ALRM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Datadog has a net margin of 12.52% compared to Alarm.com Holdings's net margin of 6.18%. Alarm.com Holdings's return on equity of 16.88% beat Datadog's return on equity of 7.67%.

Alarm.com Holdings has a consensus price target of $70.88, signalling upside risk potential of 37.78%. On the other hand Datadog has an analysts' consensus of $150.95 which suggests that it could grow by 63.11%. Given that Datadog has higher upside potential than Alarm.com Holdings, analysts believe Datadog is more attractive than Alarm.com Holdings.

Alarm.com Holdings has a beta of 1.034, which suggesting that the stock is 3.41% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Datadog has a beta of 1.205, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.516%.

Alarm.com Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Datadog offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Alarm.com Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Datadog pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Alarm.com Holdings quarterly revenues are $242.2M, which are smaller than Datadog quarterly revenues of $737.7M. Alarm.com Holdings's net income of $30.3M is lower than Datadog's net income of $45.6M. Notably, Alarm.com Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.46x while Datadog's PE ratio is 181.47x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Alarm.com Holdings is 3.17x versus 12.35x for Datadog. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Guidewire Software has a net margin of 12.52% compared to Alarm.com Holdings's net margin of -12.88%. Alarm.com Holdings's return on equity of 16.88% beat Guidewire Software's return on equity of -1.31%.

Alarm.com Holdings has a consensus price target of $70.88, signalling upside risk potential of 37.78%. On the other hand Guidewire Software has an analysts' consensus of $210.72 which suggests that it could grow by 8.83%. Given that Alarm.com Holdings has higher upside potential than Guidewire Software, analysts believe Alarm.com Holdings is more attractive than Guidewire Software.

Alarm.com Holdings has a beta of 1.034, which suggesting that the stock is 3.41% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Guidewire Software has a beta of 1.191, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.113%.

Alarm.com Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Guidewire Software offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Alarm.com Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Guidewire Software pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Alarm.com Holdings quarterly revenues are $242.2M, which are smaller than Guidewire Software quarterly revenues of $289.5M. Alarm.com Holdings's net income of $30.3M is higher than Guidewire Software's net income of -$37.3M. Notably, Alarm.com Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.46x while Guidewire Software's PE ratio is 519.39x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Alarm.com Holdings is 3.17x versus 14.95x for Guidewire Software. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Inuvo has a net margin of 12.52% compared to Alarm.com Holdings's net margin of 0.54%. Alarm.com Holdings's return on equity of 16.88% beat Inuvo's return on equity of -40.29%.

Alarm.com Holdings has a consensus price target of $70.88, signalling upside risk potential of 37.78%. On the other hand Inuvo has an analysts' consensus of $1.40 which suggests that it could grow by 258.97%. Given that Inuvo has higher upside potential than Alarm.com Holdings, analysts believe Inuvo is more attractive than Alarm.com Holdings.

Alarm.com Holdings has a beta of 1.034, which suggesting that the stock is 3.41% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Inuvo has a beta of 0.912, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.768%.

Alarm.com Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Inuvo offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Alarm.com Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Inuvo pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Alarm.com Holdings quarterly revenues are $242.2M, which are larger than Inuvo quarterly revenues of $26.2M. Alarm.com Holdings's net income of $30.3M is higher than Inuvo's net income of $141.3K. Notably, Alarm.com Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.46x while Inuvo's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Alarm.com Holdings is 3.17x versus 0.65x for Inuvo. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Manhattan Associates has a net margin of 12.52% compared to Alarm.com Holdings's net margin of 18.77%. Alarm.com Holdings's return on equity of 16.88% beat Manhattan Associates's return on equity of 81.75%.

Alarm.com Holdings has a consensus price target of $70.88, signalling upside risk potential of 37.78%. On the other hand Manhattan Associates has an analysts' consensus of $214.22 which suggests that it could grow by 30.35%. Given that Alarm.com Holdings has higher upside potential than Manhattan Associates, analysts believe Alarm.com Holdings is more attractive than Manhattan Associates.

Alarm.com Holdings has a beta of 1.034, which suggesting that the stock is 3.41% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Manhattan Associates has a beta of 1.359, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 35.862%.

Alarm.com Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Manhattan Associates offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Alarm.com Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Manhattan Associates pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Alarm.com Holdings quarterly revenues are $242.2M, which are smaller than Manhattan Associates quarterly revenues of $255.8M. Alarm.com Holdings's net income of $30.3M is lower than Manhattan Associates's net income of $48M. Notably, Alarm.com Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.46x while Manhattan Associates's PE ratio is 46.82x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Alarm.com Holdings is 3.17x versus 9.80x for Manhattan Associates. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.