CHGG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Franklin Covey Co. has a net margin of -22.47% compared to Chegg, Inc.'s net margin of 6.14%. Chegg, Inc.'s return on equity of -44.23% beat Franklin Covey Co.'s return on equity of 4.16%.

Chegg, Inc. has a consensus price target of $0.83, signalling upside risk potential of 0.79%. On the other hand Franklin Covey Co. has an analysts' consensus of $27.33 which suggests that it could grow by 60.03%. Given that Franklin Covey Co. has higher upside potential than Chegg, Inc., analysts believe Franklin Covey Co. is more attractive than Chegg, Inc..

Chegg, Inc. has a beta of 1.995, which suggesting that the stock is 99.496% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Franklin Covey Co. has a beta of 0.670, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.961%.

Chegg, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Franklin Covey Co. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Chegg, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Franklin Covey Co. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Chegg, Inc. quarterly revenues are $77.7M, which are larger than Franklin Covey Co. quarterly revenues of $71.2M. Chegg, Inc.'s net income of -$17.5M is lower than Franklin Covey Co.'s net income of $4.4M. Notably, Chegg, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Franklin Covey Co.'s PE ratio is 71.23x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Chegg, Inc. is 0.24x versus 0.83x for Franklin Covey Co.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Classover Holdings, Inc. has a net margin of -22.47% compared to Chegg, Inc.'s net margin of -532.83%. Chegg, Inc.'s return on equity of -44.23% beat Classover Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of -24.66%.

Chegg, Inc. has a consensus price target of $0.83, signalling upside risk potential of 0.79%. On the other hand Classover Holdings, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Chegg, Inc. has higher upside potential than Classover Holdings, Inc., analysts believe Chegg, Inc. is more attractive than Classover Holdings, Inc..

Chegg, Inc. has a beta of 1.995, which suggesting that the stock is 99.496% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Classover Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Chegg, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Classover Holdings, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Chegg, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Classover Holdings, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Chegg, Inc. quarterly revenues are $77.7M, which are larger than Classover Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.3M. Chegg, Inc.'s net income of -$17.5M is lower than Classover Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $2.5M. Notably, Chegg, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Classover Holdings, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Chegg, Inc. is 0.24x versus 1.01x for Classover Holdings, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Laureate Education, Inc. has a net margin of -22.47% compared to Chegg, Inc.'s net margin of 8.59%. Chegg, Inc.'s return on equity of -44.23% beat Laureate Education, Inc.'s return on equity of 20.8%.

Chegg, Inc. has a consensus price target of $0.83, signalling upside risk potential of 0.79%. On the other hand Laureate Education, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $36.83 which suggests that it could grow by 7.23%. Given that Laureate Education, Inc. has higher upside potential than Chegg, Inc., analysts believe Laureate Education, Inc. is more attractive than Chegg, Inc..

Chegg, Inc. has a beta of 1.995, which suggesting that the stock is 99.496% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Laureate Education, Inc. has a beta of 0.673, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.75%.

Chegg, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Laureate Education, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.70 per share. Chegg, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Laureate Education, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Chegg, Inc. quarterly revenues are $77.7M, which are smaller than Laureate Education, Inc. quarterly revenues of $400.2M. Chegg, Inc.'s net income of -$17.5M is lower than Laureate Education, Inc.'s net income of $34.4M. Notably, Chegg, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Laureate Education, Inc.'s PE ratio is 25.14x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Chegg, Inc. is 0.24x versus 3.22x for Laureate Education, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lincoln Educational Services Corp. has a net margin of -22.47% compared to Chegg, Inc.'s net margin of 2.69%. Chegg, Inc.'s return on equity of -44.23% beat Lincoln Educational Services Corp.'s return on equity of 7.92%.

Chegg, Inc. has a consensus price target of $0.83, signalling upside risk potential of 0.79%. On the other hand Lincoln Educational Services Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $26.60 which suggests that it could grow by 7.13%. Given that Lincoln Educational Services Corp. has higher upside potential than Chegg, Inc., analysts believe Lincoln Educational Services Corp. is more attractive than Chegg, Inc..

Chegg, Inc. has a beta of 1.995, which suggesting that the stock is 99.496% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lincoln Educational Services Corp. has a beta of 1.000, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.034000000000001%.

Chegg, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lincoln Educational Services Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Chegg, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lincoln Educational Services Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Chegg, Inc. quarterly revenues are $77.7M, which are smaller than Lincoln Educational Services Corp. quarterly revenues of $141.4M. Chegg, Inc.'s net income of -$17.5M is lower than Lincoln Educational Services Corp.'s net income of $3.8M. Notably, Chegg, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Lincoln Educational Services Corp.'s PE ratio is 54.81x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Chegg, Inc. is 0.24x versus 1.57x for Lincoln Educational Services Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.