Will UnitedHealth Stock Recover?
Shares of embattled health insurance giant UnitedHealth (NYSE:UNH) plummeted by…
Sell
43
FMET Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$33.85
Seasonality move
:
-2.61%
Day range:
$33.46 - $34.30
52-week range:
$23.86 - $39.44
Dividend yield:
0.87%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
3.4K
Avg. volume:
6.3K
1-year change:
5.33%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FMET
Fidelity Metaverse ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
BLCN
Siren NexGen Economy ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
DGIN
VanEck Digital India ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ESPO
VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
HERO
Global X Video Games & Esports ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SOCL
Global X Social Media ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FMET
Fidelity Metaverse ETF
|
$33.55 | -- | -- | -- | $0.04 | 0.87% | -- |
|
BLCN
Siren NexGen Economy ETF
|
$23.01 | -- | -- | -- | $0.69 | 3.14% | -- |
|
DGIN
VanEck Digital India ETF
|
$37.05 | -- | -- | -- | $0.78 | 0.36% | -- |
|
ESPO
VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF
|
$94.26 | -- | -- | -- | $1.29 | 1.37% | -- |
|
HERO
Global X Video Games & Esports ETF
|
$27.58 | -- | -- | -- | $0.33 | 1.75% | -- |
|
SOCL
Global X Social Media ETF
|
$49.81 | -- | -- | -- | $0.13 | 0.48% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FMET
Fidelity Metaverse ETF
|
-- | 1.872 | -- | -- |
|
BLCN
Siren NexGen Economy ETF
|
-- | 2.822 | -- | -- |
|
DGIN
VanEck Digital India ETF
|
-- | 0.298 | -- | -- |
|
ESPO
VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF
|
-- | 1.146 | -- | -- |
|
HERO
Global X Video Games & Esports ETF
|
-- | 0.984 | -- | -- |
|
SOCL
Global X Social Media ETF
|
-- | 1.668 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FMET
Fidelity Metaverse ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
BLCN
Siren NexGen Economy ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
DGIN
VanEck Digital India ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ESPO
VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
HERO
Global X Video Games & Esports ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SOCL
Global X Social Media ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Fidelity Metaverse ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns FMET or BLCN?
Siren NexGen Economy ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Fidelity Metaverse ETF's net margin of --. Fidelity Metaverse ETF's return on equity of -- beat Siren NexGen Economy ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FMETFidelity Metaverse ETF-- -- -- BLCNSiren NexGen Economy ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About FMET or BLCN?
Fidelity Metaverse ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Siren NexGen Economy ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Fidelity Metaverse ETF has higher upside potential than Siren NexGen Economy ETF, analysts believe Fidelity Metaverse ETF is more attractive than Siren NexGen Economy ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FMETFidelity Metaverse ETF0 0 0 BLCNSiren NexGen Economy ETF0 0 0 -
Is FMET or BLCN More Risky?
Fidelity Metaverse ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Siren NexGen Economy ETF has a beta of 1.676, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 67.627%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FMET or BLCN?
Fidelity Metaverse ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.87%. Siren NexGen Economy ETF offers a yield of 3.14% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.69 per share. Fidelity Metaverse ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Siren NexGen Economy ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FMET or BLCN?
Fidelity Metaverse ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Siren NexGen Economy ETF quarterly revenues of --. Fidelity Metaverse ETF's net income of -- is lower than Siren NexGen Economy ETF's net income of --. Notably, Fidelity Metaverse ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Siren NexGen Economy ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fidelity Metaverse ETF is -- versus -- for Siren NexGen Economy ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FMETFidelity Metaverse ETF-- -- -- -- BLCNSiren NexGen Economy ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns FMET or DGIN?
VanEck Digital India ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Fidelity Metaverse ETF's net margin of --. Fidelity Metaverse ETF's return on equity of -- beat VanEck Digital India ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FMETFidelity Metaverse ETF-- -- -- DGINVanEck Digital India ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About FMET or DGIN?
Fidelity Metaverse ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand VanEck Digital India ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Fidelity Metaverse ETF has higher upside potential than VanEck Digital India ETF, analysts believe Fidelity Metaverse ETF is more attractive than VanEck Digital India ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FMETFidelity Metaverse ETF0 0 0 DGINVanEck Digital India ETF0 0 0 -
Is FMET or DGIN More Risky?
Fidelity Metaverse ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison VanEck Digital India ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FMET or DGIN?
Fidelity Metaverse ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.87%. VanEck Digital India ETF offers a yield of 0.36% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.78 per share. Fidelity Metaverse ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. VanEck Digital India ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FMET or DGIN?
Fidelity Metaverse ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than VanEck Digital India ETF quarterly revenues of --. Fidelity Metaverse ETF's net income of -- is lower than VanEck Digital India ETF's net income of --. Notably, Fidelity Metaverse ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while VanEck Digital India ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fidelity Metaverse ETF is -- versus -- for VanEck Digital India ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FMETFidelity Metaverse ETF-- -- -- -- DGINVanEck Digital India ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns FMET or ESPO?
VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Fidelity Metaverse ETF's net margin of --. Fidelity Metaverse ETF's return on equity of -- beat VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FMETFidelity Metaverse ETF-- -- -- ESPOVanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About FMET or ESPO?
Fidelity Metaverse ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Fidelity Metaverse ETF has higher upside potential than VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF, analysts believe Fidelity Metaverse ETF is more attractive than VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FMETFidelity Metaverse ETF0 0 0 ESPOVanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF0 0 0 -
Is FMET or ESPO More Risky?
Fidelity Metaverse ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF has a beta of 1.129, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.923%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FMET or ESPO?
Fidelity Metaverse ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.87%. VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF offers a yield of 1.37% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.29 per share. Fidelity Metaverse ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FMET or ESPO?
Fidelity Metaverse ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF quarterly revenues of --. Fidelity Metaverse ETF's net income of -- is lower than VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF's net income of --. Notably, Fidelity Metaverse ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fidelity Metaverse ETF is -- versus -- for VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FMETFidelity Metaverse ETF-- -- -- -- ESPOVanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns FMET or HERO?
Global X Video Games & Esports ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Fidelity Metaverse ETF's net margin of --. Fidelity Metaverse ETF's return on equity of -- beat Global X Video Games & Esports ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FMETFidelity Metaverse ETF-- -- -- HEROGlobal X Video Games & Esports ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About FMET or HERO?
Fidelity Metaverse ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Global X Video Games & Esports ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Fidelity Metaverse ETF has higher upside potential than Global X Video Games & Esports ETF, analysts believe Fidelity Metaverse ETF is more attractive than Global X Video Games & Esports ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FMETFidelity Metaverse ETF0 0 0 HEROGlobal X Video Games & Esports ETF0 0 0 -
Is FMET or HERO More Risky?
Fidelity Metaverse ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Global X Video Games & Esports ETF has a beta of 1.043, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.273%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FMET or HERO?
Fidelity Metaverse ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.87%. Global X Video Games & Esports ETF offers a yield of 1.75% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.33 per share. Fidelity Metaverse ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Global X Video Games & Esports ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FMET or HERO?
Fidelity Metaverse ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Global X Video Games & Esports ETF quarterly revenues of --. Fidelity Metaverse ETF's net income of -- is lower than Global X Video Games & Esports ETF's net income of --. Notably, Fidelity Metaverse ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Global X Video Games & Esports ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fidelity Metaverse ETF is -- versus -- for Global X Video Games & Esports ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FMETFidelity Metaverse ETF-- -- -- -- HEROGlobal X Video Games & Esports ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns FMET or SOCL?
Global X Social Media ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Fidelity Metaverse ETF's net margin of --. Fidelity Metaverse ETF's return on equity of -- beat Global X Social Media ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FMETFidelity Metaverse ETF-- -- -- SOCLGlobal X Social Media ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About FMET or SOCL?
Fidelity Metaverse ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Global X Social Media ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Fidelity Metaverse ETF has higher upside potential than Global X Social Media ETF, analysts believe Fidelity Metaverse ETF is more attractive than Global X Social Media ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FMETFidelity Metaverse ETF0 0 0 SOCLGlobal X Social Media ETF0 0 0 -
Is FMET or SOCL More Risky?
Fidelity Metaverse ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Global X Social Media ETF has a beta of 1.118, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.827%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FMET or SOCL?
Fidelity Metaverse ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.87%. Global X Social Media ETF offers a yield of 0.48% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Fidelity Metaverse ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Global X Social Media ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FMET or SOCL?
Fidelity Metaverse ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Global X Social Media ETF quarterly revenues of --. Fidelity Metaverse ETF's net income of -- is lower than Global X Social Media ETF's net income of --. Notably, Fidelity Metaverse ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Global X Social Media ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fidelity Metaverse ETF is -- versus -- for Global X Social Media ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FMETFidelity Metaverse ETF-- -- -- -- SOCLGlobal X Social Media ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is Lumentum The Best Laser Stock to Buy?
Though certainly less well-known than the huge tech businesses that…
Is Planet Fitness Stock Undervalued?
Planet Fitness (NYSE:PLNT) has had a difficult 12 months, retreating…
Stock Ideas
Buy
54
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.5T
P/E Ratio: 64x
Sell
46
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 35x
Sell
42
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.7T
P/E Ratio: 29x
Alerts
Sell
17
ICLR alert for Feb 13
ICON plc [ICLR] is down 39.93% over the past day.
Buy
67
CGNX alert for Feb 13
Cognex Corp. [CGNX] is up 36.39% over the past day.
Buy
77
IPGP alert for Feb 13
IPG Photonics Corp. [IPGP] is up 35.78% over the past day.
