Is Amazon an AI Stock?
With the market starting to look skittish on pure-play AI…
Buy
55
MFIC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$12.23
Seasonality move
:
-1.63%
Day range:
$12.17 - $12.29
52-week range:
$10.18 - $14.74
Dividend yield:
12.42%
P/E ratio:
11.45x
P/S ratio:
4.81x
P/B ratio:
0.83x
Volume:
696.7K
Avg. volume:
500.7K
1-year change:
-13.74%
Market cap:
$1.1B
Revenue:
$225.4M
EPS (TTM):
$1.07
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MFIC
MidCap Financial Investment
|
$83.5M | $0.38 | 178.26% | 43.63% | $12.91 |
|
APO
Apollo Global Management, Inc.
|
$1.1B | $1.90 | -77.74% | -11.51% | $159.87 |
|
DHIL
Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
GAIN
Gladstone Investment Corp.
|
$24.6M | $0.23 | 20.86% | -77.67% | $14.13 |
|
GBDC
Golub Capital BDC, Inc.
|
$220.5M | $0.38 | 6.28% | -10.95% | $15.00 |
|
OCSL
Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp.
|
$76.5M | $0.39 | 8.55% | 326.57% | $13.70 |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MFIC
MidCap Financial Investment
|
$12.24 | $12.91 | $1.1B | 11.45x | $0.38 | 12.42% | 4.81x |
|
APO
Apollo Global Management, Inc.
|
$136.75 | $159.87 | $79.4B | 20.26x | $0.51 | 1.46% | 2.94x |
|
DHIL
Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.
|
$116.84 | -- | $316.1M | 6.78x | $5.50 | 5.14% | 2.02x |
|
GAIN
Gladstone Investment Corp.
|
$13.97 | $14.13 | $553.9M | 5.61x | $0.08 | 6.87% | 5.86x |
|
GBDC
Golub Capital BDC, Inc.
|
$14.22 | $15.00 | $3.7B | 10.04x | $0.39 | 10.97% | 4.71x |
|
OCSL
Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp.
|
$13.58 | $13.70 | $1.2B | 35.69x | $0.40 | 12.89% | 3.90x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MFIC
MidCap Financial Investment
|
58.33% | 0.796 | 171.19% | 0.44x |
|
APO
Apollo Global Management, Inc.
|
35.31% | 0.866 | 13.24% | 0.06x |
|
DHIL
Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.
|
3.47% | 0.951 | 1.7% | 1.51x |
|
GAIN
Gladstone Investment Corp.
|
50.88% | 0.483 | 101.44% | 0.04x |
|
GBDC
Golub Capital BDC, Inc.
|
55.17% | 0.363 | 134.58% | 1.25x |
|
OCSL
Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp.
|
50.36% | 0.292 | 129.35% | 0.57x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MFIC
MidCap Financial Investment
|
$50.9M | $59.8M | 3.05% | 7.18% | 94.06% | $29.2M |
|
APO
Apollo Global Management, Inc.
|
$6.6B | $3B | 12.86% | 17.12% | 29.98% | $2.3B |
|
DHIL
Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.
|
$40.1M | $16.8M | 26.2% | 27.16% | 40.62% | $21.7M |
|
GAIN
Gladstone Investment Corp.
|
-$14.2M | $39.3M | 9.5% | 18.81% | -842.46% | $8.9M |
|
GBDC
Golub Capital BDC, Inc.
|
$140.5M | $169.7M | 4.24% | 9.39% | 92% | $62.3M |
|
OCSL
Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp.
|
$71.1M | $50.9M | 1.13% | 2.31% | 60.38% | $47.8M |
MidCap Financial Investment vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns MFIC or APO?
Apollo Global Management, Inc. has a net margin of 43.19% compared to MidCap Financial Investment's net margin of 24.45%. MidCap Financial Investment's return on equity of 7.18% beat Apollo Global Management, Inc.'s return on equity of 17.12%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MFICMidCap Financial Investment80.13% $0.29 $3.3B APOApollo Global Management, Inc.66.85% $2.74 $52.4B -
What do Analysts Say About MFIC or APO?
MidCap Financial Investment has a consensus price target of $12.91, signalling upside risk potential of 5.44%. On the other hand Apollo Global Management, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $159.87 which suggests that it could grow by 16.9%. Given that Apollo Global Management, Inc. has higher upside potential than MidCap Financial Investment, analysts believe Apollo Global Management, Inc. is more attractive than MidCap Financial Investment.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MFICMidCap Financial Investment2 4 0 APOApollo Global Management, Inc.9 5 0 -
Is MFIC or APO More Risky?
MidCap Financial Investment has a beta of 0.737, which suggesting that the stock is 26.339% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Apollo Global Management, Inc. has a beta of 1.609, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 60.865%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MFIC or APO?
MidCap Financial Investment has a quarterly dividend of $0.38 per share corresponding to a yield of 12.42%. Apollo Global Management, Inc. offers a yield of 1.46% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share. MidCap Financial Investment pays 119.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Apollo Global Management, Inc. pays out 25.36% of its earnings as a dividend. Apollo Global Management, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but MidCap Financial Investment's is not.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MFIC or APO?
MidCap Financial Investment quarterly revenues are $63.6M, which are smaller than Apollo Global Management, Inc. quarterly revenues of $9.9B. MidCap Financial Investment's net income of $27.5M is lower than Apollo Global Management, Inc.'s net income of $2.4B. Notably, MidCap Financial Investment's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.45x while Apollo Global Management, Inc.'s PE ratio is 20.26x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MidCap Financial Investment is 4.81x versus 2.94x for Apollo Global Management, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MFICMidCap Financial Investment4.81x 11.45x $63.6M $27.5M APOApollo Global Management, Inc.2.94x 20.26x $9.9B $2.4B
-
Which has Higher Returns MFIC or DHIL?
Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc. has a net margin of 43.19% compared to MidCap Financial Investment's net margin of 32.75%. MidCap Financial Investment's return on equity of 7.18% beat Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.'s return on equity of 27.16%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MFICMidCap Financial Investment80.13% $0.29 $3.3B DHILDiamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.96.73% $4.99 $187.5M -
What do Analysts Say About MFIC or DHIL?
MidCap Financial Investment has a consensus price target of $12.91, signalling upside risk potential of 5.44%. On the other hand Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that MidCap Financial Investment has higher upside potential than Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc., analysts believe MidCap Financial Investment is more attractive than Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MFICMidCap Financial Investment2 4 0 DHILDiamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is MFIC or DHIL More Risky?
MidCap Financial Investment has a beta of 0.737, which suggesting that the stock is 26.339% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc. has a beta of 0.839, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.053%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MFIC or DHIL?
MidCap Financial Investment has a quarterly dividend of $0.38 per share corresponding to a yield of 12.42%. Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc. offers a yield of 5.14% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $5.50 per share. MidCap Financial Investment pays 119.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc. pays out 38.32% of its earnings as a dividend. Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but MidCap Financial Investment's is not.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MFIC or DHIL?
MidCap Financial Investment quarterly revenues are $63.6M, which are larger than Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of $41.4M. MidCap Financial Investment's net income of $27.5M is higher than Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.'s net income of $13.6M. Notably, MidCap Financial Investment's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.45x while Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is 6.78x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MidCap Financial Investment is 4.81x versus 2.02x for Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MFICMidCap Financial Investment4.81x 11.45x $63.6M $27.5M DHILDiamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.2.02x 6.78x $41.4M $13.6M
-
Which has Higher Returns MFIC or GAIN?
Gladstone Investment Corp. has a net margin of 43.19% compared to MidCap Financial Investment's net margin of -616.21%. MidCap Financial Investment's return on equity of 7.18% beat Gladstone Investment Corp.'s return on equity of 18.81%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MFICMidCap Financial Investment80.13% $0.29 $3.3B GAINGladstone Investment Corp.83.41% $0.75 $1.1B -
What do Analysts Say About MFIC or GAIN?
MidCap Financial Investment has a consensus price target of $12.91, signalling upside risk potential of 5.44%. On the other hand Gladstone Investment Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $14.13 which suggests that it could grow by 1.11%. Given that MidCap Financial Investment has higher upside potential than Gladstone Investment Corp., analysts believe MidCap Financial Investment is more attractive than Gladstone Investment Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MFICMidCap Financial Investment2 4 0 GAINGladstone Investment Corp.2 3 0 -
Is MFIC or GAIN More Risky?
MidCap Financial Investment has a beta of 0.737, which suggesting that the stock is 26.339% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gladstone Investment Corp. has a beta of 0.836, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.408%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MFIC or GAIN?
MidCap Financial Investment has a quarterly dividend of $0.38 per share corresponding to a yield of 12.42%. Gladstone Investment Corp. offers a yield of 6.87% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. MidCap Financial Investment pays 119.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Gladstone Investment Corp. pays out 53.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Gladstone Investment Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but MidCap Financial Investment's is not.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MFIC or GAIN?
MidCap Financial Investment quarterly revenues are $63.6M, which are larger than Gladstone Investment Corp. quarterly revenues of -$4.7M. MidCap Financial Investment's net income of $27.5M is lower than Gladstone Investment Corp.'s net income of $28.7M. Notably, MidCap Financial Investment's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.45x while Gladstone Investment Corp.'s PE ratio is 5.61x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MidCap Financial Investment is 4.81x versus 5.86x for Gladstone Investment Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MFICMidCap Financial Investment4.81x 11.45x $63.6M $27.5M GAINGladstone Investment Corp.5.86x 5.61x -$4.7M $28.7M
-
Which has Higher Returns MFIC or GBDC?
Golub Capital BDC, Inc. has a net margin of 43.19% compared to MidCap Financial Investment's net margin of 52.21%. MidCap Financial Investment's return on equity of 7.18% beat Golub Capital BDC, Inc.'s return on equity of 9.39%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MFICMidCap Financial Investment80.13% $0.29 $3.3B GBDCGolub Capital BDC, Inc.76.16% $0.36 $8.9B -
What do Analysts Say About MFIC or GBDC?
MidCap Financial Investment has a consensus price target of $12.91, signalling upside risk potential of 5.44%. On the other hand Golub Capital BDC, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $15.00 which suggests that it could grow by 5.49%. Given that Golub Capital BDC, Inc. has higher upside potential than MidCap Financial Investment, analysts believe Golub Capital BDC, Inc. is more attractive than MidCap Financial Investment.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MFICMidCap Financial Investment2 4 0 GBDCGolub Capital BDC, Inc.2 2 0 -
Is MFIC or GBDC More Risky?
MidCap Financial Investment has a beta of 0.737, which suggesting that the stock is 26.339% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Golub Capital BDC, Inc. has a beta of 0.436, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 56.439%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MFIC or GBDC?
MidCap Financial Investment has a quarterly dividend of $0.38 per share corresponding to a yield of 12.42%. Golub Capital BDC, Inc. offers a yield of 10.97% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.39 per share. MidCap Financial Investment pays 119.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Golub Capital BDC, Inc. pays out 113.7% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MFIC or GBDC?
MidCap Financial Investment quarterly revenues are $63.6M, which are smaller than Golub Capital BDC, Inc. quarterly revenues of $184.4M. MidCap Financial Investment's net income of $27.5M is lower than Golub Capital BDC, Inc.'s net income of $96.3M. Notably, MidCap Financial Investment's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.45x while Golub Capital BDC, Inc.'s PE ratio is 10.04x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MidCap Financial Investment is 4.81x versus 4.71x for Golub Capital BDC, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MFICMidCap Financial Investment4.81x 11.45x $63.6M $27.5M GBDCGolub Capital BDC, Inc.4.71x 10.04x $184.4M $96.3M
-
Which has Higher Returns MFIC or OCSL?
Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp. has a net margin of 43.19% compared to MidCap Financial Investment's net margin of 29.17%. MidCap Financial Investment's return on equity of 7.18% beat Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp.'s return on equity of 2.31%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MFICMidCap Financial Investment80.13% $0.29 $3.3B OCSLOaktree Specialty Lending Corp.84.43% $0.28 $3B -
What do Analysts Say About MFIC or OCSL?
MidCap Financial Investment has a consensus price target of $12.91, signalling upside risk potential of 5.44%. On the other hand Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $13.70 which suggests that it could grow by 0.88%. Given that MidCap Financial Investment has higher upside potential than Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp., analysts believe MidCap Financial Investment is more attractive than Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MFICMidCap Financial Investment2 4 0 OCSLOaktree Specialty Lending Corp.0 6 0 -
Is MFIC or OCSL More Risky?
MidCap Financial Investment has a beta of 0.737, which suggesting that the stock is 26.339% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp. has a beta of 0.507, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 49.325%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MFIC or OCSL?
MidCap Financial Investment has a quarterly dividend of $0.38 per share corresponding to a yield of 12.42%. Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp. offers a yield of 12.89% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. MidCap Financial Investment pays 119.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp. pays out 444.05% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MFIC or OCSL?
MidCap Financial Investment quarterly revenues are $63.6M, which are smaller than Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp. quarterly revenues of $84.3M. MidCap Financial Investment's net income of $27.5M is higher than Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp.'s net income of $24.6M. Notably, MidCap Financial Investment's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.45x while Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp.'s PE ratio is 35.69x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MidCap Financial Investment is 4.81x versus 3.90x for Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MFICMidCap Financial Investment4.81x 11.45x $63.6M $27.5M OCSLOaktree Specialty Lending Corp.3.90x 35.69x $84.3M $24.6M
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Google Vs NVIDIA Stock: Which Is Best?
Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOGL) and NVIDIA (NASDAQ:NVIDIA) are two of the market’s…
How High Could NVIDIA Stock Go?
NVIDIA (NASDAQ:NVDA) has been one of the best stocks to…
Stock Ideas
Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.5T
P/E Ratio: 62x
Buy
61
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.1T
P/E Ratio: 38x
Buy
63
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 40x
Alerts
Buy
54
SMX alert for Dec 5
SMX (Security Matters) Plc [SMX] is up 154.74% over the past day.
Sell
15
HOV alert for Dec 5
Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc. [HOV] is down 22.58% over the past day.
Buy
67
NUTX alert for Dec 5
Nutex Health, Inc. [NUTX] is up 18.9% over the past day.
