Is Celestica The Best AI Stock to Buy Now?
Technology and hardware business Celestica (NYSE:CLS) has seen massive upward…
Sell
15
PNNT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$4.99
Seasonality move
:
0.7%
Day range:
$5.06 - $5.16
52-week range:
$4.84 - $7.53
Dividend yield:
18.82%
P/E ratio:
13.01x
P/S ratio:
2.67x
P/B ratio:
0.73x
Volume:
503.9K
Avg. volume:
782.4K
1-year change:
-28.67%
Market cap:
$333M
Revenue:
$69.9M
EPS (TTM):
$0.39
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PNNT
PennantPark Investment Corp.
|
$28.5M | $0.16 | 826.33% | 3.07% | $5.50 |
|
AMG
Affiliated Managers Group, Inc.
|
$578.5M | $8.84 | 9.68% | 269.72% | $393.29 |
|
CFNB
California First Leasing Corp.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CNS
Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York)
|
$143.2M | $0.81 | 3.71% | 0.83% | $72.00 |
|
DHIL
Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PFLT
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd.
|
$70.3M | $0.30 | 17.69% | 1958.82% | $10.29 |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PNNT
PennantPark Investment Corp.
|
$5.10 | $5.50 | $333M | 13.01x | $0.08 | 18.82% | 2.67x |
|
AMG
Affiliated Managers Group, Inc.
|
$312.94 | $393.29 | $8.4B | 13.66x | $0.01 | 0.01% | 4.32x |
|
CFNB
California First Leasing Corp.
|
$28.33 | -- | $254.3M | 12.85x | $0.40 | 0% | 25.73x |
|
CNS
Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York)
|
$67.14 | $72.00 | $3.4B | 22.54x | $0.62 | 3.69% | 6.23x |
|
DHIL
Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.
|
$171.36 | -- | $463.6M | 9.94x | $5.50 | 3.5% | 2.97x |
|
PFLT
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd.
|
$8.45 | $10.29 | $838.4M | 24.25x | $0.10 | 14.56% | 3.51x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PNNT
PennantPark Investment Corp.
|
57.13% | 0.455 | 157.91% | 0.20x |
|
AMG
Affiliated Managers Group, Inc.
|
45.6% | 1.078 | 30.27% | 0.73x |
|
CFNB
California First Leasing Corp.
|
-- | 0.783 | -- | 32.32x |
|
CNS
Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York)
|
-- | 0.465 | -- | 1.23x |
|
DHIL
Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.
|
3.47% | 0.425 | 1.7% | 1.51x |
|
PFLT
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd.
|
61.07% | 0.055 | 178.55% | 2.25x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PNNT
PennantPark Investment Corp.
|
$78M | $20.1M | 2.22% | 5.37% | 23.32% | $61.3M |
|
AMG
Affiliated Managers Group, Inc.
|
$734.7M | $309.5M | 12.73% | 20.05% | 38.62% | $265.4M |
|
CFNB
California First Leasing Corp.
|
-- | -- | 13.72% | 13.72% | -- | -- |
|
CNS
Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York)
|
$113.4M | $38.1M | 22.73% | 27.14% | 26.89% | $74.5M |
|
DHIL
Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.
|
$40.1M | $16.8M | 26.2% | 27.16% | 40.62% | $21.7M |
|
PFLT
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd.
|
$57.2M | $23.6M | 1.35% | 3.29% | 32.95% | $8.2M |
PennantPark Investment Corp. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns PNNT or AMG?
Affiliated Managers Group, Inc. has a net margin of 10.38% compared to PennantPark Investment Corp.'s net margin of 47.18%. PennantPark Investment Corp.'s return on equity of 5.37% beat Affiliated Managers Group, Inc.'s return on equity of 20.05%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital PNNTPennantPark Investment Corp.90.44% $0.14 $1.1B AMGAffiliated Managers Group, Inc.91.68% $11.03 $7.1B -
What do Analysts Say About PNNT or AMG?
PennantPark Investment Corp. has a consensus price target of $5.50, signalling upside risk potential of 7.84%. On the other hand Affiliated Managers Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $393.29 which suggests that it could grow by 25.68%. Given that Affiliated Managers Group, Inc. has higher upside potential than PennantPark Investment Corp., analysts believe Affiliated Managers Group, Inc. is more attractive than PennantPark Investment Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings PNNTPennantPark Investment Corp.1 6 0 AMGAffiliated Managers Group, Inc.5 1 0 -
Is PNNT or AMG More Risky?
PennantPark Investment Corp. has a beta of 0.641, which suggesting that the stock is 35.892% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Affiliated Managers Group, Inc. has a beta of 1.208, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.806%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock PNNT or AMG?
PennantPark Investment Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 18.82%. Affiliated Managers Group, Inc. offers a yield of 0.01% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. PennantPark Investment Corp. pays 191.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Affiliated Managers Group, Inc. pays out 0.18% of its earnings as a dividend. Affiliated Managers Group, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but PennantPark Investment Corp.'s is not.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios PNNT or AMG?
PennantPark Investment Corp. quarterly revenues are $86.3M, which are smaller than Affiliated Managers Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of $801.4M. PennantPark Investment Corp.'s net income of $9M is lower than Affiliated Managers Group, Inc.'s net income of $378.1M. Notably, PennantPark Investment Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 13.01x while Affiliated Managers Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is 13.66x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PennantPark Investment Corp. is 2.67x versus 4.32x for Affiliated Managers Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income PNNTPennantPark Investment Corp.2.67x 13.01x $86.3M $9M AMGAffiliated Managers Group, Inc.4.32x 13.66x $801.4M $378.1M
-
Which has Higher Returns PNNT or CFNB?
California First Leasing Corp. has a net margin of 10.38% compared to PennantPark Investment Corp.'s net margin of --. PennantPark Investment Corp.'s return on equity of 5.37% beat California First Leasing Corp.'s return on equity of 13.72%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital PNNTPennantPark Investment Corp.90.44% $0.14 $1.1B CFNBCalifornia First Leasing Corp.-- -- $252.5M -
What do Analysts Say About PNNT or CFNB?
PennantPark Investment Corp. has a consensus price target of $5.50, signalling upside risk potential of 7.84%. On the other hand California First Leasing Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that PennantPark Investment Corp. has higher upside potential than California First Leasing Corp., analysts believe PennantPark Investment Corp. is more attractive than California First Leasing Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings PNNTPennantPark Investment Corp.1 6 0 CFNBCalifornia First Leasing Corp.0 0 0 -
Is PNNT or CFNB More Risky?
PennantPark Investment Corp. has a beta of 0.641, which suggesting that the stock is 35.892% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison California First Leasing Corp. has a beta of 0.161, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 83.913%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock PNNT or CFNB?
PennantPark Investment Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 18.82%. California First Leasing Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. PennantPark Investment Corp. pays 191.54% of its earnings as a dividend. California First Leasing Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios PNNT or CFNB?
PennantPark Investment Corp. quarterly revenues are $86.3M, which are larger than California First Leasing Corp. quarterly revenues of --. PennantPark Investment Corp.'s net income of $9M is higher than California First Leasing Corp.'s net income of --. Notably, PennantPark Investment Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 13.01x while California First Leasing Corp.'s PE ratio is 12.85x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PennantPark Investment Corp. is 2.67x versus 25.73x for California First Leasing Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income PNNTPennantPark Investment Corp.2.67x 13.01x $86.3M $9M CFNBCalifornia First Leasing Corp.25.73x 12.85x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns PNNT or CNS?
Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York) has a net margin of 10.38% compared to PennantPark Investment Corp.'s net margin of 21.69%. PennantPark Investment Corp.'s return on equity of 5.37% beat Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York)'s return on equity of 27.14%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital PNNTPennantPark Investment Corp.90.44% $0.14 $1.1B CNSCohen & Steers, Inc. (New York)80.08% $0.68 $562M -
What do Analysts Say About PNNT or CNS?
PennantPark Investment Corp. has a consensus price target of $5.50, signalling upside risk potential of 7.84%. On the other hand Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York) has an analysts' consensus of $72.00 which suggests that it could grow by 7.24%. Given that PennantPark Investment Corp. has higher upside potential than Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York), analysts believe PennantPark Investment Corp. is more attractive than Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York).
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings PNNTPennantPark Investment Corp.1 6 0 CNSCohen & Steers, Inc. (New York)1 1 0 -
Is PNNT or CNS More Risky?
PennantPark Investment Corp. has a beta of 0.641, which suggesting that the stock is 35.892% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York) has a beta of 1.269, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.929%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock PNNT or CNS?
PennantPark Investment Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 18.82%. Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York) offers a yield of 3.69% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.62 per share. PennantPark Investment Corp. pays 191.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York) pays out 83.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York)'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but PennantPark Investment Corp.'s is not.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios PNNT or CNS?
PennantPark Investment Corp. quarterly revenues are $86.3M, which are smaller than Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York) quarterly revenues of $141.6M. PennantPark Investment Corp.'s net income of $9M is lower than Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York)'s net income of $30.7M. Notably, PennantPark Investment Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 13.01x while Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York)'s PE ratio is 22.54x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PennantPark Investment Corp. is 2.67x versus 6.23x for Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York). Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income PNNTPennantPark Investment Corp.2.67x 13.01x $86.3M $9M CNSCohen & Steers, Inc. (New York)6.23x 22.54x $141.6M $30.7M
-
Which has Higher Returns PNNT or DHIL?
Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc. has a net margin of 10.38% compared to PennantPark Investment Corp.'s net margin of 32.75%. PennantPark Investment Corp.'s return on equity of 5.37% beat Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.'s return on equity of 27.16%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital PNNTPennantPark Investment Corp.90.44% $0.14 $1.1B DHILDiamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.96.73% $4.99 $187.5M -
What do Analysts Say About PNNT or DHIL?
PennantPark Investment Corp. has a consensus price target of $5.50, signalling upside risk potential of 7.84%. On the other hand Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that PennantPark Investment Corp. has higher upside potential than Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc., analysts believe PennantPark Investment Corp. is more attractive than Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings PNNTPennantPark Investment Corp.1 6 0 DHILDiamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is PNNT or DHIL More Risky?
PennantPark Investment Corp. has a beta of 0.641, which suggesting that the stock is 35.892% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc. has a beta of 0.779, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.143%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock PNNT or DHIL?
PennantPark Investment Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 18.82%. Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc. offers a yield of 3.5% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $5.50 per share. PennantPark Investment Corp. pays 191.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc. pays out 38.32% of its earnings as a dividend. Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but PennantPark Investment Corp.'s is not.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios PNNT or DHIL?
PennantPark Investment Corp. quarterly revenues are $86.3M, which are larger than Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of $41.4M. PennantPark Investment Corp.'s net income of $9M is lower than Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.'s net income of $13.6M. Notably, PennantPark Investment Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 13.01x while Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is 9.94x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PennantPark Investment Corp. is 2.67x versus 2.97x for Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income PNNTPennantPark Investment Corp.2.67x 13.01x $86.3M $9M DHILDiamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.2.97x 9.94x $41.4M $13.6M
-
Which has Higher Returns PNNT or PFLT?
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. has a net margin of 10.38% compared to PennantPark Investment Corp.'s net margin of -5%. PennantPark Investment Corp.'s return on equity of 5.37% beat PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd.'s return on equity of 3.29%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital PNNTPennantPark Investment Corp.90.44% $0.14 $1.1B PFLTPennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd.79.91% -$0.04 $2.7B -
What do Analysts Say About PNNT or PFLT?
PennantPark Investment Corp. has a consensus price target of $5.50, signalling upside risk potential of 7.84%. On the other hand PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $10.29 which suggests that it could grow by 21.72%. Given that PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. has higher upside potential than PennantPark Investment Corp., analysts believe PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. is more attractive than PennantPark Investment Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings PNNTPennantPark Investment Corp.1 6 0 PFLTPennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd.2 3 0 -
Is PNNT or PFLT More Risky?
PennantPark Investment Corp. has a beta of 0.641, which suggesting that the stock is 35.892% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. has a beta of 0.762, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.825%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock PNNT or PFLT?
PennantPark Investment Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 18.82%. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. offers a yield of 14.56% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. PennantPark Investment Corp. pays 191.54% of its earnings as a dividend. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. pays out 171.52% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios PNNT or PFLT?
PennantPark Investment Corp. quarterly revenues are $86.3M, which are larger than PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. quarterly revenues of $71.5M. PennantPark Investment Corp.'s net income of $9M is higher than PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd.'s net income of -$3.6M. Notably, PennantPark Investment Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 13.01x while PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd.'s PE ratio is 24.25x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PennantPark Investment Corp. is 2.67x versus 3.51x for PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income PNNTPennantPark Investment Corp.2.67x 13.01x $86.3M $9M PFLTPennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd.3.51x 24.25x $71.5M -$3.6M
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will AI Disrupt SaaS Software Stocks?
Since January 28th, software stocks in the United States have…
Why Is Meta Stock Going Higher?
Over the last five days, shares of Instagram and Facebook…
Stock Ideas
Sell
50
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.5T
P/E Ratio: 38x
Buy
55
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Sell
37
Is GOOGL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.7T
P/E Ratio: 28x
Alerts
Buy
59
SEZL alert for Feb 27
Sezzle, Inc. [SEZL] is down 13.92% over the past day.
Buy
83
GCT alert for Feb 27
GigaCloud Technology, Inc. [GCT] is down 5.87% over the past day.
Buy
62
LMAT alert for Feb 27
LeMaitre Vascular, Inc. [LMAT] is down 4.76% over the past day.
