CHGG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Laureate Education, Inc. has a net margin of -45.15% compared to Chegg, Inc.'s net margin of 31.73%. Chegg, Inc.'s return on equity of -64.46% beat Laureate Education, Inc.'s return on equity of 27.15%.

Chegg, Inc. has a consensus price target of $0.83, signalling upside risk potential of 70.65%. On the other hand Laureate Education, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $38.92 which suggests that it could grow by 14.5%. Given that Chegg, Inc. has higher upside potential than Laureate Education, Inc., analysts believe Chegg, Inc. is more attractive than Laureate Education, Inc..

Chegg, Inc. has a beta of 1.983, which suggesting that the stock is 98.333% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Laureate Education, Inc. has a beta of 0.571, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.923%.

Chegg, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Laureate Education, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.70 per share. Chegg, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Laureate Education, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Chegg, Inc. quarterly revenues are $72.7M, which are smaller than Laureate Education, Inc. quarterly revenues of $541.4M. Chegg, Inc.'s net income of -$32.8M is lower than Laureate Education, Inc.'s net income of $171.8M. Notably, Chegg, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Laureate Education, Inc.'s PE ratio is 17.75x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Chegg, Inc. is 0.17x versus 2.94x for Laureate Education, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lincoln Educational Services Corp. has a net margin of -45.15% compared to Chegg, Inc.'s net margin of 2.69%. Chegg, Inc.'s return on equity of -64.46% beat Lincoln Educational Services Corp.'s return on equity of 7.92%.

Chegg, Inc. has a consensus price target of $0.83, signalling upside risk potential of 70.65%. On the other hand Lincoln Educational Services Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $28.20 which suggests that it could fall by -9.35%. Given that Chegg, Inc. has higher upside potential than Lincoln Educational Services Corp., analysts believe Chegg, Inc. is more attractive than Lincoln Educational Services Corp..

Chegg, Inc. has a beta of 1.983, which suggesting that the stock is 98.333% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lincoln Educational Services Corp. has a beta of 0.968, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.183%.

Chegg, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lincoln Educational Services Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Chegg, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lincoln Educational Services Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Chegg, Inc. quarterly revenues are $72.7M, which are smaller than Lincoln Educational Services Corp. quarterly revenues of $141.4M. Chegg, Inc.'s net income of -$32.8M is lower than Lincoln Educational Services Corp.'s net income of $3.8M. Notably, Chegg, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Lincoln Educational Services Corp.'s PE ratio is 68.68x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Chegg, Inc. is 0.17x versus 1.96x for Lincoln Educational Services Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

National American University Holdings, Inc. has a net margin of -45.15% compared to Chegg, Inc.'s net margin of 5.19%. Chegg, Inc.'s return on equity of -64.46% beat National American University Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of --.

Chegg, Inc. has a consensus price target of $0.83, signalling upside risk potential of 70.65%. On the other hand National American University Holdings, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Chegg, Inc. has higher upside potential than National American University Holdings, Inc., analysts believe Chegg, Inc. is more attractive than National American University Holdings, Inc..

Chegg, Inc. has a beta of 1.983, which suggesting that the stock is 98.333% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison National American University Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.196, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 80.4%.

Chegg, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. National American University Holdings, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Chegg, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. National American University Holdings, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Chegg, Inc. quarterly revenues are $72.7M, which are larger than National American University Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues of $2.6M. Chegg, Inc.'s net income of -$32.8M is lower than National American University Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $137K. Notably, Chegg, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while National American University Holdings, Inc.'s PE ratio is 1.96x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Chegg, Inc. is 0.17x versus 0.09x for National American University Holdings, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PCS Edventures!, Inc. has a net margin of -45.15% compared to Chegg, Inc.'s net margin of -27.89%. Chegg, Inc.'s return on equity of -64.46% beat PCS Edventures!, Inc.'s return on equity of 1.44%.

Chegg, Inc. has a consensus price target of $0.83, signalling upside risk potential of 70.65%. On the other hand PCS Edventures!, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Chegg, Inc. has higher upside potential than PCS Edventures!, Inc., analysts believe Chegg, Inc. is more attractive than PCS Edventures!, Inc..

Chegg, Inc. has a beta of 1.983, which suggesting that the stock is 98.333% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PCS Edventures!, Inc. has a beta of 0.945, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.532%.

Chegg, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. PCS Edventures!, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Chegg, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. PCS Edventures!, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Chegg, Inc. quarterly revenues are $72.7M, which are larger than PCS Edventures!, Inc. quarterly revenues of $754.9K. Chegg, Inc.'s net income of -$32.8M is lower than PCS Edventures!, Inc.'s net income of -$210.5K. Notably, Chegg, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while PCS Edventures!, Inc.'s PE ratio is 158.75x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Chegg, Inc. is 0.17x versus 2.55x for PCS Edventures!, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.