ALG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

CEA Industries has a net margin of 6.83% compared to Alamo Group's net margin of -189.45%. Alamo Group's return on equity of 12.5% beat CEA Industries's return on equity of -26.82%.

Alamo Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 16.94%. On the other hand CEA Industries has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Alamo Group has higher upside potential than CEA Industries, analysts believe Alamo Group is more attractive than CEA Industries.

Alamo Group has a beta of 1.104, which suggesting that the stock is 10.407% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CEA Industries has a beta of 1.033, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.25%.

Alamo Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.55%. CEA Industries offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Alamo Group pays 7.7% of its earnings as a dividend. CEA Industries pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Alamo Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Alamo Group quarterly revenues are $401.3M, which are larger than CEA Industries quarterly revenues of $390.8K. Alamo Group's net income of $27.4M is higher than CEA Industries's net income of -$740.4K. Notably, Alamo Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.97x while CEA Industries's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Alamo Group is 1.36x versus 2.15x for CEA Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lindsay has a net margin of 6.83% compared to Alamo Group's net margin of 14.64%. Alamo Group's return on equity of 12.5% beat Lindsay's return on equity of 15.66%.

Alamo Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 16.94%. On the other hand Lindsay has an analysts' consensus of $132.00 which suggests that it could grow by 7.66%. Given that Alamo Group has higher upside potential than Lindsay, analysts believe Alamo Group is more attractive than Lindsay.

Alamo Group has a beta of 1.104, which suggesting that the stock is 10.407% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lindsay has a beta of 0.642, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 35.754%.

Alamo Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.55%. Lindsay offers a yield of 1.16% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share. Alamo Group pays 7.7% of its earnings as a dividend. Lindsay pays out 23.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Alamo Group quarterly revenues are $401.3M, which are larger than Lindsay quarterly revenues of $139.2M. Alamo Group's net income of $27.4M is higher than Lindsay's net income of $20.4M. Notably, Alamo Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.97x while Lindsay's PE ratio is 20.37x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Alamo Group is 1.36x versus 2.23x for Lindsay. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Titan International has a net margin of 6.83% compared to Alamo Group's net margin of -4.07%. Alamo Group's return on equity of 12.5% beat Titan International's return on equity of -1.73%.

Alamo Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 16.94%. On the other hand Titan International has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 72.66%. Given that Titan International has higher upside potential than Alamo Group, analysts believe Titan International is more attractive than Alamo Group.

Alamo Group has a beta of 1.104, which suggesting that the stock is 10.407% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Titan International has a beta of 1.827, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 82.744%.

Alamo Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.55%. Titan International offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Alamo Group pays 7.7% of its earnings as a dividend. Titan International pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Alamo Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Alamo Group quarterly revenues are $401.3M, which are smaller than Titan International quarterly revenues of $448M. Alamo Group's net income of $27.4M is higher than Titan International's net income of -$18.2M. Notably, Alamo Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.97x while Titan International's PE ratio is 17.30x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Alamo Group is 1.36x versus 0.26x for Titan International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Urban-gro has a net margin of 6.83% compared to Alamo Group's net margin of -13.78%. Alamo Group's return on equity of 12.5% beat Urban-gro's return on equity of -65.43%.

Alamo Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 16.94%. On the other hand Urban-gro has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Alamo Group has higher upside potential than Urban-gro, analysts believe Alamo Group is more attractive than Urban-gro.

Alamo Group has a beta of 1.104, which suggesting that the stock is 10.407% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Urban-gro has a beta of 1.667, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 66.652%.

Alamo Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.55%. Urban-gro offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Alamo Group pays 7.7% of its earnings as a dividend. Urban-gro pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Alamo Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Alamo Group quarterly revenues are $401.3M, which are larger than Urban-gro quarterly revenues of $15.5M. Alamo Group's net income of $27.4M is higher than Urban-gro's net income of -$2.1M. Notably, Alamo Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.97x while Urban-gro's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Alamo Group is 1.36x versus 0.18x for Urban-gro. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.