REVG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

CEA Industries has a net margin of 3.47% compared to REV Group's net margin of -189.45%. REV Group's return on equity of 21.81% beat CEA Industries's return on equity of -26.82%.

REV Group has a consensus price target of $34.00, signalling downside risk potential of -4.41%. On the other hand CEA Industries has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that REV Group has higher upside potential than CEA Industries, analysts believe REV Group is more attractive than CEA Industries.

REV Group has a beta of 1.130, which suggesting that the stock is 13.029% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CEA Industries has a beta of 0.835, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.522%.

REV Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.62%. CEA Industries offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. REV Group pays 74.53% of its earnings as a dividend. CEA Industries pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. REV Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

REV Group quarterly revenues are $525.1M, which are larger than CEA Industries quarterly revenues of $390.8K. REV Group's net income of $18.2M is higher than CEA Industries's net income of -$740.4K. Notably, REV Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.98x while CEA Industries's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for REV Group is 0.81x versus 1.83x for CEA Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hydrofarm Holdings Group has a net margin of 3.47% compared to REV Group's net margin of -46.93%. REV Group's return on equity of 21.81% beat Hydrofarm Holdings Group's return on equity of -25.85%.

REV Group has a consensus price target of $34.00, signalling downside risk potential of -4.41%. On the other hand Hydrofarm Holdings Group has an analysts' consensus of $6.50 which suggests that it could grow by 54.03%. Given that Hydrofarm Holdings Group has higher upside potential than REV Group, analysts believe Hydrofarm Holdings Group is more attractive than REV Group.

REV Group has a beta of 1.130, which suggesting that the stock is 13.029% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hydrofarm Holdings Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

REV Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.62%. Hydrofarm Holdings Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. REV Group pays 74.53% of its earnings as a dividend. Hydrofarm Holdings Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. REV Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

REV Group quarterly revenues are $525.1M, which are larger than Hydrofarm Holdings Group quarterly revenues of $37.3M. REV Group's net income of $18.2M is higher than Hydrofarm Holdings Group's net income of -$17.5M. Notably, REV Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.98x while Hydrofarm Holdings Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for REV Group is 0.81x versus 0.10x for Hydrofarm Holdings Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies has a net margin of 3.47% compared to REV Group's net margin of 12.34%. REV Group's return on equity of 21.81% beat Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies's return on equity of 10.66%.

REV Group has a consensus price target of $34.00, signalling downside risk potential of -4.41%. On the other hand Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $210.18 which suggests that it could grow by 11.09%. Given that Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies has higher upside potential than REV Group, analysts believe Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies is more attractive than REV Group.

REV Group has a beta of 1.130, which suggesting that the stock is 13.029% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies has a beta of 1.123, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.32%.

REV Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.62%. Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies offers a yield of 0.45% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. REV Group pays 74.53% of its earnings as a dividend. Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies pays out 13.26% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

REV Group quarterly revenues are $525.1M, which are smaller than Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies quarterly revenues of $2.6B. REV Group's net income of $18.2M is lower than Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies's net income of $322M. Notably, REV Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.98x while Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies's PE ratio is 29.65x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for REV Group is 0.81x versus 3.12x for Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Wabash National has a net margin of 3.47% compared to REV Group's net margin of 60.63%. REV Group's return on equity of 21.81% beat Wabash National's return on equity of -18.83%.

REV Group has a consensus price target of $34.00, signalling downside risk potential of -4.41%. On the other hand Wabash National has an analysts' consensus of $11.75 which suggests that it could grow by 44.53%. Given that Wabash National has higher upside potential than REV Group, analysts believe Wabash National is more attractive than REV Group.

REV Group has a beta of 1.130, which suggesting that the stock is 13.029% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Wabash National has a beta of 1.576, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 57.608%.

REV Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.62%. Wabash National offers a yield of 4.92% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. REV Group pays 74.53% of its earnings as a dividend. Wabash National pays out -5.2% of its earnings as a dividend. REV Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

REV Group quarterly revenues are $525.1M, which are larger than Wabash National quarterly revenues of $380.9M. REV Group's net income of $18.2M is lower than Wabash National's net income of $230.9M. Notably, REV Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.98x while Wabash National's PE ratio is 5.97x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for REV Group is 0.81x versus 0.20x for Wabash National. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.