RACE Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Ford Motor has a net margin of 22.14% compared to Ferrari NV's net margin of 3.78%. Ferrari NV's return on equity of 46.54% beat Ford Motor's return on equity of 13.45%.

Ferrari NV has a consensus price target of $509.13, signalling upside risk potential of 18.48%. On the other hand Ford Motor has an analysts' consensus of $10.45 which suggests that it could grow by 4.16%. Given that Ferrari NV has higher upside potential than Ford Motor, analysts believe Ferrari NV is more attractive than Ford Motor.

Ferrari NV has a beta of 0.943, which suggesting that the stock is 5.727% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ford Motor has a beta of 1.414, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 41.387%.

Ferrari NV has a quarterly dividend of $2.60 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.61%. Ford Motor offers a yield of 7.48% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share. Ferrari NV pays 28.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Ford Motor pays out 53.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Ferrari NV quarterly revenues are $1.9B, which are smaller than Ford Motor quarterly revenues of $48.2B. Ferrari NV's net income of $409.6M is lower than Ford Motor's net income of $1.8B. Notably, Ferrari NV's price-to-earnings ratio is 46.90x while Ford Motor's PE ratio is 6.87x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ferrari NV is 10.71x versus 0.22x for Ford Motor. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

General Motors has a net margin of 22.14% compared to Ferrari NV's net margin of -6.21%. Ferrari NV's return on equity of 46.54% beat General Motors's return on equity of 8.57%.

Ferrari NV has a consensus price target of $509.13, signalling upside risk potential of 18.48%. On the other hand General Motors has an analysts' consensus of $61.10 which suggests that it could grow by 29.93%. Given that General Motors has higher upside potential than Ferrari NV, analysts believe General Motors is more attractive than Ferrari NV.

Ferrari NV has a beta of 0.943, which suggesting that the stock is 5.727% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison General Motors has a beta of 1.275, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.509%.

Ferrari NV has a quarterly dividend of $2.60 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.61%. General Motors offers a yield of 1.02% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share. Ferrari NV pays 28.91% of its earnings as a dividend. General Motors pays out 10.87% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Ferrari NV quarterly revenues are $1.9B, which are smaller than General Motors quarterly revenues of $47.7B. Ferrari NV's net income of $409.6M is higher than General Motors's net income of -$3B. Notably, Ferrari NV's price-to-earnings ratio is 46.90x while General Motors's PE ratio is 7.36x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ferrari NV is 10.71x versus 0.28x for General Motors. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tesla has a net margin of 22.14% compared to Ferrari NV's net margin of 9.17%. Ferrari NV's return on equity of 46.54% beat Tesla's return on equity of 10.47%.

Ferrari NV has a consensus price target of $509.13, signalling upside risk potential of 18.48%. On the other hand Tesla has an analysts' consensus of $329.91 which suggests that it could grow by 25.36%. Given that Tesla has higher upside potential than Ferrari NV, analysts believe Tesla is more attractive than Ferrari NV.

Ferrari NV has a beta of 0.943, which suggesting that the stock is 5.727% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tesla has a beta of 2.504, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 150.394%.

Ferrari NV has a quarterly dividend of $2.60 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.61%. Tesla offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ferrari NV pays 28.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Tesla pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ferrari NV's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Ferrari NV quarterly revenues are $1.9B, which are smaller than Tesla quarterly revenues of $25.7B. Ferrari NV's net income of $409.6M is lower than Tesla's net income of $2.4B. Notably, Ferrari NV's price-to-earnings ratio is 46.90x while Tesla's PE ratio is 129.19x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ferrari NV is 10.71x versus 9.43x for Tesla. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Workhorse Group has a net margin of 22.14% compared to Ferrari NV's net margin of -1001.53%. Ferrari NV's return on equity of 46.54% beat Workhorse Group's return on equity of -170.46%.

Ferrari NV has a consensus price target of $509.13, signalling upside risk potential of 18.48%. On the other hand Workhorse Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 544.33%. Given that Workhorse Group has higher upside potential than Ferrari NV, analysts believe Workhorse Group is more attractive than Ferrari NV.

Ferrari NV has a beta of 0.943, which suggesting that the stock is 5.727% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Workhorse Group has a beta of 2.788, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 178.753%.

Ferrari NV has a quarterly dividend of $2.60 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.61%. Workhorse Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ferrari NV pays 28.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Workhorse Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ferrari NV's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Ferrari NV quarterly revenues are $1.9B, which are larger than Workhorse Group quarterly revenues of $2.5M. Ferrari NV's net income of $409.6M is higher than Workhorse Group's net income of -$25.1M. Notably, Ferrari NV's price-to-earnings ratio is 46.90x while Workhorse Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ferrari NV is 10.71x versus 0.31x for Workhorse Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.