
172
Avg. volume:
2K
1-year change:
-14.97%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
IVRS
iShares Future Metaverse Tech & Communications ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ESPO
VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FMET
Fidelity Metaverse ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
GAMR
Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
OND
ProShares On-Demand ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SOCL
Global X Social Media ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
IVRS
iShares Future Metaverse Tech & Communications ETF
|
$30.01 | -- | -- | -- | $2.71 | 0.31% | -- |
|
ESPO
VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF
|
$92.92 | -- | -- | -- | $1.29 | 1.39% | -- |
|
FMET
Fidelity Metaverse ETF
|
$33.48 | -- | -- | -- | $0.04 | 0.87% | -- |
|
GAMR
Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF
|
$79.64 | -- | -- | -- | $0.47 | 0.59% | -- |
|
OND
ProShares On-Demand ETF
|
$36.29 | -- | -- | -- | $0.19 | 0% | -- |
|
SOCL
Global X Social Media ETF
|
$50.34 | -- | -- | -- | $0.13 | 0.47% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
IVRS
iShares Future Metaverse Tech & Communications ETF
|
-- | 1.101 | -- | -- |
|
ESPO
VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF
|
-- | 1.146 | -- | -- |
|
FMET
Fidelity Metaverse ETF
|
-- | 1.872 | -- | -- |
|
GAMR
Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF
|
-- | 1.671 | -- | -- |
|
OND
ProShares On-Demand ETF
|
-- | 1.599 | -- | -- |
|
SOCL
Global X Social Media ETF
|
-- | 1.668 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
IVRS
iShares Future Metaverse Tech & Communications ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ESPO
VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FMET
Fidelity Metaverse ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
GAMR
Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
OND
ProShares On-Demand ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SOCL
Global X Social Media ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
iShares Future Metaverse Tech & Communications ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns IVRS or ESPO?
VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF has a net margin of -- compared to iShares Future Metaverse Tech & Communications ETF's net margin of --. iShares Future Metaverse Tech & Communications ETF's return on equity of -- beat VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital IVRSiShares Future Metaverse Tech & Communications ETF-- -- -- ESPOVanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About IVRS or ESPO?
iShares Future Metaverse Tech & Communications ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that iShares Future Metaverse Tech & Communications ETF has higher upside potential than VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF, analysts believe iShares Future Metaverse Tech & Communications ETF is more attractive than VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings IVRSiShares Future Metaverse Tech & Communications ETF0 0 0 ESPOVanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF0 0 0 -
Is IVRS or ESPO More Risky?
iShares Future Metaverse Tech & Communications ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF has a beta of 1.129, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.923%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock IVRS or ESPO?
iShares Future Metaverse Tech & Communications ETF has a quarterly dividend of $2.71 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.31%. VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF offers a yield of 1.39% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.29 per share. iShares Future Metaverse Tech & Communications ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios IVRS or ESPO?
iShares Future Metaverse Tech & Communications ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF quarterly revenues of --. iShares Future Metaverse Tech & Communications ETF's net income of -- is lower than VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF's net income of --. Notably, iShares Future Metaverse Tech & Communications ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for iShares Future Metaverse Tech & Communications ETF is -- versus -- for VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income IVRSiShares Future Metaverse Tech & Communications ETF-- -- -- -- ESPOVanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns IVRS or FMET?
Fidelity Metaverse ETF has a net margin of -- compared to iShares Future Metaverse Tech & Communications ETF's net margin of --. iShares Future Metaverse Tech & Communications ETF's return on equity of -- beat Fidelity Metaverse ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital IVRSiShares Future Metaverse Tech & Communications ETF-- -- -- FMETFidelity Metaverse ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About IVRS or FMET?
iShares Future Metaverse Tech & Communications ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Fidelity Metaverse ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that iShares Future Metaverse Tech & Communications ETF has higher upside potential than Fidelity Metaverse ETF, analysts believe iShares Future Metaverse Tech & Communications ETF is more attractive than Fidelity Metaverse ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings IVRSiShares Future Metaverse Tech & Communications ETF0 0 0 FMETFidelity Metaverse ETF0 0 0 -
Is IVRS or FMET More Risky?
iShares Future Metaverse Tech & Communications ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Fidelity Metaverse ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock IVRS or FMET?
iShares Future Metaverse Tech & Communications ETF has a quarterly dividend of $2.71 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.31%. Fidelity Metaverse ETF offers a yield of 0.87% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share. iShares Future Metaverse Tech & Communications ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Fidelity Metaverse ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios IVRS or FMET?
iShares Future Metaverse Tech & Communications ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Fidelity Metaverse ETF quarterly revenues of --. iShares Future Metaverse Tech & Communications ETF's net income of -- is lower than Fidelity Metaverse ETF's net income of --. Notably, iShares Future Metaverse Tech & Communications ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Fidelity Metaverse ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for iShares Future Metaverse Tech & Communications ETF is -- versus -- for Fidelity Metaverse ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income IVRSiShares Future Metaverse Tech & Communications ETF-- -- -- -- FMETFidelity Metaverse ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns IVRS or GAMR?
Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF has a net margin of -- compared to iShares Future Metaverse Tech & Communications ETF's net margin of --. iShares Future Metaverse Tech & Communications ETF's return on equity of -- beat Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital IVRSiShares Future Metaverse Tech & Communications ETF-- -- -- GAMRAmplify Video Game Leaders ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About IVRS or GAMR?
iShares Future Metaverse Tech & Communications ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that iShares Future Metaverse Tech & Communications ETF has higher upside potential than Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF, analysts believe iShares Future Metaverse Tech & Communications ETF is more attractive than Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings IVRSiShares Future Metaverse Tech & Communications ETF0 0 0 GAMRAmplify Video Game Leaders ETF0 0 0 -
Is IVRS or GAMR More Risky?
iShares Future Metaverse Tech & Communications ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF has a beta of 1.192, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.16%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock IVRS or GAMR?
iShares Future Metaverse Tech & Communications ETF has a quarterly dividend of $2.71 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.31%. Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF offers a yield of 0.59% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.47 per share. iShares Future Metaverse Tech & Communications ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios IVRS or GAMR?
iShares Future Metaverse Tech & Communications ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF quarterly revenues of --. iShares Future Metaverse Tech & Communications ETF's net income of -- is lower than Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF's net income of --. Notably, iShares Future Metaverse Tech & Communications ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for iShares Future Metaverse Tech & Communications ETF is -- versus -- for Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income IVRSiShares Future Metaverse Tech & Communications ETF-- -- -- -- GAMRAmplify Video Game Leaders ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns IVRS or OND?
ProShares On-Demand ETF has a net margin of -- compared to iShares Future Metaverse Tech & Communications ETF's net margin of --. iShares Future Metaverse Tech & Communications ETF's return on equity of -- beat ProShares On-Demand ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital IVRSiShares Future Metaverse Tech & Communications ETF-- -- -- ONDProShares On-Demand ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About IVRS or OND?
iShares Future Metaverse Tech & Communications ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand ProShares On-Demand ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that iShares Future Metaverse Tech & Communications ETF has higher upside potential than ProShares On-Demand ETF, analysts believe iShares Future Metaverse Tech & Communications ETF is more attractive than ProShares On-Demand ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings IVRSiShares Future Metaverse Tech & Communications ETF0 0 0 ONDProShares On-Demand ETF0 0 0 -
Is IVRS or OND More Risky?
iShares Future Metaverse Tech & Communications ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ProShares On-Demand ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock IVRS or OND?
iShares Future Metaverse Tech & Communications ETF has a quarterly dividend of $2.71 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.31%. ProShares On-Demand ETF offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share. iShares Future Metaverse Tech & Communications ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. ProShares On-Demand ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios IVRS or OND?
iShares Future Metaverse Tech & Communications ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than ProShares On-Demand ETF quarterly revenues of --. iShares Future Metaverse Tech & Communications ETF's net income of -- is lower than ProShares On-Demand ETF's net income of --. Notably, iShares Future Metaverse Tech & Communications ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while ProShares On-Demand ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for iShares Future Metaverse Tech & Communications ETF is -- versus -- for ProShares On-Demand ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income IVRSiShares Future Metaverse Tech & Communications ETF-- -- -- -- ONDProShares On-Demand ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns IVRS or SOCL?
Global X Social Media ETF has a net margin of -- compared to iShares Future Metaverse Tech & Communications ETF's net margin of --. iShares Future Metaverse Tech & Communications ETF's return on equity of -- beat Global X Social Media ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital IVRSiShares Future Metaverse Tech & Communications ETF-- -- -- SOCLGlobal X Social Media ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About IVRS or SOCL?
iShares Future Metaverse Tech & Communications ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Global X Social Media ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that iShares Future Metaverse Tech & Communications ETF has higher upside potential than Global X Social Media ETF, analysts believe iShares Future Metaverse Tech & Communications ETF is more attractive than Global X Social Media ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings IVRSiShares Future Metaverse Tech & Communications ETF0 0 0 SOCLGlobal X Social Media ETF0 0 0 -
Is IVRS or SOCL More Risky?
iShares Future Metaverse Tech & Communications ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Global X Social Media ETF has a beta of 1.118, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.827%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock IVRS or SOCL?
iShares Future Metaverse Tech & Communications ETF has a quarterly dividend of $2.71 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.31%. Global X Social Media ETF offers a yield of 0.47% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. iShares Future Metaverse Tech & Communications ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Global X Social Media ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios IVRS or SOCL?
iShares Future Metaverse Tech & Communications ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Global X Social Media ETF quarterly revenues of --. iShares Future Metaverse Tech & Communications ETF's net income of -- is lower than Global X Social Media ETF's net income of --. Notably, iShares Future Metaverse Tech & Communications ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Global X Social Media ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for iShares Future Metaverse Tech & Communications ETF is -- versus -- for Global X Social Media ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income IVRSiShares Future Metaverse Tech & Communications ETF-- -- -- -- SOCLGlobal X Social Media ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will AI Disrupt SaaS Software Stocks?
Since January 28th, software stocks in the United States have…
Why Is Meta Stock Going Higher?
Over the last five days, shares of Instagram and Facebook…
Stock Ideas
Buy
55
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.6T
P/E Ratio: 65x
Sell
50
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 35x
Sell
40
Is GOOGL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 29x
Alerts
Buy
77
RNG alert for Feb 21
RingCentral, Inc. [RNG] is up 34.37% over the past day.
Sell
9
FROG alert for Feb 21
JFrog Ltd. [FROG] is down 24.98% over the past day.
Buy
72
SNSE alert for Feb 21
Sensei Biotherapeutics, Inc. [SNSE] is up 23.81% over the past day.
