LAUR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Franklin Covey Co. has a net margin of 31.73% compared to Laureate Education, Inc.'s net margin of -5.14%. Laureate Education, Inc.'s return on equity of 27.15% beat Franklin Covey Co.'s return on equity of -2.06%.

Laureate Education, Inc. has a consensus price target of $39.58, signalling upside risk potential of 20.57%. On the other hand Franklin Covey Co. has an analysts' consensus of $27.33 which suggests that it could grow by 83.2%. Given that Franklin Covey Co. has higher upside potential than Laureate Education, Inc., analysts believe Franklin Covey Co. is more attractive than Laureate Education, Inc..

Laureate Education, Inc. has a beta of 0.571, which suggesting that the stock is 42.923% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Franklin Covey Co. has a beta of 0.686, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 31.412%.

Laureate Education, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.70 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Franklin Covey Co. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Laureate Education, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Franklin Covey Co. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Laureate Education, Inc. quarterly revenues are $541.4M, which are larger than Franklin Covey Co. quarterly revenues of $64M. Laureate Education, Inc.'s net income of $171.8M is higher than Franklin Covey Co.'s net income of -$3.3M. Notably, Laureate Education, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 17.14x while Franklin Covey Co.'s PE ratio is 74.31x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Laureate Education, Inc. is 2.84x versus 0.73x for Franklin Covey Co.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lincoln Educational Services Corp. has a net margin of 31.73% compared to Laureate Education, Inc.'s net margin of 2.69%. Laureate Education, Inc.'s return on equity of 27.15% beat Lincoln Educational Services Corp.'s return on equity of 7.92%.

Laureate Education, Inc. has a consensus price target of $39.58, signalling upside risk potential of 20.57%. On the other hand Lincoln Educational Services Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $29.40 which suggests that it could fall by -1.97%. Given that Laureate Education, Inc. has higher upside potential than Lincoln Educational Services Corp., analysts believe Laureate Education, Inc. is more attractive than Lincoln Educational Services Corp..

Laureate Education, Inc. has a beta of 0.571, which suggesting that the stock is 42.923% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lincoln Educational Services Corp. has a beta of 0.968, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.183%.

Laureate Education, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.70 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lincoln Educational Services Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Laureate Education, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lincoln Educational Services Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Laureate Education, Inc. quarterly revenues are $541.4M, which are larger than Lincoln Educational Services Corp. quarterly revenues of $141.4M. Laureate Education, Inc.'s net income of $171.8M is higher than Lincoln Educational Services Corp.'s net income of $3.8M. Notably, Laureate Education, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 17.14x while Lincoln Educational Services Corp.'s PE ratio is 66.20x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Laureate Education, Inc. is 2.84x versus 1.89x for Lincoln Educational Services Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

National American University Holdings, Inc. has a net margin of 31.73% compared to Laureate Education, Inc.'s net margin of 5.19%. Laureate Education, Inc.'s return on equity of 27.15% beat National American University Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of --.

Laureate Education, Inc. has a consensus price target of $39.58, signalling upside risk potential of 20.57%. On the other hand National American University Holdings, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Laureate Education, Inc. has higher upside potential than National American University Holdings, Inc., analysts believe Laureate Education, Inc. is more attractive than National American University Holdings, Inc..

Laureate Education, Inc. has a beta of 0.571, which suggesting that the stock is 42.923% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison National American University Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.196, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 80.4%.

Laureate Education, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.70 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. National American University Holdings, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Laureate Education, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. National American University Holdings, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Laureate Education, Inc. quarterly revenues are $541.4M, which are larger than National American University Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues of $2.6M. Laureate Education, Inc.'s net income of $171.8M is higher than National American University Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $137K. Notably, Laureate Education, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 17.14x while National American University Holdings, Inc.'s PE ratio is 1.96x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Laureate Education, Inc. is 2.84x versus 0.09x for National American University Holdings, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PCS Edventures!, Inc. has a net margin of 31.73% compared to Laureate Education, Inc.'s net margin of -27.89%. Laureate Education, Inc.'s return on equity of 27.15% beat PCS Edventures!, Inc.'s return on equity of 1.44%.

Laureate Education, Inc. has a consensus price target of $39.58, signalling upside risk potential of 20.57%. On the other hand PCS Edventures!, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Laureate Education, Inc. has higher upside potential than PCS Edventures!, Inc., analysts believe Laureate Education, Inc. is more attractive than PCS Edventures!, Inc..

Laureate Education, Inc. has a beta of 0.571, which suggesting that the stock is 42.923% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PCS Edventures!, Inc. has a beta of 0.945, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.532%.

Laureate Education, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.70 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. PCS Edventures!, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Laureate Education, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. PCS Edventures!, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Laureate Education, Inc. quarterly revenues are $541.4M, which are larger than PCS Edventures!, Inc. quarterly revenues of $754.9K. Laureate Education, Inc.'s net income of $171.8M is higher than PCS Edventures!, Inc.'s net income of -$210.5K. Notably, Laureate Education, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 17.14x while PCS Edventures!, Inc.'s PE ratio is 158.75x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Laureate Education, Inc. is 2.84x versus 2.55x for PCS Edventures!, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.