QTWO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Bandwidth has a net margin of 2.51% compared to Q2 Holdings's net margin of -0.84%. Q2 Holdings's return on equity of -3.98% beat Bandwidth's return on equity of -2.1%.

Q2 Holdings has a consensus price target of $97.73, signalling upside risk potential of 9.06%. On the other hand Bandwidth has an analysts' consensus of $19.60 which suggests that it could grow by 39.3%. Given that Bandwidth has higher upside potential than Q2 Holdings, analysts believe Bandwidth is more attractive than Q2 Holdings.

Q2 Holdings has a beta of 1.469, which suggesting that the stock is 46.94% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Bandwidth has a beta of 1.885, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 88.475%.

Q2 Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Bandwidth offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Q2 Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Bandwidth pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Q2 Holdings quarterly revenues are $189.7M, which are smaller than Bandwidth quarterly revenues of $210M. Q2 Holdings's net income of $4.8M is higher than Bandwidth's net income of -$1.8M. Notably, Q2 Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Bandwidth's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Q2 Holdings is 7.64x versus 0.53x for Bandwidth. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

BlackLine has a net margin of 2.51% compared to Q2 Holdings's net margin of 3.63%. Q2 Holdings's return on equity of -3.98% beat BlackLine's return on equity of 38.98%.

Q2 Holdings has a consensus price target of $97.73, signalling upside risk potential of 9.06%. On the other hand BlackLine has an analysts' consensus of $56.91 which suggests that it could grow by 6.91%. Given that Q2 Holdings has higher upside potential than BlackLine, analysts believe Q2 Holdings is more attractive than BlackLine.

Q2 Holdings has a beta of 1.469, which suggesting that the stock is 46.94% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison BlackLine has a beta of 0.939, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.067%.

Q2 Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. BlackLine offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Q2 Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. BlackLine pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Q2 Holdings quarterly revenues are $189.7M, which are larger than BlackLine quarterly revenues of $166.9M. Q2 Holdings's net income of $4.8M is lower than BlackLine's net income of $6.1M. Notably, Q2 Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while BlackLine's PE ratio is 38.57x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Q2 Holdings is 7.64x versus 5.74x for BlackLine. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Cerence has a net margin of 2.51% compared to Q2 Holdings's net margin of 27.76%. Q2 Holdings's return on equity of -3.98% beat Cerence's return on equity of -163.61%.

Q2 Holdings has a consensus price target of $97.73, signalling upside risk potential of 9.06%. On the other hand Cerence has an analysts' consensus of $11.42 which suggests that it could grow by 22.89%. Given that Cerence has higher upside potential than Q2 Holdings, analysts believe Cerence is more attractive than Q2 Holdings.

Q2 Holdings has a beta of 1.469, which suggesting that the stock is 46.94% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cerence has a beta of 2.969, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 196.943%.

Q2 Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Cerence offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Q2 Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cerence pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Q2 Holdings quarterly revenues are $189.7M, which are larger than Cerence quarterly revenues of $78M. Q2 Holdings's net income of $4.8M is lower than Cerence's net income of $21.7M. Notably, Q2 Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Cerence's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Q2 Holdings is 7.64x versus 1.63x for Cerence. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Paycom Software has a net margin of 2.51% compared to Q2 Holdings's net margin of 26.28%. Q2 Holdings's return on equity of -3.98% beat Paycom Software's return on equity of 25.86%.

Q2 Holdings has a consensus price target of $97.73, signalling upside risk potential of 9.06%. On the other hand Paycom Software has an analysts' consensus of $235.31 which suggests that it could fall by -6.88%. Given that Q2 Holdings has higher upside potential than Paycom Software, analysts believe Q2 Holdings is more attractive than Paycom Software.

Q2 Holdings has a beta of 1.469, which suggesting that the stock is 46.94% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Paycom Software has a beta of 0.804, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.588%.

Q2 Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Paycom Software offers a yield of 0.59% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.38 per share. Q2 Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Paycom Software pays out 16.89% of its earnings as a dividend. Paycom Software's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Q2 Holdings quarterly revenues are $189.7M, which are smaller than Paycom Software quarterly revenues of $530.5M. Q2 Holdings's net income of $4.8M is lower than Paycom Software's net income of $139.4M. Notably, Q2 Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Paycom Software's PE ratio is 36.05x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Q2 Holdings is 7.64x versus 7.43x for Paycom Software. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.