Disney vs Estée Lauder Stock, Which Is Best?
Inflation has eaten away at a lot of the money…
Sell
33
OND Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$33.00
Seasonality move
:
1.43%
Day range:
$33.37 - $33.55
52-week range:
$23.47 - $35.57
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
1.1K
Avg. volume:
--
1-year change:
39.5%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
OND
ProShares On-Demand ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
BNGE
First Trust S-Network Streaming & Gaming ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ESPO
VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FMET
Fidelity Metaverse ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
NERD
Roundhill Video Games ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SOCL
Global X Social Media ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
OND
ProShares On-Demand ETF
|
$33.37 | -- | -- | -- | $0.19 | 0% | -- |
|
BNGE
First Trust S-Network Streaming & Gaming ETF
|
$28.57 | -- | -- | -- | $0.00 | 0.67% | -- |
|
ESPO
VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF
|
$83.56 | -- | -- | -- | $0.37 | 0.44% | -- |
|
FMET
Fidelity Metaverse ETF
|
$30.49 | -- | -- | -- | $0.06 | 0.43% | -- |
|
NERD
Roundhill Video Games ETF
|
$19.78 | -- | -- | -- | $0.34 | 1.73% | -- |
|
SOCL
Global X Social Media ETF
|
$43.04 | -- | -- | -- | $0.10 | 0.37% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
OND
ProShares On-Demand ETF
|
-- | 1.260 | -- | -- |
|
BNGE
First Trust S-Network Streaming & Gaming ETF
|
-- | 1.269 | -- | -- |
|
ESPO
VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF
|
-- | 1.517 | -- | -- |
|
FMET
Fidelity Metaverse ETF
|
-- | 1.032 | -- | -- |
|
NERD
Roundhill Video Games ETF
|
-- | 1.211 | -- | -- |
|
SOCL
Global X Social Media ETF
|
-- | 0.621 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
OND
ProShares On-Demand ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
BNGE
First Trust S-Network Streaming & Gaming ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ESPO
VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FMET
Fidelity Metaverse ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
NERD
Roundhill Video Games ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SOCL
Global X Social Media ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
ProShares On-Demand ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns OND or BNGE?
First Trust S-Network Streaming & Gaming ETF has a net margin of -- compared to ProShares On-Demand ETF's net margin of --. ProShares On-Demand ETF's return on equity of -- beat First Trust S-Network Streaming & Gaming ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ONDProShares On-Demand ETF-- -- -- BNGEFirst Trust S-Network Streaming & Gaming ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About OND or BNGE?
ProShares On-Demand ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand First Trust S-Network Streaming & Gaming ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that ProShares On-Demand ETF has higher upside potential than First Trust S-Network Streaming & Gaming ETF, analysts believe ProShares On-Demand ETF is more attractive than First Trust S-Network Streaming & Gaming ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ONDProShares On-Demand ETF0 0 0 BNGEFirst Trust S-Network Streaming & Gaming ETF0 0 0 -
Is OND or BNGE More Risky?
ProShares On-Demand ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison First Trust S-Network Streaming & Gaming ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock OND or BNGE?
ProShares On-Demand ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. First Trust S-Network Streaming & Gaming ETF offers a yield of 0.67% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. ProShares On-Demand ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. First Trust S-Network Streaming & Gaming ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios OND or BNGE?
ProShares On-Demand ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than First Trust S-Network Streaming & Gaming ETF quarterly revenues of --. ProShares On-Demand ETF's net income of -- is lower than First Trust S-Network Streaming & Gaming ETF's net income of --. Notably, ProShares On-Demand ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while First Trust S-Network Streaming & Gaming ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ProShares On-Demand ETF is -- versus -- for First Trust S-Network Streaming & Gaming ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ONDProShares On-Demand ETF-- -- -- -- BNGEFirst Trust S-Network Streaming & Gaming ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns OND or ESPO?
VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF has a net margin of -- compared to ProShares On-Demand ETF's net margin of --. ProShares On-Demand ETF's return on equity of -- beat VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ONDProShares On-Demand ETF-- -- -- ESPOVanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About OND or ESPO?
ProShares On-Demand ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that ProShares On-Demand ETF has higher upside potential than VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF, analysts believe ProShares On-Demand ETF is more attractive than VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ONDProShares On-Demand ETF0 0 0 ESPOVanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF0 0 0 -
Is OND or ESPO More Risky?
ProShares On-Demand ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF has a beta of 0.882, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.753%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock OND or ESPO?
ProShares On-Demand ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF offers a yield of 0.44% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.37 per share. ProShares On-Demand ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios OND or ESPO?
ProShares On-Demand ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF quarterly revenues of --. ProShares On-Demand ETF's net income of -- is lower than VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF's net income of --. Notably, ProShares On-Demand ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ProShares On-Demand ETF is -- versus -- for VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ONDProShares On-Demand ETF-- -- -- -- ESPOVanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns OND or FMET?
Fidelity Metaverse ETF has a net margin of -- compared to ProShares On-Demand ETF's net margin of --. ProShares On-Demand ETF's return on equity of -- beat Fidelity Metaverse ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ONDProShares On-Demand ETF-- -- -- FMETFidelity Metaverse ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About OND or FMET?
ProShares On-Demand ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Fidelity Metaverse ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that ProShares On-Demand ETF has higher upside potential than Fidelity Metaverse ETF, analysts believe ProShares On-Demand ETF is more attractive than Fidelity Metaverse ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ONDProShares On-Demand ETF0 0 0 FMETFidelity Metaverse ETF0 0 0 -
Is OND or FMET More Risky?
ProShares On-Demand ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Fidelity Metaverse ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock OND or FMET?
ProShares On-Demand ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Fidelity Metaverse ETF offers a yield of 0.43% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. ProShares On-Demand ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Fidelity Metaverse ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios OND or FMET?
ProShares On-Demand ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Fidelity Metaverse ETF quarterly revenues of --. ProShares On-Demand ETF's net income of -- is lower than Fidelity Metaverse ETF's net income of --. Notably, ProShares On-Demand ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Fidelity Metaverse ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ProShares On-Demand ETF is -- versus -- for Fidelity Metaverse ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ONDProShares On-Demand ETF-- -- -- -- FMETFidelity Metaverse ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns OND or NERD?
Roundhill Video Games ETF has a net margin of -- compared to ProShares On-Demand ETF's net margin of --. ProShares On-Demand ETF's return on equity of -- beat Roundhill Video Games ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ONDProShares On-Demand ETF-- -- -- NERDRoundhill Video Games ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About OND or NERD?
ProShares On-Demand ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Roundhill Video Games ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that ProShares On-Demand ETF has higher upside potential than Roundhill Video Games ETF, analysts believe ProShares On-Demand ETF is more attractive than Roundhill Video Games ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ONDProShares On-Demand ETF0 0 0 NERDRoundhill Video Games ETF0 0 0 -
Is OND or NERD More Risky?
ProShares On-Demand ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Roundhill Video Games ETF has a beta of 1.008, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.77700000000001%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock OND or NERD?
ProShares On-Demand ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Roundhill Video Games ETF offers a yield of 1.73% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share. ProShares On-Demand ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Roundhill Video Games ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios OND or NERD?
ProShares On-Demand ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Roundhill Video Games ETF quarterly revenues of --. ProShares On-Demand ETF's net income of -- is lower than Roundhill Video Games ETF's net income of --. Notably, ProShares On-Demand ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Roundhill Video Games ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ProShares On-Demand ETF is -- versus -- for Roundhill Video Games ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ONDProShares On-Demand ETF-- -- -- -- NERDRoundhill Video Games ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns OND or SOCL?
Global X Social Media ETF has a net margin of -- compared to ProShares On-Demand ETF's net margin of --. ProShares On-Demand ETF's return on equity of -- beat Global X Social Media ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ONDProShares On-Demand ETF-- -- -- SOCLGlobal X Social Media ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About OND or SOCL?
ProShares On-Demand ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Global X Social Media ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that ProShares On-Demand ETF has higher upside potential than Global X Social Media ETF, analysts believe ProShares On-Demand ETF is more attractive than Global X Social Media ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ONDProShares On-Demand ETF0 0 0 SOCLGlobal X Social Media ETF0 0 0 -
Is OND or SOCL More Risky?
ProShares On-Demand ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Global X Social Media ETF has a beta of 1.002, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.193%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock OND or SOCL?
ProShares On-Demand ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Global X Social Media ETF offers a yield of 0.37% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. ProShares On-Demand ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Global X Social Media ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios OND or SOCL?
ProShares On-Demand ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Global X Social Media ETF quarterly revenues of --. ProShares On-Demand ETF's net income of -- is lower than Global X Social Media ETF's net income of --. Notably, ProShares On-Demand ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Global X Social Media ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ProShares On-Demand ETF is -- versus -- for Global X Social Media ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ONDProShares On-Demand ETF-- -- -- -- SOCLGlobal X Social Media ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is SCHD a Good ETF to Buy?
With around $65.7 billion in net assets, Schwab’s US Dividend…
Is NAIL a Good ETF to Buy?
If you’re thinking about buying the NAIL ETF, this article…
Stock Ideas
Sell
40
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.7T
P/E Ratio: 40x
Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.4T
P/E Ratio: 117x
Sell
43
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.1T
P/E Ratio: 36x
Alerts
Buy
57
NARI alert for Jan 8
Inari Medical [NARI] is down 0.23% over the past day.
Buy
69
UNF alert for Jan 8
UniFirst [UNF] is up 4.97% over the past day.
Sell
31
APOG alert for Jan 8
Apogee Enterprises [APOG] is down 8.78% over the past day.
