UTI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Franklin Covey Co. has a net margin of 5.81% compared to Universal Technical Institute, Inc.'s net margin of -5.14%. Universal Technical Institute, Inc.'s return on equity of 17.38% beat Franklin Covey Co.'s return on equity of -2.06%.

Universal Technical Institute, Inc. has a consensus price target of $37.33, signalling upside risk potential of 22.12%. On the other hand Franklin Covey Co. has an analysts' consensus of $27.33 which suggests that it could grow by 83.2%. Given that Franklin Covey Co. has higher upside potential than Universal Technical Institute, Inc., analysts believe Franklin Covey Co. is more attractive than Universal Technical Institute, Inc..

Universal Technical Institute, Inc. has a beta of 1.359, which suggesting that the stock is 35.926% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Franklin Covey Co. has a beta of 0.686, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 31.412%.

Universal Technical Institute, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Franklin Covey Co. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Universal Technical Institute, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Franklin Covey Co. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Universal Technical Institute, Inc. quarterly revenues are $220.8M, which are larger than Franklin Covey Co. quarterly revenues of $64M. Universal Technical Institute, Inc.'s net income of $12.8M is higher than Franklin Covey Co.'s net income of -$3.3M. Notably, Universal Technical Institute, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 31.69x while Franklin Covey Co.'s PE ratio is 74.31x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Universal Technical Institute, Inc. is 1.99x versus 0.73x for Franklin Covey Co.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Laureate Education, Inc. has a net margin of 5.81% compared to Universal Technical Institute, Inc.'s net margin of 31.73%. Universal Technical Institute, Inc.'s return on equity of 17.38% beat Laureate Education, Inc.'s return on equity of 27.15%.

Universal Technical Institute, Inc. has a consensus price target of $37.33, signalling upside risk potential of 22.12%. On the other hand Laureate Education, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $39.58 which suggests that it could grow by 20.57%. Given that Universal Technical Institute, Inc. has higher upside potential than Laureate Education, Inc., analysts believe Universal Technical Institute, Inc. is more attractive than Laureate Education, Inc..

Universal Technical Institute, Inc. has a beta of 1.359, which suggesting that the stock is 35.926% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Laureate Education, Inc. has a beta of 0.571, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.923%.

Universal Technical Institute, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Laureate Education, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.70 per share. Universal Technical Institute, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Laureate Education, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Universal Technical Institute, Inc. quarterly revenues are $220.8M, which are smaller than Laureate Education, Inc. quarterly revenues of $541.4M. Universal Technical Institute, Inc.'s net income of $12.8M is lower than Laureate Education, Inc.'s net income of $171.8M. Notably, Universal Technical Institute, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 31.69x while Laureate Education, Inc.'s PE ratio is 17.14x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Universal Technical Institute, Inc. is 1.99x versus 2.84x for Laureate Education, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MHI Group, Inc. has a net margin of 5.81% compared to Universal Technical Institute, Inc.'s net margin of --. Universal Technical Institute, Inc.'s return on equity of 17.38% beat MHI Group, Inc.'s return on equity of --.

Universal Technical Institute, Inc. has a consensus price target of $37.33, signalling upside risk potential of 22.12%. On the other hand MHI Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $20.67 which suggests that it could grow by 50.74%. Given that MHI Group, Inc. has higher upside potential than Universal Technical Institute, Inc., analysts believe MHI Group, Inc. is more attractive than Universal Technical Institute, Inc..

Universal Technical Institute, Inc. has a beta of 1.359, which suggesting that the stock is 35.926% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MHI Group, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Universal Technical Institute, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. MHI Group, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Universal Technical Institute, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. MHI Group, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Universal Technical Institute, Inc. quarterly revenues are $220.8M, which are larger than MHI Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Universal Technical Institute, Inc.'s net income of $12.8M is higher than MHI Group, Inc.'s net income of --. Notably, Universal Technical Institute, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 31.69x while MHI Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Universal Technical Institute, Inc. is 1.99x versus 1.48x for MHI Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Perdoceo Education Corp. has a net margin of 5.81% compared to Universal Technical Institute, Inc.'s net margin of 16.7%. Universal Technical Institute, Inc.'s return on equity of 17.38% beat Perdoceo Education Corp.'s return on equity of 16.37%.

Universal Technical Institute, Inc. has a consensus price target of $37.33, signalling upside risk potential of 22.12%. On the other hand Perdoceo Education Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $42.00 which suggests that it could grow by 27.89%. Given that Perdoceo Education Corp. has higher upside potential than Universal Technical Institute, Inc., analysts believe Perdoceo Education Corp. is more attractive than Universal Technical Institute, Inc..

Universal Technical Institute, Inc. has a beta of 1.359, which suggesting that the stock is 35.926% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Perdoceo Education Corp. has a beta of 0.904, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.567%.

Universal Technical Institute, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Perdoceo Education Corp. offers a yield of 1.71% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share. Universal Technical Institute, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Perdoceo Education Corp. pays out 23.17% of its earnings as a dividend. Perdoceo Education Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Universal Technical Institute, Inc. quarterly revenues are $220.8M, which are larger than Perdoceo Education Corp. quarterly revenues of $211.6M. Universal Technical Institute, Inc.'s net income of $12.8M is lower than Perdoceo Education Corp.'s net income of $35.3M. Notably, Universal Technical Institute, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 31.69x while Perdoceo Education Corp.'s PE ratio is 13.59x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Universal Technical Institute, Inc. is 1.99x versus 2.57x for Perdoceo Education Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.