UTI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Laureate Education has a net margin of 11% compared to Universal Technical Institute's net margin of 22.12%. Universal Technical Institute's return on equity of 21.78% beat Laureate Education's return on equity of 31.85%.

Universal Technical Institute has a consensus price target of $32.60, signalling upside risk potential of 21.24%. On the other hand Laureate Education has an analysts' consensus of $22.83 which suggests that it could grow by 20.88%. Given that Universal Technical Institute has higher upside potential than Laureate Education, analysts believe Universal Technical Institute is more attractive than Laureate Education.

Universal Technical Institute has a beta of 1.491, which suggesting that the stock is 49.058% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Laureate Education has a beta of 0.854, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.6%.

Universal Technical Institute has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Laureate Education offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.70 per share. Universal Technical Institute pays 2.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Laureate Education pays out 0.58% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Universal Technical Institute quarterly revenues are $201.4M, which are smaller than Laureate Education quarterly revenues of $423.4M. Universal Technical Institute's net income of $22.2M is lower than Laureate Education's net income of $93.6M. Notably, Universal Technical Institute's price-to-earnings ratio is 27.72x while Laureate Education's PE ratio is 9.74x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Universal Technical Institute is 1.96x versus 1.85x for Laureate Education. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lincoln Educational Services has a net margin of 11% compared to Universal Technical Institute's net margin of 5.73%. Universal Technical Institute's return on equity of 21.78% beat Lincoln Educational Services's return on equity of 5.86%.

Universal Technical Institute has a consensus price target of $32.60, signalling upside risk potential of 21.24%. On the other hand Lincoln Educational Services has an analysts' consensus of $22.33 which suggests that it could grow by 50.19%. Given that Lincoln Educational Services has higher upside potential than Universal Technical Institute, analysts believe Lincoln Educational Services is more attractive than Universal Technical Institute.

Universal Technical Institute has a beta of 1.491, which suggesting that the stock is 49.058% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lincoln Educational Services has a beta of 1.607, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 60.691%.

Universal Technical Institute has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lincoln Educational Services offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Universal Technical Institute pays 2.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Lincoln Educational Services pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Universal Technical Institute's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Universal Technical Institute quarterly revenues are $201.4M, which are larger than Lincoln Educational Services quarterly revenues of $119.4M. Universal Technical Institute's net income of $22.2M is higher than Lincoln Educational Services's net income of $6.8M. Notably, Universal Technical Institute's price-to-earnings ratio is 27.72x while Lincoln Educational Services's PE ratio is 46.47x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Universal Technical Institute is 1.96x versus 1.04x for Lincoln Educational Services. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Grand Canyon Education has a net margin of 11% compared to Universal Technical Institute's net margin of 27.99%. Universal Technical Institute's return on equity of 21.78% beat Grand Canyon Education's return on equity of 29.89%.

Universal Technical Institute has a consensus price target of $32.60, signalling upside risk potential of 21.24%. On the other hand Grand Canyon Education has an analysts' consensus of $194.67 which suggests that it could grow by 15.25%. Given that Universal Technical Institute has higher upside potential than Grand Canyon Education, analysts believe Universal Technical Institute is more attractive than Grand Canyon Education.

Universal Technical Institute has a beta of 1.491, which suggesting that the stock is 49.058% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Grand Canyon Education has a beta of 0.784, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 21.623%.

Universal Technical Institute has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Grand Canyon Education offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Universal Technical Institute pays 2.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Grand Canyon Education pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Universal Technical Institute's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Universal Technical Institute quarterly revenues are $201.4M, which are smaller than Grand Canyon Education quarterly revenues of $292.6M. Universal Technical Institute's net income of $22.2M is lower than Grand Canyon Education's net income of $81.9M. Notably, Universal Technical Institute's price-to-earnings ratio is 27.72x while Grand Canyon Education's PE ratio is 21.82x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Universal Technical Institute is 1.96x versus 4.79x for Grand Canyon Education. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Strategic Education has a net margin of 11% compared to Universal Technical Institute's net margin of 8.14%. Universal Technical Institute's return on equity of 21.78% beat Strategic Education's return on equity of 6.75%.

Universal Technical Institute has a consensus price target of $32.60, signalling upside risk potential of 21.24%. On the other hand Strategic Education has an analysts' consensus of $112.33 which suggests that it could grow by 40.59%. Given that Strategic Education has higher upside potential than Universal Technical Institute, analysts believe Strategic Education is more attractive than Universal Technical Institute.

Universal Technical Institute has a beta of 1.491, which suggesting that the stock is 49.058% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Strategic Education has a beta of 0.595, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 40.472%.

Universal Technical Institute has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Strategic Education offers a yield of 3% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.60 per share. Universal Technical Institute pays 2.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Strategic Education pays out 52.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Universal Technical Institute quarterly revenues are $201.4M, which are smaller than Strategic Education quarterly revenues of $311.5M. Universal Technical Institute's net income of $22.2M is lower than Strategic Education's net income of $25.3M. Notably, Universal Technical Institute's price-to-earnings ratio is 27.72x while Strategic Education's PE ratio is 17.11x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Universal Technical Institute is 1.96x versus 1.58x for Strategic Education. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.