PNNT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Golub Capital BDC, Inc. has a net margin of -15.26% compared to PennantPark Investment Corp.'s net margin of 52.21%. PennantPark Investment Corp.'s return on equity of 6.76% beat Golub Capital BDC, Inc.'s return on equity of 9.39%.

PennantPark Investment Corp. has a consensus price target of $6.15, signalling upside risk potential of 4.77%. On the other hand Golub Capital BDC, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $15.00 which suggests that it could grow by 11.77%. Given that Golub Capital BDC, Inc. has higher upside potential than PennantPark Investment Corp., analysts believe Golub Capital BDC, Inc. is more attractive than PennantPark Investment Corp..

PennantPark Investment Corp. has a beta of 0.620, which suggesting that the stock is 38.04% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Golub Capital BDC, Inc. has a beta of 0.436, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 56.439%.

PennantPark Investment Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 16.35%. Golub Capital BDC, Inc. offers a yield of 11.62% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.39 per share. PennantPark Investment Corp. pays 191.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Golub Capital BDC, Inc. pays out 113.7% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

PennantPark Investment Corp. quarterly revenues are $6.3M, which are smaller than Golub Capital BDC, Inc. quarterly revenues of $184.4M. PennantPark Investment Corp.'s net income of -$964K is lower than Golub Capital BDC, Inc.'s net income of $96.3M. Notably, PennantPark Investment Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 11.71x while Golub Capital BDC, Inc.'s PE ratio is 9.47x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PennantPark Investment Corp. is 5.48x versus 4.45x for Golub Capital BDC, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp. has a net margin of -15.26% compared to PennantPark Investment Corp.'s net margin of 29.17%. PennantPark Investment Corp.'s return on equity of 6.76% beat Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp.'s return on equity of 2.31%.

PennantPark Investment Corp. has a consensus price target of $6.15, signalling upside risk potential of 4.77%. On the other hand Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $13.71 which suggests that it could grow by 7.94%. Given that Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp. has higher upside potential than PennantPark Investment Corp., analysts believe Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp. is more attractive than PennantPark Investment Corp..

PennantPark Investment Corp. has a beta of 0.620, which suggesting that the stock is 38.04% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp. has a beta of 0.507, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 49.325%.

PennantPark Investment Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 16.35%. Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp. offers a yield of 12.6% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. PennantPark Investment Corp. pays 191.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp. pays out 444.05% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

PennantPark Investment Corp. quarterly revenues are $6.3M, which are smaller than Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp. quarterly revenues of $84.3M. PennantPark Investment Corp.'s net income of -$964K is lower than Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp.'s net income of $24.6M. Notably, PennantPark Investment Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 11.71x while Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp.'s PE ratio is 33.38x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PennantPark Investment Corp. is 5.48x versus 3.65x for Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. has a net margin of -15.26% compared to PennantPark Investment Corp.'s net margin of 32.04%. PennantPark Investment Corp.'s return on equity of 6.76% beat PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd.'s return on equity of 6.55%.

PennantPark Investment Corp. has a consensus price target of $6.15, signalling upside risk potential of 4.77%. On the other hand PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $10.79 which suggests that it could grow by 19.31%. Given that PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. has higher upside potential than PennantPark Investment Corp., analysts believe PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. is more attractive than PennantPark Investment Corp..

PennantPark Investment Corp. has a beta of 0.620, which suggesting that the stock is 38.04% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. has a beta of 0.751, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.852%.

PennantPark Investment Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 16.35%. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. offers a yield of 13.61% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. PennantPark Investment Corp. pays 191.54% of its earnings as a dividend. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. pays out 171.52% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

PennantPark Investment Corp. quarterly revenues are $6.3M, which are smaller than PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. quarterly revenues of $54.7M. PennantPark Investment Corp.'s net income of -$964K is lower than PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd.'s net income of $17.5M. Notably, PennantPark Investment Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 11.71x while PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd.'s PE ratio is 12.36x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PennantPark Investment Corp. is 5.48x versus 3.28x for PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sixth Street Specialty Lending, Inc. has a net margin of -15.26% compared to PennantPark Investment Corp.'s net margin of 42.22%. PennantPark Investment Corp.'s return on equity of 6.76% beat Sixth Street Specialty Lending, Inc.'s return on equity of 11.91%.

PennantPark Investment Corp. has a consensus price target of $6.15, signalling upside risk potential of 4.77%. On the other hand Sixth Street Specialty Lending, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $23.75 which suggests that it could grow by 10.57%. Given that Sixth Street Specialty Lending, Inc. has higher upside potential than PennantPark Investment Corp., analysts believe Sixth Street Specialty Lending, Inc. is more attractive than PennantPark Investment Corp..

PennantPark Investment Corp. has a beta of 0.620, which suggesting that the stock is 38.04% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sixth Street Specialty Lending, Inc. has a beta of 0.701, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.906%.

PennantPark Investment Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 16.35%. Sixth Street Specialty Lending, Inc. offers a yield of 8.57% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.46 per share. PennantPark Investment Corp. pays 191.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Sixth Street Specialty Lending, Inc. pays out 90.77% of its earnings as a dividend. Sixth Street Specialty Lending, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but PennantPark Investment Corp.'s is not.

PennantPark Investment Corp. quarterly revenues are $6.3M, which are smaller than Sixth Street Specialty Lending, Inc. quarterly revenues of $105.6M. PennantPark Investment Corp.'s net income of -$964K is lower than Sixth Street Specialty Lending, Inc.'s net income of $44.6M. Notably, PennantPark Investment Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 11.71x while Sixth Street Specialty Lending, Inc.'s PE ratio is 10.53x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PennantPark Investment Corp. is 5.48x versus 4.85x for Sixth Street Specialty Lending, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.