ALG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Deere & Co. has a net margin of 6.04% compared to Alamo Group, Inc.'s net margin of 8.55%. Alamo Group, Inc.'s return on equity of 10.89% beat Deere & Co.'s return on equity of 20.63%.

Alamo Group, Inc. has a consensus price target of $219.75, signalling upside risk potential of 17.57%. On the other hand Deere & Co. has an analysts' consensus of $528.26 which suggests that it could grow by 8.23%. Given that Alamo Group, Inc. has higher upside potential than Deere & Co., analysts believe Alamo Group, Inc. is more attractive than Deere & Co..

Alamo Group, Inc. has a beta of 1.125, which suggesting that the stock is 12.532% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Deere & Co. has a beta of 1.003, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.282%.

Alamo Group, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.64%. Deere & Co. offers a yield of 1.33% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.62 per share. Alamo Group, Inc. pays 10.8% of its earnings as a dividend. Deere & Co. pays out 35.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Alamo Group, Inc. quarterly revenues are $420M, which are smaller than Deere & Co. quarterly revenues of $12.4B. Alamo Group, Inc.'s net income of $25.4M is lower than Deere & Co.'s net income of $1.1B. Notably, Alamo Group, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 19.38x while Deere & Co.'s PE ratio is 26.37x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Alamo Group, Inc. is 1.40x versus 2.90x for Deere & Co.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lindsay Corp. has a net margin of 6.04% compared to Alamo Group, Inc.'s net margin of 10.61%. Alamo Group, Inc.'s return on equity of 10.89% beat Lindsay Corp.'s return on equity of 14.2%.

Alamo Group, Inc. has a consensus price target of $219.75, signalling upside risk potential of 17.57%. On the other hand Lindsay Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $134.00 which suggests that it could grow by 7.08%. Given that Alamo Group, Inc. has higher upside potential than Lindsay Corp., analysts believe Alamo Group, Inc. is more attractive than Lindsay Corp..

Alamo Group, Inc. has a beta of 1.125, which suggesting that the stock is 12.532% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lindsay Corp. has a beta of 0.803, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.722%.

Alamo Group, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.64%. Lindsay Corp. offers a yield of 1.17% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.37 per share. Alamo Group, Inc. pays 10.8% of its earnings as a dividend. Lindsay Corp. pays out 21.38% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Alamo Group, Inc. quarterly revenues are $420M, which are larger than Lindsay Corp. quarterly revenues of $155.8M. Alamo Group, Inc.'s net income of $25.4M is higher than Lindsay Corp.'s net income of $16.5M. Notably, Alamo Group, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 19.38x while Lindsay Corp.'s PE ratio is 18.53x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Alamo Group, Inc. is 1.40x versus 2.04x for Lindsay Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Titan International, Inc. has a net margin of 6.04% compared to Alamo Group, Inc.'s net margin of -0.53%. Alamo Group, Inc.'s return on equity of 10.89% beat Titan International, Inc.'s return on equity of -0.87%.

Alamo Group, Inc. has a consensus price target of $219.75, signalling upside risk potential of 17.57%. On the other hand Titan International, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $11.00 which suggests that it could grow by 28.51%. Given that Titan International, Inc. has higher upside potential than Alamo Group, Inc., analysts believe Titan International, Inc. is more attractive than Alamo Group, Inc..

Alamo Group, Inc. has a beta of 1.125, which suggesting that the stock is 12.532% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Titan International, Inc. has a beta of 1.411, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 41.136%.

Alamo Group, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.64%. Titan International, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Alamo Group, Inc. pays 10.8% of its earnings as a dividend. Titan International, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Alamo Group, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Alamo Group, Inc. quarterly revenues are $420M, which are smaller than Titan International, Inc. quarterly revenues of $466.5M. Alamo Group, Inc.'s net income of $25.4M is higher than Titan International, Inc.'s net income of -$2.5M. Notably, Alamo Group, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 19.38x while Titan International, Inc.'s PE ratio is 18.93x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Alamo Group, Inc. is 1.40x versus 0.30x for Titan International, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

urban-gro, Inc. has a net margin of 6.04% compared to Alamo Group, Inc.'s net margin of -13.78%. Alamo Group, Inc.'s return on equity of 10.89% beat urban-gro, Inc.'s return on equity of -65.43%.

Alamo Group, Inc. has a consensus price target of $219.75, signalling upside risk potential of 17.57%. On the other hand urban-gro, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $2.30 which suggests that it could grow by 707.02%. Given that urban-gro, Inc. has higher upside potential than Alamo Group, Inc., analysts believe urban-gro, Inc. is more attractive than Alamo Group, Inc..

Alamo Group, Inc. has a beta of 1.125, which suggesting that the stock is 12.532% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison urban-gro, Inc. has a beta of 1.258, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.804%.

Alamo Group, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.64%. urban-gro, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Alamo Group, Inc. pays 10.8% of its earnings as a dividend. urban-gro, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Alamo Group, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Alamo Group, Inc. quarterly revenues are $420M, which are larger than urban-gro, Inc. quarterly revenues of $15.5M. Alamo Group, Inc.'s net income of $25.4M is higher than urban-gro, Inc.'s net income of -$2.1M. Notably, Alamo Group, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 19.38x while urban-gro, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Alamo Group, Inc. is 1.40x versus 0.06x for urban-gro, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.