Is Celestica The Best AI Stock to Buy Now?
Technology and hardware business Celestica (NYSE:CLS) has seen massive upward…
Sell
48
MFIC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$10.44
Seasonality move
:
9.01%
Day range:
$10.26 - $10.49
52-week range:
$9.48 - $13.51
Dividend yield:
13.92%
P/E ratio:
15.46x
P/S ratio:
3.54x
P/B ratio:
0.74x
Volume:
1.4M
Avg. volume:
1.2M
1-year change:
-19.6%
Market cap:
$960.8M
Revenue:
$274.4M
EPS (TTM):
$0.67
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MFIC
MidCap Financial Investment
|
$78.9M | $0.37 | -9.79% | 10.39% | $11.13 |
|
APO
Apollo Global Management, Inc.
|
$1.2B | $2.04 | -78.37% | 216.91% | $156.59 |
|
GBDC
Golub Capital BDC, Inc.
|
$208.9M | $0.38 | -0.81% | 21.46% | $14.32 |
|
MAIN
Main Street Capital
|
$143.1M | $1.01 | 29.52% | -22.05% | $63.83 |
|
OCSL
Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp.
|
$75.3M | $0.38 | -11.44% | 328.07% | $12.77 |
|
TRIN
Trinity Capital, Inc.
|
$80M | $0.52 | 34.08% | 18.65% | $16.61 |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MFIC
MidCap Financial Investment
|
$10.42 | $11.13 | $960.8M | 15.46x | $0.31 | 13.92% | 3.54x |
|
APO
Apollo Global Management, Inc.
|
$103.45 | $156.59 | $59.8B | 18.91x | $0.51 | 1.97% | 1.90x |
|
GBDC
Golub Capital BDC, Inc.
|
$12.10 | $14.32 | $3.2B | 9.74x | $0.33 | 12.4% | 3.97x |
|
MAIN
Main Street Capital
|
$55.07 | $63.83 | $5B | 9.98x | $0.26 | 5.56% | 7.64x |
|
OCSL
Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp.
|
$10.78 | $12.77 | $949.6M | 30.26x | $0.40 | 14.84% | 3.08x |
|
TRIN
Trinity Capital, Inc.
|
$14.18 | $16.61 | $1.2B | 7.23x | $0.17 | 17.98% | 4.23x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MFIC
MidCap Financial Investment
|
60.42% | 1.065 | 189.14% | 0.68x |
|
APO
Apollo Global Management, Inc.
|
36.41% | 0.787 | 12.8% | 0.06x |
|
GBDC
Golub Capital BDC, Inc.
|
55.52% | 0.552 | 136.52% | 0.23x |
|
MAIN
Main Street Capital
|
45.19% | 1.044 | 45.93% | 3.88x |
|
OCSL
Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp.
|
52.85% | 0.403 | 143.47% | 0.55x |
|
TRIN
Trinity Capital, Inc.
|
54.37% | 0.729 | 112.65% | 0.22x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MFIC
MidCap Financial Investment
|
$55.4M | $21.9M | 1.92% | 4.61% | 33.68% | $27.2M |
|
APO
Apollo Global Management, Inc.
|
$6.4B | $1.7B | 11.08% | 14.74% | 17.38% | $2.8B |
|
GBDC
Golub Capital BDC, Inc.
|
$161.5M | $130.6M | 3.71% | 8.29% | 63.95% | $81.8M |
|
MAIN
Main Street Capital
|
$202.9M | $168.4M | 9.6% | 17.07% | 82.98% | $103.5M |
|
OCSL
Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp.
|
$67.1M | $32.3M | 1.09% | 2.21% | 42.26% | $41.5M |
|
TRIN
Trinity Capital, Inc.
|
$50.4M | $63.3M | 6.74% | 14.51% | 125.67% | $46.3M |
MidCap Financial Investment vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns MFIC or APO?
Apollo Global Management, Inc. has a net margin of -19.59% compared to MidCap Financial Investment's net margin of 11.43%. MidCap Financial Investment's return on equity of 4.61% beat Apollo Global Management, Inc.'s return on equity of 14.74%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MFICMidCap Financial Investment85.31% -$0.14 $3.3B APOApollo Global Management, Inc.64.5% $1.07 $55.9B -
What do Analysts Say About MFIC or APO?
MidCap Financial Investment has a consensus price target of $11.13, signalling upside risk potential of 6.77%. On the other hand Apollo Global Management, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $156.59 which suggests that it could grow by 51.37%. Given that Apollo Global Management, Inc. has higher upside potential than MidCap Financial Investment, analysts believe Apollo Global Management, Inc. is more attractive than MidCap Financial Investment.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MFICMidCap Financial Investment1 5 0 APOApollo Global Management, Inc.10 5 0 -
Is MFIC or APO More Risky?
MidCap Financial Investment has a beta of 0.780, which suggesting that the stock is 21.993% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Apollo Global Management, Inc. has a beta of 1.606, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 60.556%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MFIC or APO?
MidCap Financial Investment has a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share corresponding to a yield of 13.92%. Apollo Global Management, Inc. offers a yield of 1.97% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share. MidCap Financial Investment pays 224.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Apollo Global Management, Inc. pays out 35.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Apollo Global Management, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but MidCap Financial Investment's is not.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MFIC or APO?
MidCap Financial Investment quarterly revenues are $65M, which are smaller than Apollo Global Management, Inc. quarterly revenues of $10B. MidCap Financial Investment's net income of -$12.7M is lower than Apollo Global Management, Inc.'s net income of $1.1B. Notably, MidCap Financial Investment's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.46x while Apollo Global Management, Inc.'s PE ratio is 18.91x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MidCap Financial Investment is 3.54x versus 1.90x for Apollo Global Management, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MFICMidCap Financial Investment3.54x 15.46x $65M -$12.7M APOApollo Global Management, Inc.1.90x 18.91x $10B $1.1B
-
Which has Higher Returns MFIC or GBDC?
Golub Capital BDC, Inc. has a net margin of -19.59% compared to MidCap Financial Investment's net margin of 31.94%. MidCap Financial Investment's return on equity of 4.61% beat Golub Capital BDC, Inc.'s return on equity of 8.29%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MFICMidCap Financial Investment85.31% -$0.14 $3.3B GBDCGolub Capital BDC, Inc.79.07% $0.25 $8.8B -
What do Analysts Say About MFIC or GBDC?
MidCap Financial Investment has a consensus price target of $11.13, signalling upside risk potential of 6.77%. On the other hand Golub Capital BDC, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $14.32 which suggests that it could grow by 18.35%. Given that Golub Capital BDC, Inc. has higher upside potential than MidCap Financial Investment, analysts believe Golub Capital BDC, Inc. is more attractive than MidCap Financial Investment.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MFICMidCap Financial Investment1 5 0 GBDCGolub Capital BDC, Inc.4 1 0 -
Is MFIC or GBDC More Risky?
MidCap Financial Investment has a beta of 0.780, which suggesting that the stock is 21.993% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Golub Capital BDC, Inc. has a beta of 0.449, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 55.1%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MFIC or GBDC?
MidCap Financial Investment has a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share corresponding to a yield of 13.92%. Golub Capital BDC, Inc. offers a yield of 12.4% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.33 per share. MidCap Financial Investment pays 224.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Golub Capital BDC, Inc. pays out 113.7% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MFIC or GBDC?
MidCap Financial Investment quarterly revenues are $65M, which are smaller than Golub Capital BDC, Inc. quarterly revenues of $204.3M. MidCap Financial Investment's net income of -$12.7M is lower than Golub Capital BDC, Inc.'s net income of $65.2M. Notably, MidCap Financial Investment's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.46x while Golub Capital BDC, Inc.'s PE ratio is 9.74x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MidCap Financial Investment is 3.54x versus 3.97x for Golub Capital BDC, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MFICMidCap Financial Investment3.54x 15.46x $65M -$12.7M GBDCGolub Capital BDC, Inc.3.97x 9.74x $204.3M $65.2M
-
Which has Higher Returns MFIC or MAIN?
Main Street Capital has a net margin of -19.59% compared to MidCap Financial Investment's net margin of 64.61%. MidCap Financial Investment's return on equity of 4.61% beat Main Street Capital's return on equity of 17.07%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MFICMidCap Financial Investment85.31% -$0.14 $3.3B MAINMain Street Capital-- $1.46 $5.5B -
What do Analysts Say About MFIC or MAIN?
MidCap Financial Investment has a consensus price target of $11.13, signalling upside risk potential of 6.77%. On the other hand Main Street Capital has an analysts' consensus of $63.83 which suggests that it could grow by 15.91%. Given that Main Street Capital has higher upside potential than MidCap Financial Investment, analysts believe Main Street Capital is more attractive than MidCap Financial Investment.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MFICMidCap Financial Investment1 5 0 MAINMain Street Capital0 5 0 -
Is MFIC or MAIN More Risky?
MidCap Financial Investment has a beta of 0.780, which suggesting that the stock is 21.993% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Main Street Capital has a beta of 0.801, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.863%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MFIC or MAIN?
MidCap Financial Investment has a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share corresponding to a yield of 13.92%. Main Street Capital offers a yield of 5.56% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share. MidCap Financial Investment pays 224.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Main Street Capital pays out 55.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Main Street Capital's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but MidCap Financial Investment's is not.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MFIC or MAIN?
MidCap Financial Investment quarterly revenues are $65M, which are smaller than Main Street Capital quarterly revenues of $202.9M. MidCap Financial Investment's net income of -$12.7M is lower than Main Street Capital's net income of $131.1M. Notably, MidCap Financial Investment's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.46x while Main Street Capital's PE ratio is 9.98x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MidCap Financial Investment is 3.54x versus 7.64x for Main Street Capital. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MFICMidCap Financial Investment3.54x 15.46x $65M -$12.7M MAINMain Street Capital7.64x 9.98x $202.9M $131.1M
-
Which has Higher Returns MFIC or OCSL?
Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp. has a net margin of -19.59% compared to MidCap Financial Investment's net margin of 7.34%. MidCap Financial Investment's return on equity of 4.61% beat Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp.'s return on equity of 2.21%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MFICMidCap Financial Investment85.31% -$0.14 $3.3B OCSLOaktree Specialty Lending Corp.87.83% $0.06 $3B -
What do Analysts Say About MFIC or OCSL?
MidCap Financial Investment has a consensus price target of $11.13, signalling upside risk potential of 6.77%. On the other hand Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $12.77 which suggests that it could grow by 18.43%. Given that Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp. has higher upside potential than MidCap Financial Investment, analysts believe Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp. is more attractive than MidCap Financial Investment.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MFICMidCap Financial Investment1 5 0 OCSLOaktree Specialty Lending Corp.0 7 0 -
Is MFIC or OCSL More Risky?
MidCap Financial Investment has a beta of 0.780, which suggesting that the stock is 21.993% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp. has a beta of 0.514, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 48.617%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MFIC or OCSL?
MidCap Financial Investment has a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share corresponding to a yield of 13.92%. Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp. offers a yield of 14.84% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. MidCap Financial Investment pays 224.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp. pays out 444.05% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MFIC or OCSL?
MidCap Financial Investment quarterly revenues are $65M, which are smaller than Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp. quarterly revenues of $76.4M. MidCap Financial Investment's net income of -$12.7M is lower than Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp.'s net income of $5.6M. Notably, MidCap Financial Investment's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.46x while Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp.'s PE ratio is 30.26x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MidCap Financial Investment is 3.54x versus 3.08x for Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MFICMidCap Financial Investment3.54x 15.46x $65M -$12.7M OCSLOaktree Specialty Lending Corp.3.08x 30.26x $76.4M $5.6M
-
Which has Higher Returns MFIC or TRIN?
Trinity Capital, Inc. has a net margin of -19.59% compared to MidCap Financial Investment's net margin of 78.28%. MidCap Financial Investment's return on equity of 4.61% beat Trinity Capital, Inc.'s return on equity of 14.51%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MFICMidCap Financial Investment85.31% -$0.14 $3.3B TRINTrinity Capital, Inc.-- $0.51 $2.4B -
What do Analysts Say About MFIC or TRIN?
MidCap Financial Investment has a consensus price target of $11.13, signalling upside risk potential of 6.77%. On the other hand Trinity Capital, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $16.61 which suggests that it could grow by 17.15%. Given that Trinity Capital, Inc. has higher upside potential than MidCap Financial Investment, analysts believe Trinity Capital, Inc. is more attractive than MidCap Financial Investment.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MFICMidCap Financial Investment1 5 0 TRINTrinity Capital, Inc.6 1 1 -
Is MFIC or TRIN More Risky?
MidCap Financial Investment has a beta of 0.780, which suggesting that the stock is 21.993% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Trinity Capital, Inc. has a beta of 0.529, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 47.118%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MFIC or TRIN?
MidCap Financial Investment has a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share corresponding to a yield of 13.92%. Trinity Capital, Inc. offers a yield of 17.98% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share. MidCap Financial Investment pays 224.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Trinity Capital, Inc. pays out 104.23% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MFIC or TRIN?
MidCap Financial Investment quarterly revenues are $65M, which are larger than Trinity Capital, Inc. quarterly revenues of $50.4M. MidCap Financial Investment's net income of -$12.7M is lower than Trinity Capital, Inc.'s net income of $39.5M. Notably, MidCap Financial Investment's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.46x while Trinity Capital, Inc.'s PE ratio is 7.23x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MidCap Financial Investment is 3.54x versus 4.23x for Trinity Capital, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MFICMidCap Financial Investment3.54x 15.46x $65M -$12.7M TRINTrinity Capital, Inc.4.23x 7.23x $50.4M $39.5M
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will AI Disrupt SaaS Software Stocks?
Since January 28th, software stocks in the United States have…
Why Is Meta Stock Going Higher?
Over the last five days, shares of Instagram and Facebook…
Stock Ideas
Sell
47
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.5T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Sell
43
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.7T
P/E Ratio: 34x
Sell
34
Is GOOGL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.7T
P/E Ratio: 28x
Alerts
Buy
71
NSA alert for Mar 17
National Storage Affiliates Trust [NSA] is up 30.03% over the past day.
Buy
100
APEI alert for Mar 16
American Public Education, Inc. [APEI] is down 4.18% over the past day.
Sell
40
GDXD alert for Mar 16
MicroSectors Gold Miners -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN [GDXD] is down 3.77% over the past day.
