RH Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Chewy, Inc. has a net margin of 4.1% compared to RH's net margin of 1.9%. RH's return on equity of -- beat Chewy, Inc.'s return on equity of 60.01%.

RH has a consensus price target of $210.35, signalling upside risk potential of 2.84%. On the other hand Chewy, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $45.62 which suggests that it could grow by 47.06%. Given that Chewy, Inc. has higher upside potential than RH, analysts believe Chewy, Inc. is more attractive than RH.

RH has a beta of 2.091, which suggesting that the stock is 109.141% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Chewy, Inc. has a beta of 1.560, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 56.006%.

RH has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Chewy, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. RH pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Chewy, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

RH quarterly revenues are $883.8M, which are smaller than Chewy, Inc. quarterly revenues of $3.1B. RH's net income of $36.3M is lower than Chewy, Inc.'s net income of $59.2M. Notably, RH's price-to-earnings ratio is 36.87x while Chewy, Inc.'s PE ratio is 64.06x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for RH is 1.19x versus 1.05x for Chewy, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tesla, Inc. has a net margin of 4.1% compared to RH's net margin of 4.94%. RH's return on equity of -- beat Tesla, Inc.'s return on equity of 7.04%.

RH has a consensus price target of $210.35, signalling upside risk potential of 2.84%. On the other hand Tesla, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $411.40 which suggests that it could fall by -4.65%. Given that RH has higher upside potential than Tesla, Inc., analysts believe RH is more attractive than Tesla, Inc..

RH has a beta of 2.091, which suggesting that the stock is 109.141% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tesla, Inc. has a beta of 1.831, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 83.075%.

RH has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Tesla, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. RH pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tesla, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

RH quarterly revenues are $883.8M, which are smaller than Tesla, Inc. quarterly revenues of $28.1B. RH's net income of $36.3M is lower than Tesla, Inc.'s net income of $1.4B. Notably, RH's price-to-earnings ratio is 36.87x while Tesla, Inc.'s PE ratio is 288.29x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for RH is 1.19x versus 15.88x for Tesla, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Wayfair, Inc. has a net margin of 4.1% compared to RH's net margin of -3.18%. RH's return on equity of -- beat Wayfair, Inc.'s return on equity of --.

RH has a consensus price target of $210.35, signalling upside risk potential of 2.84%. On the other hand Wayfair, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $114.21 which suggests that it could grow by 5.08%. Given that Wayfair, Inc. has higher upside potential than RH, analysts believe Wayfair, Inc. is more attractive than RH.

RH has a beta of 2.091, which suggesting that the stock is 109.141% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Wayfair, Inc. has a beta of 3.307, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 230.686%.

RH has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Wayfair, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. RH pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Wayfair, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

RH quarterly revenues are $883.8M, which are smaller than Wayfair, Inc. quarterly revenues of $3.1B. RH's net income of $36.3M is higher than Wayfair, Inc.'s net income of -$99M. Notably, RH's price-to-earnings ratio is 36.87x while Wayfair, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for RH is 1.19x versus 1.13x for Wayfair, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Williams-Sonoma, Inc. has a net margin of 4.1% compared to RH's net margin of 12.83%. RH's return on equity of -- beat Williams-Sonoma, Inc.'s return on equity of 54.37%.

RH has a consensus price target of $210.35, signalling upside risk potential of 2.84%. On the other hand Williams-Sonoma, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $201.89 which suggests that it could fall by -3.05%. Given that RH has higher upside potential than Williams-Sonoma, Inc., analysts believe RH is more attractive than Williams-Sonoma, Inc..

RH has a beta of 2.091, which suggesting that the stock is 109.141% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Williams-Sonoma, Inc. has a beta of 1.585, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 58.477%.

RH has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Williams-Sonoma, Inc. offers a yield of 1.27% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.66 per share. RH pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Williams-Sonoma, Inc. pays out 25.89% of its earnings as a dividend. Williams-Sonoma, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

RH quarterly revenues are $883.8M, which are smaller than Williams-Sonoma, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.9B. RH's net income of $36.3M is lower than Williams-Sonoma, Inc.'s net income of $241.6M. Notably, RH's price-to-earnings ratio is 36.87x while Williams-Sonoma, Inc.'s PE ratio is 22.90x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for RH is 1.19x versus 3.27x for Williams-Sonoma, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.