Is Celestica The Best AI Stock to Buy Now?
Technology and hardware business Celestica (NYSE:CLS) has seen massive upward…
Sell
21
GAMR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$79.49
Seasonality move
:
1.92%
Day range:
$79.64 - $79.79
52-week range:
$56.93 - $103.93
Dividend yield:
0.59%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
492
Avg. volume:
1K
1-year change:
7.17%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GAMR
Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
AIVC
Amplify Bloomberg AI Value Chain ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
BLCN
Siren NexGen Economy ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FMET
Fidelity Metaverse ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
IVRS
iShares Future Metaverse Tech & Communications ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SOCL
Global X Social Media ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GAMR
Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF
|
$79.64 | -- | -- | -- | $0.47 | 0.59% | -- |
|
AIVC
Amplify Bloomberg AI Value Chain ETF
|
$72.65 | -- | -- | -- | $0.12 | 0.16% | -- |
|
BLCN
Siren NexGen Economy ETF
|
$22.56 | -- | -- | -- | $0.69 | 3.2% | -- |
|
FMET
Fidelity Metaverse ETF
|
$33.48 | -- | -- | -- | $0.04 | 0.87% | -- |
|
IVRS
iShares Future Metaverse Tech & Communications ETF
|
$30.01 | -- | -- | -- | $2.71 | 0.31% | -- |
|
SOCL
Global X Social Media ETF
|
$50.34 | -- | -- | -- | $0.13 | 0.47% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GAMR
Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF
|
-- | 1.671 | -- | -- |
|
AIVC
Amplify Bloomberg AI Value Chain ETF
|
-- | 2.580 | -- | -- |
|
BLCN
Siren NexGen Economy ETF
|
-- | 2.822 | -- | -- |
|
FMET
Fidelity Metaverse ETF
|
-- | 1.872 | -- | -- |
|
IVRS
iShares Future Metaverse Tech & Communications ETF
|
-- | 1.101 | -- | -- |
|
SOCL
Global X Social Media ETF
|
-- | 1.668 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GAMR
Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
AIVC
Amplify Bloomberg AI Value Chain ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
BLCN
Siren NexGen Economy ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FMET
Fidelity Metaverse ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
IVRS
iShares Future Metaverse Tech & Communications ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SOCL
Global X Social Media ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns GAMR or AIVC?
Amplify Bloomberg AI Value Chain ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF's net margin of --. Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF's return on equity of -- beat Amplify Bloomberg AI Value Chain ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GAMRAmplify Video Game Leaders ETF-- -- -- AIVCAmplify Bloomberg AI Value Chain ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About GAMR or AIVC?
Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Amplify Bloomberg AI Value Chain ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF has higher upside potential than Amplify Bloomberg AI Value Chain ETF, analysts believe Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF is more attractive than Amplify Bloomberg AI Value Chain ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GAMRAmplify Video Game Leaders ETF0 0 0 AIVCAmplify Bloomberg AI Value Chain ETF0 0 0 -
Is GAMR or AIVC More Risky?
Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF has a beta of 1.192, which suggesting that the stock is 19.16% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Amplify Bloomberg AI Value Chain ETF has a beta of 1.084, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.39%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GAMR or AIVC?
Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.47 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.59%. Amplify Bloomberg AI Value Chain ETF offers a yield of 0.16% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share. Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Amplify Bloomberg AI Value Chain ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GAMR or AIVC?
Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Amplify Bloomberg AI Value Chain ETF quarterly revenues of --. Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF's net income of -- is lower than Amplify Bloomberg AI Value Chain ETF's net income of --. Notably, Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Amplify Bloomberg AI Value Chain ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF is -- versus -- for Amplify Bloomberg AI Value Chain ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GAMRAmplify Video Game Leaders ETF-- -- -- -- AIVCAmplify Bloomberg AI Value Chain ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns GAMR or BLCN?
Siren NexGen Economy ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF's net margin of --. Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF's return on equity of -- beat Siren NexGen Economy ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GAMRAmplify Video Game Leaders ETF-- -- -- BLCNSiren NexGen Economy ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About GAMR or BLCN?
Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Siren NexGen Economy ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF has higher upside potential than Siren NexGen Economy ETF, analysts believe Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF is more attractive than Siren NexGen Economy ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GAMRAmplify Video Game Leaders ETF0 0 0 BLCNSiren NexGen Economy ETF0 0 0 -
Is GAMR or BLCN More Risky?
Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF has a beta of 1.192, which suggesting that the stock is 19.16% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Siren NexGen Economy ETF has a beta of 1.676, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 67.627%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GAMR or BLCN?
Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.47 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.59%. Siren NexGen Economy ETF offers a yield of 3.2% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.69 per share. Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Siren NexGen Economy ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GAMR or BLCN?
Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Siren NexGen Economy ETF quarterly revenues of --. Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF's net income of -- is lower than Siren NexGen Economy ETF's net income of --. Notably, Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Siren NexGen Economy ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF is -- versus -- for Siren NexGen Economy ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GAMRAmplify Video Game Leaders ETF-- -- -- -- BLCNSiren NexGen Economy ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns GAMR or FMET?
Fidelity Metaverse ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF's net margin of --. Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF's return on equity of -- beat Fidelity Metaverse ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GAMRAmplify Video Game Leaders ETF-- -- -- FMETFidelity Metaverse ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About GAMR or FMET?
Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Fidelity Metaverse ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF has higher upside potential than Fidelity Metaverse ETF, analysts believe Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF is more attractive than Fidelity Metaverse ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GAMRAmplify Video Game Leaders ETF0 0 0 FMETFidelity Metaverse ETF0 0 0 -
Is GAMR or FMET More Risky?
Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF has a beta of 1.192, which suggesting that the stock is 19.16% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Fidelity Metaverse ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GAMR or FMET?
Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.47 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.59%. Fidelity Metaverse ETF offers a yield of 0.87% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share. Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Fidelity Metaverse ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GAMR or FMET?
Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Fidelity Metaverse ETF quarterly revenues of --. Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF's net income of -- is lower than Fidelity Metaverse ETF's net income of --. Notably, Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Fidelity Metaverse ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF is -- versus -- for Fidelity Metaverse ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GAMRAmplify Video Game Leaders ETF-- -- -- -- FMETFidelity Metaverse ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns GAMR or IVRS?
iShares Future Metaverse Tech & Communications ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF's net margin of --. Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF's return on equity of -- beat iShares Future Metaverse Tech & Communications ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GAMRAmplify Video Game Leaders ETF-- -- -- IVRSiShares Future Metaverse Tech & Communications ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About GAMR or IVRS?
Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand iShares Future Metaverse Tech & Communications ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF has higher upside potential than iShares Future Metaverse Tech & Communications ETF, analysts believe Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF is more attractive than iShares Future Metaverse Tech & Communications ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GAMRAmplify Video Game Leaders ETF0 0 0 IVRSiShares Future Metaverse Tech & Communications ETF0 0 0 -
Is GAMR or IVRS More Risky?
Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF has a beta of 1.192, which suggesting that the stock is 19.16% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iShares Future Metaverse Tech & Communications ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GAMR or IVRS?
Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.47 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.59%. iShares Future Metaverse Tech & Communications ETF offers a yield of 0.31% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $2.71 per share. Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iShares Future Metaverse Tech & Communications ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GAMR or IVRS?
Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than iShares Future Metaverse Tech & Communications ETF quarterly revenues of --. Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF's net income of -- is lower than iShares Future Metaverse Tech & Communications ETF's net income of --. Notably, Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iShares Future Metaverse Tech & Communications ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF is -- versus -- for iShares Future Metaverse Tech & Communications ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GAMRAmplify Video Game Leaders ETF-- -- -- -- IVRSiShares Future Metaverse Tech & Communications ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns GAMR or SOCL?
Global X Social Media ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF's net margin of --. Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF's return on equity of -- beat Global X Social Media ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GAMRAmplify Video Game Leaders ETF-- -- -- SOCLGlobal X Social Media ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About GAMR or SOCL?
Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Global X Social Media ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF has higher upside potential than Global X Social Media ETF, analysts believe Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF is more attractive than Global X Social Media ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GAMRAmplify Video Game Leaders ETF0 0 0 SOCLGlobal X Social Media ETF0 0 0 -
Is GAMR or SOCL More Risky?
Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF has a beta of 1.192, which suggesting that the stock is 19.16% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Global X Social Media ETF has a beta of 1.118, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.827%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GAMR or SOCL?
Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.47 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.59%. Global X Social Media ETF offers a yield of 0.47% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Global X Social Media ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GAMR or SOCL?
Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Global X Social Media ETF quarterly revenues of --. Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF's net income of -- is lower than Global X Social Media ETF's net income of --. Notably, Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Global X Social Media ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF is -- versus -- for Global X Social Media ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GAMRAmplify Video Game Leaders ETF-- -- -- -- SOCLGlobal X Social Media ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will AI Disrupt SaaS Software Stocks?
Since January 28th, software stocks in the United States have…
Why Is Meta Stock Going Higher?
Over the last five days, shares of Instagram and Facebook…
Stock Ideas
Buy
55
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.6T
P/E Ratio: 65x
Sell
50
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 35x
Sell
40
Is GOOGL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 29x
Alerts
Buy
77
RNG alert for Feb 21
RingCentral, Inc. [RNG] is up 34.37% over the past day.
Sell
9
FROG alert for Feb 21
JFrog Ltd. [FROG] is down 24.98% over the past day.
Buy
72
SNSE alert for Feb 21
Sensei Biotherapeutics, Inc. [SNSE] is up 23.81% over the past day.
