UGRO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Alamo Group, Inc. has a net margin of -13.78% compared to urban-gro, Inc.'s net margin of 6.04%. urban-gro, Inc.'s return on equity of -65.43% beat Alamo Group, Inc.'s return on equity of 10.89%.

urban-gro, Inc. has a consensus price target of $2.30, signalling upside risk potential of 834.58%. On the other hand Alamo Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $219.75 which suggests that it could grow by 31.84%. Given that urban-gro, Inc. has higher upside potential than Alamo Group, Inc., analysts believe urban-gro, Inc. is more attractive than Alamo Group, Inc..

urban-gro, Inc. has a beta of 1.259, which suggesting that the stock is 25.884% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Alamo Group, Inc. has a beta of 1.126, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.642%.

urban-gro, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Alamo Group, Inc. offers a yield of 0.72% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share. urban-gro, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Alamo Group, Inc. pays out 10.8% of its earnings as a dividend. Alamo Group, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

urban-gro, Inc. quarterly revenues are $15.5M, which are smaller than Alamo Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of $420M. urban-gro, Inc.'s net income of -$2.1M is lower than Alamo Group, Inc.'s net income of $25.4M. Notably, urban-gro, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Alamo Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is 17.28x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for urban-gro, Inc. is 0.05x versus 1.25x for Alamo Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Art's-Way Manufacturing Co., Inc. has a net margin of -13.78% compared to urban-gro, Inc.'s net margin of 3.95%. urban-gro, Inc.'s return on equity of -65.43% beat Art's-Way Manufacturing Co., Inc.'s return on equity of 15.98%.

urban-gro, Inc. has a consensus price target of $2.30, signalling upside risk potential of 834.58%. On the other hand Art's-Way Manufacturing Co., Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 190.46%. Given that urban-gro, Inc. has higher upside potential than Art's-Way Manufacturing Co., Inc., analysts believe urban-gro, Inc. is more attractive than Art's-Way Manufacturing Co., Inc..

urban-gro, Inc. has a beta of 1.259, which suggesting that the stock is 25.884% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Art's-Way Manufacturing Co., Inc. has a beta of 0.741, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.873%.

urban-gro, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Art's-Way Manufacturing Co., Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. urban-gro, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Art's-Way Manufacturing Co., Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

urban-gro, Inc. quarterly revenues are $15.5M, which are larger than Art's-Way Manufacturing Co., Inc. quarterly revenues of $6.4M. urban-gro, Inc.'s net income of -$2.1M is lower than Art's-Way Manufacturing Co., Inc.'s net income of $254.1K. Notably, urban-gro, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Art's-Way Manufacturing Co., Inc.'s PE ratio is 6.71x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for urban-gro, Inc. is 0.05x versus 0.51x for Art's-Way Manufacturing Co., Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

CEA Industries, Inc. has a net margin of -13.78% compared to urban-gro, Inc.'s net margin of -77.65%. urban-gro, Inc.'s return on equity of -65.43% beat CEA Industries, Inc.'s return on equity of -95.23%.

urban-gro, Inc. has a consensus price target of $2.30, signalling upside risk potential of 834.58%. On the other hand CEA Industries, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $29.00 which suggests that it could grow by 306.16%. Given that urban-gro, Inc. has higher upside potential than CEA Industries, Inc., analysts believe urban-gro, Inc. is more attractive than CEA Industries, Inc..

urban-gro, Inc. has a beta of 1.259, which suggesting that the stock is 25.884% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CEA Industries, Inc. has a beta of 1.056, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.621%.

urban-gro, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CEA Industries, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. urban-gro, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CEA Industries, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

urban-gro, Inc. quarterly revenues are $15.5M, which are larger than CEA Industries, Inc. quarterly revenues of $7.5M. urban-gro, Inc.'s net income of -$2.1M is higher than CEA Industries, Inc.'s net income of -$5.8M. Notably, urban-gro, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while CEA Industries, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for urban-gro, Inc. is 0.05x versus 0.64x for CEA Industries, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hydrofarm Holdings Group, Inc. has a net margin of -13.78% compared to urban-gro, Inc.'s net margin of -55.84%. urban-gro, Inc.'s return on equity of -65.43% beat Hydrofarm Holdings Group, Inc.'s return on equity of -31.03%.

urban-gro, Inc. has a consensus price target of $2.30, signalling upside risk potential of 834.58%. On the other hand Hydrofarm Holdings Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $6.50 which suggests that it could grow by 238.54%. Given that urban-gro, Inc. has higher upside potential than Hydrofarm Holdings Group, Inc., analysts believe urban-gro, Inc. is more attractive than Hydrofarm Holdings Group, Inc..

urban-gro, Inc. has a beta of 1.259, which suggesting that the stock is 25.884% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hydrofarm Holdings Group, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

urban-gro, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Hydrofarm Holdings Group, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. urban-gro, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hydrofarm Holdings Group, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

urban-gro, Inc. quarterly revenues are $15.5M, which are smaller than Hydrofarm Holdings Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of $29.4M. urban-gro, Inc.'s net income of -$2.1M is higher than Hydrofarm Holdings Group, Inc.'s net income of -$16.4M. Notably, urban-gro, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Hydrofarm Holdings Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for urban-gro, Inc. is 0.05x versus 0.06x for Hydrofarm Holdings Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.