LINC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

EpicQuest Education Group International Ltd. has a net margin of 2.69% compared to Lincoln Educational Services Corp.'s net margin of --. Lincoln Educational Services Corp.'s return on equity of 7.92% beat EpicQuest Education Group International Ltd.'s return on equity of -57.44%.

Lincoln Educational Services Corp. has a consensus price target of $26.60, signalling upside risk potential of 7.35%. On the other hand EpicQuest Education Group International Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 848.05%. Given that EpicQuest Education Group International Ltd. has higher upside potential than Lincoln Educational Services Corp., analysts believe EpicQuest Education Group International Ltd. is more attractive than Lincoln Educational Services Corp..

Lincoln Educational Services Corp. has a beta of 1.000, which suggesting that the stock is 0.034000000000001% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison EpicQuest Education Group International Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Lincoln Educational Services Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. EpicQuest Education Group International Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lincoln Educational Services Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. EpicQuest Education Group International Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Lincoln Educational Services Corp. quarterly revenues are $141.4M, which are larger than EpicQuest Education Group International Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Lincoln Educational Services Corp.'s net income of $3.8M is higher than EpicQuest Education Group International Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Lincoln Educational Services Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 54.70x while EpicQuest Education Group International Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lincoln Educational Services Corp. is 1.56x versus 0.37x for EpicQuest Education Group International Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Franklin Covey Co. has a net margin of 2.69% compared to Lincoln Educational Services Corp.'s net margin of 6.14%. Lincoln Educational Services Corp.'s return on equity of 7.92% beat Franklin Covey Co.'s return on equity of 4.16%.

Lincoln Educational Services Corp. has a consensus price target of $26.60, signalling upside risk potential of 7.35%. On the other hand Franklin Covey Co. has an analysts' consensus of $27.33 which suggests that it could grow by 61.07%. Given that Franklin Covey Co. has higher upside potential than Lincoln Educational Services Corp., analysts believe Franklin Covey Co. is more attractive than Lincoln Educational Services Corp..

Lincoln Educational Services Corp. has a beta of 1.000, which suggesting that the stock is 0.034000000000001% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Franklin Covey Co. has a beta of 0.670, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.961%.

Lincoln Educational Services Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Franklin Covey Co. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lincoln Educational Services Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Franklin Covey Co. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Lincoln Educational Services Corp. quarterly revenues are $141.4M, which are larger than Franklin Covey Co. quarterly revenues of $71.2M. Lincoln Educational Services Corp.'s net income of $3.8M is lower than Franklin Covey Co.'s net income of $4.4M. Notably, Lincoln Educational Services Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 54.70x while Franklin Covey Co.'s PE ratio is 70.77x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lincoln Educational Services Corp. is 1.56x versus 0.83x for Franklin Covey Co.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Classover Holdings, Inc. has a net margin of 2.69% compared to Lincoln Educational Services Corp.'s net margin of -532.83%. Lincoln Educational Services Corp.'s return on equity of 7.92% beat Classover Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of -24.66%.

Lincoln Educational Services Corp. has a consensus price target of $26.60, signalling upside risk potential of 7.35%. On the other hand Classover Holdings, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Lincoln Educational Services Corp. has higher upside potential than Classover Holdings, Inc., analysts believe Lincoln Educational Services Corp. is more attractive than Classover Holdings, Inc..

Lincoln Educational Services Corp. has a beta of 1.000, which suggesting that the stock is 0.034000000000001% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Classover Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Lincoln Educational Services Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Classover Holdings, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lincoln Educational Services Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Classover Holdings, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Lincoln Educational Services Corp. quarterly revenues are $141.4M, which are larger than Classover Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.3M. Lincoln Educational Services Corp.'s net income of $3.8M is higher than Classover Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $2.5M. Notably, Lincoln Educational Services Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 54.70x while Classover Holdings, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lincoln Educational Services Corp. is 1.56x versus 1.04x for Classover Holdings, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Laureate Education, Inc. has a net margin of 2.69% compared to Lincoln Educational Services Corp.'s net margin of 8.59%. Lincoln Educational Services Corp.'s return on equity of 7.92% beat Laureate Education, Inc.'s return on equity of 20.8%.

Lincoln Educational Services Corp. has a consensus price target of $26.60, signalling upside risk potential of 7.35%. On the other hand Laureate Education, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $36.83 which suggests that it could grow by 8.85%. Given that Laureate Education, Inc. has higher upside potential than Lincoln Educational Services Corp., analysts believe Laureate Education, Inc. is more attractive than Lincoln Educational Services Corp..

Lincoln Educational Services Corp. has a beta of 1.000, which suggesting that the stock is 0.034000000000001% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Laureate Education, Inc. has a beta of 0.673, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.75%.

Lincoln Educational Services Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Laureate Education, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.70 per share. Lincoln Educational Services Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Laureate Education, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Lincoln Educational Services Corp. quarterly revenues are $141.4M, which are smaller than Laureate Education, Inc. quarterly revenues of $400.2M. Lincoln Educational Services Corp.'s net income of $3.8M is lower than Laureate Education, Inc.'s net income of $34.4M. Notably, Lincoln Educational Services Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 54.70x while Laureate Education, Inc.'s PE ratio is 24.77x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lincoln Educational Services Corp. is 1.56x versus 3.17x for Laureate Education, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.