RACE Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

General Motors has a net margin of 22.14% compared to Ferrari NV's net margin of 6.32%. Ferrari NV's return on equity of 46.54% beat General Motors's return on equity of 8.33%.

Ferrari NV has a consensus price target of $506.20, signalling upside risk potential of 6.63%. On the other hand General Motors has an analysts' consensus of $54.39 which suggests that it could grow by 19.64%. Given that General Motors has higher upside potential than Ferrari NV, analysts believe General Motors is more attractive than Ferrari NV.

Ferrari NV has a beta of 1.119, which suggesting that the stock is 11.924% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison General Motors has a beta of 1.361, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 36.127%.

Ferrari NV has a quarterly dividend of $3.39 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.72%. General Motors offers a yield of 1.06% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share. Ferrari NV pays 28.91% of its earnings as a dividend. General Motors pays out 10.87% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Ferrari NV quarterly revenues are $1.9B, which are smaller than General Motors quarterly revenues of $44B. Ferrari NV's net income of $409.6M is lower than General Motors's net income of $2.8B. Notably, Ferrari NV's price-to-earnings ratio is 51.74x while General Motors's PE ratio is 6.33x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ferrari NV is 11.82x versus 0.26x for General Motors. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Rivian Automotive has a net margin of 22.14% compared to Ferrari NV's net margin of -42.85%. Ferrari NV's return on equity of 46.54% beat Rivian Automotive's return on equity of -65.03%.

Ferrari NV has a consensus price target of $506.20, signalling upside risk potential of 6.63%. On the other hand Rivian Automotive has an analysts' consensus of $14.19 which suggests that it could grow by 5.39%. Given that Ferrari NV has higher upside potential than Rivian Automotive, analysts believe Ferrari NV is more attractive than Rivian Automotive.

Ferrari NV has a beta of 1.119, which suggesting that the stock is 11.924% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Rivian Automotive has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Ferrari NV has a quarterly dividend of $3.39 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.72%. Rivian Automotive offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ferrari NV pays 28.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Rivian Automotive pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ferrari NV's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Ferrari NV quarterly revenues are $1.9B, which are larger than Rivian Automotive quarterly revenues of $1.7B. Ferrari NV's net income of $409.6M is higher than Rivian Automotive's net income of -$743M. Notably, Ferrari NV's price-to-earnings ratio is 51.74x while Rivian Automotive's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ferrari NV is 11.82x versus 2.75x for Rivian Automotive. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tesla has a net margin of 22.14% compared to Ferrari NV's net margin of 2.12%. Ferrari NV's return on equity of 46.54% beat Tesla's return on equity of 9.1%.

Ferrari NV has a consensus price target of $506.20, signalling upside risk potential of 6.63%. On the other hand Tesla has an analysts' consensus of $289.44 which suggests that it could grow by 5.12%. Given that Ferrari NV has higher upside potential than Tesla, analysts believe Ferrari NV is more attractive than Tesla.

Ferrari NV has a beta of 1.119, which suggesting that the stock is 11.924% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tesla has a beta of 2.429, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 142.869%.

Ferrari NV has a quarterly dividend of $3.39 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.72%. Tesla offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ferrari NV pays 28.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Tesla pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ferrari NV's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Ferrari NV quarterly revenues are $1.9B, which are smaller than Tesla quarterly revenues of $19.3B. Ferrari NV's net income of $409.6M is higher than Tesla's net income of $409M. Notably, Ferrari NV's price-to-earnings ratio is 51.74x while Tesla's PE ratio is 151.29x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ferrari NV is 11.82x versus 10.09x for Tesla. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Workhorse Group has a net margin of 22.14% compared to Ferrari NV's net margin of -1001.53%. Ferrari NV's return on equity of 46.54% beat Workhorse Group's return on equity of -170.46%.

Ferrari NV has a consensus price target of $506.20, signalling upside risk potential of 6.63%. On the other hand Workhorse Group has an analysts' consensus of $2.00 which suggests that it could grow by 88.68%. Given that Workhorse Group has higher upside potential than Ferrari NV, analysts believe Workhorse Group is more attractive than Ferrari NV.

Ferrari NV has a beta of 1.119, which suggesting that the stock is 11.924% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Workhorse Group has a beta of 2.828, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 182.819%.

Ferrari NV has a quarterly dividend of $3.39 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.72%. Workhorse Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ferrari NV pays 28.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Workhorse Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ferrari NV's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Ferrari NV quarterly revenues are $1.9B, which are larger than Workhorse Group quarterly revenues of $2.5M. Ferrari NV's net income of $409.6M is higher than Workhorse Group's net income of -$25.1M. Notably, Ferrari NV's price-to-earnings ratio is 51.74x while Workhorse Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ferrari NV is 11.82x versus 0.34x for Workhorse Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.