SHOO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Deckers Outdoor Corp. has a net margin of 3.27% compared to Steven Madden Ltd.'s net margin of 18.85%. Steven Madden Ltd.'s return on equity of 7.08% beat Deckers Outdoor Corp.'s return on equity of 41.28%.

Steven Madden Ltd. has a consensus price target of $46.13, signalling upside risk potential of 7.17%. On the other hand Deckers Outdoor Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $111.40 which suggests that it could grow by 8.06%. Given that Deckers Outdoor Corp. has higher upside potential than Steven Madden Ltd., analysts believe Deckers Outdoor Corp. is more attractive than Steven Madden Ltd..

Steven Madden Ltd. has a beta of 1.136, which suggesting that the stock is 13.552% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Deckers Outdoor Corp. has a beta of 1.188, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.76%.

Steven Madden Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.95%. Deckers Outdoor Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Steven Madden Ltd. pays 35.69% of its earnings as a dividend. Deckers Outdoor Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Steven Madden Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Steven Madden Ltd. quarterly revenues are $667.9M, which are smaller than Deckers Outdoor Corp. quarterly revenues of $1.4B. Steven Madden Ltd.'s net income of $21.8M is lower than Deckers Outdoor Corp.'s net income of $268.2M. Notably, Steven Madden Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 54.66x while Deckers Outdoor Corp.'s PE ratio is 15.29x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Steven Madden Ltd. is 1.30x versus 2.96x for Deckers Outdoor Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NIKE, Inc. has a net margin of 3.27% compared to Steven Madden Ltd.'s net margin of 6.37%. Steven Madden Ltd.'s return on equity of 7.08% beat NIKE, Inc.'s return on equity of 18.34%.

Steven Madden Ltd. has a consensus price target of $46.13, signalling upside risk potential of 7.17%. On the other hand NIKE, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $77.24 which suggests that it could grow by 26.76%. Given that NIKE, Inc. has higher upside potential than Steven Madden Ltd., analysts believe NIKE, Inc. is more attractive than Steven Madden Ltd..

Steven Madden Ltd. has a beta of 1.136, which suggesting that the stock is 13.552% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NIKE, Inc. has a beta of 1.287, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 28.707%.

Steven Madden Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.95%. NIKE, Inc. offers a yield of 2.64% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.41 per share. Steven Madden Ltd. pays 35.69% of its earnings as a dividend. NIKE, Inc. pays out 72.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Steven Madden Ltd. quarterly revenues are $667.9M, which are smaller than NIKE, Inc. quarterly revenues of $12.4B. Steven Madden Ltd.'s net income of $21.8M is lower than NIKE, Inc.'s net income of $792M. Notably, Steven Madden Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 54.66x while NIKE, Inc.'s PE ratio is 35.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Steven Madden Ltd. is 1.30x versus 1.94x for NIKE, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Purple Innovation, Inc. has a net margin of 3.27% compared to Steven Madden Ltd.'s net margin of -9.89%. Steven Madden Ltd.'s return on equity of 7.08% beat Purple Innovation, Inc.'s return on equity of -4018.96%.

Steven Madden Ltd. has a consensus price target of $46.13, signalling upside risk potential of 7.17%. On the other hand Purple Innovation, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $2.53 which suggests that it could grow by 244.44%. Given that Purple Innovation, Inc. has higher upside potential than Steven Madden Ltd., analysts believe Purple Innovation, Inc. is more attractive than Steven Madden Ltd..

Steven Madden Ltd. has a beta of 1.136, which suggesting that the stock is 13.552% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Purple Innovation, Inc. has a beta of 1.851, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 85.103%.

Steven Madden Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.95%. Purple Innovation, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Steven Madden Ltd. pays 35.69% of its earnings as a dividend. Purple Innovation, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Steven Madden Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Steven Madden Ltd. quarterly revenues are $667.9M, which are larger than Purple Innovation, Inc. quarterly revenues of $118.8M. Steven Madden Ltd.'s net income of $21.8M is higher than Purple Innovation, Inc.'s net income of -$11.7M. Notably, Steven Madden Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 54.66x while Purple Innovation, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Steven Madden Ltd. is 1.30x versus 0.17x for Purple Innovation, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Reynolds Consumer Products, Inc. has a net margin of 3.27% compared to Steven Madden Ltd.'s net margin of 8.49%. Steven Madden Ltd.'s return on equity of 7.08% beat Reynolds Consumer Products, Inc.'s return on equity of 14.26%.

Steven Madden Ltd. has a consensus price target of $46.13, signalling upside risk potential of 7.17%. On the other hand Reynolds Consumer Products, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $27.75 which suggests that it could grow by 19.15%. Given that Reynolds Consumer Products, Inc. has higher upside potential than Steven Madden Ltd., analysts believe Reynolds Consumer Products, Inc. is more attractive than Steven Madden Ltd..

Steven Madden Ltd. has a beta of 1.136, which suggesting that the stock is 13.552% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Reynolds Consumer Products, Inc. has a beta of 0.555, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 44.52%.

Steven Madden Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.95%. Reynolds Consumer Products, Inc. offers a yield of 3.95% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share. Steven Madden Ltd. pays 35.69% of its earnings as a dividend. Reynolds Consumer Products, Inc. pays out 54.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Steven Madden Ltd. quarterly revenues are $667.9M, which are smaller than Reynolds Consumer Products, Inc. quarterly revenues of $931M. Steven Madden Ltd.'s net income of $21.8M is lower than Reynolds Consumer Products, Inc.'s net income of $79M. Notably, Steven Madden Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 54.66x while Reynolds Consumer Products, Inc.'s PE ratio is 16.13x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Steven Madden Ltd. is 1.30x versus 1.32x for Reynolds Consumer Products, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.