PFLT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Gladstone Investment has a net margin of 65.88% compared to PennantPark Floating Rate Capital's net margin of 99.99%. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital's return on equity of 12.32% beat Gladstone Investment's return on equity of 8.06%.

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 5.2%. On the other hand Gladstone Investment has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 1.5%. Given that PennantPark Floating Rate Capital has higher upside potential than Gladstone Investment, analysts believe PennantPark Floating Rate Capital is more attractive than Gladstone Investment.

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital has a beta of 1.661, which suggesting that the stock is 66.103% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gladstone Investment has a beta of 1.306, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.622%.

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 11.09%. Gladstone Investment offers a yield of 7.22% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital pays 85.82% of its earnings as a dividend. Gladstone Investment pays out 89.16% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital quarterly revenues are $32.4M, which are larger than Gladstone Investment quarterly revenues of $15.5M. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital's net income of $21.3M is higher than Gladstone Investment's net income of $15.5M. Notably, PennantPark Floating Rate Capital's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.76x while Gladstone Investment's PE ratio is 12.67x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PennantPark Floating Rate Capital is 6.71x versus 13.36x for Gladstone Investment. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MidCap Financial Investment has a net margin of 65.88% compared to PennantPark Floating Rate Capital's net margin of 89.54%. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital's return on equity of 12.32% beat MidCap Financial Investment's return on equity of 9.95%.

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 5.2%. On the other hand MidCap Financial Investment has an analysts' consensus of $14.91 which suggests that it could grow by 9.36%. Given that MidCap Financial Investment has higher upside potential than PennantPark Floating Rate Capital, analysts believe MidCap Financial Investment is more attractive than PennantPark Floating Rate Capital.

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital has a beta of 1.661, which suggesting that the stock is 66.103% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MidCap Financial Investment has a beta of 1.490, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 48.968%.

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 11.09%. MidCap Financial Investment offers a yield of 11.15% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.38 per share. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital pays 85.82% of its earnings as a dividend. MidCap Financial Investment pays out 103.97% of its earnings as a dividend. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but MidCap Financial Investment's is not.

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital quarterly revenues are $32.4M, which are larger than MidCap Financial Investment quarterly revenues of $29.8M. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital's net income of $21.3M is lower than MidCap Financial Investment's net income of $26.7M. Notably, PennantPark Floating Rate Capital's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.76x while MidCap Financial Investment's PE ratio is 8.74x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PennantPark Floating Rate Capital is 6.71x versus 7.33x for MidCap Financial Investment. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Oaktree Specialty Lending has a net margin of 65.88% compared to PennantPark Floating Rate Capital's net margin of -121.48%. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital's return on equity of 12.32% beat Oaktree Specialty Lending's return on equity of 3.84%.

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 5.2%. On the other hand Oaktree Specialty Lending has an analysts' consensus of $17.70 which suggests that it could grow by 10.42%. Given that Oaktree Specialty Lending has higher upside potential than PennantPark Floating Rate Capital, analysts believe Oaktree Specialty Lending is more attractive than PennantPark Floating Rate Capital.

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital has a beta of 1.661, which suggesting that the stock is 66.103% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Oaktree Specialty Lending has a beta of 1.076, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.634%.

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 11.09%. Oaktree Specialty Lending offers a yield of 14.36% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.55 per share. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital pays 85.82% of its earnings as a dividend. Oaktree Specialty Lending pays out 305.35% of its earnings as a dividend. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Oaktree Specialty Lending's is not.

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital quarterly revenues are $32.4M, which are smaller than Oaktree Specialty Lending quarterly revenues of $36.5M. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital's net income of $21.3M is lower than Oaktree Specialty Lending's net income of $36.9M. Notably, PennantPark Floating Rate Capital's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.76x while Oaktree Specialty Lending's PE ratio is 21.28x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PennantPark Floating Rate Capital is 6.71x versus 21.39x for Oaktree Specialty Lending. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Pennant Park Investment has a net margin of 65.88% compared to PennantPark Floating Rate Capital's net margin of 89.79%. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital's return on equity of 12.32% beat Pennant Park Investment's return on equity of 9.82%.

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 5.2%. On the other hand Pennant Park Investment has an analysts' consensus of $6.90 which suggests that it could fall by -3.36%. Given that PennantPark Floating Rate Capital has higher upside potential than Pennant Park Investment, analysts believe PennantPark Floating Rate Capital is more attractive than Pennant Park Investment.

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital has a beta of 1.661, which suggesting that the stock is 66.103% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Pennant Park Investment has a beta of 1.471, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 47.102%.

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 11.09%. Pennant Park Investment offers a yield of 12.75% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital pays 85.82% of its earnings as a dividend. Pennant Park Investment pays out 134.91% of its earnings as a dividend. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Pennant Park Investment's is not.

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital quarterly revenues are $32.4M, which are larger than Pennant Park Investment quarterly revenues of $20.5M. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital's net income of $21.3M is higher than Pennant Park Investment's net income of $18.4M. Notably, PennantPark Floating Rate Capital's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.76x while Pennant Park Investment's PE ratio is 42.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PennantPark Floating Rate Capital is 6.71x versus 7.96x for Pennant Park Investment. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.