WK Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Automatic Data Processing, Inc. has a net margin of 1.24% compared to Workiva, Inc.'s net margin of 19.57%. Workiva, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat Automatic Data Processing, Inc.'s return on equity of 71.7%.

Workiva, Inc. has a consensus price target of $106.27, signalling upside risk potential of 18.73%. On the other hand Automatic Data Processing, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $289.54 which suggests that it could grow by 8.84%. Given that Workiva, Inc. has higher upside potential than Automatic Data Processing, Inc., analysts believe Workiva, Inc. is more attractive than Automatic Data Processing, Inc..

Workiva, Inc. has a beta of 0.603, which suggesting that the stock is 39.687% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Automatic Data Processing, Inc. has a beta of 0.859, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.15%.

Workiva, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Automatic Data Processing, Inc. offers a yield of 2.38% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.70 per share. Workiva, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Automatic Data Processing, Inc. pays out 60.31% of its earnings as a dividend. Automatic Data Processing, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Workiva, Inc. quarterly revenues are $224.2M, which are smaller than Automatic Data Processing, Inc. quarterly revenues of $5.2B. Workiva, Inc.'s net income of $2.8M is lower than Automatic Data Processing, Inc.'s net income of $1B. Notably, Workiva, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Automatic Data Processing, Inc.'s PE ratio is 26.24x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Workiva, Inc. is 5.99x versus 5.19x for Automatic Data Processing, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Bill Holdings, Inc. has a net margin of 1.24% compared to Workiva, Inc.'s net margin of -0.75%. Workiva, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat Bill Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 0.31%.

Workiva, Inc. has a consensus price target of $106.27, signalling upside risk potential of 18.73%. On the other hand Bill Holdings, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $62.09 which suggests that it could grow by 13.97%. Given that Workiva, Inc. has higher upside potential than Bill Holdings, Inc., analysts believe Workiva, Inc. is more attractive than Bill Holdings, Inc..

Workiva, Inc. has a beta of 0.603, which suggesting that the stock is 39.687% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Bill Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 1.324, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.427%.

Workiva, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Bill Holdings, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Workiva, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Bill Holdings, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Workiva, Inc. quarterly revenues are $224.2M, which are smaller than Bill Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues of $395.7M. Workiva, Inc.'s net income of $2.8M is higher than Bill Holdings, Inc.'s net income of -$3M. Notably, Workiva, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Bill Holdings, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Workiva, Inc. is 5.99x versus 3.74x for Bill Holdings, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Paycom Software, Inc. has a net margin of 1.24% compared to Workiva, Inc.'s net margin of 22.44%. Workiva, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat Paycom Software, Inc.'s return on equity of 27.4%.

Workiva, Inc. has a consensus price target of $106.27, signalling upside risk potential of 18.73%. On the other hand Paycom Software, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $205.71 which suggests that it could grow by 30.88%. Given that Paycom Software, Inc. has higher upside potential than Workiva, Inc., analysts believe Paycom Software, Inc. is more attractive than Workiva, Inc..

Workiva, Inc. has a beta of 0.603, which suggesting that the stock is 39.687% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Paycom Software, Inc. has a beta of 0.820, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.969%.

Workiva, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Paycom Software, Inc. offers a yield of 0.95% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.38 per share. Workiva, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Paycom Software, Inc. pays out 16.82% of its earnings as a dividend. Paycom Software, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Workiva, Inc. quarterly revenues are $224.2M, which are smaller than Paycom Software, Inc. quarterly revenues of $493.3M. Workiva, Inc.'s net income of $2.8M is lower than Paycom Software, Inc.'s net income of $110.7M. Notably, Workiva, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Paycom Software, Inc.'s PE ratio is 19.54x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Workiva, Inc. is 5.99x versus 4.43x for Paycom Software, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Q2 Holdings, Inc. has a net margin of 1.24% compared to Workiva, Inc.'s net margin of 7.46%. Workiva, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat Q2 Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 5.74%.

Workiva, Inc. has a consensus price target of $106.27, signalling upside risk potential of 18.73%. On the other hand Q2 Holdings, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $89.71 which suggests that it could grow by 27.22%. Given that Q2 Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than Workiva, Inc., analysts believe Q2 Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than Workiva, Inc..

Workiva, Inc. has a beta of 0.603, which suggesting that the stock is 39.687% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Q2 Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 1.354, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 35.39%.

Workiva, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Q2 Holdings, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Workiva, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Q2 Holdings, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Workiva, Inc. quarterly revenues are $224.2M, which are larger than Q2 Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues of $201.7M. Workiva, Inc.'s net income of $2.8M is lower than Q2 Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $15M. Notably, Workiva, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Q2 Holdings, Inc.'s PE ratio is 145.61x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Workiva, Inc. is 5.99x versus 6.16x for Q2 Holdings, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.