RHLD Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Astronics Corp. has a net margin of 32.6% compared to Resolute Holdings Management, Inc.'s net margin of -5.25%. Resolute Holdings Management, Inc.'s return on equity of 1770.44% beat Astronics Corp.'s return on equity of -1.34%.

Resolute Holdings Management, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Astronics Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $76.98 which suggests that it could grow by 1.43%. Given that Astronics Corp. has higher upside potential than Resolute Holdings Management, Inc., analysts believe Astronics Corp. is more attractive than Resolute Holdings Management, Inc..

Resolute Holdings Management, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Astronics Corp. has a beta of 1.096, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.627%.

Resolute Holdings Management, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Astronics Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Resolute Holdings Management, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Astronics Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Resolute Holdings Management, Inc. quarterly revenues are $120.9M, which are smaller than Astronics Corp. quarterly revenues of $211.4M. Resolute Holdings Management, Inc.'s net income of $39.4M is higher than Astronics Corp.'s net income of -$11.1M. Notably, Resolute Holdings Management, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Astronics Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Resolute Holdings Management, Inc. is 3.57x versus 3.43x for Astronics Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

AeroVironment, Inc. has a net margin of 32.6% compared to Resolute Holdings Management, Inc.'s net margin of -3.62%. Resolute Holdings Management, Inc.'s return on equity of 1770.44% beat AeroVironment, Inc.'s return on equity of -3.04%.

Resolute Holdings Management, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand AeroVironment, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $391.44 which suggests that it could grow by 66.48%. Given that AeroVironment, Inc. has higher upside potential than Resolute Holdings Management, Inc., analysts believe AeroVironment, Inc. is more attractive than Resolute Holdings Management, Inc..

Resolute Holdings Management, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison AeroVironment, Inc. has a beta of 1.227, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.721%.

Resolute Holdings Management, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. AeroVironment, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Resolute Holdings Management, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. AeroVironment, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Resolute Holdings Management, Inc. quarterly revenues are $120.9M, which are smaller than AeroVironment, Inc. quarterly revenues of $472.5M. Resolute Holdings Management, Inc.'s net income of $39.4M is higher than AeroVironment, Inc.'s net income of -$17.1M. Notably, Resolute Holdings Management, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while AeroVironment, Inc.'s PE ratio is 149.03x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Resolute Holdings Management, Inc. is 3.57x versus 6.56x for AeroVironment, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. has a net margin of 32.6% compared to Resolute Holdings Management, Inc.'s net margin of 4.29%. Resolute Holdings Management, Inc.'s return on equity of 1770.44% beat Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.'s return on equity of 4.5%.

Resolute Holdings Management, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $90.15 which suggests that it could grow by 0.54%. Given that Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. has higher upside potential than Resolute Holdings Management, Inc., analysts believe Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. is more attractive than Resolute Holdings Management, Inc..

Resolute Holdings Management, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. has a beta of 1.211, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 21.092%.

Resolute Holdings Management, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. offers a yield of 3.68% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share. Resolute Holdings Management, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. pays out 124.71% of its earnings as a dividend.

Resolute Holdings Management, Inc. quarterly revenues are $120.9M, which are smaller than Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. quarterly revenues of $3.7B. Resolute Holdings Management, Inc.'s net income of $39.4M is lower than Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.'s net income of $158.2M. Notably, Resolute Holdings Management, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.'s PE ratio is 33.90x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Resolute Holdings Management, Inc. is 3.57x versus 0.90x for Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.