RH Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Chewy has a net margin of 1.71% compared to RH's net margin of 0.7%. RH's return on equity of -- beat Chewy's return on equity of 92.42%.

RH has a consensus price target of $256.12, signalling upside risk potential of 35.5%. On the other hand Chewy has an analysts' consensus of $39.35 which suggests that it could grow by 2.62%. Given that RH has higher upside potential than Chewy, analysts believe RH is more attractive than Chewy.

RH has a beta of 2.356, which suggesting that the stock is 135.621% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Chewy has a beta of 1.693, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 69.33%.

RH has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Chewy offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. RH pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Chewy pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

RH quarterly revenues are $812.4M, which are smaller than Chewy quarterly revenues of $3.2B. RH's net income of $13.9M is lower than Chewy's net income of $22.8M. Notably, RH's price-to-earnings ratio is 52.51x while Chewy's PE ratio is 43.09x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for RH is 1.16x versus 1.39x for Chewy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Nike has a net margin of 1.71% compared to RH's net margin of 7.05%. RH's return on equity of -- beat Nike's return on equity of 31.91%.

RH has a consensus price target of $256.12, signalling upside risk potential of 35.5%. On the other hand Nike has an analysts' consensus of $73.86 which suggests that it could grow by 26%. Given that RH has higher upside potential than Nike, analysts believe RH is more attractive than Nike.

RH has a beta of 2.356, which suggesting that the stock is 135.621% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nike has a beta of 1.229, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.917%.

RH has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Nike offers a yield of 2.63% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. RH pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Nike pays out 38.05% of its earnings as a dividend. Nike's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

RH quarterly revenues are $812.4M, which are smaller than Nike quarterly revenues of $11.3B. RH's net income of $13.9M is lower than Nike's net income of $794M. Notably, RH's price-to-earnings ratio is 52.51x while Nike's PE ratio is 19.48x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for RH is 1.16x versus 1.84x for Nike. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Wayfair has a net margin of 1.71% compared to RH's net margin of -4.14%. RH's return on equity of -- beat Wayfair's return on equity of --.

RH has a consensus price target of $256.12, signalling upside risk potential of 35.5%. On the other hand Wayfair has an analysts' consensus of $44.03 which suggests that it could grow by 44.61%. Given that Wayfair has higher upside potential than RH, analysts believe Wayfair is more attractive than RH.

RH has a beta of 2.356, which suggesting that the stock is 135.621% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Wayfair has a beta of 2.932, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 193.237%.

RH has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Wayfair offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. RH pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Wayfair pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

RH quarterly revenues are $812.4M, which are smaller than Wayfair quarterly revenues of $2.7B. RH's net income of $13.9M is higher than Wayfair's net income of -$113M. Notably, RH's price-to-earnings ratio is 52.51x while Wayfair's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for RH is 1.16x versus 0.32x for Wayfair. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Williams-Sonoma has a net margin of 1.71% compared to RH's net margin of 15.63%. RH's return on equity of -- beat Williams-Sonoma's return on equity of 52.9%.

RH has a consensus price target of $256.12, signalling upside risk potential of 35.5%. On the other hand Williams-Sonoma has an analysts' consensus of $174.03 which suggests that it could grow by 10.4%. Given that RH has higher upside potential than Williams-Sonoma, analysts believe RH is more attractive than Williams-Sonoma.

RH has a beta of 2.356, which suggesting that the stock is 135.621% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Williams-Sonoma has a beta of 1.568, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 56.808%.

RH has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Williams-Sonoma offers a yield of 1.5% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.66 per share. RH pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Williams-Sonoma pays out 24.89% of its earnings as a dividend. Williams-Sonoma's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

RH quarterly revenues are $812.4M, which are smaller than Williams-Sonoma quarterly revenues of $2.5B. RH's net income of $13.9M is lower than Williams-Sonoma's net income of $384.9M. Notably, RH's price-to-earnings ratio is 52.51x while Williams-Sonoma's PE ratio is 17.94x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for RH is 1.16x versus 2.62x for Williams-Sonoma. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.