HYFM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Alamo Group, Inc. has a net margin of -55.84% compared to Hydrofarm Holdings Group, Inc.'s net margin of 6.04%. Hydrofarm Holdings Group, Inc.'s return on equity of -31.03% beat Alamo Group, Inc.'s return on equity of 10.89%.

Hydrofarm Holdings Group, Inc. has a consensus price target of $6.50, signalling upside risk potential of 316.67%. On the other hand Alamo Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $219.75 which suggests that it could grow by 13.85%. Given that Hydrofarm Holdings Group, Inc. has higher upside potential than Alamo Group, Inc., analysts believe Hydrofarm Holdings Group, Inc. is more attractive than Alamo Group, Inc..

Hydrofarm Holdings Group, Inc. has a beta of 2.324, which suggesting that the stock is 132.445% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Alamo Group, Inc. has a beta of 1.125, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.532%.

Hydrofarm Holdings Group, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Alamo Group, Inc. offers a yield of 0.64% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share. Hydrofarm Holdings Group, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Alamo Group, Inc. pays out 10.8% of its earnings as a dividend. Alamo Group, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Hydrofarm Holdings Group, Inc. quarterly revenues are $29.4M, which are smaller than Alamo Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of $420M. Hydrofarm Holdings Group, Inc.'s net income of -$16.4M is lower than Alamo Group, Inc.'s net income of $25.4M. Notably, Hydrofarm Holdings Group, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Alamo Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is 20.01x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hydrofarm Holdings Group, Inc. is 0.05x versus 1.44x for Alamo Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Art's-Way Manufacturing Co., Inc. has a net margin of -55.84% compared to Hydrofarm Holdings Group, Inc.'s net margin of 3.95%. Hydrofarm Holdings Group, Inc.'s return on equity of -31.03% beat Art's-Way Manufacturing Co., Inc.'s return on equity of 15.98%.

Hydrofarm Holdings Group, Inc. has a consensus price target of $6.50, signalling upside risk potential of 316.67%. On the other hand Art's-Way Manufacturing Co., Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 181.13%. Given that Hydrofarm Holdings Group, Inc. has higher upside potential than Art's-Way Manufacturing Co., Inc., analysts believe Hydrofarm Holdings Group, Inc. is more attractive than Art's-Way Manufacturing Co., Inc..

Hydrofarm Holdings Group, Inc. has a beta of 2.324, which suggesting that the stock is 132.445% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Art's-Way Manufacturing Co., Inc. has a beta of 0.713, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 28.707%.

Hydrofarm Holdings Group, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Art's-Way Manufacturing Co., Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Hydrofarm Holdings Group, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Art's-Way Manufacturing Co., Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Hydrofarm Holdings Group, Inc. quarterly revenues are $29.4M, which are larger than Art's-Way Manufacturing Co., Inc. quarterly revenues of $6.4M. Hydrofarm Holdings Group, Inc.'s net income of -$16.4M is lower than Art's-Way Manufacturing Co., Inc.'s net income of $254.1K. Notably, Hydrofarm Holdings Group, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Art's-Way Manufacturing Co., Inc.'s PE ratio is 6.94x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hydrofarm Holdings Group, Inc. is 0.05x versus 0.53x for Art's-Way Manufacturing Co., Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

CEA Industries, Inc. has a net margin of -55.84% compared to Hydrofarm Holdings Group, Inc.'s net margin of -77.65%. Hydrofarm Holdings Group, Inc.'s return on equity of -31.03% beat CEA Industries, Inc.'s return on equity of 265.43%.

Hydrofarm Holdings Group, Inc. has a consensus price target of $6.50, signalling upside risk potential of 316.67%. On the other hand CEA Industries, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $29.00 which suggests that it could grow by 476.54%. Given that CEA Industries, Inc. has higher upside potential than Hydrofarm Holdings Group, Inc., analysts believe CEA Industries, Inc. is more attractive than Hydrofarm Holdings Group, Inc..

Hydrofarm Holdings Group, Inc. has a beta of 2.324, which suggesting that the stock is 132.445% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CEA Industries, Inc. has a beta of 1.068, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.832%.

Hydrofarm Holdings Group, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CEA Industries, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Hydrofarm Holdings Group, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CEA Industries, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Hydrofarm Holdings Group, Inc. quarterly revenues are $29.4M, which are larger than CEA Industries, Inc. quarterly revenues of $7.1M. Hydrofarm Holdings Group, Inc.'s net income of -$16.4M is lower than CEA Industries, Inc.'s net income of $283.6M. Notably, Hydrofarm Holdings Group, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while CEA Industries, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hydrofarm Holdings Group, Inc. is 0.05x versus 4.41x for CEA Industries, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

urban-gro, Inc. has a net margin of -55.84% compared to Hydrofarm Holdings Group, Inc.'s net margin of -13.78%. Hydrofarm Holdings Group, Inc.'s return on equity of -31.03% beat urban-gro, Inc.'s return on equity of -65.43%.

Hydrofarm Holdings Group, Inc. has a consensus price target of $6.50, signalling upside risk potential of 316.67%. On the other hand urban-gro, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $2.30 which suggests that it could grow by 900%. Given that urban-gro, Inc. has higher upside potential than Hydrofarm Holdings Group, Inc., analysts believe urban-gro, Inc. is more attractive than Hydrofarm Holdings Group, Inc..

Hydrofarm Holdings Group, Inc. has a beta of 2.324, which suggesting that the stock is 132.445% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison urban-gro, Inc. has a beta of 1.258, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.804%.

Hydrofarm Holdings Group, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. urban-gro, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Hydrofarm Holdings Group, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. urban-gro, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Hydrofarm Holdings Group, Inc. quarterly revenues are $29.4M, which are larger than urban-gro, Inc. quarterly revenues of $15.5M. Hydrofarm Holdings Group, Inc.'s net income of -$16.4M is lower than urban-gro, Inc.'s net income of -$2.1M. Notably, Hydrofarm Holdings Group, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while urban-gro, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hydrofarm Holdings Group, Inc. is 0.05x versus 0.03x for urban-gro, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.