WWW Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Deckers Outdoor has a net margin of 5.36% compared to Wolverine World Wide's net margin of 18.48%. Wolverine World Wide's return on equity of -22.79% beat Deckers Outdoor's return on equity of 42.48%.

Wolverine World Wide has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 8.41%. On the other hand Deckers Outdoor has an analysts' consensus of $198.63 which suggests that it could fall by -5.85%. Given that Wolverine World Wide has higher upside potential than Deckers Outdoor, analysts believe Wolverine World Wide is more attractive than Deckers Outdoor.

Wolverine World Wide has a beta of 1.888, which suggesting that the stock is 88.844% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Deckers Outdoor has a beta of 1.084, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.394%.

Wolverine World Wide has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.74%. Deckers Outdoor offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Wolverine World Wide pays -82.32% of its earnings as a dividend. Deckers Outdoor pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Wolverine World Wide quarterly revenues are $440.2M, which are smaller than Deckers Outdoor quarterly revenues of $1.3B. Wolverine World Wide's net income of $23.6M is lower than Deckers Outdoor's net income of $242.3M. Notably, Wolverine World Wide's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Deckers Outdoor's PE ratio is 37.10x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Wolverine World Wide is 1.03x versus 6.98x for Deckers Outdoor. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Nike has a net margin of 5.36% compared to Wolverine World Wide's net margin of 9.41%. Wolverine World Wide's return on equity of -22.79% beat Nike's return on equity of 34.51%.

Wolverine World Wide has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 8.41%. On the other hand Nike has an analysts' consensus of $86.74 which suggests that it could grow by 12.74%. Given that Nike has higher upside potential than Wolverine World Wide, analysts believe Nike is more attractive than Wolverine World Wide.

Wolverine World Wide has a beta of 1.888, which suggesting that the stock is 88.844% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nike has a beta of 1.023, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.318%.

Wolverine World Wide has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.74%. Nike offers a yield of 1.96% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. Wolverine World Wide pays -82.32% of its earnings as a dividend. Nike pays out 38.05% of its earnings as a dividend. Nike's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Wolverine World Wide quarterly revenues are $440.2M, which are smaller than Nike quarterly revenues of $12.4B. Wolverine World Wide's net income of $23.6M is lower than Nike's net income of $1.2B. Notably, Wolverine World Wide's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Nike's PE ratio is 23.75x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Wolverine World Wide is 1.03x versus 2.37x for Nike. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Rocky Brands has a net margin of 5.36% compared to Wolverine World Wide's net margin of 4.61%. Wolverine World Wide's return on equity of -22.79% beat Rocky Brands's return on equity of 5.95%.

Wolverine World Wide has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 8.41%. On the other hand Rocky Brands has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 9.46%. Given that Rocky Brands has higher upside potential than Wolverine World Wide, analysts believe Rocky Brands is more attractive than Wolverine World Wide.

Wolverine World Wide has a beta of 1.888, which suggesting that the stock is 88.844% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Rocky Brands has a beta of 2.129, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 112.914%.

Wolverine World Wide has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.74%. Rocky Brands offers a yield of 2.72% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share. Wolverine World Wide pays -82.32% of its earnings as a dividend. Rocky Brands pays out 43.79% of its earnings as a dividend. Rocky Brands's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Wolverine World Wide quarterly revenues are $440.2M, which are larger than Rocky Brands quarterly revenues of $114.6M. Wolverine World Wide's net income of $23.6M is higher than Rocky Brands's net income of $5.3M. Notably, Wolverine World Wide's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Rocky Brands's PE ratio is 12.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Wolverine World Wide is 1.03x versus 0.38x for Rocky Brands. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Steven Madden has a net margin of 5.36% compared to Wolverine World Wide's net margin of 8.85%. Wolverine World Wide's return on equity of -22.79% beat Steven Madden's return on equity of 20.11%.

Wolverine World Wide has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 8.41%. On the other hand Steven Madden has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 8.93%. Given that Steven Madden has higher upside potential than Wolverine World Wide, analysts believe Steven Madden is more attractive than Wolverine World Wide.

Wolverine World Wide has a beta of 1.888, which suggesting that the stock is 88.844% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Steven Madden has a beta of 1.073, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.331%.

Wolverine World Wide has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.74%. Steven Madden offers a yield of 1.96% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share. Wolverine World Wide pays -82.32% of its earnings as a dividend. Steven Madden pays out 36.83% of its earnings as a dividend. Steven Madden's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Wolverine World Wide quarterly revenues are $440.2M, which are smaller than Steven Madden quarterly revenues of $624.7M. Wolverine World Wide's net income of $23.6M is lower than Steven Madden's net income of $55.3M. Notably, Wolverine World Wide's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Steven Madden's PE ratio is 18.23x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Wolverine World Wide is 1.03x versus 1.40x for Steven Madden. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.