CHGG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Laureate Education has a net margin of -4.27% compared to Chegg's net margin of 22.12%. Chegg's return on equity of -157.85% beat Laureate Education's return on equity of 31.85%.

Chegg has a consensus price target of $1.34, signalling upside risk potential of 71.77%. On the other hand Laureate Education has an analysts' consensus of $22.83 which suggests that it could grow by 23.49%. Given that Chegg has higher upside potential than Laureate Education, analysts believe Chegg is more attractive than Laureate Education.

Chegg has a beta of 1.520, which suggesting that the stock is 52.007% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Laureate Education has a beta of 0.854, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.6%.

Chegg has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Laureate Education offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.70 per share. Chegg pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Laureate Education pays out 0.58% of its earnings as a dividend. Laureate Education's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Chegg quarterly revenues are $143.5M, which are smaller than Laureate Education quarterly revenues of $423.4M. Chegg's net income of -$6.1M is lower than Laureate Education's net income of $93.6M. Notably, Chegg's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Laureate Education's PE ratio is 9.53x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Chegg is 0.13x versus 1.81x for Laureate Education. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lincoln Educational Services has a net margin of -4.27% compared to Chegg's net margin of 5.73%. Chegg's return on equity of -157.85% beat Lincoln Educational Services's return on equity of 5.86%.

Chegg has a consensus price target of $1.34, signalling upside risk potential of 71.77%. On the other hand Lincoln Educational Services has an analysts' consensus of $22.33 which suggests that it could grow by 54.66%. Given that Chegg has higher upside potential than Lincoln Educational Services, analysts believe Chegg is more attractive than Lincoln Educational Services.

Chegg has a beta of 1.520, which suggesting that the stock is 52.007% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lincoln Educational Services has a beta of 1.607, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 60.691%.

Chegg has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lincoln Educational Services offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Chegg pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lincoln Educational Services pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Chegg quarterly revenues are $143.5M, which are larger than Lincoln Educational Services quarterly revenues of $119.4M. Chegg's net income of -$6.1M is lower than Lincoln Educational Services's net income of $6.8M. Notably, Chegg's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Lincoln Educational Services's PE ratio is 45.13x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Chegg is 0.13x versus 1.01x for Lincoln Educational Services. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

National American University Holdings has a net margin of -4.27% compared to Chegg's net margin of -4.18%. Chegg's return on equity of -157.85% beat National American University Holdings's return on equity of --.

Chegg has a consensus price target of $1.34, signalling upside risk potential of 71.77%. On the other hand National American University Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Chegg has higher upside potential than National American University Holdings, analysts believe Chegg is more attractive than National American University Holdings.

Chegg has a beta of 1.520, which suggesting that the stock is 52.007% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison National American University Holdings has a beta of -0.544, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 154.398%.

Chegg has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. National American University Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Chegg pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. National American University Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Chegg quarterly revenues are $143.5M, which are larger than National American University Holdings quarterly revenues of $2.3M. Chegg's net income of -$6.1M is lower than National American University Holdings's net income of -$97K. Notably, Chegg's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while National American University Holdings's PE ratio is 1.04x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Chegg is 0.13x versus 0.10x for National American University Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PCS Edventures!.com has a net margin of -4.27% compared to Chegg's net margin of -31.79%. Chegg's return on equity of -157.85% beat PCS Edventures!.com's return on equity of 45.27%.

Chegg has a consensus price target of $1.34, signalling upside risk potential of 71.77%. On the other hand PCS Edventures!.com has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Chegg has higher upside potential than PCS Edventures!.com, analysts believe Chegg is more attractive than PCS Edventures!.com.

Chegg has a beta of 1.520, which suggesting that the stock is 52.007% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PCS Edventures!.com has a beta of 0.496, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 50.366%.

Chegg has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. PCS Edventures!.com offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Chegg pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. PCS Edventures!.com pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Chegg quarterly revenues are $143.5M, which are larger than PCS Edventures!.com quarterly revenues of $701.2K. Chegg's net income of -$6.1M is lower than PCS Edventures!.com's net income of -$222.9K. Notably, Chegg's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while PCS Edventures!.com's PE ratio is 4.60x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Chegg is 0.13x versus 2.28x for PCS Edventures!.com. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.