Why Did Stan Druckenmiller Sell Broadcom Stock?
In Q3, legendary macro investor Stan Druckenmiller sold his entire…
Buy
54
PFLT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$9.27
Seasonality move
:
-0.99%
Day range:
$9.10 - $9.28
52-week range:
$8.40 - $11.50
Dividend yield:
13.33%
P/E ratio:
12.62x
P/S ratio:
3.34x
P/B ratio:
0.85x
Volume:
1.2M
Avg. volume:
953.9K
1-year change:
-15.01%
Market cap:
$915.8M
Revenue:
$255.4M
EPS (TTM):
$0.73
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PFLT
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd.
|
$70.5M | $0.30 | -24.71% | -14.2% | $10.79 |
|
DHIL
Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MFIC
MidCap Financial Investment
|
$78.9M | $0.37 | 178.26% | 43.63% | $12.91 |
|
OCSL
Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp.
|
$75.7M | $0.38 | 9.21% | 329.34% | $13.71 |
|
PNNT
PennantPark Investment Corp.
|
$29.3M | $0.17 | -7.36% | -32.93% | $6.15 |
|
TPG
TPG, Inc.
|
$548.8M | $0.70 | -49.04% | 1203.48% | $68.46 |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PFLT
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd.
|
$9.23 | $10.79 | $915.8M | 12.62x | $0.10 | 13.33% | 3.34x |
|
DHIL
Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.
|
$169.51 | -- | $458.6M | 9.83x | $5.50 | 3.54% | 2.94x |
|
MFIC
MidCap Financial Investment
|
$11.46 | $12.91 | $1.1B | 10.72x | $0.38 | 13.26% | 4.51x |
|
OCSL
Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp.
|
$12.84 | $13.71 | $1.1B | 33.75x | $0.40 | 12.46% | 3.69x |
|
PNNT
PennantPark Investment Corp.
|
$5.94 | $6.15 | $387.9M | 11.85x | $0.08 | 16.16% | 5.55x |
|
TPG
TPG, Inc.
|
$64.32 | $68.46 | $9.8B | 671.40x | $0.45 | 3.08% | 5.60x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PFLT
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd.
|
62.32% | 0.139 | 202.59% | 2.03x |
|
DHIL
Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.
|
3.47% | 0.951 | 1.7% | 1.51x |
|
MFIC
MidCap Financial Investment
|
58.33% | 0.796 | 171.19% | 0.44x |
|
OCSL
Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp.
|
50.36% | 0.292 | 129.35% | 0.57x |
|
PNNT
PennantPark Investment Corp.
|
61.43% | 0.245 | 168.64% | 0.35x |
|
TPG
TPG, Inc.
|
67.73% | 1.941 | 21.03% | 0.91x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PFLT
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd.
|
$40.3M | $43.3M | 2.74% | 6.55% | 79.22% | $42.2M |
|
DHIL
Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.
|
$40.1M | $16.8M | 26.2% | 27.16% | 40.62% | $21.7M |
|
MFIC
MidCap Financial Investment
|
$50.9M | $59.8M | 3.05% | 7.18% | 94.06% | $29.2M |
|
OCSL
Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp.
|
$71.1M | $50.9M | 1.13% | 2.31% | 60.38% | $47.8M |
|
PNNT
PennantPark Investment Corp.
|
-$222K | $9.8M | 2.75% | 6.76% | 154.57% | $17.3M |
|
TPG
TPG, Inc.
|
$1.2B | $224.9M | 5.01% | 7.72% | 18.36% | $29.7M |
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns PFLT or DHIL?
Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc. has a net margin of 32.04% compared to PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd.'s net margin of 32.75%. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd.'s return on equity of 6.55% beat Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.'s return on equity of 27.16%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital PFLTPennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd.73.78% $0.18 $2.9B DHILDiamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.96.73% $4.99 $187.5M -
What do Analysts Say About PFLT or DHIL?
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. has a consensus price target of $10.79, signalling upside risk potential of 16.86%. On the other hand Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. has higher upside potential than Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc., analysts believe PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. is more attractive than Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings PFLTPennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd.2 3 0 DHILDiamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is PFLT or DHIL More Risky?
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. has a beta of 0.751, which suggesting that the stock is 24.852% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc. has a beta of 0.839, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.053%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock PFLT or DHIL?
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 13.33%. Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc. offers a yield of 3.54% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $5.50 per share. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. pays 171.52% of its earnings as a dividend. Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc. pays out 38.32% of its earnings as a dividend. Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd.'s is not.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios PFLT or DHIL?
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. quarterly revenues are $54.7M, which are larger than Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of $41.4M. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd.'s net income of $17.5M is higher than Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.'s net income of $13.6M. Notably, PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 12.62x while Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is 9.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. is 3.34x versus 2.94x for Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income PFLTPennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd.3.34x 12.62x $54.7M $17.5M DHILDiamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.2.94x 9.83x $41.4M $13.6M
-
Which has Higher Returns PFLT or MFIC?
MidCap Financial Investment has a net margin of 32.04% compared to PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd.'s net margin of 43.19%. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd.'s return on equity of 6.55% beat MidCap Financial Investment's return on equity of 7.18%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital PFLTPennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd.73.78% $0.18 $2.9B MFICMidCap Financial Investment80.13% $0.29 $3.3B -
What do Analysts Say About PFLT or MFIC?
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. has a consensus price target of $10.79, signalling upside risk potential of 16.86%. On the other hand MidCap Financial Investment has an analysts' consensus of $12.91 which suggests that it could grow by 12.62%. Given that PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. has higher upside potential than MidCap Financial Investment, analysts believe PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. is more attractive than MidCap Financial Investment.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings PFLTPennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd.2 3 0 MFICMidCap Financial Investment2 4 0 -
Is PFLT or MFIC More Risky?
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. has a beta of 0.751, which suggesting that the stock is 24.852% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MidCap Financial Investment has a beta of 0.737, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.339%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock PFLT or MFIC?
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 13.33%. MidCap Financial Investment offers a yield of 13.26% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.38 per share. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. pays 171.52% of its earnings as a dividend. MidCap Financial Investment pays out 119.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios PFLT or MFIC?
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. quarterly revenues are $54.7M, which are smaller than MidCap Financial Investment quarterly revenues of $63.6M. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd.'s net income of $17.5M is lower than MidCap Financial Investment's net income of $27.5M. Notably, PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 12.62x while MidCap Financial Investment's PE ratio is 10.72x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. is 3.34x versus 4.51x for MidCap Financial Investment. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income PFLTPennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd.3.34x 12.62x $54.7M $17.5M MFICMidCap Financial Investment4.51x 10.72x $63.6M $27.5M
-
Which has Higher Returns PFLT or OCSL?
Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp. has a net margin of 32.04% compared to PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd.'s net margin of 29.17%. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd.'s return on equity of 6.55% beat Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp.'s return on equity of 2.31%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital PFLTPennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd.73.78% $0.18 $2.9B OCSLOaktree Specialty Lending Corp.84.43% $0.28 $3B -
What do Analysts Say About PFLT or OCSL?
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. has a consensus price target of $10.79, signalling upside risk potential of 16.86%. On the other hand Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $13.71 which suggests that it could grow by 6.76%. Given that PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. has higher upside potential than Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp., analysts believe PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. is more attractive than Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings PFLTPennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd.2 3 0 OCSLOaktree Specialty Lending Corp.0 7 0 -
Is PFLT or OCSL More Risky?
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. has a beta of 0.751, which suggesting that the stock is 24.852% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp. has a beta of 0.507, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 49.325%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock PFLT or OCSL?
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 13.33%. Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp. offers a yield of 12.46% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. pays 171.52% of its earnings as a dividend. Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp. pays out 444.05% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios PFLT or OCSL?
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. quarterly revenues are $54.7M, which are smaller than Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp. quarterly revenues of $84.3M. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd.'s net income of $17.5M is lower than Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp.'s net income of $24.6M. Notably, PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 12.62x while Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp.'s PE ratio is 33.75x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. is 3.34x versus 3.69x for Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income PFLTPennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd.3.34x 12.62x $54.7M $17.5M OCSLOaktree Specialty Lending Corp.3.69x 33.75x $84.3M $24.6M
-
Which has Higher Returns PFLT or PNNT?
PennantPark Investment Corp. has a net margin of 32.04% compared to PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd.'s net margin of -15.26%. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd.'s return on equity of 6.55% beat PennantPark Investment Corp.'s return on equity of 6.76%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital PFLTPennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd.73.78% $0.18 $2.9B PNNTPennantPark Investment Corp.-3.51% -$0.01 $1.2B -
What do Analysts Say About PFLT or PNNT?
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. has a consensus price target of $10.79, signalling upside risk potential of 16.86%. On the other hand PennantPark Investment Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $6.15 which suggests that it could grow by 3.54%. Given that PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. has higher upside potential than PennantPark Investment Corp., analysts believe PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. is more attractive than PennantPark Investment Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings PFLTPennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd.2 3 0 PNNTPennantPark Investment Corp.1 6 0 -
Is PFLT or PNNT More Risky?
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. has a beta of 0.751, which suggesting that the stock is 24.852% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PennantPark Investment Corp. has a beta of 0.620, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 38.04%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock PFLT or PNNT?
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 13.33%. PennantPark Investment Corp. offers a yield of 16.16% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. pays 171.52% of its earnings as a dividend. PennantPark Investment Corp. pays out 191.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios PFLT or PNNT?
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. quarterly revenues are $54.7M, which are larger than PennantPark Investment Corp. quarterly revenues of $6.3M. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd.'s net income of $17.5M is higher than PennantPark Investment Corp.'s net income of -$964K. Notably, PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 12.62x while PennantPark Investment Corp.'s PE ratio is 11.85x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. is 3.34x versus 5.55x for PennantPark Investment Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income PFLTPennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd.3.34x 12.62x $54.7M $17.5M PNNTPennantPark Investment Corp.5.55x 11.85x $6.3M -$964K
-
Which has Higher Returns PFLT or TPG?
TPG, Inc. has a net margin of 32.04% compared to PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd.'s net margin of 14.81%. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd.'s return on equity of 6.55% beat TPG, Inc.'s return on equity of 7.72%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital PFLTPennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd.73.78% $0.18 $2.9B TPGTPG, Inc.96.65% $0.20 $6.2B -
What do Analysts Say About PFLT or TPG?
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. has a consensus price target of $10.79, signalling upside risk potential of 16.86%. On the other hand TPG, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $68.46 which suggests that it could grow by 6.44%. Given that PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. has higher upside potential than TPG, Inc., analysts believe PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. is more attractive than TPG, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings PFLTPennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd.2 3 0 TPGTPG, Inc.6 6 0 -
Is PFLT or TPG More Risky?
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. has a beta of 0.751, which suggesting that the stock is 24.852% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison TPG, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock PFLT or TPG?
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 13.33%. TPG, Inc. offers a yield of 3.08% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. pays 171.52% of its earnings as a dividend. TPG, Inc. pays out 826.66% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios PFLT or TPG?
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. quarterly revenues are $54.7M, which are smaller than TPG, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.2B. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd.'s net income of $17.5M is lower than TPG, Inc.'s net income of $181.4M. Notably, PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 12.62x while TPG, Inc.'s PE ratio is 671.40x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. is 3.34x versus 5.60x for TPG, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income PFLTPennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd.3.34x 12.62x $54.7M $17.5M TPGTPG, Inc.5.60x 671.40x $1.2B $181.4M
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Why Is CoreWeave Stock Down So Much?
AI cloud computing business CoreWeave (NASDAQ:CRWV) has been through a…
Why Did Stan Druckenmiller Buy MercadoLibre Stock?
In Q3, billionaire Stan Druckenmiller bought about 4,620 shares of…
Stock Ideas
Buy
56
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.6T
P/E Ratio: 64x
Buy
55
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
61
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 39x
Alerts
Buy
80
FTAI alert for Dec 31
FTAI Aviation Ltd. [FTAI] is down 0.38% over the past day.
Sell
45
LYEL alert for Dec 31
Lyell Immunopharma, Inc. [LYEL] is down 2.63% over the past day.
Sell
36
CORT alert for Dec 31
Corcept Therapeutics, Inc. [CORT] is down 50.44% over the past day.
