Why Did SoundHound AI Stock Go Up?
SoundHound AI (NASDAQ:SOUN) has moved higher in recent days, breaking…
Buy
72
FMET Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$36.11
Seasonality move
:
-3.13%
Day range:
$36.03 - $36.22
52-week range:
$23.86 - $39.44
Dividend yield:
0.81%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
7.1K
Avg. volume:
6.4K
1-year change:
16.6%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FMET
Fidelity Metaverse ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
BLCN
Siren NexGen Economy ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CHPS
Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
DGIN
VanEck Digital India ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ESPO
VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SOCL
Global X Social Media ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FMET
Fidelity Metaverse ETF
|
$36.07 | -- | -- | -- | $0.04 | 0.81% | -- |
|
BLCN
Siren NexGen Economy ETF
|
$24.54 | -- | -- | -- | $0.69 | 2.94% | -- |
|
CHPS
Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF
|
$55.20 | -- | -- | -- | $0.08 | 0.58% | -- |
|
DGIN
VanEck Digital India ETF
|
$38.96 | -- | -- | -- | $0.78 | 0.34% | -- |
|
ESPO
VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF
|
$103.54 | -- | -- | -- | $1.29 | 1.25% | -- |
|
SOCL
Global X Social Media ETF
|
$56.40 | -- | -- | -- | $0.13 | 0.42% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FMET
Fidelity Metaverse ETF
|
-- | 1.867 | -- | -- |
|
BLCN
Siren NexGen Economy ETF
|
-- | 2.708 | -- | -- |
|
CHPS
Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF
|
-- | 2.505 | -- | -- |
|
DGIN
VanEck Digital India ETF
|
-- | 0.195 | -- | -- |
|
ESPO
VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF
|
-- | 1.208 | -- | -- |
|
SOCL
Global X Social Media ETF
|
-- | 1.774 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FMET
Fidelity Metaverse ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
BLCN
Siren NexGen Economy ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CHPS
Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
DGIN
VanEck Digital India ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ESPO
VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SOCL
Global X Social Media ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Fidelity Metaverse ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns FMET or BLCN?
Siren NexGen Economy ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Fidelity Metaverse ETF's net margin of --. Fidelity Metaverse ETF's return on equity of -- beat Siren NexGen Economy ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FMETFidelity Metaverse ETF-- -- -- BLCNSiren NexGen Economy ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About FMET or BLCN?
Fidelity Metaverse ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Siren NexGen Economy ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Fidelity Metaverse ETF has higher upside potential than Siren NexGen Economy ETF, analysts believe Fidelity Metaverse ETF is more attractive than Siren NexGen Economy ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FMETFidelity Metaverse ETF0 0 0 BLCNSiren NexGen Economy ETF0 0 0 -
Is FMET or BLCN More Risky?
Fidelity Metaverse ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Siren NexGen Economy ETF has a beta of 1.671, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 67.066%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FMET or BLCN?
Fidelity Metaverse ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.81%. Siren NexGen Economy ETF offers a yield of 2.94% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.69 per share. Fidelity Metaverse ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Siren NexGen Economy ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FMET or BLCN?
Fidelity Metaverse ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Siren NexGen Economy ETF quarterly revenues of --. Fidelity Metaverse ETF's net income of -- is lower than Siren NexGen Economy ETF's net income of --. Notably, Fidelity Metaverse ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Siren NexGen Economy ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fidelity Metaverse ETF is -- versus -- for Siren NexGen Economy ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FMETFidelity Metaverse ETF-- -- -- -- BLCNSiren NexGen Economy ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns FMET or CHPS?
Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Fidelity Metaverse ETF's net margin of --. Fidelity Metaverse ETF's return on equity of -- beat Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FMETFidelity Metaverse ETF-- -- -- CHPSXtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About FMET or CHPS?
Fidelity Metaverse ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Fidelity Metaverse ETF has higher upside potential than Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF, analysts believe Fidelity Metaverse ETF is more attractive than Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FMETFidelity Metaverse ETF0 0 0 CHPSXtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF0 0 0 -
Is FMET or CHPS More Risky?
Fidelity Metaverse ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FMET or CHPS?
Fidelity Metaverse ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.81%. Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF offers a yield of 0.58% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. Fidelity Metaverse ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FMET or CHPS?
Fidelity Metaverse ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF quarterly revenues of --. Fidelity Metaverse ETF's net income of -- is lower than Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF's net income of --. Notably, Fidelity Metaverse ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fidelity Metaverse ETF is -- versus -- for Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FMETFidelity Metaverse ETF-- -- -- -- CHPSXtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns FMET or DGIN?
VanEck Digital India ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Fidelity Metaverse ETF's net margin of --. Fidelity Metaverse ETF's return on equity of -- beat VanEck Digital India ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FMETFidelity Metaverse ETF-- -- -- DGINVanEck Digital India ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About FMET or DGIN?
Fidelity Metaverse ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand VanEck Digital India ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Fidelity Metaverse ETF has higher upside potential than VanEck Digital India ETF, analysts believe Fidelity Metaverse ETF is more attractive than VanEck Digital India ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FMETFidelity Metaverse ETF0 0 0 DGINVanEck Digital India ETF0 0 0 -
Is FMET or DGIN More Risky?
Fidelity Metaverse ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison VanEck Digital India ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FMET or DGIN?
Fidelity Metaverse ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.81%. VanEck Digital India ETF offers a yield of 0.34% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.78 per share. Fidelity Metaverse ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. VanEck Digital India ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FMET or DGIN?
Fidelity Metaverse ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than VanEck Digital India ETF quarterly revenues of --. Fidelity Metaverse ETF's net income of -- is lower than VanEck Digital India ETF's net income of --. Notably, Fidelity Metaverse ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while VanEck Digital India ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fidelity Metaverse ETF is -- versus -- for VanEck Digital India ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FMETFidelity Metaverse ETF-- -- -- -- DGINVanEck Digital India ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns FMET or ESPO?
VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Fidelity Metaverse ETF's net margin of --. Fidelity Metaverse ETF's return on equity of -- beat VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FMETFidelity Metaverse ETF-- -- -- ESPOVanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About FMET or ESPO?
Fidelity Metaverse ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Fidelity Metaverse ETF has higher upside potential than VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF, analysts believe Fidelity Metaverse ETF is more attractive than VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FMETFidelity Metaverse ETF0 0 0 ESPOVanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF0 0 0 -
Is FMET or ESPO More Risky?
Fidelity Metaverse ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF has a beta of 1.125, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.516%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FMET or ESPO?
Fidelity Metaverse ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.81%. VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF offers a yield of 1.25% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.29 per share. Fidelity Metaverse ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FMET or ESPO?
Fidelity Metaverse ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF quarterly revenues of --. Fidelity Metaverse ETF's net income of -- is lower than VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF's net income of --. Notably, Fidelity Metaverse ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fidelity Metaverse ETF is -- versus -- for VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FMETFidelity Metaverse ETF-- -- -- -- ESPOVanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns FMET or SOCL?
Global X Social Media ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Fidelity Metaverse ETF's net margin of --. Fidelity Metaverse ETF's return on equity of -- beat Global X Social Media ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FMETFidelity Metaverse ETF-- -- -- SOCLGlobal X Social Media ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About FMET or SOCL?
Fidelity Metaverse ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Global X Social Media ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Fidelity Metaverse ETF has higher upside potential than Global X Social Media ETF, analysts believe Fidelity Metaverse ETF is more attractive than Global X Social Media ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FMETFidelity Metaverse ETF0 0 0 SOCLGlobal X Social Media ETF0 0 0 -
Is FMET or SOCL More Risky?
Fidelity Metaverse ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Global X Social Media ETF has a beta of 1.101, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.139%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FMET or SOCL?
Fidelity Metaverse ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.81%. Global X Social Media ETF offers a yield of 0.42% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Fidelity Metaverse ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Global X Social Media ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FMET or SOCL?
Fidelity Metaverse ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Global X Social Media ETF quarterly revenues of --. Fidelity Metaverse ETF's net income of -- is lower than Global X Social Media ETF's net income of --. Notably, Fidelity Metaverse ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Global X Social Media ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fidelity Metaverse ETF is -- versus -- for Global X Social Media ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FMETFidelity Metaverse ETF-- -- -- -- SOCLGlobal X Social Media ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is Goldman Sachs Going to Go Up?
Shares of financial giant Goldman Sachs (NYSE:GS) have soared by…
How High Will MSTR Stock Go?
After several months of pressure, shares of Bitcoin treasury Strategy…
Stock Ideas
Buy
57
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.5T
P/E Ratio: 63x
Buy
59
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 41x
Sell
48
Is GOOGL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 41x
Alerts
Buy
69
INTC alert for Jan 23
Intel Corp. [INTC] is down 17.01% over the past day.
Buy
70
BNR alert for Jan 23
Burning Rock Biotech Ltd. [BNR] is down 12.81% over the past day.
Buy
80
MTRN alert for Jan 23
Materion Corp. [MTRN] is down 9.13% over the past day.
