Is DocuSign Stock Undervalued?
Digital signature software business DocuSign (NASDAQ:DOCU) has been struggling over…
Buy
74
FMET Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$36.43
Seasonality move
:
3.91%
Day range:
$36.24 - $36.43
52-week range:
$23.86 - $39.44
Dividend yield:
0.8%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
2.2K
Avg. volume:
7.5K
1-year change:
18.91%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FMET
Fidelity Metaverse ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
AGNG
Global X Aging Population ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
BLCN
Siren Nasdaq NexGen Economy ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
DRIV
Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
KARS
KraneShares Electric Vehicles and Future Mobility
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SOCL
Global X Social Media ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FMET
Fidelity Metaverse ETF
|
$36.39 | -- | -- | -- | $0.04 | 0.8% | -- |
|
AGNG
Global X Aging Population ETF
|
$36.42 | -- | -- | -- | $0.14 | 0.79% | -- |
|
BLCN
Siren Nasdaq NexGen Economy ETF
|
$24.58 | -- | -- | -- | $0.69 | 2.94% | -- |
|
DRIV
Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF
|
$30.31 | -- | -- | -- | $0.17 | 1.53% | -- |
|
KARS
KraneShares Electric Vehicles and Future Mobility
|
$30.90 | -- | -- | -- | $0.06 | 0.18% | -- |
|
SOCL
Global X Social Media ETF
|
$55.16 | -- | -- | -- | $0.11 | 0.2% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FMET
Fidelity Metaverse ETF
|
-- | 1.728 | -- | -- |
|
AGNG
Global X Aging Population ETF
|
-- | 0.484 | -- | -- |
|
BLCN
Siren Nasdaq NexGen Economy ETF
|
-- | 2.757 | -- | -- |
|
DRIV
Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF
|
-- | 1.436 | -- | -- |
|
KARS
KraneShares Electric Vehicles and Future Mobility
|
-- | 0.999 | -- | -- |
|
SOCL
Global X Social Media ETF
|
-- | 1.652 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FMET
Fidelity Metaverse ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
AGNG
Global X Aging Population ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
BLCN
Siren Nasdaq NexGen Economy ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
DRIV
Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
KARS
KraneShares Electric Vehicles and Future Mobility
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SOCL
Global X Social Media ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Fidelity Metaverse ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns FMET or AGNG?
Global X Aging Population ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Fidelity Metaverse ETF's net margin of --. Fidelity Metaverse ETF's return on equity of -- beat Global X Aging Population ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FMETFidelity Metaverse ETF-- -- -- AGNGGlobal X Aging Population ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About FMET or AGNG?
Fidelity Metaverse ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Global X Aging Population ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Fidelity Metaverse ETF has higher upside potential than Global X Aging Population ETF, analysts believe Fidelity Metaverse ETF is more attractive than Global X Aging Population ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FMETFidelity Metaverse ETF0 0 0 AGNGGlobal X Aging Population ETF0 0 0 -
Is FMET or AGNG More Risky?
Fidelity Metaverse ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Global X Aging Population ETF has a beta of 0.743, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.722%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FMET or AGNG?
Fidelity Metaverse ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.8%. Global X Aging Population ETF offers a yield of 0.79% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share. Fidelity Metaverse ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Global X Aging Population ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FMET or AGNG?
Fidelity Metaverse ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Global X Aging Population ETF quarterly revenues of --. Fidelity Metaverse ETF's net income of -- is lower than Global X Aging Population ETF's net income of --. Notably, Fidelity Metaverse ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Global X Aging Population ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fidelity Metaverse ETF is -- versus -- for Global X Aging Population ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FMETFidelity Metaverse ETF-- -- -- -- AGNGGlobal X Aging Population ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns FMET or BLCN?
Siren Nasdaq NexGen Economy ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Fidelity Metaverse ETF's net margin of --. Fidelity Metaverse ETF's return on equity of -- beat Siren Nasdaq NexGen Economy ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FMETFidelity Metaverse ETF-- -- -- BLCNSiren Nasdaq NexGen Economy ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About FMET or BLCN?
Fidelity Metaverse ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Siren Nasdaq NexGen Economy ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Fidelity Metaverse ETF has higher upside potential than Siren Nasdaq NexGen Economy ETF, analysts believe Fidelity Metaverse ETF is more attractive than Siren Nasdaq NexGen Economy ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FMETFidelity Metaverse ETF0 0 0 BLCNSiren Nasdaq NexGen Economy ETF0 0 0 -
Is FMET or BLCN More Risky?
Fidelity Metaverse ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Siren Nasdaq NexGen Economy ETF has a beta of 1.673, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 67.274%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FMET or BLCN?
Fidelity Metaverse ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.8%. Siren Nasdaq NexGen Economy ETF offers a yield of 2.94% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.69 per share. Fidelity Metaverse ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Siren Nasdaq NexGen Economy ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FMET or BLCN?
Fidelity Metaverse ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Siren Nasdaq NexGen Economy ETF quarterly revenues of --. Fidelity Metaverse ETF's net income of -- is lower than Siren Nasdaq NexGen Economy ETF's net income of --. Notably, Fidelity Metaverse ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Siren Nasdaq NexGen Economy ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fidelity Metaverse ETF is -- versus -- for Siren Nasdaq NexGen Economy ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FMETFidelity Metaverse ETF-- -- -- -- BLCNSiren Nasdaq NexGen Economy ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns FMET or DRIV?
Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Fidelity Metaverse ETF's net margin of --. Fidelity Metaverse ETF's return on equity of -- beat Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FMETFidelity Metaverse ETF-- -- -- DRIVGlobal X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About FMET or DRIV?
Fidelity Metaverse ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Fidelity Metaverse ETF has higher upside potential than Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF, analysts believe Fidelity Metaverse ETF is more attractive than Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FMETFidelity Metaverse ETF0 0 0 DRIVGlobal X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF0 0 0 -
Is FMET or DRIV More Risky?
Fidelity Metaverse ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF has a beta of 1.420, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 41.989%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FMET or DRIV?
Fidelity Metaverse ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.8%. Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF offers a yield of 1.53% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share. Fidelity Metaverse ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FMET or DRIV?
Fidelity Metaverse ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF quarterly revenues of --. Fidelity Metaverse ETF's net income of -- is lower than Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF's net income of --. Notably, Fidelity Metaverse ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fidelity Metaverse ETF is -- versus -- for Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FMETFidelity Metaverse ETF-- -- -- -- DRIVGlobal X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns FMET or KARS?
KraneShares Electric Vehicles and Future Mobility has a net margin of -- compared to Fidelity Metaverse ETF's net margin of --. Fidelity Metaverse ETF's return on equity of -- beat KraneShares Electric Vehicles and Future Mobility's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FMETFidelity Metaverse ETF-- -- -- KARSKraneShares Electric Vehicles and Future Mobility-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About FMET or KARS?
Fidelity Metaverse ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand KraneShares Electric Vehicles and Future Mobility has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Fidelity Metaverse ETF has higher upside potential than KraneShares Electric Vehicles and Future Mobility, analysts believe Fidelity Metaverse ETF is more attractive than KraneShares Electric Vehicles and Future Mobility.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FMETFidelity Metaverse ETF0 0 0 KARSKraneShares Electric Vehicles and Future Mobility0 0 0 -
Is FMET or KARS More Risky?
Fidelity Metaverse ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison KraneShares Electric Vehicles and Future Mobility has a beta of 1.151, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.114%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FMET or KARS?
Fidelity Metaverse ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.8%. KraneShares Electric Vehicles and Future Mobility offers a yield of 0.18% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. Fidelity Metaverse ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. KraneShares Electric Vehicles and Future Mobility pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FMET or KARS?
Fidelity Metaverse ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than KraneShares Electric Vehicles and Future Mobility quarterly revenues of --. Fidelity Metaverse ETF's net income of -- is lower than KraneShares Electric Vehicles and Future Mobility's net income of --. Notably, Fidelity Metaverse ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while KraneShares Electric Vehicles and Future Mobility's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fidelity Metaverse ETF is -- versus -- for KraneShares Electric Vehicles and Future Mobility. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FMETFidelity Metaverse ETF-- -- -- -- KARSKraneShares Electric Vehicles and Future Mobility-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns FMET or SOCL?
Global X Social Media ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Fidelity Metaverse ETF's net margin of --. Fidelity Metaverse ETF's return on equity of -- beat Global X Social Media ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FMETFidelity Metaverse ETF-- -- -- SOCLGlobal X Social Media ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About FMET or SOCL?
Fidelity Metaverse ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Global X Social Media ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Fidelity Metaverse ETF has higher upside potential than Global X Social Media ETF, analysts believe Fidelity Metaverse ETF is more attractive than Global X Social Media ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FMETFidelity Metaverse ETF0 0 0 SOCLGlobal X Social Media ETF0 0 0 -
Is FMET or SOCL More Risky?
Fidelity Metaverse ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Global X Social Media ETF has a beta of 1.117, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.663%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FMET or SOCL?
Fidelity Metaverse ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.8%. Global X Social Media ETF offers a yield of 0.2% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share. Fidelity Metaverse ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Global X Social Media ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FMET or SOCL?
Fidelity Metaverse ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Global X Social Media ETF quarterly revenues of --. Fidelity Metaverse ETF's net income of -- is lower than Global X Social Media ETF's net income of --. Notably, Fidelity Metaverse ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Global X Social Media ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fidelity Metaverse ETF is -- versus -- for Global X Social Media ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FMETFidelity Metaverse ETF-- -- -- -- SOCLGlobal X Social Media ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is SentinelOne Stock Undervalued?
Cybersecurity major SentinelOne (NYSE:S) has struggled over several years, delivering…
Is Broadcom Stock on Sale?
Chip and software maker Broadcom (NASDAQ:AVGO) has been among the…
Stock Ideas
Buy
57
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.6T
P/E Ratio: 64x
Buy
55
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
61
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 39x
Alerts
Buy
80
TVTX alert for Dec 25
Travere Therapeutics, Inc. [TVTX] is up 14.03% over the past day.
Buy
68
KOD alert for Dec 25
Kodiak Sciences, Inc. [KOD] is up 13.41% over the past day.
Buy
64
ZCSH alert for Dec 25
Grayscale Zcash Trust (ZEC) [ZCSH] is up 5.33% over the past day.
