PNNT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Gladstone Investment has a net margin of 89.79% compared to Pennant Park Investment's net margin of 99.99%. Pennant Park Investment's return on equity of 9.82% beat Gladstone Investment's return on equity of 8.06%.

Pennant Park Investment has a consensus price target of $6.90, signalling downside risk potential of -3.36%. On the other hand Gladstone Investment has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 1.5%. Given that Gladstone Investment has higher upside potential than Pennant Park Investment, analysts believe Gladstone Investment is more attractive than Pennant Park Investment.

Pennant Park Investment has a beta of 1.471, which suggesting that the stock is 47.102% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gladstone Investment has a beta of 1.306, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.622%.

Pennant Park Investment has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 12.75%. Gladstone Investment offers a yield of 7.22% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. Pennant Park Investment pays 134.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Gladstone Investment pays out 89.16% of its earnings as a dividend. Gladstone Investment's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Pennant Park Investment's is not.

Pennant Park Investment quarterly revenues are $20.5M, which are larger than Gladstone Investment quarterly revenues of $15.5M. Pennant Park Investment's net income of $18.4M is higher than Gladstone Investment's net income of $15.5M. Notably, Pennant Park Investment's price-to-earnings ratio is 42.00x while Gladstone Investment's PE ratio is 12.67x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pennant Park Investment is 7.96x versus 13.36x for Gladstone Investment. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MidCap Financial Investment has a net margin of 89.79% compared to Pennant Park Investment's net margin of 89.54%. Pennant Park Investment's return on equity of 9.82% beat MidCap Financial Investment's return on equity of 9.95%.

Pennant Park Investment has a consensus price target of $6.90, signalling downside risk potential of -3.36%. On the other hand MidCap Financial Investment has an analysts' consensus of $14.91 which suggests that it could grow by 9.36%. Given that MidCap Financial Investment has higher upside potential than Pennant Park Investment, analysts believe MidCap Financial Investment is more attractive than Pennant Park Investment.

Pennant Park Investment has a beta of 1.471, which suggesting that the stock is 47.102% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MidCap Financial Investment has a beta of 1.490, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 48.968%.

Pennant Park Investment has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 12.75%. MidCap Financial Investment offers a yield of 11.15% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.38 per share. Pennant Park Investment pays 134.91% of its earnings as a dividend. MidCap Financial Investment pays out 103.97% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Pennant Park Investment quarterly revenues are $20.5M, which are smaller than MidCap Financial Investment quarterly revenues of $29.8M. Pennant Park Investment's net income of $18.4M is lower than MidCap Financial Investment's net income of $26.7M. Notably, Pennant Park Investment's price-to-earnings ratio is 42.00x while MidCap Financial Investment's PE ratio is 8.74x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pennant Park Investment is 7.96x versus 7.33x for MidCap Financial Investment. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Oaktree Specialty Lending has a net margin of 89.79% compared to Pennant Park Investment's net margin of -121.48%. Pennant Park Investment's return on equity of 9.82% beat Oaktree Specialty Lending's return on equity of 3.84%.

Pennant Park Investment has a consensus price target of $6.90, signalling downside risk potential of -3.36%. On the other hand Oaktree Specialty Lending has an analysts' consensus of $17.70 which suggests that it could grow by 10.42%. Given that Oaktree Specialty Lending has higher upside potential than Pennant Park Investment, analysts believe Oaktree Specialty Lending is more attractive than Pennant Park Investment.

Pennant Park Investment has a beta of 1.471, which suggesting that the stock is 47.102% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Oaktree Specialty Lending has a beta of 1.076, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.634%.

Pennant Park Investment has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 12.75%. Oaktree Specialty Lending offers a yield of 14.36% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.55 per share. Pennant Park Investment pays 134.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Oaktree Specialty Lending pays out 305.35% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Pennant Park Investment quarterly revenues are $20.5M, which are smaller than Oaktree Specialty Lending quarterly revenues of $36.5M. Pennant Park Investment's net income of $18.4M is lower than Oaktree Specialty Lending's net income of $36.9M. Notably, Pennant Park Investment's price-to-earnings ratio is 42.00x while Oaktree Specialty Lending's PE ratio is 21.28x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pennant Park Investment is 7.96x versus 21.39x for Oaktree Specialty Lending. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital has a net margin of 89.79% compared to Pennant Park Investment's net margin of 65.88%. Pennant Park Investment's return on equity of 9.82% beat PennantPark Floating Rate Capital's return on equity of 12.32%.

Pennant Park Investment has a consensus price target of $6.90, signalling downside risk potential of -3.36%. On the other hand PennantPark Floating Rate Capital has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 5.2%. Given that PennantPark Floating Rate Capital has higher upside potential than Pennant Park Investment, analysts believe PennantPark Floating Rate Capital is more attractive than Pennant Park Investment.

Pennant Park Investment has a beta of 1.471, which suggesting that the stock is 47.102% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PennantPark Floating Rate Capital has a beta of 1.661, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 66.103%.

Pennant Park Investment has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 12.75%. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital offers a yield of 11.09% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. Pennant Park Investment pays 134.91% of its earnings as a dividend. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital pays out 85.82% of its earnings as a dividend. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Pennant Park Investment's is not.

Pennant Park Investment quarterly revenues are $20.5M, which are smaller than PennantPark Floating Rate Capital quarterly revenues of $32.4M. Pennant Park Investment's net income of $18.4M is lower than PennantPark Floating Rate Capital's net income of $21.3M. Notably, Pennant Park Investment's price-to-earnings ratio is 42.00x while PennantPark Floating Rate Capital's PE ratio is 7.76x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pennant Park Investment is 7.96x versus 6.71x for PennantPark Floating Rate Capital. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.