Is Celestica The Best AI Stock to Buy Now?
Technology and hardware business Celestica (NYSE:CLS) has seen massive upward…
Sell
31
GAIN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$13.85
Seasonality move
:
-2.55%
Day range:
$13.65 - $13.88
52-week range:
$11.42 - $15.34
Dividend yield:
6.99%
P/E ratio:
4.43x
P/S ratio:
5.52x
P/B ratio:
0.92x
Volume:
187.3K
Avg. volume:
198.4K
1-year change:
0.37%
Market cap:
$547.2M
Revenue:
$156.8M
EPS (TTM):
$3.10
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GAIN
Gladstone Investment Corp.
|
$25.7M | $0.23 | -46.73% | -56.2% | $14.83 |
|
AMG
Affiliated Managers Group, Inc.
|
$578.5M | $8.84 | 9.68% | 269.72% | $393.29 |
|
CFNB
California First Leasing Corp.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CNS
Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York)
|
$143.2M | $0.81 | 3.71% | 0.83% | $72.00 |
|
DHIL
Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
GSBD
Goldman Sachs BDC, Inc.
|
$87.2M | $0.35 | 59.27% | 15.24% | $9.56 |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GAIN
Gladstone Investment Corp.
|
$13.74 | $14.83 | $547.2M | 4.43x | $0.08 | 6.99% | 5.52x |
|
AMG
Affiliated Managers Group, Inc.
|
$310.30 | $393.29 | $8.3B | 13.54x | $0.01 | 0.01% | 4.28x |
|
CFNB
California First Leasing Corp.
|
$28.33 | -- | $254.3M | 12.85x | $0.40 | 0% | 25.73x |
|
CNS
Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York)
|
$67.90 | $72.00 | $3.5B | 22.83x | $0.62 | 3.65% | 6.12x |
|
DHIL
Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.
|
$171.70 | -- | $464.6M | 9.59x | $5.50 | 3.5% | 2.96x |
|
GSBD
Goldman Sachs BDC, Inc.
|
$9.17 | $9.56 | $1B | 8.90x | $0.32 | 13.96% | 4.37x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GAIN
Gladstone Investment Corp.
|
48.99% | 0.505 | 102.79% | 0.04x |
|
AMG
Affiliated Managers Group, Inc.
|
45.6% | 0.897 | 30.27% | 0.73x |
|
CFNB
California First Leasing Corp.
|
-- | 0.876 | -- | 32.32x |
|
CNS
Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York)
|
19.75% | 0.372 | 4.22% | 1.23x |
|
DHIL
Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.
|
3.5% | 0.351 | 1.4% | 1.18x |
|
GSBD
Goldman Sachs BDC, Inc.
|
56.89% | 1.065 | 180.74% | 0.53x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GAIN
Gladstone Investment Corp.
|
$7.3M | $76.4M | 11.45% | 23.08% | 280.32% | $14.1M |
|
AMG
Affiliated Managers Group, Inc.
|
$734.7M | $309.5M | 12.73% | 20.05% | 38.62% | $265.4M |
|
CFNB
California First Leasing Corp.
|
-- | -- | 13.72% | 13.72% | -- | -- |
|
CNS
Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York)
|
$129.6M | $38.1M | 21.43% | 26.48% | 24.13% | $55.7M |
|
DHIL
Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.
|
$37.9M | $9.4M | 26.94% | 27.92% | 23.91% | $16.1M |
|
GSBD
Goldman Sachs BDC, Inc.
|
$71.2M | $54M | 3.54% | 7.94% | 64.9% | $43.3M |
Gladstone Investment Corp. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns GAIN or AMG?
Affiliated Managers Group, Inc. has a net margin of -616.21% compared to Gladstone Investment Corp.'s net margin of 47.18%. Gladstone Investment Corp.'s return on equity of 23.08% beat Affiliated Managers Group, Inc.'s return on equity of 20.05%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GAINGladstone Investment Corp.26.95% $1.66 $1.2B AMGAffiliated Managers Group, Inc.91.68% $11.03 $7.1B -
What do Analysts Say About GAIN or AMG?
Gladstone Investment Corp. has a consensus price target of $14.83, signalling upside risk potential of 7.96%. On the other hand Affiliated Managers Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $393.29 which suggests that it could grow by 26.74%. Given that Affiliated Managers Group, Inc. has higher upside potential than Gladstone Investment Corp., analysts believe Affiliated Managers Group, Inc. is more attractive than Gladstone Investment Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GAINGladstone Investment Corp.2 2 0 AMGAffiliated Managers Group, Inc.5 1 0 -
Is GAIN or AMG More Risky?
Gladstone Investment Corp. has a beta of 0.825, which suggesting that the stock is 17.509% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Affiliated Managers Group, Inc. has a beta of 1.179, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.931%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GAIN or AMG?
Gladstone Investment Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.99%. Affiliated Managers Group, Inc. offers a yield of 0.01% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Gladstone Investment Corp. pays 53.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Affiliated Managers Group, Inc. pays out 0.18% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GAIN or AMG?
Gladstone Investment Corp. quarterly revenues are $27.2M, which are smaller than Affiliated Managers Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of $801.4M. Gladstone Investment Corp.'s net income of $65.9M is lower than Affiliated Managers Group, Inc.'s net income of $378.1M. Notably, Gladstone Investment Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 4.43x while Affiliated Managers Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is 13.54x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Gladstone Investment Corp. is 5.52x versus 4.28x for Affiliated Managers Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GAINGladstone Investment Corp.5.52x 4.43x $27.2M $65.9M AMGAffiliated Managers Group, Inc.4.28x 13.54x $801.4M $378.1M
-
Which has Higher Returns GAIN or CFNB?
California First Leasing Corp. has a net margin of -616.21% compared to Gladstone Investment Corp.'s net margin of --. Gladstone Investment Corp.'s return on equity of 23.08% beat California First Leasing Corp.'s return on equity of 13.72%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GAINGladstone Investment Corp.26.95% $1.66 $1.2B CFNBCalifornia First Leasing Corp.-- -- $252.5M -
What do Analysts Say About GAIN or CFNB?
Gladstone Investment Corp. has a consensus price target of $14.83, signalling upside risk potential of 7.96%. On the other hand California First Leasing Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Gladstone Investment Corp. has higher upside potential than California First Leasing Corp., analysts believe Gladstone Investment Corp. is more attractive than California First Leasing Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GAINGladstone Investment Corp.2 2 0 CFNBCalifornia First Leasing Corp.0 0 0 -
Is GAIN or CFNB More Risky?
Gladstone Investment Corp. has a beta of 0.825, which suggesting that the stock is 17.509% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison California First Leasing Corp. has a beta of 0.159, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 84.132%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GAIN or CFNB?
Gladstone Investment Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.99%. California First Leasing Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. Gladstone Investment Corp. pays 53.99% of its earnings as a dividend. California First Leasing Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Gladstone Investment Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GAIN or CFNB?
Gladstone Investment Corp. quarterly revenues are $27.2M, which are larger than California First Leasing Corp. quarterly revenues of --. Gladstone Investment Corp.'s net income of $65.9M is higher than California First Leasing Corp.'s net income of --. Notably, Gladstone Investment Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 4.43x while California First Leasing Corp.'s PE ratio is 12.85x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Gladstone Investment Corp. is 5.52x versus 25.73x for California First Leasing Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GAINGladstone Investment Corp.5.52x 4.43x $27.2M $65.9M CFNBCalifornia First Leasing Corp.25.73x 12.85x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns GAIN or CNS?
Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York) has a net margin of -616.21% compared to Gladstone Investment Corp.'s net margin of 19.46%. Gladstone Investment Corp.'s return on equity of 23.08% beat Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York)'s return on equity of 26.48%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GAINGladstone Investment Corp.26.95% $1.66 $1.2B CNSCohen & Steers, Inc. (New York)82.12% $0.68 $772.2M -
What do Analysts Say About GAIN or CNS?
Gladstone Investment Corp. has a consensus price target of $14.83, signalling upside risk potential of 7.96%. On the other hand Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York) has an analysts' consensus of $72.00 which suggests that it could grow by 6.04%. Given that Gladstone Investment Corp. has higher upside potential than Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York), analysts believe Gladstone Investment Corp. is more attractive than Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York).
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GAINGladstone Investment Corp.2 2 0 CNSCohen & Steers, Inc. (New York)1 1 0 -
Is GAIN or CNS More Risky?
Gladstone Investment Corp. has a beta of 0.825, which suggesting that the stock is 17.509% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York) has a beta of 1.265, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.458%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GAIN or CNS?
Gladstone Investment Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.99%. Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York) offers a yield of 3.65% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.62 per share. Gladstone Investment Corp. pays 53.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York) pays out 83.4% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GAIN or CNS?
Gladstone Investment Corp. quarterly revenues are $27.2M, which are smaller than Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York) quarterly revenues of $157.8M. Gladstone Investment Corp.'s net income of $65.9M is higher than Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York)'s net income of $30.7M. Notably, Gladstone Investment Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 4.43x while Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York)'s PE ratio is 22.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Gladstone Investment Corp. is 5.52x versus 6.12x for Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York). Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GAINGladstone Investment Corp.5.52x 4.43x $27.2M $65.9M CNSCohen & Steers, Inc. (New York)6.12x 22.83x $157.8M $30.7M
-
Which has Higher Returns GAIN or DHIL?
Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc. has a net margin of -616.21% compared to Gladstone Investment Corp.'s net margin of 23.6%. Gladstone Investment Corp.'s return on equity of 23.08% beat Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.'s return on equity of 27.92%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GAINGladstone Investment Corp.26.95% $1.66 $1.2B DHILDiamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.96.49% $3.43 $182.8M -
What do Analysts Say About GAIN or DHIL?
Gladstone Investment Corp. has a consensus price target of $14.83, signalling upside risk potential of 7.96%. On the other hand Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Gladstone Investment Corp. has higher upside potential than Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc., analysts believe Gladstone Investment Corp. is more attractive than Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GAINGladstone Investment Corp.2 2 0 DHILDiamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is GAIN or DHIL More Risky?
Gladstone Investment Corp. has a beta of 0.825, which suggesting that the stock is 17.509% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc. has a beta of 0.786, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 21.361%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GAIN or DHIL?
Gladstone Investment Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.99%. Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc. offers a yield of 3.5% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $5.50 per share. Gladstone Investment Corp. pays 53.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc. pays out 33.51% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GAIN or DHIL?
Gladstone Investment Corp. quarterly revenues are $27.2M, which are smaller than Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of $39.3M. Gladstone Investment Corp.'s net income of $65.9M is higher than Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.'s net income of $9.3M. Notably, Gladstone Investment Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 4.43x while Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is 9.59x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Gladstone Investment Corp. is 5.52x versus 2.96x for Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GAINGladstone Investment Corp.5.52x 4.43x $27.2M $65.9M DHILDiamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.2.96x 9.59x $39.3M $9.3M
-
Which has Higher Returns GAIN or GSBD?
Goldman Sachs BDC, Inc. has a net margin of -616.21% compared to Gladstone Investment Corp.'s net margin of 28.5%. Gladstone Investment Corp.'s return on equity of 23.08% beat Goldman Sachs BDC, Inc.'s return on equity of 7.94%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GAINGladstone Investment Corp.26.95% $1.66 $1.2B GSBDGoldman Sachs BDC, Inc.85.55% $0.21 $3.3B -
What do Analysts Say About GAIN or GSBD?
Gladstone Investment Corp. has a consensus price target of $14.83, signalling upside risk potential of 7.96%. On the other hand Goldman Sachs BDC, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $9.56 which suggests that it could grow by 4.28%. Given that Gladstone Investment Corp. has higher upside potential than Goldman Sachs BDC, Inc., analysts believe Gladstone Investment Corp. is more attractive than Goldman Sachs BDC, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GAINGladstone Investment Corp.2 2 0 GSBDGoldman Sachs BDC, Inc.0 4 1 -
Is GAIN or GSBD More Risky?
Gladstone Investment Corp. has a beta of 0.825, which suggesting that the stock is 17.509% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Goldman Sachs BDC, Inc. has a beta of 0.605, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.498%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GAIN or GSBD?
Gladstone Investment Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.99%. Goldman Sachs BDC, Inc. offers a yield of 13.96% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.32 per share. Gladstone Investment Corp. pays 53.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Goldman Sachs BDC, Inc. pays out 124.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Gladstone Investment Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Goldman Sachs BDC, Inc.'s is not.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GAIN or GSBD?
Gladstone Investment Corp. quarterly revenues are $27.2M, which are smaller than Goldman Sachs BDC, Inc. quarterly revenues of $83.2M. Gladstone Investment Corp.'s net income of $65.9M is higher than Goldman Sachs BDC, Inc.'s net income of $23.7M. Notably, Gladstone Investment Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 4.43x while Goldman Sachs BDC, Inc.'s PE ratio is 8.90x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Gladstone Investment Corp. is 5.52x versus 4.37x for Goldman Sachs BDC, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GAINGladstone Investment Corp.5.52x 4.43x $27.2M $65.9M GSBDGoldman Sachs BDC, Inc.4.37x 8.90x $83.2M $23.7M
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will AI Disrupt SaaS Software Stocks?
Since January 28th, software stocks in the United States have…
Why Is Meta Stock Going Higher?
Over the last five days, shares of Instagram and Facebook…
Stock Ideas
Sell
47
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.4T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Sell
46
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 35x
Sell
34
Is GOOGL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.7T
P/E Ratio: 28x
Alerts
Sell
46
ZD alert for Mar 4
Ziff Davis, Inc. [ZD] is up 3.93% over the past day.
Buy
54
KORU alert for Mar 4
Direxion Daily MSCI South Korea Bull 3X Shares [KORU] is up 4.82% over the past day.
Sell
40
PSIX alert for Mar 4
Power Solutions International, Inc. [PSIX] is down 1.48% over the past day.
