Is Celestica The Best AI Stock to Buy Now?
Technology and hardware business Celestica (NYSE:CLS) has seen massive upward…
Sell
10
PFLT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$8.18
Seasonality move
:
-3.43%
Day range:
$8.36 - $8.48
52-week range:
$8.18 - $11.46
Dividend yield:
14.56%
P/E ratio:
24.25x
P/S ratio:
3.51x
P/B ratio:
0.81x
Volume:
1M
Avg. volume:
1.3M
1-year change:
-24.42%
Market cap:
$838.4M
Revenue:
$255.4M
EPS (TTM):
$0.35
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PFLT
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd.
|
$70.3M | $0.30 | 17.69% | 1958.82% | $10.29 |
|
AMG
Affiliated Managers Group, Inc.
|
$578.5M | $8.84 | 9.68% | 269.72% | $393.29 |
|
CFNB
California First Leasing Corp.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CNS
Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York)
|
$143.2M | $0.81 | 3.71% | 0.83% | $72.00 |
|
DHIL
Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PNNT
PennantPark Investment Corp.
|
$28.5M | $0.16 | 826.33% | 3.07% | $5.50 |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PFLT
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd.
|
$8.45 | $10.29 | $838.4M | 24.25x | $0.10 | 14.56% | 3.51x |
|
AMG
Affiliated Managers Group, Inc.
|
$312.94 | $393.29 | $8.4B | 13.66x | $0.01 | 0.01% | 4.32x |
|
CFNB
California First Leasing Corp.
|
$28.33 | -- | $254.3M | 12.85x | $0.40 | 0% | 25.73x |
|
CNS
Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York)
|
$67.14 | $72.00 | $3.4B | 22.54x | $0.62 | 3.69% | 6.23x |
|
DHIL
Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.
|
$171.36 | -- | $463.6M | 9.94x | $5.50 | 3.5% | 2.97x |
|
PNNT
PennantPark Investment Corp.
|
$5.10 | $5.50 | $333M | 13.01x | $0.08 | 18.82% | 2.67x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PFLT
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd.
|
61.07% | 0.055 | 178.55% | 2.25x |
|
AMG
Affiliated Managers Group, Inc.
|
45.6% | 1.078 | 30.27% | 0.73x |
|
CFNB
California First Leasing Corp.
|
-- | 0.783 | -- | 32.32x |
|
CNS
Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York)
|
-- | 0.465 | -- | 1.23x |
|
DHIL
Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.
|
3.47% | 0.425 | 1.7% | 1.51x |
|
PNNT
PennantPark Investment Corp.
|
57.13% | 0.455 | 157.91% | 0.20x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PFLT
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd.
|
$57.2M | $23.6M | 1.35% | 3.29% | 32.95% | $8.2M |
|
AMG
Affiliated Managers Group, Inc.
|
$734.7M | $309.5M | 12.73% | 20.05% | 38.62% | $265.4M |
|
CFNB
California First Leasing Corp.
|
-- | -- | 13.72% | 13.72% | -- | -- |
|
CNS
Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York)
|
$113.4M | $38.1M | 22.73% | 27.14% | 26.89% | $74.5M |
|
DHIL
Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.
|
$40.1M | $16.8M | 26.2% | 27.16% | 40.62% | $21.7M |
|
PNNT
PennantPark Investment Corp.
|
$78M | $20.1M | 2.22% | 5.37% | 23.32% | $61.3M |
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns PFLT or AMG?
Affiliated Managers Group, Inc. has a net margin of -5% compared to PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd.'s net margin of 47.18%. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd.'s return on equity of 3.29% beat Affiliated Managers Group, Inc.'s return on equity of 20.05%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital PFLTPennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd.79.91% -$0.04 $2.7B AMGAffiliated Managers Group, Inc.91.68% $11.03 $7.1B -
What do Analysts Say About PFLT or AMG?
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. has a consensus price target of $10.29, signalling upside risk potential of 21.72%. On the other hand Affiliated Managers Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $393.29 which suggests that it could grow by 25.68%. Given that Affiliated Managers Group, Inc. has higher upside potential than PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd., analysts believe Affiliated Managers Group, Inc. is more attractive than PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings PFLTPennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd.2 3 0 AMGAffiliated Managers Group, Inc.5 1 0 -
Is PFLT or AMG More Risky?
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. has a beta of 0.762, which suggesting that the stock is 23.825% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Affiliated Managers Group, Inc. has a beta of 1.208, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.806%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock PFLT or AMG?
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 14.56%. Affiliated Managers Group, Inc. offers a yield of 0.01% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. pays 171.52% of its earnings as a dividend. Affiliated Managers Group, Inc. pays out 0.18% of its earnings as a dividend. Affiliated Managers Group, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd.'s is not.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios PFLT or AMG?
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. quarterly revenues are $71.5M, which are smaller than Affiliated Managers Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of $801.4M. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd.'s net income of -$3.6M is lower than Affiliated Managers Group, Inc.'s net income of $378.1M. Notably, PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 24.25x while Affiliated Managers Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is 13.66x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. is 3.51x versus 4.32x for Affiliated Managers Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income PFLTPennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd.3.51x 24.25x $71.5M -$3.6M AMGAffiliated Managers Group, Inc.4.32x 13.66x $801.4M $378.1M
-
Which has Higher Returns PFLT or CFNB?
California First Leasing Corp. has a net margin of -5% compared to PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd.'s net margin of --. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd.'s return on equity of 3.29% beat California First Leasing Corp.'s return on equity of 13.72%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital PFLTPennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd.79.91% -$0.04 $2.7B CFNBCalifornia First Leasing Corp.-- -- $252.5M -
What do Analysts Say About PFLT or CFNB?
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. has a consensus price target of $10.29, signalling upside risk potential of 21.72%. On the other hand California First Leasing Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. has higher upside potential than California First Leasing Corp., analysts believe PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. is more attractive than California First Leasing Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings PFLTPennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd.2 3 0 CFNBCalifornia First Leasing Corp.0 0 0 -
Is PFLT or CFNB More Risky?
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. has a beta of 0.762, which suggesting that the stock is 23.825% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison California First Leasing Corp. has a beta of 0.161, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 83.913%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock PFLT or CFNB?
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 14.56%. California First Leasing Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. pays 171.52% of its earnings as a dividend. California First Leasing Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios PFLT or CFNB?
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. quarterly revenues are $71.5M, which are larger than California First Leasing Corp. quarterly revenues of --. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd.'s net income of -$3.6M is higher than California First Leasing Corp.'s net income of --. Notably, PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 24.25x while California First Leasing Corp.'s PE ratio is 12.85x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. is 3.51x versus 25.73x for California First Leasing Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income PFLTPennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd.3.51x 24.25x $71.5M -$3.6M CFNBCalifornia First Leasing Corp.25.73x 12.85x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns PFLT or CNS?
Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York) has a net margin of -5% compared to PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd.'s net margin of 21.69%. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd.'s return on equity of 3.29% beat Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York)'s return on equity of 27.14%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital PFLTPennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd.79.91% -$0.04 $2.7B CNSCohen & Steers, Inc. (New York)80.08% $0.68 $562M -
What do Analysts Say About PFLT or CNS?
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. has a consensus price target of $10.29, signalling upside risk potential of 21.72%. On the other hand Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York) has an analysts' consensus of $72.00 which suggests that it could grow by 7.24%. Given that PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. has higher upside potential than Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York), analysts believe PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. is more attractive than Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York).
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings PFLTPennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd.2 3 0 CNSCohen & Steers, Inc. (New York)1 1 0 -
Is PFLT or CNS More Risky?
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. has a beta of 0.762, which suggesting that the stock is 23.825% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York) has a beta of 1.269, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.929%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock PFLT or CNS?
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 14.56%. Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York) offers a yield of 3.69% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.62 per share. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. pays 171.52% of its earnings as a dividend. Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York) pays out 83.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York)'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd.'s is not.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios PFLT or CNS?
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. quarterly revenues are $71.5M, which are smaller than Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York) quarterly revenues of $141.6M. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd.'s net income of -$3.6M is lower than Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York)'s net income of $30.7M. Notably, PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 24.25x while Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York)'s PE ratio is 22.54x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. is 3.51x versus 6.23x for Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York). Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income PFLTPennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd.3.51x 24.25x $71.5M -$3.6M CNSCohen & Steers, Inc. (New York)6.23x 22.54x $141.6M $30.7M
-
Which has Higher Returns PFLT or DHIL?
Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc. has a net margin of -5% compared to PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd.'s net margin of 32.75%. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd.'s return on equity of 3.29% beat Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.'s return on equity of 27.16%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital PFLTPennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd.79.91% -$0.04 $2.7B DHILDiamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.96.73% $4.99 $187.5M -
What do Analysts Say About PFLT or DHIL?
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. has a consensus price target of $10.29, signalling upside risk potential of 21.72%. On the other hand Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. has higher upside potential than Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc., analysts believe PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. is more attractive than Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings PFLTPennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd.2 3 0 DHILDiamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is PFLT or DHIL More Risky?
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. has a beta of 0.762, which suggesting that the stock is 23.825% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc. has a beta of 0.779, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.143%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock PFLT or DHIL?
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 14.56%. Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc. offers a yield of 3.5% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $5.50 per share. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. pays 171.52% of its earnings as a dividend. Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc. pays out 38.32% of its earnings as a dividend. Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd.'s is not.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios PFLT or DHIL?
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. quarterly revenues are $71.5M, which are larger than Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of $41.4M. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd.'s net income of -$3.6M is lower than Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.'s net income of $13.6M. Notably, PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 24.25x while Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is 9.94x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. is 3.51x versus 2.97x for Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income PFLTPennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd.3.51x 24.25x $71.5M -$3.6M DHILDiamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.2.97x 9.94x $41.4M $13.6M
-
Which has Higher Returns PFLT or PNNT?
PennantPark Investment Corp. has a net margin of -5% compared to PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd.'s net margin of 10.38%. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd.'s return on equity of 3.29% beat PennantPark Investment Corp.'s return on equity of 5.37%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital PFLTPennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd.79.91% -$0.04 $2.7B PNNTPennantPark Investment Corp.90.44% $0.14 $1.1B -
What do Analysts Say About PFLT or PNNT?
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. has a consensus price target of $10.29, signalling upside risk potential of 21.72%. On the other hand PennantPark Investment Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $5.50 which suggests that it could grow by 7.84%. Given that PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. has higher upside potential than PennantPark Investment Corp., analysts believe PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. is more attractive than PennantPark Investment Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings PFLTPennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd.2 3 0 PNNTPennantPark Investment Corp.1 6 0 -
Is PFLT or PNNT More Risky?
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. has a beta of 0.762, which suggesting that the stock is 23.825% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PennantPark Investment Corp. has a beta of 0.641, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 35.892%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock PFLT or PNNT?
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 14.56%. PennantPark Investment Corp. offers a yield of 18.82% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. pays 171.52% of its earnings as a dividend. PennantPark Investment Corp. pays out 191.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios PFLT or PNNT?
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. quarterly revenues are $71.5M, which are smaller than PennantPark Investment Corp. quarterly revenues of $86.3M. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd.'s net income of -$3.6M is lower than PennantPark Investment Corp.'s net income of $9M. Notably, PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 24.25x while PennantPark Investment Corp.'s PE ratio is 13.01x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. is 3.51x versus 2.67x for PennantPark Investment Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income PFLTPennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd.3.51x 24.25x $71.5M -$3.6M PNNTPennantPark Investment Corp.2.67x 13.01x $86.3M $9M
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will AI Disrupt SaaS Software Stocks?
Since January 28th, software stocks in the United States have…
Why Is Meta Stock Going Higher?
Over the last five days, shares of Instagram and Facebook…
Stock Ideas
Sell
50
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.5T
P/E Ratio: 38x
Buy
55
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Sell
37
Is GOOGL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.7T
P/E Ratio: 28x
Alerts
Buy
59
SEZL alert for Feb 27
Sezzle, Inc. [SEZL] is down 13.92% over the past day.
Buy
83
GCT alert for Feb 27
GigaCloud Technology, Inc. [GCT] is down 5.87% over the past day.
Buy
62
LMAT alert for Feb 27
LeMaitre Vascular, Inc. [LMAT] is down 4.76% over the past day.
