ALG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

CEA Industries, Inc. has a net margin of 6.04% compared to Alamo Group, Inc.'s net margin of -77.65%. Alamo Group, Inc.'s return on equity of 10.89% beat CEA Industries, Inc.'s return on equity of -95.23%.

Alamo Group, Inc. has a consensus price target of $219.75, signalling upside risk potential of 32.71%. On the other hand CEA Industries, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $29.00 which suggests that it could grow by 285.64%. Given that CEA Industries, Inc. has higher upside potential than Alamo Group, Inc., analysts believe CEA Industries, Inc. is more attractive than Alamo Group, Inc..

Alamo Group, Inc. has a beta of 1.126, which suggesting that the stock is 12.642% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CEA Industries, Inc. has a beta of 1.056, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.621%.

Alamo Group, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.73%. CEA Industries, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Alamo Group, Inc. pays 10.8% of its earnings as a dividend. CEA Industries, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Alamo Group, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Alamo Group, Inc. quarterly revenues are $420M, which are larger than CEA Industries, Inc. quarterly revenues of $7.5M. Alamo Group, Inc.'s net income of $25.4M is higher than CEA Industries, Inc.'s net income of -$5.8M. Notably, Alamo Group, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 17.17x while CEA Industries, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Alamo Group, Inc. is 1.24x versus 0.68x for CEA Industries, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Deere & Co. has a net margin of 6.04% compared to Alamo Group, Inc.'s net margin of 8.55%. Alamo Group, Inc.'s return on equity of 10.89% beat Deere & Co.'s return on equity of 20.63%.

Alamo Group, Inc. has a consensus price target of $219.75, signalling upside risk potential of 32.71%. On the other hand Deere & Co. has an analysts' consensus of $523.82 which suggests that it could grow by 8.72%. Given that Alamo Group, Inc. has higher upside potential than Deere & Co., analysts believe Alamo Group, Inc. is more attractive than Deere & Co..

Alamo Group, Inc. has a beta of 1.126, which suggesting that the stock is 12.642% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Deere & Co. has a beta of 1.001, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.13700000000001%.

Alamo Group, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.73%. Deere & Co. offers a yield of 1.35% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.62 per share. Alamo Group, Inc. pays 10.8% of its earnings as a dividend. Deere & Co. pays out 35.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Alamo Group, Inc. quarterly revenues are $420M, which are smaller than Deere & Co. quarterly revenues of $12.4B. Alamo Group, Inc.'s net income of $25.4M is lower than Deere & Co.'s net income of $1.1B. Notably, Alamo Group, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 17.17x while Deere & Co.'s PE ratio is 26.03x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Alamo Group, Inc. is 1.24x versus 2.87x for Deere & Co.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hydrofarm Holdings Group, Inc. has a net margin of 6.04% compared to Alamo Group, Inc.'s net margin of -55.84%. Alamo Group, Inc.'s return on equity of 10.89% beat Hydrofarm Holdings Group, Inc.'s return on equity of -31.03%.

Alamo Group, Inc. has a consensus price target of $219.75, signalling upside risk potential of 32.71%. On the other hand Hydrofarm Holdings Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $6.50 which suggests that it could grow by 245.75%. Given that Hydrofarm Holdings Group, Inc. has higher upside potential than Alamo Group, Inc., analysts believe Hydrofarm Holdings Group, Inc. is more attractive than Alamo Group, Inc..

Alamo Group, Inc. has a beta of 1.126, which suggesting that the stock is 12.642% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hydrofarm Holdings Group, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Alamo Group, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.73%. Hydrofarm Holdings Group, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Alamo Group, Inc. pays 10.8% of its earnings as a dividend. Hydrofarm Holdings Group, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Alamo Group, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Alamo Group, Inc. quarterly revenues are $420M, which are larger than Hydrofarm Holdings Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of $29.4M. Alamo Group, Inc.'s net income of $25.4M is higher than Hydrofarm Holdings Group, Inc.'s net income of -$16.4M. Notably, Alamo Group, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 17.17x while Hydrofarm Holdings Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Alamo Group, Inc. is 1.24x versus 0.06x for Hydrofarm Holdings Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

urban-gro, Inc. has a net margin of 6.04% compared to Alamo Group, Inc.'s net margin of -13.78%. Alamo Group, Inc.'s return on equity of 10.89% beat urban-gro, Inc.'s return on equity of -65.43%.

Alamo Group, Inc. has a consensus price target of $219.75, signalling upside risk potential of 32.71%. On the other hand urban-gro, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $2.30 which suggests that it could grow by 838.01%. Given that urban-gro, Inc. has higher upside potential than Alamo Group, Inc., analysts believe urban-gro, Inc. is more attractive than Alamo Group, Inc..

Alamo Group, Inc. has a beta of 1.126, which suggesting that the stock is 12.642% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison urban-gro, Inc. has a beta of 1.259, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.884%.

Alamo Group, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.73%. urban-gro, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Alamo Group, Inc. pays 10.8% of its earnings as a dividend. urban-gro, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Alamo Group, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Alamo Group, Inc. quarterly revenues are $420M, which are larger than urban-gro, Inc. quarterly revenues of $15.5M. Alamo Group, Inc.'s net income of $25.4M is higher than urban-gro, Inc.'s net income of -$2.1M. Notably, Alamo Group, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 17.17x while urban-gro, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Alamo Group, Inc. is 1.24x versus 0.05x for urban-gro, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.