QTWO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

BlackLine has a net margin of 0.09% compared to Q2 Holdings's net margin of 33.29%. Q2 Holdings's return on equity of -8.01% beat BlackLine's return on equity of 43.72%.

Q2 Holdings has a consensus price target of $107.79, signalling upside risk potential of 33.33%. On the other hand BlackLine has an analysts' consensus of $64.80 which suggests that it could grow by 32.76%. Given that Q2 Holdings has higher upside potential than BlackLine, analysts believe Q2 Holdings is more attractive than BlackLine.

Q2 Holdings has a beta of 1.624, which suggesting that the stock is 62.446% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison BlackLine has a beta of 1.031, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.08%.

Q2 Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. BlackLine offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Q2 Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. BlackLine pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Q2 Holdings quarterly revenues are $183M, which are larger than BlackLine quarterly revenues of $169.5M. Q2 Holdings's net income of $164K is lower than BlackLine's net income of $56.4M. Notably, Q2 Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while BlackLine's PE ratio is 33.66x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Q2 Holdings is 6.98x versus 5.49x for BlackLine. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Guidewire Software has a net margin of 0.09% compared to Q2 Holdings's net margin of -12.88%. Q2 Holdings's return on equity of -8.01% beat Guidewire Software's return on equity of -1.31%.

Q2 Holdings has a consensus price target of $107.79, signalling upside risk potential of 33.33%. On the other hand Guidewire Software has an analysts' consensus of $210.92 which suggests that it could grow by 12.51%. Given that Q2 Holdings has higher upside potential than Guidewire Software, analysts believe Q2 Holdings is more attractive than Guidewire Software.

Q2 Holdings has a beta of 1.624, which suggesting that the stock is 62.446% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Guidewire Software has a beta of 1.306, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.586%.

Q2 Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Guidewire Software offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Q2 Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Guidewire Software pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Q2 Holdings quarterly revenues are $183M, which are smaller than Guidewire Software quarterly revenues of $289.5M. Q2 Holdings's net income of $164K is higher than Guidewire Software's net income of -$37.3M. Notably, Q2 Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Guidewire Software's PE ratio is 519.39x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Q2 Holdings is 6.98x versus 14.48x for Guidewire Software. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ncino has a net margin of 0.09% compared to Q2 Holdings's net margin of -3.78%. Q2 Holdings's return on equity of -8.01% beat Ncino's return on equity of -1.7%.

Q2 Holdings has a consensus price target of $107.79, signalling upside risk potential of 33.33%. On the other hand Ncino has an analysts' consensus of $41.14 which suggests that it could grow by 42.26%. Given that Ncino has higher upside potential than Q2 Holdings, analysts believe Ncino is more attractive than Q2 Holdings.

Q2 Holdings has a beta of 1.624, which suggesting that the stock is 62.446% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ncino has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Q2 Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ncino offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Q2 Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ncino pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Q2 Holdings quarterly revenues are $183M, which are larger than Ncino quarterly revenues of $138.8M. Q2 Holdings's net income of $164K is higher than Ncino's net income of -$5.3M. Notably, Q2 Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Ncino's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Q2 Holdings is 6.98x versus 6.33x for Ncino. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tyler Technologies has a net margin of 0.09% compared to Q2 Holdings's net margin of 12.05%. Q2 Holdings's return on equity of -8.01% beat Tyler Technologies's return on equity of 8.35%.

Q2 Holdings has a consensus price target of $107.79, signalling upside risk potential of 33.33%. On the other hand Tyler Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $704.63 which suggests that it could grow by 21.56%. Given that Q2 Holdings has higher upside potential than Tyler Technologies, analysts believe Q2 Holdings is more attractive than Tyler Technologies.

Q2 Holdings has a beta of 1.624, which suggesting that the stock is 62.446% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tyler Technologies has a beta of 0.799, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.121%.

Q2 Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Tyler Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Q2 Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tyler Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Q2 Holdings quarterly revenues are $183M, which are smaller than Tyler Technologies quarterly revenues of $541.1M. Q2 Holdings's net income of $164K is lower than Tyler Technologies's net income of $65.2M. Notably, Q2 Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Tyler Technologies's PE ratio is 95.65x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Q2 Holdings is 6.98x versus 11.78x for Tyler Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.