NCNO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Autodesk, Inc. has a net margin of 5.66% compared to nCino, Inc.'s net margin of 18.5%. nCino, Inc.'s return on equity of -1.36% beat Autodesk, Inc.'s return on equity of 41.26%.

nCino, Inc. has a consensus price target of $33.14, signalling upside risk potential of 102.71%. On the other hand Autodesk, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $359.75 which suggests that it could grow by 56.59%. Given that nCino, Inc. has higher upside potential than Autodesk, Inc., analysts believe nCino, Inc. is more attractive than Autodesk, Inc..

nCino, Inc. has a beta of 0.551, which suggesting that the stock is 44.923% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Autodesk, Inc. has a beta of 1.446, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 44.621%.

nCino, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Autodesk, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. nCino, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Autodesk, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

nCino, Inc. quarterly revenues are $152.2M, which are smaller than Autodesk, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.9B. nCino, Inc.'s net income of $8.6M is lower than Autodesk, Inc.'s net income of $343M. Notably, nCino, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Autodesk, Inc.'s PE ratio is 44.60x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for nCino, Inc. is 3.23x versus 7.21x for Autodesk, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Agilysys, Inc. has a net margin of 5.66% compared to nCino, Inc.'s net margin of 12.31%. nCino, Inc.'s return on equity of -1.36% beat Agilysys, Inc.'s return on equity of 10.74%.

nCino, Inc. has a consensus price target of $33.14, signalling upside risk potential of 102.71%. On the other hand Agilysys, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $138.00 which suggests that it could grow by 72.95%. Given that nCino, Inc. has higher upside potential than Agilysys, Inc., analysts believe nCino, Inc. is more attractive than Agilysys, Inc..

nCino, Inc. has a beta of 0.551, which suggesting that the stock is 44.923% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Agilysys, Inc. has a beta of 0.411, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 58.885%.

nCino, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Agilysys, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. nCino, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Agilysys, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

nCino, Inc. quarterly revenues are $152.2M, which are larger than Agilysys, Inc. quarterly revenues of $80.4M. nCino, Inc.'s net income of $8.6M is lower than Agilysys, Inc.'s net income of $9.9M. Notably, nCino, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Agilysys, Inc.'s PE ratio is 74.42x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for nCino, Inc. is 3.23x versus 7.28x for Agilysys, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Q2 Holdings, Inc. has a net margin of 5.66% compared to nCino, Inc.'s net margin of 9.82%. nCino, Inc.'s return on equity of -1.36% beat Q2 Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 8.87%.

nCino, Inc. has a consensus price target of $33.14, signalling upside risk potential of 102.71%. On the other hand Q2 Holdings, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $76.07 which suggests that it could grow by 45.37%. Given that nCino, Inc. has higher upside potential than Q2 Holdings, Inc., analysts believe nCino, Inc. is more attractive than Q2 Holdings, Inc..

nCino, Inc. has a beta of 0.551, which suggesting that the stock is 44.923% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Q2 Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 1.360, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 36.038%.

nCino, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Q2 Holdings, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. nCino, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Q2 Holdings, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

nCino, Inc. quarterly revenues are $152.2M, which are smaller than Q2 Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues of $208.2M. nCino, Inc.'s net income of $8.6M is lower than Q2 Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $20.4M. Notably, nCino, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Q2 Holdings, Inc.'s PE ratio is 67.03x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for nCino, Inc. is 3.23x versus 4.49x for Q2 Holdings, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sprout Social, Inc. has a net margin of 5.66% compared to nCino, Inc.'s net margin of -8.12%. nCino, Inc.'s return on equity of -1.36% beat Sprout Social, Inc.'s return on equity of -26.75%.

nCino, Inc. has a consensus price target of $33.14, signalling upside risk potential of 102.71%. On the other hand Sprout Social, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $15.67 which suggests that it could grow by 116.39%. Given that Sprout Social, Inc. has higher upside potential than nCino, Inc., analysts believe Sprout Social, Inc. is more attractive than nCino, Inc..

nCino, Inc. has a beta of 0.551, which suggesting that the stock is 44.923% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sprout Social, Inc. has a beta of 0.901, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.884%.

nCino, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Sprout Social, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. nCino, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sprout Social, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

nCino, Inc. quarterly revenues are $152.2M, which are larger than Sprout Social, Inc. quarterly revenues of $115.6M. nCino, Inc.'s net income of $8.6M is higher than Sprout Social, Inc.'s net income of -$9.4M. Notably, nCino, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Sprout Social, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for nCino, Inc. is 3.23x versus 0.95x for Sprout Social, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.